Transcript here

Journal Club
Updates in Infectious Diseases, Sept 2013
Dr. Katy Thompson
Preceptor: Dr. David Coleman
Case #1
 54 yo F presents with 8 days of runny
nose, productive of yellow purulent
secretions, and maxillary tenderness
 Which medications would you offer?
 How would you explain your medication
choice to the patient?
 1/5 antibiotics in US is given for
sinusitis
 To limit resistance, this antibiotic use
should be evidence-based
Amoxicillin for Acute
Rhinosinusitis
 RCT
 166 adults
 Uncomplicated, acute rhinosinusitis.
 Definition:
 Maxillary pain or tenderness
 Purulent nasal secretions
 Rhinosinusitis symptoms for 7-28 days
 10 community-based PCP offices
Amoxicillin for Acute
Rhinosinusitis
 All patients received 1 week supply of supportive tx for
pain, fever, cough, nasal congestion:
 Tylenol 500 mg q6h PRN pain, fever
 Guaifenesin 600 mg q12h
 Dextromethorphan/guaifenesin 10 mL q4-6h
 Pseudoephedrine 120 mg q12h
 0.65% saline nasal spray
 Treatment for 10 days:
 Amoxicillin 500 mg tid
 Vs. Placebo
Amoxicillin for Acute
Rhinosinusitis
 Outcome:
 Symptomatic improvement- Y/N
 SNOT16 = Sinonasal Outcome Test-16
 Zero = no problem to 3 = severe problem





Need to blow nose
Reduced productivity
Ear fullness
Headache
Sneezing
Amoxicillin for Acute
Rhinosinusitis
 Result:
 Symptomatic improvement:
 At Days 3 and 10, symptomatic improvement was the
same for both placebo and Amoxicillin groups (34% vs.
37%, 78% vs. 80%)
 However, at day 7, more people in the Amoxicillin
group reported feeling better 56% vs 74%.
Amoxicillin for Acute
Rhinosinusitis
 Result:
 Change in SNOT-16 score from day zero:
 Day 3: 0.59 (Amox) vs. 0.54 (Placebo)
 Day 7: 1.06 (Amox) vs. 0.86 (Placebo)
 Day 10: 1.23 (Amox) vs. 1.20 (Placebo)
p-value 0.2
Amoxicillin for Acute
Rhinosinusitis
 Limitations?
Limitations
 No stratification by fever (though did stratify by sx
severity)
 Only based on one antibiotic
 Time of year – allergies affecting results
 Adherence to antibiotics
 Bias in who’s performing study- academic vs. industry
 Clinical versus statistical significance
Case #1
 54 yo F presents with 8 days of runny nose, productive
of yellow purulent secretions, and maxillary tenderness
 Which medications would you offer?
 How would you explain your medication choice to the
patient?
Case #2
 68M with HTN, DM, CHF presents due to a cough for 2
weeks. She is requesting a Z pack.
 What do you tell her?
 Azithromycin is the most
commonly prescribed antibiotic
in the U.S.
Azithromycin and CV Death
 Tennessee Medicaid Program
 All patients 1992-2006 prescribed Azithro
 Excluded persons at immediate high risk of death from
other causes
 Ages 30-74
 Control groups: Those taking Amoxicillin or similar
patients not taking antibiotic
Azithromycin and CV Death
 Azithromycin – 347,795
 Amoxicillin – 1,348,672
 No Rx – 1,391,180
Azithromycin and CV Death
 Endpoint:
 CV death
 Death from any cause
Azithromycin and CV Death
 5-day treatment course
 Estimated 47 additional CV deaths / 1 million tx courses
 Sudden cardiac deaths
 Azithro – 22 people died (65 sudden cardiac deaths / 1 million
tx courses)
 Amox – 29 people died (22 sudden cardiac deaths/ 1 million tx
courses)
 No Rx – 33 people died (24 sudden cardiac deaths/ 1 million 5day periods)
 Among highest CV risk group, 245 / 1 million tx courses
Azithromycin and CV Death
 Cautions:
 Relative risk vs. absolute risk
 Retrospective administrative
databases- incomplete clinical
information
Case #2
 68M with HTN, DM, CHF presents due to a cough for 2
weeks. She is requesting a Z pack.
 What do you tell her?
Case #3
 ED patient, 25F presents for STD check. Develops
chest pain, admitted for rule out MI.
 They sent a urine culture, which returns >100,000
CFUs of E.coli.
 What do you do?
Asymptomatic Bacteruria
 Relevance
 Studies showing that if you have asymptomatic
bacteruria, you’re more likely to develop a symptomatic
UTI
Asymptomatic Bacteruria
 18 - 40 years old
 Sexually active with 1 partner over the past 12 months
 One symptomatic UTI treated in past 12 months
 Currently asymptomatic
 With urine culture with >= 105 CFUs on 2 consecutive
specimens
Asymptomatic Bacteruria
 Randomized to receive antibiotic or not (369 women
vs. 330)
 No placebo used
 Pts returned at 3, 6, and 12 months for repeat urine
cultures
 Asked to return sooner if symptoms
Asymptomatic Bacteruria
 Symptomatic UTIs
 3 months
 Untreated 3.5% vs. treated 8.8%
 6 months
 Untreated 7.6% vs. treated 29.7%
 12 months
 Untreated 14.7% vs. treated 73.1%
Asymptomatic Bacteruria
 Limitations?
Asymptomatic Bacteruria
 Cautions:
 Limited study population
 STD symptoms vs. UTI symptoms
Asymptomatic Bacteruria
 Distortion of native ecology by giving antibiotics
 Antibiotic resistance versus virulence
Daily Post-Exposure Ppx in
HIV Discordant Couples
 4747 serodiscordant couples
 From Kenya and Uganda
 Followed for 36 months
 RTC, double-blind, placebo-controlled
 Studied the seronegative partner: (62% males)
 1584 people took tenofovir
 1579 took tenofovir-emtricitabine
 1584 took placebo
Daily Post-Exposure Ppx in
HIV Discordant Couples
 All participants got:
 HIV-1 testing with counseling before and after
 Individual and couples risk-reduction counseling
 Screening and Tx for other STDs
 Free condoms with training and counseling
 Referral for male circumcision and PEP
 Offered Hep B vaccination
Daily Post-Exposure Ppx in
HIV Discordant Couples
 Endpoint:
 Seropositivity in partners previously HIV-negative
 17 infections in the tenofovir group (0.65/100 personyears)
 13 in the tenofovir-emtricitabine group (0.50/100
person-years)
 52 in the placebo group (1.99/100 person-years)
Daily Post-Exposure Ppx in
HIV Discordant Couples
 What’s wrong with this study?
Daily Post-Exposure Ppx in
HIV Discordant Couples
 What’s wrong with this study?
 Ethics
 Strong emphasis on adherence- monthly visits with
seronegative partner and pill counts
 Limited study population- only heterosexual
 Safety of Tenofovir in pregnancy, renal function, breastfeeding, bone mineral density
Daily Post-Exposure Ppx in
HIV Discordant Couples
 BMC Resources:
 +HOPE prenatal clinic- advice for HIV+ women who are
pregnant or want to become pregnant
 Dr. Margaret Sullivan (sees all concordant or
discordant HIV+ patients contemplating pregnancy)
Thanks for your attention!