Program expectations - Columbia Law School
Download
Report
Transcript Program expectations - Columbia Law School
The Pennsylvania Academic
Detailing Program
Pharmaceuticals Conference
Evidence Based Medicine and Counter Detailing
Thomas M. Snedden,
([email protected])
Director,
Pennsylvania PACE Program
(www.aging.state.pa.us)
National State Attorney General Program
At Columbia Law School
New York, New York
May 11, 2007
The Pennsylvania
Academic Detailing Program
Academic detailing is a supplement
to PACE’s long-standing,
comprehensive, concurrent and
retrospective DUR processes.
Program expectations
The medication educator’s role
Our goals
To provide evidence-based, noncommercial information about
medications to physicians
To facilitate physicians’ use of that
information in making the best
prescription choices (efficacy, safety,
and cost) for their patients
Program strengths:
Service, credibility, and integrity
Service
Providing useful, practice-relevant information…
in a very time-efficient way…
that would be difficult to assemble oneself…
delivered in a professional, supportive manner.
Credibility
Evidence-based materials, developed by experts
Non-commercial viewpoint
Integrity
Only goal is to improve prescribing and patient care
No pharmaceutical company funding
Salary is not based on sales performance
Goal 1:
To provide physicians with current,
evidence-based, non-commercial drug
information
HOW?
Offer the physician a flexible schedule for visits
Respond to questions knowledgeably, honestly, and with
the weight of the evidence—or find someone who can!
Offer free CME credits to add value to the interaction
Present a professional appearance and pleasant demeanor
Practice the art of persistence
Goal 2:
To facilitate physicians’ use of that
information in making the best prescription
choices (efficacy, safety, and cost) for patients
HOW?
Identify the physician’s needs, priorities, and concerns
Offer tools and resources to facilitate better choices (data
summaries, patient education materials, etc.)
Refrain from excessive bashing of drug manufacturers
What makes a medication
educator unique?
Drug rep
Medication educator
Serves: drug company
Product: drug
Goal: maximize use of a
particular drug for profit$
Serves: doctor
Product: knowledge about
drugs
Goal: Share knowledge with
doctor that will result in
optimized prescription
choices
Pharmaceutical company
relationships
No affiliations with a pharmaceutical
company (paid or unpaid)
Consulting
Employment
Speakers bureau/seminars/conferences
Educational modules completed
(whom to treat, which drugs to choose)
Cox-2’s / NSAIDs
Gastric acid: PPIs, H
blockers
Nexium, Prilosec, etc.
Anti-platelet drugs
2
Plavix, aspirin
Cholesterol-lowering drugs
Lipitor, Crestor, Zocor, other statins
Drug Consultants
Clinical background in nursing, pharmacy
10 individuals employed
7.5 FTE total
Located in areas with highest density of PACE
beneficiaries
Multi-day training sessions in Boston
6 nurses, 4 pharmacists
regular followup teleconferences for updates,
feedback
Quarterly one-on-one visits, ongoing
relationships with prescribers
The Harvard connection
Systematic review of current medical
literature evidence-based synthesis
Development of user-friendly materials
Follow-up, consultant support
Responses to MD questions
Fiscal management
Program evaluation
Web presence – www. RxFacts.org
Detailer activity through
mid-November
N
Completed educational encounters
974
Unique providers who have had
educational encounters
450
Educational encounters by topic*
iDiS introduction
175
coxibs/NSAIDs
362
PPIs, acid-suppressing therapy
340
anti-platelet therapy
240
statins, lipid-lowering therapy
2
Survey item:
Mean ± SD
1=Strongly disagree 2=Disagree 3=Neutral 4=Agree 5=Strongly Agree
The program provides me with useful information about
commonly used medications
4.6 ± .5
The content represents unbiased and balanced
information about drugs
4.6 ± .5
The program provides a perspective on prescribing that is
different form what I get from other sources
4.4 ± .6
My Drug Information Consultant is a well-informed source
of evidence-based information about drugs I prescribe
4.6 ± .5
I find the patient materials useful in my practice
4.3 ± .8
Being able to get Continuing Medical Education credits
from Harvard is a valuable component of the service
4.0 ± 1.2
It makes sense for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to
devote resources to this activity
4.5 ± .6
I would like to see this program continue
4.6 ± .6
The media have noticed
Wall Street Journal
Page One, March 13
“The Daily Show”
May 4, www. TheDailyShow.com
The New York Times
op-ed, September 16
Harvard Magazine, The Harvard Health Letter
November
The Boston Globe
February 26, 2007
The Central Pennsylvania Business Journal
April 2007
Effect on drug utilization:
preliminary analysis
The cox-2 / NSAID module
IDIS intervention month
800
600
400
200
Internal control cohort
Intervention cohort
0
-18
-17
-16
-15
-14
-13
-12
-11
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Coxib spending per physician
1000
Months before and after intervention month
Next steps
Additional analyses are ongoing
Additional drug topics to be covered:
–Hypertension
–Alzheimer’s disease
–Diabetes
Broaden to other state programs?
–state employees/retirees
Questions