Pain Management and Palliative Care
Download
Report
Transcript Pain Management and Palliative Care
Clinical Review for the
Hospice and Palliative Nurse
Pain Management
1
Objectives
1. Describe the prevalence of pain in the
hospice and palliative care setting
2. Recognize the impact of pain on patients,
families and the healthcare system
3. Identify common barriers to effective pain
management
2
Objectives
4. Define the types of pain experienced by
the hospice and palliative patient
5. State the principles of effective pain
management
6 Identify the components of a thorough
pain assessment
7. Demonstrate the ability to do
equianalgesic conversions
3
Undertreatment of Pain
70-90% of patients with advanced disease experience pain
50% hospitalized patient’s experience pain
80% of long term care experience pain
Only 40-50% are given analgesics
Pain scores (on a 0-10 scale) greater than or equal to “4”
greatly impact on quality of life
4
Impact of Poorly Controlled
Pain
Physical
Psychosocial
Emotional
Financial
Spiritual
Cultural
5
Interdisciplinary Resources
Pain affects multiple dimensions
No one discipline can address all issues
Strengths and talents of many disciplines
Address multiple institutional barriers
On going communication
6
Cost of Poor Pain Management
$100 billion per year
Chronic pain is most expensive heath problem
40 million physician visits per year for pain
25% of all work days lost are due to pain
Improving pain management costs less than cost of
inadequate relief
7
Pain Co-morbidities
Depression
Anxiety disorder
Diabetes
Chronic fatigue syndrome
8
Barriers to Effective
Pain Management
Patient / family
Healthcare Provider
Institutional
9
Definition of Pain
An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience
associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or
described in terms of such damage (APS)
10
Definition of Pain
Pain is whatever the experiencing person says it is,
existing whenever he/she says it does (McCaffery &
Pasero, 1999)
The patient’s report must be accepted!
11
Types of Pain
Acute
Accompanied by physiological
Perceived as reversible
Chronic
Often not a clear cause
Usually persist for longer than 3 months
Autonomic nervous system adapts – patient does not
exhibit objective signs of pain
12
Classification of Pain
Nociceptive Pain
The normal processing of stimuli that damages normal
tissues or has the potential to do so if prolonged
Usually responsive to non-opioids and/or opioids
Stimuli from somatic or visceral structures
13
Types of Nociceptive Pain
Somatic Pain
Bone, joints, muscle, skin, connective tissue
Throbbing, dull
Well localized
14
Types of Nociceptive Pain
Visceral Pain
Visceral organs
Often referred to distant dermatomal sites
Squeezing, cramping, pressure, deep ache
Poorly localized
15
Neuropathic Pain
Results from actual injury to nerves rather than
stimulation of nerve endings
Burning, shooting, tingling, numbness, radiating,
electrical
Responds to adjuvant analgesics
16
Neuropathic Pain
Centrally generated pain
Deafferentation pain
Sympathetically maintained pain
Peripherally generated pain
Painful polyneuropathies
Painful mononeuropathies
17
Mixed nociceptive and
neuropathic pain syndrome
Common in life-threatening illnesses
Thorough assessment is indicated
Occur concomitantly so patients may require agents from
more than one category of analgesics
18
APS 12 Principles of
Pain Management
1. Individualize dose, route and schedule
2. Around the clock dosing
19
APS 12 Principles of
Pain Management
3. Selection of opioids
4. Adequate dosing for infants/children
20
APS 12 Principles of
Pain Management
5. Follow patients closely
6. Use equianalgesic dosing
21
APS 12 Principles of
Pain Management
Recognize and treat side effects
Most common side effects of opioids:
7.
Sedation
Constipation
Nausea
Vomiting
Itching
Respiratory depression
22
APS 12 Principles of
Pain Management
8. Be aware of hazards of Demerol® and mixed agonistantagonists
23
APS 12 Principles of
Pain Management
9. Watch for development of tolerance
10. Be aware of physical dependence
24
APS 12 Principles of
Pain Management
11. Do not label a patient addicted
12. Be aware of psychological state
25
WHO Ladder
Recommendations
Portrays progression in the doses and types of analgesic
drugs for effective pain relief
Changes as patients condition and characteristics of pain
change
Orally whenever possible
“By the clock” dosing
Based on assessment of the individual’s pain experience
26
WHO Ladder
Step 1 (Mild pain)
Mild Pain
1-3 on a scale of 0-10
Non-opioids
Adjuvants
As analgesics
To reduce side effects
27
WHO Ladder
Step 2 (Moderate pain)
Moderate Pain
4-6 on a scale of 0-10
Opioids in low doses
Non-opioids and adjuvants may be continued
28
WHO Ladder
Step 3 (Severe pain)
Severe Pain
7-10 on a scale of 0-10
Add higher doses of opioids
Continue non-opioids and adjuvants
29
Pain Assessment Principles
Accept patient’s complaint of pain
History of pain
Assessment for non-verbal patients
Patient centered goals
30
Pain Assessment Principles
Nonverbal signs of pain
Psychological impact of pain
Diagnostic workup
Assess effectiveness and side effects of pain medication
31
Initial Pain Assessment
Onset/duration
When did the pain first begin?
Is it associated with a particular activity
Other symptoms
Site
More than 75% persons with cancer have pain in 2 or
more sites
Ask patient to point to the pain
Assess each site for pain intensity, quality, duration
32
Initial Pain Assessment
Severity/intensity
Select pain scale appropriate to patient
Quality
Ask patient to describe their pain
Exacerbating/relieving factors
What makes the pain worse or what causes the pain?
Assess the pain at rest, with movement, and in relation to
daily activity
Ask the caregivers how patient is doing with activities
33
Initial Pain Assessment
Effects of pain on quality of life
What does the pain mean to the patient and family?
Does the pain keep the patient from doing activities
he/she enjoys?
Medication history
Current
Past
Side effects
34
Initial Pain Assessment
Physical
Examine site(s) of pain, including referral sites
Consider disease process, extent of progression
Cultural considerations
Cultural generalities and determine individual differences
Other factors
Age
Gender
Environmental
35
Initial Pain Assessment
Pain Assessment in the Non-verbal patient
Self-report
Search for potential causes of pain
Observe patient behaviors
Surrogate reporting
Attempt an analgesic trial
Hierarchy of Pain Assessment Techniques
(McCaffery & Pasero, 1999)
36
Initial Pain Assessment
Persons with Advanced Dementia
Self report
Search for potential causes of pain/discomfort
Observation of patient behaviors
Behavioral pain assessment tools
37
Communication
Physician/Nurse
Critical in providing excellent patient care
SBAR
Situation
Background
Assessment
Recommendation
38
Communication
Interdisciplinary Team
Establish common goals
Use common language
Common knowledge base
Regular communication
39
Non-opioids
Used in acute and chronic pain
Relief for mild/moderate pain
Most effective with nociceptive pain (muscle
and joint pain)
Combined with opioid analgesics for both additive
analgesic effects or opioid dose sparing effects
40
Non-opioids
Acetaminophen
Mechanism
Not well understood
Dosing
Decrease for patients with hepatic impairment
Routes
Oral
Rectal
IV
41
Non-opioids
Acetaminophen
Side effects
Considerations
Be aware of hidden doses, i.e., APAP in combination
products
42
Non-opioids
NSAIDs
Characteristics
Analgesic effects through the inhibition of prostaglandin
production
Multipurpose analgesia
Drug choices
If no response after 3 days of adjustment, consider
switching to different NSAID
Contraindicated If patient is hypersensitive or allergic to
ASA or other NSAIDs
43
Non-opioids
NSAIDs
Dosing
PRN basis for occasional pain
Around-the-clock (ATC) for ongoing pain
Routes of Administration
44
Non-opioids
NSAIDs
Sides Effects
Hematologic
GI
Renal
Cognitive Impairment
Cardiovascular
45
Teaching Points
for Non-opioids
Risk for GI bleeding with NSAIDs
Why medication ordered
Stopping medications
Reporting side effects
46
Opioids
CNS action – bind to opioid receptor site in brain and
spinal cord
mu, kappa, and delta receptor sites
Pain relief occurs when opioids bind to 1 or more
receptors as an agonist
Agonists and agonist – antagonists
47
Pure Agonist Opioids
Expect physical dependence
Withdrawal will occur when abruptly stopped or naloxone
(Narcan®) is given
Prevent withdrawal by reducing by 25%
Tolerance to side effects other than constipation
Tolerance to analgesia is rare
48
Choice of Opioid Drug
One pure agonist with one route
If one not relieving pain with titration, may need to
switch medication
All pure agonist have same side effects
Side effects may be reported as allergies
Rapid onset formulation for breakthrough
49
Opioids
Morphine
Considered ‘gold standard’ for opioid analgesic
Standard for comparison in opioid use
Some patients cannot tolerate because of the side effects
Tolerance to side effects in a few days
No tolerance to constipation
50
Opioids
Codeine
Appropriate for mild pain
Metabolized by liver
Fentanyl
Routes include IV, epidural, topical patch
Hydrocodone
Found in combination therapy with acetaminophen
51
Opioids
Hydromorphone
Short half life and lack of metabolite problems make it
preferable to morphine in patients with renal insufficiency,
particularly the elderly
52
Opioids
Meperidine
Contraindicated – normeperidine (active metabolite) acts as
a CNS stimulant
Evidence to support that should NOT be used as a first line
analgesic for any type of pain
53
Opioids
Methadone
Long half life
Inexpensive
Monitor closely for arrhythmias
Caution in equianalgesic conversion – methadone may be up
to 10 times more potent than indicated on most equianalgesic
charts
54
Opioids
Oxycodone
Used in acute, cancer, chronic nonmalignant pain
Mild to severe intensity
55
Opioids
Tepentadol (Nucynta)
management of moderate to severe chronic pain
Mu-opioid agonist
NUCYNTA® ER
extended-release formulation
56
Mixed Agonist-antagonists
Indications
Not recommended for chronic pain
Ceiling doses
Psychotomimetic effects
Disorientation/hallucinations
57
Abuse Resistant Opioids
Oxecta
The first immediate-release oxycodone medicine
that applies technology designed to discourage
common methods of tampering associated with
opioid abuse and misuse
58
Mixed Agonist-antagonists
Buprenorphine (Buprenex®)
Butorphanol (Stadol®)
59
Mixed Agonist-antagonists
Nalbuphine (Nubain®)
Pentazocine (Talwin®)
60
Opioid Dosing
Multiple routes available for pure agonists
If current dose safe but ineffective, increase by 25% to
50% until pain relief occurs or unmanageable side effects
present
No ceiling effect for pure agonists
All opioids have side effects that eventually limit dose
escalation
61
Opioid Routes
Oral/Sublingual
Usually preferred route
Consider liquid if difficulty swallowing
Intramuscular
Not recommended – painful
Subcutaneous
Not used in acute pain situations
Limited volume of infusion
62
Opioid Routes
Intravenous
Bolus provides most rapid onset of effect
Peak times vary among opioids
Starting doses may be one-half the oral route
63
Opioid Routes
Transdermal
Medication is delivered continuously through skin
Caution patients that increased heat to patch or skin area
may increase release of medication
Best results when applied to skin without hair and
adequate subcutaneous tissue
64
Opioid Routes
Rectal
Alternative to patients who cannot swallow
Onset of action may be within 10 minutes
Stomal
Not equivalent to rectal administration
Starting dose should be considered same as oral or rectal
route
65
Opioid Routes
Intraspinal
Used for postoperative pain, cancer pain
Opioid binds to receptors of spinal cord at level of
injection
Dose related side effects: nausea, itching, urinary
retention
66
Opioid Routes
Patient Controlled Analgesia
Predetermined dose of opioid delivered based on time
intervals
Primarily used in acute pain situations
Allows greater control over pain experience
67
Management of
Opioid Side Effects
Constipation
Most common side effect of opioids
Bowel regimen
68
Management of
Opioid Side Effects
Nausea and Vomiting
May be due to:
Stimulation of chemoreceptor trigger zone in brain
Slowing of GI motility
Effects on balance and equilibrium of inner ear
69
Management of
Opioid Side Effects
Sedation
Usually when opioids started or dose increased
Tolerance will occur over period of days to weeks
Pruritus
Can occur with any associated histamine release &
commonly with morphine
May be generalized, usually localized to face, neck, chest
Usually not accompanied by rash
70
Management of
Opioid Side Effects
Mental status change
Cause of increased anxiety and fear for patients, families,
caregivers
Assess to ensure that opioid is cause
71
Management of
Opioid Side Effects
Respiratory depression
Considered clinically significant when there is a decrease
in rate and depth of respirations from baseline
Tolerance develops over period of days to weeks
Longer patient on opioid, less likely to develop
Prevention by appropriate titration, monitoring of sedation
levels
Monitor sedation levels respiratory status, every 1-2 hours
for first 24 hours in opioid naïve
72
Opioid-induced neurotoxicity
Caused by prolonged opioid use
Frequently missed in assessments
Unusual and unpredictable painful sensations
Pain out of proportion to disease condition
Involuntary muscle tremors (myoclonus)
Sudden decreased LOC, or confusion/hallucinations
73
Opioid Teaching Points
Discuss effects of unrelieved pain
Review how to administration
Side effects
Fear of addiction
Written information
74
Equianalgesia
Doses of various opioids analgesics that provide
approximately the same pain relief
Charts
Consistent
Most use morphine 10 mg and every 4 hour dosing as basis
75
Sample Equianalgesic Chart
Drug
Dose (mg)
Parenteral
Dose (mg)
Oral
Duration
(hours)
Morphine (IR)
10
30
3-4
Hydromorphone
1.5
7.5
3-4
Oxycodone (long
acting)
----
20
8-12
76
Titration of opioids
Adjusting the amount of dose of an opioid
Make increases at the onset or peak effect
Provide smallest dose that provides greatest relief with
fewest side effects
Titrate in increments of 25% to 100%
77
Methods of Titration
Add total of scheduled doses and immediate-release over
24 hr period
Increase by 50% if initial dose not effective
Provide breakthrough dosing
78
Breakthrough Dosing
Referred to as rescue dosing or supplemental dosing
Occurs in 2/3 of patients receiving opioids for chronic
malignant pain
Assessing for breakthrough – no tool – rely on patient’s
report of pain
Types
Incident – elicited by specific activities
Spontaneous
End-of-dose failure
79
Rescue Dosing
Always ordered with long-acting opioids
APS
10-15% of the 24-hour oral dose, given every 2 hours as
needed
Adjust with ATC dosing increases
Increase ATC dose if received more than 3 rescue doses
in a 24 period
80
Calculating Rescue Dose
ATC dose in 24 hrs
180mg in 24 hrs
Divided by 10 (1/10 or
180 ÷ 10 = 18 or
10%) or 6 (1/6 or 15%)
Equals IR rescue dose to be
given every 3 hrs PRN
180 ÷ 6 = 30
18mg to 30mg PO every 3
hr PRN
81
Calculating Rescue Dose
Example
Oral Transmucosal Fentanyl Citrate
Must convert opioid to morphine using equianalgesic chart or
manufacturer recommendation
200 g transdermal fentanyl = 400 mg morphine (total
fentanyl gs x 2 for morphine equivalent)
400 10 (1/10 or 10%) = 40 mg
400 6 (1/6 or 15%) = 70 mg
Immediate release rescue dose = 40-70 mg PO every 1-2 hour
PRN
82
Calculating Rescue Dose
Parenteral opioid infusions
Recommended rescue dose for patients receiving
continuous parenteral or epidural opioid infusion is
25-50% of hourly opioid dose
Should be offered every 30 minutes if not using
Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA)
83
Adjuvants
Non pain medications that have analgesic effects on
certain types of pain
Chronic neuropathic pain
Additional therapy to opioids
Distinct primary therapy
84
Adjuvants
Choice of drug
Depends on type of pain, patient age, and other medical
condition
Individual response
Sequential trials
85
Tricyclic Antidepressants
In co-administration with opioids, interaction may result in
higher opioid concentrations
Analgesia usually occurs within 1 week
May be effective for both lancinating and continuous
neuropathic pain
Not indicated for acute pain
In palliative care, strongest indication in neuropathic pain
not responding to opioids
In terminal care, benefits from non-analgesic effects
86
Tricyclic Antidepressants
Choice of Drug
Desipramine (Norpramine®)
Nortriptyline (Aventyl®, Pamelor®)
Imipramine (Tofranil®)
Doxepin (Sinequan®)
Clomipramine (Anafranil®)
87
Tricyclic Antidepressants
Dosing
Start low: elderly 10 mg; younger 25 mg
Increase by same amount as starting dose
Evaluate and increase every 3 to 5 days
Side Effects
Orthostatic hypotension
Sedation / mental clouding
Anticholergic effects
88
SSRIs
Venlafaxine (Effexor®)
Duloxetine (Cymbalta®)
Paraxetine (Paxil®)
Fluoxetine (Prozac®)
89
Anticonvulsants
First line drugs for chronic lancinating neuropathic pain
Variability among drugs is great
Analgesia similar mechanism that inhibit seizure activity
Lessens conduction of pain signals along damaged
peripheral nerves
90
Anticonvulsants
Gabapentin (Neurontin)
Considered first line drug of choice for all types of
neuropathic pain due to effectiveness of analgesic action
and low side effect profile
Carbamazepine (Tegretol)
Effective in lancinating neuropathic pain
91
Anticonvulsants
Phenytoin (Dilantin)
Clonazepam (Klonopin)
Valproic acid (Depakene)
Baclofen (Lioresal)
92
Other Adjuvants
Corticosteroids
Considered multipurpose adjuvant analgesic
Mechanism of action as analgesia is unknown
Drug of choice
Dexamethasone (Decadron)
Prednisone and methylprednisolone
Adverse Effects
Short Term Therapy
Long Term Therapy
93
Other Adjuvants
Local anesthetic agents
Local action with minimal systemic side effects
Limited information on long term safety and effectiveness
Medications
Mexiletine (Mexitil)
Tocainide (Tonocard)
Lidocaine
94
Other Adjuvants
Adverse Effects
Central nervous system effects
Caution or avoid use with patients with preexisting heart
disease such as cardiac dysrhythmias, those receiving
antiarrhythmic drugs, cardiac insufficiency
If topical route used, side effects include redness, edema,
and abnormal sensation at the site of application
95
Other Adjuvants
Psychostimulants
Multipurpose for acute or chronic pain
Useful in nociceptive or neuropathic pain
Caffeine (PO)
Used in combination products for relief of headache
Dextroamphetamine: (Dexedrine) (PO)
Methylphenidate: (Ritalin) (PO)
Side Effects
Insomnia, anorexia, tremulousness, anxiety, agitation,
cognitive changes
96
Other Adjuvants
Teaching Points
May take days to weeks for pain relief
Reassessment and titration may be necessary
Review adverse effects
Provide educational materials
97
Addiction
“A pattern of compulsive drug use characterized by a
continued craving for an opioid for effects other than pain
relief” (APS, 1999)
98
Pseudoaddiction
The patient who seeks additional medications appropriately
or inappropriately secondary to significant undertreatment
of the pain syndrome
Behaviors cease when pain is treated
99
Tolerance
A form of neuroadaptation to the effects of chronically
administered opioids which is indicated by the need for
increasing or more frequent doses of the medication to
achieve the initial effects
Clinicians should not fear tolerance in patients with
extended life expectancy
100
Physical Dependence
A physiological state in which abrupt cessation of the opioid
results in withdrawal syndrome.
101
Physical Dependence
Pain management for
Substance abuse history
Accept patient’s report of pain
Clinicians most likely to under medicate
102
Physical Dependence
Pain management for
Active addict – general guidelines
Reassure patient of staff commitment to pain
management of all patients
Inpatient
Consider IV PCA: gives patient control, avoids
confrontation with staff, safely regulates dosing
Outpatient
Less frequent dosing increases compliance to treatment plan
103
Physical Dependence
Pain management for
Patient recovering from addiction
Acknowledge patient’s addiction history
Offer non-pharmacologic and non-opioid pain
management options
Differentiate between addiction and physical
dependence
If relapse occurs, intensify recovery effort – do not
terminate pain care
104
Special Populations
Geriatric
Dying
Pediatric
Cognitive impaired
Veteran
105
Special Populations
Geriatric
Age classifications
Younger old: age 65 to 75 years
Older old: age 75 to 85 years
Oldest old: over 85 years
Most under treated population for pain
Rule of thumb: start low and go slow
106
Special Populations
Geriatric
Common types of pain
Acute pain
Cancer pain
Chronic nonmalignant pain
107
Special Populations
Geriatric
Analgesic therapy issues
Physiologic changes
Absorption
Distribution
108
Special Populations
Geriatric
Analgesic therapy issues
Metabolism
Elimination
109
Special Populations
Geriatric
Analgesic therapy
Acetaminophen
Generally well-tolerated by elderly
NSAIDs
Increased risk of GI problems, renal insufficiency,
platelet dysfunction
Always take NSAIDs with food and water
110
Special Populations
Geriatric
Analgesic therapy
Opioids
Recommend reducing initial opioid dosing by
25-50% in elderly patient
111
Special Populations
Geriatric
Analgesic therapy
Drug selection
Adjuvants
Tricyclic antidepressants
Anticonvulsants
Local anesthetics
112
Special Populations
Cognitively Impaired
Cognitively impaired
High risk for under treatment
Assessment ability to report pain
0-5 scale
Collaborate with family or caregiver to determine behaviors
that indicate pain
113
Special Populations
Dying
Dying
Pain assessment continues to be a priority at end-of-life
Palliative sedation or therapeutic sedation
114
Special Populations
Pediatrics
Pediatric
Consider age, developmental level, verbal capabilities, past
experiences, cultural factors, types of pain
Child self report of pain considered most reliable and valid
indicator
Medication dose determined by body weight (kilogram)
Learn the child's word for pain
115
Special Populations
Veterans
Pain may be seen as a weakness
Military taught to ‘grin and bear it’
Many suffer in silence, do not report pain
Assess for pain in consistent manner
Provide interdisciplinary, multimodal approach to pain
management
116
Non-pharmacological
Pain Management
Use concurrently with medications
Methods
Cognitive-behavioral
Relaxation
Guided imagery
Distraction
117
Non-pharmacological
Pain Management
Methods
Physical interventions
Hot and cold
Massage
Positioning
Exercise
118
Non-pharmacological
Pain Management
Methods
Physical interventions
Positioning
Exercise
119
Non-pharmacological
Pain Management
Complementary therapies
Therapeutic touch
Music therapy
Aromatherapy
120
Ethical Considerations
Related to pain management
Patient rights
Relief from pain
The Joint Commission
American Nurses Association
Double effect
Distinguishing between harming and benefiting patient
121
Ethical Considerations
Related to pain management
Principle of double effect
Found in situations when distinguishing between harm
and benefit
122
Ethical Considerations
Related to pain management
Advocacy
Nurses have duty to relieve pain and suffering
Patient and family view nurse as advocate which increases
trusting relationship
123
REMS
Opioid drugs and Risk Evaluation and
Mitigation Strategies (REMS)
REMS are FDA-mandated requirements to minimize the
risks associated with certain medications. REMS can be
mandated for any medication or class of medication, and
certain opioids have been included in this mandate.
124
References
1. Berry PH, ed. Core Curriculum for the Generalist Hospice and
Palliative Nurse. 2nd ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendal/Hunt; 2005.
2. SUPPORT SPI. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill
hospitalized patients: a study to understand prognoses and preferences
for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). Journal of the
American Medical Association. 1995;274:1591-1598.
3. McMillan S. Pain and pain relief experienced by hospice patients with
cancer. Cancer Nursing. 1996;19:298-307.
4. Warfield C, Kahn C. Acute pain management: programs in U.S.
hospitals and experiences and attitudes among U.S. adults. Anesthesiology.
1995;83:1090-1094.
5. Ferrell BR, Dean G. The meaning of cancer pain. Seminars in Oncology
Nursing. 1995:11(1):17-22.
125
References
6. Gloth F. Concerns with chronic analgesic therapy in elderly patients.
American Journal of Medicine. 1996;101(suppl 1A):19S-24S.
7. McCaffery M, Passero C. Pain: Clinical Manual. St. Louis, MO:
Mosby;1999.
8. Arnst C. Conquering Pain. Business Week. 1999:3681102-109.
9. Paice JA. Pain at the end of life. In: Ferrell BR, Coyle N, eds. Textbook of
Palliative Nursing. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010:
161-185.
10. Long C, Morgan B, Alonzo A, Mitchell K, Beardsley M. Improving pain
management in long-term care. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing.
2010;12 (3):148-155.
126
References
11. American Pain Society. Principles of analgesic use in the treatment of
acute pain and cancer pain. 3rd ed. Skokie, IL: American Pain
Society;1999.
12. McCaffery M. Nursing Practice Theories Related To Cognition, Bodily
Pain, And Man-Environment Interactions. Los Angeles, CA:
UCLA;1968.
13. (AHCPR). A.f.H.C.P.a.R. Acute Pain Management: Operative or Medical
Procedures and Trauma. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD:
Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;
1992.
14. Fink R, Gates R. Pain assessment. In: Ferrell BR, Coyle N, eds. Textbook
of Palliative Nursing. 3rd. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;
2010: 137-160.
15. Foley KM. Pain assessment and cancer pain syndromes. In: Doyle D,
Hanks GWC, MacDonald N, eds. Oxford Textbook of Palliative
127
Medicine. New York NY: Oxford University Press: 2005: 298-316.
References
16. (AHCPR). A.f.H.C.P.a.R. Cancer Pain Management. Clinical Practice
Guideline. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service, U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services; 1994.
17. Bednash G, Ferrell BR. End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium
(ELNEC). Washington, DC: Association of Colleges of Nursing; 2009.
18. Herr K, Coyne P, Manworren R, McCaffery M, Merkel S, Pelosi-Kelly J,
Wild L. Pain assessment in the nonverbal patient: position statement with
clinical practice recommendations. Pain Management Nursing.
2006;7(2):44-52.
19. FDA.gov. 2011. Acetaminophen Information. Available at
http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/informationbydrugclass/ucm165107
.htm Accessed November 15, 2011.
20. FDA.gov. 2011. Propoxyphene withdrawn from U.S. market. Available
at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents?Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/uc
m23450.htm. Accessed November 15, 2011.
128
References
21. FDA.gov. 2011. Nucyntar ER REMS. Available at
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInf
ormationforPatientsandProviders/UCM270224.pdf. Accessed November
15, 2011.
22. Abuse Resistant opioids. 2011. Available at
http://www.drugs.com/newdrugs/pfizer-acura-announce-fda-approvaloxecta-oxycodone-hcl-usp-cii-2709.html. Accessed November 15, 2011.
23. Kozlov M, Anderson, M A, Sparbel, K. Opioid induced neurotoxicity in
the hospice patient. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing 2011;1 (5)
334-338.
24. Coyle N, Layman-Goldstein M. Pain assessment and pharmacological
interventions. In: Matzo, ML, Sherman DW, eds. Palliative Care Nursing:
Quality Care to the End of Life. 2nd New York, NY: Springer;2006:345-405.
25.Emanuel L, von Gunten C, Ferris F. The Education for Physicians on End of
Life Care (EPEC) Curriculum. Washington, DC: American Medical
129
Association; 2003.
26. Santucci G. ed. Core Curriculum for the Pediatric Hospice and
Palliative Nurse. Pittsburgh, PA : Hospice and Palliative Nurses
Association;2011.
27. VA.gov. PTSD101. Available at
http://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/ptsd101/ptsd-101.asp. Accessed
November 15, 2011.
28. Prince-Paul M, Daly B. Ethical considerations in Palliative Care. In:
Ferrell BR, Coyle N, eds. Textbook of Palliative Nursing. 2nd ed. New
York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010:1057-1171.
29. Emanuel L, von Gunten C, Ferris F. The Education for Physicians on
End of Life Care (EPEC) Curriculum. Washington, DC: American
Medical Association;2003.
30. Mariano C. Holistic integrative therapies in palliative care. In: Matzo,
ML, Sherman DW, eds. Palliative Care Nursing: Quality Care to the
End of Life. New York, NY: Springer; 2006:51-86.
130
31. Prince-Paul M, Daly B. Ethical considerations in Palliative Care. In:
Ferrell BR, Coyle N, eds. Textbook of Palliative Nursing. 2nd ed. New
York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010:1057-1171.
32. Gorman L, Beach P, Ersek M, Montana B, Bartel J. Pain Position
Statement. Pittsburgh, PA: Hospice and Palliative Nurses
Association;2008.
Additional References
Mariano C. Holistic integrative therapies in palliative care. In: Matzo ML,
Sherman DW, eds. Palliative Care Nursing: Quality Care to the End of
Life. New York, NY: Springer; 2006:51-86.
HPNA.org. Position Statements. Available at
http://www.hpna.org/DisplayPage.aspx?Title=Position Statement.
Accessed November 15, 2011.
Panke J, Coyne P. Conversations in Palliative Care. 3rd ed. Pittsburgh,
131
PA. Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association:2011.