PHARMACY AND THE HEALTH CARE STSTEM
Download
Report
Transcript PHARMACY AND THE HEALTH CARE STSTEM
Pharmacy and the Health Care
System-Fall 2005
Lee R. Strandberg, Ph.D.
Emeritus Professor
Pharmacy Economics and Pubic Health
&
Director, Managed Care Pharmacy
Samaritan Health Services
What is this course about?
I. Pharmacy and the Health Care
System
Pharmacy and its Relationship to the
Health Care Delivery System
II. Health Economics
What causes medical care spending
to increase?
Who pays for medical care?
Health Economics -con’t.
Why is the cost of producing health such an
important political issue all over the world?
How do other countries provide and pay for
medical care?
What are some of their problems?
What influence does organizational structure
and insurance have on demand for medical
care?
I. Pharmacy and the Health
Care System
What is a Professional
The Five Elements of a Profession
The Importance of Client Trust
Professional and Business Ethics
What is a Professional
Expected to exercise special skill and
care
Has clients not customers
Places client’s interest first
A customer determines services/goods
wanted
Prof is held to a higher standard of
behavior
The Five Elements of a
Profession
1. A Body of Knowledge
Profession controls its training centers
One of its associations accredits academic
programs
Controls admission into the profession
Convinces the community that no one is allowed
the professional title unless conferred by accredited
academic program
State establishes licensing and or examination
The Five Elements of a
Profession
2. Professional Authority
Client acknowledges the superior
competence of the professional
Client surrenders a portion of own
autonomy to the professional
Client trusts the professional’s judgement
The Five Elements of a
Profession
3. Community Sanctions
Include restrictions on use of a professional
title
Licensure requirements imposed by the
State
Accreditation of academic programs
Granting professional privileges ie., duty (
right) to respect client confidentiality
The Five Elements of a
Profession
4. Code of Ethics
Virtually all professions have one
May or may not be as important today as
they once were
The Five Elements of a
Profession
5. Professional Culture
Every profession operates through a formal and
informal network
These networks produce the single attribute that
differentiates professions from other occupations:
Values, Norms and Symbols
Value: Central beliefs of a profession
Norms: Accepted ways of social behavior within
the profession
Symbols: Recognized insignia
The Importance of Client Trust
Prof. Authority may be most important
It originates when clients place trust in the
professional to make decisions
Professional, in return, implicitly promises to
act in client’s best interest
“Social action depends on there being mutual
reciprocal expectations as to how people are
likely to act, and on these expectations not
being too often disappointed”
Professional versus Business
Ethics
Are you viewed primarily as a
professional or business person
People will view you differently, one or
the other or both
Health care providers have to be both at
the same time to meet patient needs
Health care is both an economic good
and special social relationship
Major Elements of Health Care
System: Sources of Conflict
Consumers
Financing
Mechanisms
Private
Public
Health Care
Providers
Secondary
Providers
Academic ,
Associations
Health Care Organizations by
Type of Ownership
Unmanaged Indemnity
Managed Indemnity (PPO Plus Indemnity)
IPA HMO
Staff HMO
PHO HMO
Physician owned HMO
????
System Composition and
Characteristics
SYSTEM COMPOSITION
Providers
Purchasers
Regulators
PROVIDERS
People
Organizations
Hospitals
MCOs
PPOs
Clinics
PBMS
PURCHASERS
Self Insured Employers-Private Sector
Government - Medicare/Medicaid
Insurance Companies/Agents
Insurance Brokers/Insurance
Consultants
Business Coalitions on Health
Regulators
Board of Pharmacy
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Drug Enforcement Administration ( DEA)
Elected State and Federal Legislators
Determinants of Health
Physical Environment-Food, Housing...
Social Environment-Education,
Income…
Biological Status-Age, Sex, Genetics
Health Services-Delivery System,
Technology, Prevention
Behavior
System Characteristics
Five Basic Characteristics of the
Health Care System
1. Respond to Incentives (people and
organizations
2. Quality and Quantity are infinitely expandable
3. Provider Incentives lean to high tech, high cost
4. Consumer is a poor judge of health care quality
5. Full Insurance Coverage increases use of
services
Evolution of National Health
Policy
Six Stages of National Policy
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The Beginning
Categorical Grants in Aid
Decades of Investment
Organization and Delivery of Service
Decade of Transition
Managed Care Era
The Beginning
Original Federal role was minimal in late
1700s
Fed took responsibility for health care of
military
Quarantine was responsibility of each
sea port
Local officials could not enforce
quarantine regulations
The Beginning
Major Debate Centered on State Vs
Federal Rights
Who Should be Responsible for Public
Health
Debate Ended in Court Ruling in 1893
Debates Started in Court in 1796
The Beginning
The System is still slow to respond
Government moves into areas ignored
by the market
Categorical Grants (1935-1945)
2nd Stage
1930’s focused attention on public health
issues
States could not handle public health
problems
Social Security Act of 1935 addressed
some of these issues
Social Security Act
Originally was Social Health Ins. Act
Provided money for
child health programs
establish and maintain various public health
programs
Social Security Act
Two consequences
1. Decision making shifted from local to
national
2. Increased involvement to non health
professionals in health issues
3rd Stage. Decades of
Investment (1946-1962)
The need for investment in basic health
resources became evident
Congress passed the Hill Burton Act-1946
Funded 4,000 health buildings (hospitals etc..)
Mandated that hospitals give free care for 20 yr..
Cost $ 4 billion
Decades of Investment
Congress also funded medical research
cancer, heart, mental health…
Decades of Investment
Belief at that time was spending on
developing health resources
Would increase access to care
However, it did not increase access
Problems remain with uninsured, rural poor,
urban poor, rural in general
Providers tend to locate around population
centers
4th Stage: Organization and
Delivery of Services (1963-1966)
Three major themes
1. Provide Consumers with money to buy
health care
2. Emphasis on organization and delivery
of care
3. Emphasis on health care planning as a
means to control costs
Medicare. Amendment to
Soc......... Sec Act in 1965
Targets those over 65 (can qualify for
some features even if younger)
Is an insurance program
Is a Federal Program
Medicare Part A Covers
Hospital Stays
Skilled nursing facility care
Some Home Health Care
Hospice Care
No Premium
$110 Deductible-2005
Medicare Part B Covers
Doctors’ Services
Outpatient hospital services
Home health care
Monthly Premium $78.20-2005
Medicare Part D-Prescription
Drugs
Drug Program Effective Jan 2006
Monthly premium-$35
Beneficiary pays first $250 in drug costs
Pays 25% of total drug costs between
$250 and $2,250
Patient pays 100% between $2,250 and
$5,100 (donut hole)
Pay greater of $2 for generics, $5 for
brand or 5% ($3600 out of pocket)
Part D Low Income Assistance
Medicare now covers Rxs for eligibles on
Medicaid
State must pay fed back for this (clawback)
Those below 100% of poverty pay $1-$3 co
pay
Those above 100% will pay $2 $5 co pays
Medicaid eligibles pay no premium or
deductible and no drug costs above $3,600
out of pocket
Part D-con’t
Any Medicare eligible can enroll-benefit is voluntary
Can’t have other Rx coverage ie Tricare
Qualified retiree health plans with Rx coverage equal
to Part D will receive subsidies of 28% of costs for
coverage above $250 and up to $5,000per Medicare
enrollee
Benefit delivered through private health plans and
PBMs
Act requires that plans cover at least 2 drugs in each
therapeutic class
Medicare hired USP to develop a formulary
They proposed covering 146 classes, PBMs say that
is too many, PhARMA says it is not enough
Part D Costs
Initial CBO estimate was $400 billion (10 years)
True Cost projected to be $540 billion
Typical 65 yr old with drug benefit will spend 37% of
Social Sec Inc on Medicare premiums, co-payments,
and out of pocket expenses in 2006
Will grow to 40% in 2011 and 50% by 2021
Medicare prohibited from negotiating with drug manuf
for best price ie., VA and State of Maine.
Drug Discount Cards 2004-2005
Patient pays 100% co pay-a discount price
Card sponsors are private companies ie PBMs. AARP
, Chain Drug stores
72 originally approved by CMS
Low enrollment because of confusing sign up
procedures
May have an annual enrollment fee of up to $30
Gvt subsidies of $600 to individuals making less than
$12,569 or couples $15,862/year
Rx Drug Coverage and Seniors
2003 Data
Four in 10 did not take all drugs prescribed due to
cost, side effects, perceived lack of effectiveness, or
believe that they did not need the med
27% lacked Rx coverage (will be covered under Part
D)
Half have more than one MD
36% more than one pharmacy
26% skipped taking meds because of cost
12% spent less on basic needs because of med costs
Medicare Comparative Cost
Adjustment Program
Establishes a test competition between
local private Medicare plans and
traditional Medicare starting in 2010
Comparisons will run for 6 years
Medicaid. Amendment to
Soc......... Sec. Act in 1965
Targets needy and low income of any
age
Is an assistance program
Is a federal state partnership
Provides financial assistance-varies by
state Fed match varies between $1 and
$3.89 Fed 2005
Covers 51 million people-more than one
out of every 6 Americans (2005)
Medicaid
Congress recently limited the number of
years a person can be on Medicaid (able
bodied adult)
Covers out patient medicine
Define inpatient, outpatient, ambulatory
Medicaid and Medicare
Did not address organization and
delivery of health care services
Provider Compensation was usual and
customary (fee for service)
Did not promote efficient use of limited
health care resources
Fifth Stage: Decade of Transition
( 1967-1987)
Addressed Development of
Comprehensive Delivery Systems
1. Professional Standards Review
Organizations (PSRO)
2. Health Maintenance Organization
(HMO)
3. Preferred Provider Organization (PPO)
4. Pharmacy Benefit Management
Companies (PBMs)
(1) PSRO -Amendment to Social
Security Act
Passed in 1972 by US Congress
Purposes
1. Review health care paid for by Medicare
and Medicaid
Review Quality
To Assure Appropriate Utilization of Services
PSRO- CON’T
Non profit organizations funded by US
Gvt
Hired nurses and physicians to review
hospital charts
Could deny payment to providers for
cause
Probably cost more than they saved
PSRO-CON’T --PROs
Were replaced by Professional Review
Organizations (PRO)-1983
PROs still in operation
Oregon Medical PRO (OMPRO)-1220 SW
Morrison PDX
OMPRO does Medicaid and Medicare and
Private Sector Reviews
Does disease specific studies (asthma,
anticoagulation...
PROs
Much of its work already being done by
current managed care organizations
But remains an independent verification
of work done by others
(2) HMO Act of 1973
Signed into law by Richard Nixon-was
his cost Mgt. agenda
Provided start up $$ to small HMOs
$364 million provided by feds
Regence HMO started this way via
Capitol Health Care in Salem mid 1970s
Purpose was to stimulate development
of cost management
HMO Definition
An organization which assumes
Responsibility for financing and
developing
Comprehensive package of health
benefits
Guarantee to provide care to an enrolled
Pt. population
For a fixed prepaid premium
HMO Vs Indemnity Insurance
(Major Medical)
HMO is an insurance CO + a delivery
system
Major Med is only an insurance company
Indemnity (to protect against loss)
HMO Vs Indemnity Insurance
HMO guarantees to provide health care
services
Major Med-you find your own health care
providers
no network of ;pharmacies/hospitals or
doctors...
Capitation Vs FFS
Capitation-Providers receive a fixed,
monthly payment for each primary
patient
FFS Providers receive a fee for each
service provided
How does provider payment drive
behavior???
How did Health Insurance Start?
Baylor Univ............. hospital in Dallas
Texas 1929
Local teachers paid for hospital and
physician services in advancem,
Was beginning of Blue Cross Blue Shield
How did HMOs start?
Grand Coulee Dam Project -1930s
Kaiser Construction Company needed
health care for workers
Spun off as a separate company after
W.W.II
Group Health Coop-mid 1940s Seattle
A true consumer CO-op
Three Major Types of HMOs
Staff
IPA (Independent Practice Assoc.........)
Group
Staff HMO (i.e............, Kaiser)
Salaried MD, RPh, Nurses
Owns on hospitals/clinics
In House Pharmacies
Does not contract out for pharmacy services
-such as using community pharmacies
IPA ( i.e., Good Health Plan)
Independent physicians, alone or in
groups
Contracts out for pharmacy service and
all other providers
Physicians paid on a fee schedule and/or
risk assumption
Group Model (i.e............, Pacific
Care)
Contracts with medical clinics (exclusive)
Contracts out for pharmacy services and
all other providers
Physicians paid on a fee schedule and/or
risk assumption
POS-Point of Service Model
Variation of all previous models
Allows patient to select non panel
providers and pay more
HMO Issues from
Consumer/Provider/Purchaser Viewpoint
Patient
Purchaser
wants rich benefit package/low cost/high
quality
wants rich benefit package/low cost/high
quality
Provider
high quality and high income
Various HMOs
Cigna (Ins. CO.)
Regence (BCBS-Or)Network
CareOregon (Academic)
Good Health Plan ( Sisters of
Providence)
Various HMOs
Select Care
ODS HMO (Ins. CO.)
Mid Valley IPA-Salem.
HMO Growth-Market Share
Overhead
What Tools are used by Managed Care and
Employers to Manage Costs?
Lower Hospital Admissions
Drug Formularies (list of drugs pd for by
HMO)
Treatment Protocols
Prescribing Protocols (what to prescribe)
Providers at Financial Risk-Changes
treatment patterns/incentives
Cost Mgt Con’t
Centralized Data Analysis
Profile Physician treatment/prescribing
patterns
Hospital Contracting (fixed payments/bed
days)
Patient Profiling
Disease management-Osteoporosis example
Pharmaceutical Care
Drug Use Review
(3) Preferred Provider
Organizations (PPO)
Contractual arrangement among
providers
and employers, / ins. companies..,
to provide services to a defined pop. of
patients
at established fees
Does not assume financial risk
PPO Examples
Provider networks
pharmacies
hospital
doctors
Paid FFS, but less than usual and customary
PPOs were formed to increase sales volume &
to protect market share of participating
providers
4.(PBMs)
Pharmacy Benefit Mgt. CO.
For and non profit corporations
contracted to
Manage the pharmacy benefit for
Insurance companies/MCOs/private
employers, Gvt
PBM Examples
1. Advance PCS
--Originally owned by McKesson Wholesale
Drug CO, Eli Lilly then Rite Aid
Merger with Caremark underway
2. Medco-PAID Prescriptions
Originally owned by Calif. Pharmacists
Association
Spun off in the 1960s by CPHA via action
from US Justice Dept....
Bought by Merck, then spun off as a
separate company in 2004
PBM Examples-CON'T
Diversified Pharmaceutical Services
(DPS)
Originally owned by United Health CareMinneapolis
Then by Smith Kline Beecham-UK
Now ??
Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) and PBMs (1998)
Sen. Wyden requested FTC investigation
re monopoly-restraint of trade
Apparent conflict of interests when PBM
owned by pharm. manuf.
Will PBM tend to push use of own
products v those made by other manuf?
PBM’s –Unregulated Private
Monopoly?
Top 3 PBM’s will have 80% of all Rx
business
Exec from PCS-Caremark merger said it
will increase their leverage with Rx
manuf.
Creighton School of Pharm study-Dr.
Garis.
Sixth Stage: Managed Care Era
(1988-Present)
Definition: Systems, programs or actions
aimed at controlling health care utilization,
costs and promoting quality improvement
Goals:
To foster competition among providers and plans
To incorporate provider risk and incentives to
promote efficiency
To improve and document patient outcomes
To develop critical pathways designed to improve
patient outcomes
Managed Care Organizations (MCOs)by
ownership (MCO is new name for HMO)
Hospital-Sisters of Providence-The Good
Health Plan
Insurance Company-HMOO-Blues
Staff Model-Kaiser/Group Health
Cooperative
Physician-COIHS/Family Care
Academic Medical Center-CareOregonOHSU
Today’s MCOs Possess:
Superior data analysis technology
More Provider risk assumption
More emphasis on medical outcomes
Enhanced purchaser sophistication
drives more accountability
Superior Medical and Drug Technology
www.vips.com/ MC Source
Health Insurance Continuum
1. Pure Indemnity
2. Modified Indemnity
3. PPO
4. PHO/ Group IPA HMO
5. Staff “Pure HMO”
6. Equity HMO
7. Consumer Choice Model/Medical
Savings Accts www.myhealthbank.com
1. Pure Indemnity
No Utilization Review
No Provider Selection
Total Freedom of Choice
FFS Payment
Experience Rated
2. Modified Indemnity
Preadmission certification for hospital
admissions
Concurrent Review
Second Surgical Opinion
3. PPO
Physician Profiling
Providers selected to participate in the
PPO
Consumer Incentives to limit choice of
providers
4. PHO (physician hospital
organization)/Group IPA
Formal Peer Review
Provider Panel in place
Payment to providers using
withholds/Capitation
Community Rated
5. Staff HMO (Kaiser)
Formal peer review
Uses Protocols
Providers are employees/on salary
Group Practice
6. Equity HMO (MidValley IPASalem)
Formal Peer Review, Protocols
Provider Panel
Profit Sharing among docs
Owned by Doctors
7. Consumer Choice –Medical
Savings Accts
www.myhealthbank.com
Offers consumers a variety of choices to
meet individual needs
MSA accts-pay for health care with pre
tax dollars
Pharmacy example
Factors Causing Delivery
System to Change
1. Declining Hospital Use
2. Purchaser Pressure to reduce
costs(Public and Private)
3. MD numbers
1. Declining Hospital Use
Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG Payment
System)
Fixed Fees for hospital services regardless of
hospital costs
Increased outpatient services
Public Lifestyles (wellness…)
Incentives to physicians to not use hospitals
Growth of Managed Care
Purchaser Pressure to Manage
Costs
Increased contracting by employers with
HMOs
Increased demand for
performance/accountability
Increased employer sophistication
MD Numbers
1950-14 MDs/100,000 people nationwide
1980-20 “
1990-24
40% of MDs are over age 50 (2000)
38% will retire within 3 yrs/12% part time
Corvallis has about 100 MDs/50,000 people
Or 2/1000 pop
Australia 2.5/1000; UK 1.7; Canada 2.1;
France 3.0; Germany 3.4; US 2.7
Common Characteristics of
Managed Care Organizations
Factor: Provider Panel/Fee
Schedule/UR Utilization Review
FOC (freedom of choice of provider)
Assume Risk
Sells insurance
How Employers Select/Evaluate
an HMO
Handout/Overhead
NCQA Stds now include Health
Outcomes
HEDIS 3.0
No. CHF pts taking ACE Inhibitors (proposed)
Pt satisfactions survey
Mandatory Disease Management Programs
(Diabetes-see Genesis rpt)
Includes Medicare and Medicaid pt. pop.
Accreditation
NCQA accredits MCOs
Joint Commission accredits hospitals
Joint Commission on Accreditation of
Health Organizations
will move to accredit MCOs also
1935-1996 - Legislative History
Social Sec. Act 1935
Hill Burton Act 1946
Medicare-Medicaid 1965
PSRO 1972
1973 HMO Act
1983 PROs (replaced PSRO)
1996 Health Ins. Portability & Accountability
Act (HIPAA)
Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 Rx benefit
starting 2006
1935-1996 Con’t
1983 PROs (replaced PSRO)
1988 Medicare Catastrophic Coverage
Act
Repealed in 1989
Medicare would have covered outpatient Rx
Funded by Medicare eligibles-not entire
working population of USA
1935-1996 Con’t
1990 OBRA 90 (Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act)
(Medicaid Antidiscriminatory Drug Price and Patient
Benefit Restoration Act)
Mandated Drug manuf. rebates back to Medicaid
rebates based on lowest price drug manuf. charged
to MCOs
Drug Manuf have raised contract prices charged to
MCO, reducing Medicaid rebates $$
OBRA mandated RPh Pt Counseling (Medicaid Pts)
provided basis for St...... Bds Phar to mandate Pt.
Counseling
1935-1996 Con’t
HIPAA (Kennedy Kassenbaum Act)
Main focus is security of patient dataPrivacy
Makes Ins portable from job to job
discussion
Three Health Care Cost
Management Options
1. Regulatory (health care planning-Gvt
control)
2. Market Place Competition-Competing
Delivery systems-little Gvt control
3. Managed Care Approach-Combines
market and regulation approach
Managed Care Approach-Employer Driven
over last few years
Group Practice of Medicine
Characteristics
1. Shared Facilities and equipment
2. Full Time MDs
3. Two or more medical specialists
4. Shared patient responsibility
5. Pooled income (PCs are usually a
partnership-like a law firm with Partners)
Hospitals - General Stats (2001)
Federal Hospitals 264
Community Hospitals 4,956
Not for profit Community-3,012
For profit Community-747
State/Local Gvt-1,197
Handouts for 2002 stats
Hospitals
90% of hosp revenue is from Ins.
must compete for MDs based on
facilities and technology
MDs have admitting privileges, are not
hosp. employees
Hosp has MDs on staff i.e......, ER and
Radiology
Hospitals are Accredited
by Joint Commission
Need accreditation to participate in
Medicare/Medicaid/residencies
Joint Commission
includes AHA, AMA, Am Society Health
Systems Pharmacists
Provider Specialization
80 % of MDs today are specialists
but provide primary care i.e......, Internists,
OBGYN, Pediatrician
MDs have specialty boards
BD Qualified-complete post grad training
BD Certified-training plus residency
No laws covering MD specialist training
regulated by the Medical Profession
Looming shortage of specialists
MD CON'T
MD gains hospital admitting privileges
upon review of medical staff
RPh Specialties
LTCF/Geriatric
Nuclear Pharmacy
Institutional Based Clinical Practice
Health Care Costs.
Overheads handout
Cost of Health Insurance-Kaiser
Study
Ave Annual Premium (family ) $9,068 (2003)
13.9 % increase over 2002
Small business (3-9 workers) 16.6% increase
Mid sized (200-999 workers) 12.4% increase
Ave premium paid by a family grew 1.29%
over 2002 now $201/month.
Single employee pays $42/month.
How Much is a Billion??
billion seconds ago it was early 1950s
billion minutes ago, it was about 2,000
yrs ago
billion dollars in Wash DC was about 10
hrs.
Aging Trends: Ratio of People
Age 20:64 to Those 65+
1955-6.29 to 1
1990-4.69 to 1
2010-4.47 to 1
2030-2.65 to 1
2050-2.59 to 1
(source: WSJ 11-29-99)
Aging Trends
30 Million over age 65 in 1988
40 Million over age 65 by 2011
50 Million over age 65 by 2019
One in Five will be over age 65 by 2030
General Causes of Cost
Increases
Demand Factors
Supply Factors
Demand Factors
Aging Population
Emergence of Chronic Diseases as
Dominant Cause of Morbidity
Increase of environment and behavior
risk factors
Plan Benefit Design
Repeat Hospitalization for Same
Disease
Supply Factors
Life Style (behavior, lack of preventive care)
Increased Utilization
Technology
System Inefficiencies
duplication of services/facilities
waste/fraud
Incomplete electronic medical record system
Cost of Unhealthy Workers
People who smoke one pack per day
have 65 % more hospitalizations than
non smokers
when both have COPD
smoking creates 50 billion in annual
health care costs
25% of pop smoke
Obesity costs employers $12 Billion per
year (2003)
Seat Belt Use
non seat belt user cost 150% more to
treat
than a seat belt user in same type of
accident
Lifestyles that increase costs
(handouts)
lack of exercise
xs weight
smoking
hypertension
cholesterol
lack of seat belt use
Employee Wellness/Weight
Reduction
Obesity increases health care costs and
absenteeism
65% of US pop is overweight (2003) BMI over
25/30% are obese (BMI over 30)
Defined as a BMI for men greater than 27.8;
for women greater than 27.3
Major differences in health care costs noted
for overweight people were age 45 + and
particularly among women
BMI is weight divided in inches squared times
704.5
Ave Annual Health Care Costs for
Employees Age 45+ by BMI (1996)
At Risk Overall-$2,933
At Risk Men-$2,064
At Risk Women-$3,610
Not At Risk-$1,748
Not At Risk Men-$1,202
Not At Risk Women-$2,038
Why Do Hospital Costs Increase
Staff Salaries
Technology
Uncompensated Care
General Costs of doing business
Composition of Medicaid
AFDC 66% of pop/26% of cost
Elderly 15% of pop/37% of cost
Mentally retarded, disabled 12% of pop/
35% of cost
Rx Spending by Year (Billions $)
1999 $105
2000 $121
2001 $139
2002 $160
2003 $184
2004 $212
Pharmacy Expenditures
Approx 11% of total cost
Majority of Rxs 3rd party
Ave...... No. Rxs/yr =4
Ave....... No. Rxs retiree/yr 12
Will become # 1 health care cost
category within 4-5 years
Number 2 in this market behind hospital
spending
Impact of Aging on Health Care
Costs
Study on 3.75 million lives (year 2000 data)
Per capital lifetime cost $316,000
Females $361,200 (2/5th of cost-longer
lifespan
Males $278,700
1/3 of cost middle age
50% during senior years
-survivors to age 85-1/3 of cost in remaining yrs
Health, Life Expectancy and health
spending among elderly
2003 data
Cumulative health spending for healthier
elderly are similar to those for less healthy
elderly who die sooner
Health promotion efforts aimed at persons
under 65 may improve longevity and health
without increasing costs
Healthy age 70+14.3 yrs
Those with at least one limitation in activity of
daily living + 11.6 yrs
Methods to Manage Medication
Costs
1. Maximum Allowable Cost (MAC)
MCO establishes ceiling on generic prices
Average Wholesale Price-AWP
Actual Acquisition Cost-AAC
AWP could be $567.00/AAC could be
$43.00
2. Dispensing fees
Money paid to pharmacist for dispensing
Rx
usually two or three dollars/Rx
Combined with AWP (minus) to pay for
Rxs
AWP-12% plus $2.50 (common fee
structure)
3. Patient Rx Co-Pay
$5.00 generic/$10.00 brand
Percent i.e......, 50% of allowed
charge/$10 minimum
Three Tiered Copay
Higher Rx Copays lowers Utilization of
services
Average Rx Co-pays-Generics
2000 $7.00
2001 $8.00
2002 $9.00
2003 $9.00
Average Rx Co-pays-Preferred
Brand
2000 $13.00
2001 $15.00
2002 $17.00
2003 $19.00
Average Rx Co-pays Non-Preferred
Brand
2000 $17.00
2001 $20.00
2002 $25.00
2003 $29.00
4. Capitation/Risk
Pharmacies unlikely to have risk in future
Dr prescribes so RPh can only do so
much to control costs
Insurance co., HMOs, employers have
financial risk
5. Formularly
List of Drugs paid for by the plan
Developed based on therapeutics and
cost
6. Generic Drugs
Mandated by some plans
always less expensive
are all generics therapeutically
equivalent to brand counterpart???
Lanoxin, Theodur, Premarin, Tegretol...
7. Therapeutic Substitution
Exchanging one brand drug for another
must have MD OK
Amoxicillin for Penicillin
Naprosyn for Ibuprofen
8. Mail Order Prescriptions
May be less expensive than retail on a per Rx
basis
Plan benefit usually structured, in the past, to
reduce patient CoPay
This means Rx use goes up, if patient out of
pocket is less
This means total Rx costs are greater if Mail
Order has lower CoPay
Popular benefit, but not a cost saver for the
MCO
Drug waste on mail order -4-12% of spend
9. Group Buying of Rx items
Hospitals band together to buy in volume
Independent Pharmacies band together
to buy Rx items
Chains are merging to increase buying
power
10. Benefit Design
Lower out of pocket for Rx increases
utilization
11. Treatment Protocol
Lipid Example/Cardiovascular Risk
Assessment
Group Health Evidenced Based MedicineCD
Hospital Cost Management
DRG Diagnosis Related Group
Fixed Fees for Hospital Procedures
Established by Medicare
Commonly used by Ins. companies
Risk Assumption
Physician Cost Management
RBRVS
Resource Based Relative Value System
Fee Schedule for MD Office visits
Established by Medicare
Commonly used by Ins. Companies
Risk Assumption-Capitation
Utilization Review Programs
1. Hospital Based
Pre Admission Certification
On Site Review
Concurrent Review
Severity of Illness Reporting by MD
show overhead
UR- no. 2 Medication Non
Adherence
Definition: Overuse, underuse, misuse
of Rx
$177.4 billion annual cost to the system
(2001 data)
28 % of Medicare hospital Admissions
caused by Rxs
11% adverse reactions
17% non compliance
Compliance Related to Doses
per day
bid- 80% compliance/ tid -60%/ qid 30%
question: To what degree does
compliance with a specific Rx lower total
costs
Nonadherence and Hospitalization
Oral antihyperglycemic Med non adherence and
subsequent hospitalization among people with Type II
Diabetes (Diabetes Care Aug 2004)
Non adherence was defined as a med possession
ration of less than 80%
28.9 % were nonadherent to diabetic meds
18.8 % and 26.9% sere non adherent to
antihypertensive and lipid meds
Hospitalization rates increased when MPR dropped to
80% or less for diabetic pts
3. Drug Utilization Review
(DUR)
Inpatient. Focuses on use of target Rx
items ie., antibiotics
Outpatient Focuses on medication use
patterns
Disease State Management
(DSM)
Readings
DSM targets high cost, chronic diseases
Where interventions can save money in
12 months or less
For plans of under 65 age people
DSM (from RPh point of view)
involves
linking Community Based RPh clinical
services
to MCO
and document outcomes
Handouts-Ashville Project
DSM
promotes patient education and
responsibility
RPh works to improve Rx compliance
to improve adherence to treatment
protocol
Rationing
Occurs in all health care systems based
on
money
coverage
waiting time
Methods to Monitor Health Care
Quality
Judging the Quality of Health
Care
Two Dimensions: Technical Process and
Art of Care
Technical: Was the most appropriate
treatment used?
Art of Care: Manner in which the
Provider interacted with Patient
Technical Care
refers to amount, type and manner of
resource utilization
requires correct diagnosis, proper course
of treatment
requires successfully implementing the
treatment
requires monitoring patient progress
requires stopping treatment if needed
Art of Care
Refers to interpersonal interaction
between provider and patient
Patient Satisfaction measured by survey
instrument
called SF 36. Health Status Short Form
36. 36 questions
measures patient satisfaction with care
provided
Quality Assessment
Accomplished by establishing minimum
standards
and measuring observed care against the
standards
Example: % of pop that should be vaccinated
and Quality Improvement
the organization seeks to improve quality all
the time
Quality Assurance (QA
Programs)
Organization establishes a minimum std
of performance
Develops ways to measure whether or
not the std was met
Measured statistically
Quality Improvement
Total Quality Improvement (TQM)
Based on work of Deming
QI: Quality Mgt and Improvement are
information driven processes that involve
using monitoring procedures to ensure
that continuous improvement is being
obtained
Measuring the Quality of Care
Structure-equipment
Process-how the equipment was used
Outcome-what were the results
Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals
Efficacy: Defines Optimal Practice (clinical
trials for FDA approval)
Effectiveness: Compare actual with optimal
practice (real world or standard care)
Quality Assessment: Evaluate why actual and
optimal practice differ
Quality Improvement: Design interventions to
close gap between actual and optimal
Cost of Illness Analysis
Calculate the Cost of a Disease i.e..,
how much is spent on Diabetes each
year??
Cost Minimization Analysis
Compares costs for comparable
treatments with the same clinical
effectiveness and outcomes
What is the least expensive drug to treat
a disease ?
Cost Benefit Analysis
Measures Costs and consequences only in
dollars
If you lower blood pressure, how much money
does that save?
If your patients are more compliant, how much
money does that save?
CBA could compare costs of a drug or non
drug therapy i.e.., diet/exercise Vs drugs to
control blood pressure
Cost Effective Analysis
Measures costs in relation to therapeutic
objectives in natural units
Cost to reduce blood pressure x number
of points
Cost Utility Analysis
Measures costs of therapeutic
intervention against outcome
preferences by the patient
Cost of cancer drugs against number of
life-years gained by patient and patient’s
preference for his or her quality of life
when taking chemo.
Section II. Health Economics
Overview
Who pays for medical care?
How do they pay for it?
What causes medical care spending to
increase?
Does medical care always increase a patient’s
health status?
Why is government so intimately involved in
medical care and the production of health?
Overview
Why is the cost of producing health such an
important political issue all over the world?
How do other countries provide and pay for
medical care?
What are some of their problems?
What influence does organizational structure
and insurance have on demand for medical
care?
Health Economics Topic Areas
I. Health, Health Economics and
Medical Care
II. Transformation of Medical Care into
Health
III. Policy Issues in Health Care Finance
IV. Global Perspective: Australia,
Canada, Germany, UK and Sweden
I. Health, Health Economics and
Medical Care
A. Unique Aspects
B. Health Care From an Economic
Perspective
C. Factors Influencing Demand for Medical
Care
D. Factors Influencing Demand for Health
Insurance
E. Changes Through Time Influencing Health
Care Markets
II. Transformation of Medical
Care into Health
A. Productivity of Medical Care
B. How Insurance Affects Demand for
Medical Care
C. Role of Quality in Demand for
Medical Care
III. Policy Issues in Health Care
Finance
A. Mandatory Employer Health Ins
B. Uninsured Population
C. Health Care Rationing
D. Erosion of Plan Benefits
E. Rising Premium Costs
F. Managing Process of Care v Managing
Costs
G. Medicare Reform Efforts
IV. Health Care Finance-Global-Australia,
Canada, Germany, UK, Sweden
A.
B.
C.
D.
Financing Mechanisms
Organization of Delivery Systems
Problems
Reorganization Efforts
I (A) Unique Aspects-Health,
Health Econ and Medical Care
Government Involvement
Uncertainty
Asymmetric Knowledge
Externalities
Participants
Government-State
Licenses health care providers/facilities
State Health Insurance Commissioner
Local Public Health Clinics
Others
Uncertainty
Illness is a random event
(Accidents, colds, flu, pneumonia, diabetes,
CHF)
Illness is a behavior driven event
(obesity, diet, exercise, drunken driving)
Uncertainty creates hypochondriac behavior
(illness anxiety)
Asymmetric Knowledge
Licensed health care providers usually
have more knowledge than patients
MD decides what the patient needs to do
and purchase
Managed Care Organizations ( MCOs)
are intervening between MD-Patient re
MD prescribing, requiring Prior
Authorizations ( PA)
Externalities
One person’s actions can create benefits
or costs for others
Communicable diseases ( flu, hepatitis,
e-coli -handwashing-cooking)
Antibiotics in the food supply/Drunken
Driving
Cocaine Use/Violence health care costs
Medication non compliance
Participants
Government
Individual Consumers
Employers
Benefit Consultants
Politicians
Consumer Groups
Insurance Companies
(B) Health Care From an
Economic Perspective
Health as a Durable Good
Health as a Public Good
The Production of Health
Health as a Durable Good
Health is a good that increases a
person’s utility
People seek medical care to
maintain/increase their health/utility
Health as a Public Good
The Health of family/coworkers, or lack
of it, influences us as individuals
How is health status influenced by Wall
Street and the federal budget?
Health as a Public Good:Wall Street and
Health Care ( NEJM-2-25-99)
1987 42% of all HMO enrollees - investor
owned HMO
1997 62%
Investor owned HMOs shaped the health care
market - including non profits
Intensified market place competition
Pushed cost containment to new levels
More monitoring of physicians by non-MDs
Health as a Public Good: Wall
Street and Health Care
Stocks of major hospitals, HMOs and MD
management companies have declined in
recent years
Resulting in Insurance company mergers
Pharmaceutical and biotech stocks are
outperforming market averages
Enbrel-Immunex from Seattle
DeCode-Iceland Project
Health as a Public Good:1997
Balanced Budget Act
Requires Medicare to cut $115 Billion/5 years
Medicare subsidizes non-Medicare patients
Will reduce Medicare payments to hospitals
Will force hospitals to outsource
Increase number of empty beds
Medicare Reform
Health as a Public Good: Trends
HMOs/Insurance companies are experiencing
losses/low margins
Pressure to keep premium increases in check
Increased technology costs
Extremely unhappy patients
cost shifting
non covered items
Federal Patient Bill of Rights
The Production of Health
Involves
Medical Care
Individual Behavior
Environmental Factors
Economic Factors
Others
(C) Factors Influencing Demand
for Medical Care
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Illness Events
Systematic Factors
Consumer Beliefs
Provider Advice
Income
Money Price
Time Price
Medical Care Supply
(C) Factors Influencing Demand
for Medical Care-con’t
9. Changing Inputs into Outputs
10. Input Costs and Final Product Price
11. Laws and Regulations
12. Organizational Structures
13. Final Product Price
14. Individual Behavior and Public
Consequences
15. Rx Drug Advertising
1. Illness Events
Overall Disease Trends in the 20th
Century
Issues in Infectious Diseases
Antibiotics
Iatrogenic Disease (Hospitals)
Chronic Diseases and Infections
20th Century Disease Trends
North America/Europe
Substantial decline in mortality and an
increase in life span
Transitioned from infectious diseases to
chronic
Infections-4.2% of Disability Adjusted Life
Years (DALY)
Chronic/Neoplasms-81.0% of DALYs
DALY-measure of burden caused by disease
and injury
20th Century Infectious Disease
Trends
Substantial declines during first 8 decades
Caused by improvements in sanitation,
medical care, living conditions, economy
Trend reversed in 1981-increase in deaths
from infection
Trend lasted 15 years till 1996-7% red.
Red. Caused by decline in Aids deaths
1900-1980-Three Distinct
Periods
1900-1937-2.3% decline/ yr...
1938-1952-8.2% (sulfonamides 1935,
penicillin 1941, streptomycin 1943)
Para aminosalicylic acid 1944, isoniazid 1952 (
Tuberculosis )
1953-1980-2.8%
Increased from 1981-1996 (AIDS)
AIDS treatments-anti virals, protease inhibitors
Cause of Death World-Wide
1995 ( WHO)
51.9 Million Deaths
33% Infectious Disease
67% Other
Top Ten Infectious Disease
Respiratory-4.4 Million Deaths
Diarrhea-3.1
TB-3.1
Malaria-2.1
Hepatitis B-1.1
HIV/AIDS-1
Measles, Neonatal tetanus, Whopping Cough,
Roundworm, Hookworm
Antibiotics
One-third of all Rxs are inappropriate
50 million Rxs/yr... for cold and viral inf.
Up to 30% of Strep pneumonia resistance to
penicillin
AOM-80% of children recover without
antibiotic Rx
More than 70% of AOM preceded by viral resp
inf.
Dirty hands/surfaces v airborne droplets
Managing Resistance via
Computer Programs
Nosocomial Infections: Hospital acquired
(Vancomycin Use)
NEJM Article-1-22-98
LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City, UT
System reduced
no. days excessive drug dose
adverse events
allergies
MIC matches
Antibiotic Prescribing Trends
Towards more powerful new products
(Zithromax, Biaxin)
Increasing Dose of Amoxicillin
Influenced by:
Patient Compliance
MD MCO Payment
Local Resistance Trends
Reduced Prescribing Antibiotics to
Children
Study published in Pediatrics 2003
Tracked all Rxs for 225,000 children in 9
HMOs from 1996-2000
Antibiotics use dropped 24% in patients
under age 3
25% decline for those age 3-6
16% decline for those age 6-18
Number of Antibiotic Rxs/child per
year by age (1996-2000)
Age 3 months to 3 yrs. (2.46/1.89)
Age 3 -6 (1.47/1.09)
Age 7-18 (0.85/0.69)
Iatrogenic Hospital Disease
Injury induced by the treatment itself
1.3 million injuries per year
$2 billion direct cost per year
20-70 % may be preventable
Adverse Drug Events ( ADEs)-19%
ADE-most common cause of Iatrogenic
Disease
777,000 ADEs causing injury/death/year
AHRQ (4-13-01)
$1.56-$5.6 Billion cost
Iatrogenic Hospital Disease
Approx. 3 hospitalized pts/1000 die-ADE
Approx. 1 will have long term effectsADE
Hospital Information systems reduce
incidence of ADEs
Some ADEs can never be stopped
(Stevens-Johnson Syndrome)
4 articles in handout
Pharmacist –Patient interviews cuts
med errors
Aug 15, 2004 Am J Health System Pharmacy
Rphs and pharm students at Northwestern Mem Hosp
in Chicago
Interviewed 204 pts with 24-48 hrs adm
To identify and resolve any discrepancies between pts
med records, adm profile and actual med regimen
50% of pts had med history discrepancies
22% could have caused harm during hospitalization
59% could have harmed pts after discharge
Intervention cost $5000-saved $39,000
Chronic Diseases and Infections
Ulcers-H-Pylori
Antibiotics and Risk of 1st Acute Myocardial
Infarction ( AMI)
Risk of AMI declines if patient has taken
Tetracycline or Quinolones
Bacteria in mouths can cause
Nephritis
Rheumatoid arthritis
Dermatitis, Pneumonia, Endocarditis
2. Systematic Factors
Rate at which health depreciates over
time
Age, Sex, Occupation, Behavior, Race,
Inherited factors...
3. Consumer Beliefs (Alternative
Medicine)
A broad set of health care practices that are
not readily integrated into the dominant health
care model.
Alternative Medicine poses challenges to
diverse social beliefs and practices
Cultural
Economic
Scientific
Medical & Education
4. Provider Advice
Patient’s don’t always follow expert
advice
non compliance (Rx , treatments - )
OSU Ph D study ( Public Health &
Pharmacy)
5. Income
Individual
Economy in General
Health Insurance
Government subsidies ( Transfer Payments)
Medicare
Medicaid
Public Health Programs
Others??
6. Money Price
Cost of health care items
Out of pocket costs--co payments,
deductibles...
Cost of Health Insurance Premium
7. Time Price
Your Personal Time to see a physician,
schedule something...
8. Medical Care Supply
No. of MDs/100,000 population
1965-139/100,000 population
1995-252/100,000 population
Needed: 145-185/100,000 populationyr.??
Varies considerably by geography and
local wealth
Rural-20% of USA pop. 9% of MDs
9. Changing Inputs into OutputsQuality Counts
Def: The degree to which health services for
individuals and populations increase the
likelihood of desired health outcomes
Quality is in the eye of the beholder
MD-application of evidence-based medicine
Pt.-how long was the wait for an appt or Rx
Employer-no complaints/low cost
Problems with Lack of Quality
that Increase Costs
Costs from Iatrogenic Disease
Physician practice variations
Lack of Information systems (already
discussed)
Treating chronically ill patients in an
acute care model
www.improvingchroniccare.org
Does Quality Care Drive Market
Share
New York State’s physician specific
mortality report for CABG
Physicians & Hospitals with lower
mortality rates have experienced
increased business
How many CABG procedures per year
are needed to attain proficiency?
Hospital Volume and Surgical
Mortality in the US
Mortality decreases as hospital surgical
volume increases
Risk varies with type of procedure
12% diff for pancreatic resection
0.2% diff for carotid endarterectomy
64% diff for aortic aneurysm repair (hosp with
30 or fewer surgeries most risk)
NEJM April 2002, JAMA March 2000.
10. Input Costs and Final
Product Price
What controls the Final Product Price of
a health care item?
11. Laws and Regulations
Health Care Mandates
Coverage mandated by State law
Applies only to health insurance polices controlled
by state health insurance laws
1000 mandates across the USA
Mandates coverage for hairpieces, in vitro
fertilization, pastoral counseling…
Self insured companies are exempt
Mandates impact small business
Cost impact-up to 30%
12. Organizational Structures
Managed Care
Organizational Structures
Have different levels of efficiency and
information systems
Develop locally based on local
needs/politics
An IPA on the West Coast looks different
than those on the East Coast
Therefore create different health care
costs and local financing options
US Health Care System: Drivers
of Change
Employers
Insurers
Gvt
Citizens
Employees
Consumer Choice
Patients; Physicians
Hospitals; Product Suppliers; Dis.Mgt.
Technology
13. Final Product Price
Established by Insurance co., HMO, Gvt
14. Individual Behavior and
Public Consequences
Obesity-Body Mass Index ( BMI) ntl
222=28.6%-Obesity costs 9% of total
Smokers: Health care costs -(millions) $9,473
smokers, non smokers $11,138
Smokers cost less because they have a
shorter life span. (NEJM 10-9-97)
Cost of Violence
Cost of Illegal Drug use/infants born addicted
Habits:
“I’ll take fries with that”
Obesity
Sedentary
life
Tobacco
Risky
behavior
ie
t&
In
fe
ru
gs
ct
io
ns
of
D
Ex
er
ci
se
Il l
ic
it
us
e
ar
m
s
nd
D
&
M
En
ot
vi
or
ro
Ve
nm
hi
en
cl
ta
es
lC
on
ta
m
in
an
Se
ts
xu
al
Be
ha
vi
or
Fi
re
lc
oh
ol
a
To
ba
cc
o
# of deaths
Modifiable Factors Associated
with Deaths USA 1990
400000
350000
300000
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
Prevalence of Overweight among
U.S. Adults, BRFSS, 1989
Source: Mokdad, et al.
<10%
10-15%
>15%
Prevalence of Overweight among
U.S. Adults, BRFSS, 1990
Source: Mokdad, et al.
<10%
10-15%
>15%
Prevalence of Overweight among
U.S. Adults, BRFSS, 1991
Source: Mokdad, et al.
<10%
10-15%
>15%
Prevalence of Overweight among
U.S. Adults, BRFSS, 1992
Source: Mokdad, et al.
<10%
10-15%
>15%
Prevalence of Overweight among
U.S. Adults, BRFSS, 1993
Source: Mokdad, et al.
<10%
10-15%
>15%
Prevalence of Overweight among
U.S. Adults, BRFSS, 1994
Source: Mokdad, et al.
<10%
10-15%
>15%
Prevalence of Overweight among
U.S. Adults, BRFSS, 1995
Source: Mokdad, et al.
<10%
10-15%
>15%
Prevalence of Overweight among
U.S. Adults, BRFSS, 1996
Source: Mokdad, et al.
<10%
10-15%
>15%
Prevalence of Overweight among
U.S. Adults, BRFSS, 1997
Source: Mokdad, et al.
<10%
10-15%
>15%
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults
BRFSS, 1998
(*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’4” woman)
No Data
<10%
10%-14%
15-19%
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 2000;282:16
20%
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults
BRFSS, 1999
(*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’4” woman)
No Data
<10%
10%-14%
15-19%
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 2000;284:13
20%
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults
BRFSS, 2000
(*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’4” woman)
No Data
<10%
10%-14%
15-19%
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 2001;286:10
20%
Percentage of Obese Oregonians
1993 - 2000
% of Oregonians
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
Year
1998
1999
2000
Percentage of Adults Getting Any Physical
Activity 30 Minutes Per Day, 5 Days Per Week
% adults physically active
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Men
Women
Individual Behavior
Factors Associated with Women’s Adherence
to Mammography Screening Guidelines
27% of women had the age-appropriate number of
exams
More likely to adhere if they reported participating
with their MD in the decision to be screened
Were younger, had smaller families, higher
education/income…see article
Individual Behavior
Public Health/Pharmacy PHD study
Asthmatic patients in OHP
Ambulatory patients managed by a RPh
working with pts MD
Better outcomes achieved if MD actively
participated in process/supported
Individual Behavior-Rx nonadherence
Costs more than we spend on outpatient
Rxs/yr...
Creates health care costs = 125% of Drug
Spend
Better educated AIDS patients are more
compliant
57% of College grads v 37% of high school
dropouts were compliant
Education makes no difference with diabetic
patients compliance
Statin 1 in 4 elderly pts compliant after 5 yrs
15. Rx Drug to Consumer
Advertising
Spending $2.5 Billion in 2000
$1. 8 Billion spent 1999
Up 40% over 1998
Total promotional spending 1999 $13.9 Billion
Ten Rx items=41% of spending (1999)
Claritin $137.4 million/Propecia $99.7/Viagra
$93.5/Prilosec $79.5/Xenical $75.5/Lipitor
$55.5/Zyban $54.8/Nolvadex $54.4/Flonase
$53.5
$125 mill on Vioxx-more than spent on Pepsi
ads in 2000
Rx Advertising Spending 2001
(Billions $)
$2.6 DTC Ads
$5.2 MD Sales Calls
$10.5 on Free Samples.
Rx Advertising 2002
$2.6 DTC
$6.2 MD Sales Calls
$11.9 on Free Samples
D. Factors Influencing Demand
for Health Insurance
1. Financial Risk
2. Price of Insurance
3. Tax Laws
4. The Supply of Health Insurance
5. Interaction of Insurance, Employers
and Medical Markets
1. Financial Risk
Most people seek insurance to avoid the
high cost of illness
Some high income people do not
purchase health insurance
Reflects individual attitude towards risk
assumption
2. Price of Insurance/4. Supply of Ins., & 5. Interaction of
Ins., Employers and Medical Markets
Most prominent feature of Am. Health Ins
coverage is its slow erosion
Americans without health ins grew from 14.2%
in 1995 to 16.1%-1997 (43.4 million people)
2001 16.5 % of pop without ins-17.3% 2002
No. of people underinsured grew faster
Caused by deterioration of employer provided
coverage-the source of coverage for nearly
two in three people
2/4/5. Why?
Because health care prices have increased
more rapidly than income (Kronick Article
Health Affairs Mar/Apr 1999)
Lack of insurance is correlated to low income
annual income xs $75 K; 8% with no ins
annual income less than $25K 24% with no ins
2/4/5.
50% of those below Medicaid poverty
line had at least 1 month with no ins.
31.6% of all the poor had no ins at all in
1997
52% of all employees below poverty
level had no ins 1996.
2/4/5.
Employers health care premiums
increased 218 % (1980-1993)
Inflation adjusted GDP rose by 17%
during same time period
Average cost of a family policy PPO is
above $10,000 per year (2004)
Average worker pays $558 for single
coverage/$2,661 family plan/yr 2004
2/4/5.-What Caused the Erosion in
Coverage-Insured and Underinsured?
1. Rising Premiums (Technology/
Demographics/Utilization)
2. Trend toward Temporary Workers
3. Benefit reductions-most notable Rx drugs
4. Coverage Limits-excluded items.
5. Shift from HMO to POS (requires out of
pocket payment-pt then submits for payment
to ins co.)
Con’t
6. Loss of Medicaid Coverage due to
Welfare Reform passed by Congress
7. Rising cost of Medigap coverage for
over 65.
8. Reduction in services to illegal
immigrants (in some states)
3. Tax Laws
Health insurance premiums and
expenses are tax deductible
US Tax Code subsidizes health care
purchases
E. Changes Through Time Influencing
Health Care Markets
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Changes in Overall Economy
Demographics
Technology
Price and Spending Patterns
Growth in Medical Prices
Medical Spending Patterns
1. Changes in Overall Economy
A robust economy should be able to
afford health care ins for employees
Is this the case now Vs 1945-60s??
Why was health insurance added as an
employee benefit after WWII?
2. Distribution of US Pop by
Age/Year
Y2000 (%)
Under 5-6.9
5-13 13.1
14-17 5.7
18-24 9.6
25-34 13.6
35-44 16.3
45-64 22.2
65 + 12.6
85 + 1.6
100 + 0.0
Y2020
6.8
12.0
5.3
9.3
13.3
12.3
24.6
16.5
2.0
0.1
Source WSJ 11-29-99
Y2050
6.9
12.1
5.4
9.2
12.5
12.0
21.8
20.0
4.6
0.2
3. Technology
New Technologies substitute for older
ones at higher cost
Rx Industry is an examplewww.pharma.org
Genetically engineered drugs
i.e.., treat breast cancer without side
effects
Enbrel for RA
3. Technology
Genetic information varies from person to
person
Pharmacogenomics-study of genes to
determine how DNA variations diminish or
amplify drug effect
Can have a drug for 1% of population
Hep C and Peg Intron
Genetic Testing for Rx-Patient Compatibility
4/5/6.Price, Spending and Growth in
Medical Expenditures
Spending Trends
1997 Spending was $1.092 trillion
(13.5% GDP)
2007 Projected $2.1 trillion (16.6%
GDP)
Gvt spending-40% of total in 1990
Gvt spending -41.8 % 1992
Gvt spending-46% 2001-44.2 % 2002
4/5/6.-Role of Employers
Paid for 60% of health care costs
Deducted as a business expense
4/5/6-Role of Government
As modern economies prosper-more is
spent on health care
Countries with per capita incomes above
$8,500 accounted for 89% of global
health spending in 1994
These countries comprised 16 % of
global pop.
7% of DALYs
4/5/6. US-Spends More per Capita than
other Countries-Why?
1. MDs in US are paid more/unit of
service
2. US hospital costs are higher
3. Medical technology diffuses more
rapidly and used to treat more people
4/5/6. Medicaid Funding
Covers 51. million people
Costs $257 billion 2002
4/5/6. Medicare Funding-4
Sources
1. Mandatory contributions from employers
and employees
2. General Tax revenues
3. Beneficiaries Premiums
4. Deductibles and co-payments pd by
patients (supplemental ins.)
Part A-Hospital Trust Fund
Part B-MD, Outpatient, Home Health..$78.20
2005 monthly premium
Part D. Rx-premium and co pays
4/5/6. Contributions of
Individuals
Out of Pocket spending-17.2% of all ntl
health spending
Drugs the largest single cat of out of
pocket
4/5/6. Five General Factors
Driving Health Care Spending
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Population Growth
Economy wide Inflation
Excess Medical Inflation
Per Capita Use of Services
Intensity
The Internet and Health Care
Ultimate Knowledge Business
Impacts
Organization of health care services (MD
referrals/selection)
Information available to consumers
Provision of services (cyberspace HMO)
Data analysis
Data acquisition and storage
Examples from the net
II. Transformation of Medical
Care into Health
A. Productivity of Medical Care
B. How Insurance Affects Demand for
Medical Care
C. Role of Quality in Demand for
Medical Care
A. Productivity of Medical Care
1. Marginal and Ave Productivity
2. Productivity Changes on Extensive
Margin
3. Productivity Changes on Intensive
Margin
4. Evidence on Aggregate Productivity
of Medical Care
5. Aggregate Data Comparisons
A. Productivity of Medical Care
6. Prospective, Randomized Clinical
Trials
7. Evidence on Productivity of Specific
Treatments
8. Medical Practice Variations on the
Extensive Margin
9. Variations in Physician Practice
Patterns
1. Marginal and Average
Productivity
For almost every medical intervention, there is
a point at which Incremental Productivity
(Marginal) of medical care could become
negative.
However the Average Productivity can be high.
On Average, Medical Care has been
beneficial, but after a point, overall benefits
can decline
2. Productivity Changes on
Extensive Margin
Productivity of health care resources varies
with total amount used
Marginal productivity of health care resources
will increase at low levels where none existed
before i.e.., penicillin where none had been
used before
Marginal productivity will fall as more
resources are used
Large amts of care-Iatrogenic Disease
2. Productivity Changes on
Extensive Margin
Inpatient Practice Patterns-Oregon v
Florida (NEJM-1994)
FL MDs used 53% more resources per
Medicare patient admission than did OR
MDs-no apparent diff in outcomes
Study was case mix adjusted
Is an example of variation in MD practice
patterns
Medicare Spending-Miami,
MPLS, Portland & Orange CA
Age,Sex and Race adjusted spending for FFS
Medicare Pts
Miami 1996 $8,414-MPLS $3,341
Portland is about same as Minneapolis
Higher spend does not produce better health
outcomes
Means more spending on physicians and
hospital stays
If high cost areas were reduced to low cost
areas, Medicare costs would decline 30% or
$120 billion per year.
3. Productivity Changes on the
Intensive Margin
Frequency of doing something
How often should a 40 yr.... old get a
physical
How often should a 50 yr.... old get a
physical
How often PSA screenings,
mammograms?
4. Evidence on Aggregate
Productivity of Medical Care
How much health care do we get from our
current patterns of medical care use?
JAMA study-Prof... Ware, using the SF 36,
Health Status Survey-1996
4 yr.., 2235 patients comparing FFS v HMO
Patients were age 18-97
hypertension, NIDDM, AMI, CHF, Depr.
4. Results-JAMA study
Physical health declined and mental health
remained stable during 4 yr.. follow up
physical declines larger for elderly than
nonelderly
Over 65 declines in health were more common
in HMOs v FFS 54% v 28%
Conc. Elderly and poor chronically ill pts had
worse health outcomes in HMOs
4. Results-NEJM studyCanada/US AMI
Canadian pts. Hospital stay 1 day longer
Much lower rate of cardiac cath/ angioplasty,
and CABG
At one yr.., 24% of Canadians, 53% of US-had
angioplasty or CABG
Canadians-more visits to GPs, but fewer to
specialists
At 30 days, functional status was same
4. Results
After one year, US pts had substantially
more improvement
Prevalence of chest pain and dyspnea at
1 yr.. was higher among Canadians
34% v 21% (chest pain) & 45% v 29%
(dyspnea)
5. Aggregate Data Comparisons
Comparing Mortality Data Among
Hospitals to Assess Quality of Care
Are death rate comparisons among
hospitals valid comparison?
6. Prospective, Randomized
Clinical Trial Data
The gold standard of research
FDA’s favorite study design
Method used for many drug, population,
medical studies
Prospective trials involving control and
experimental groups
Treatment and non-treatment arms
7. Evidence on Productivity of
Specific Treatments
Use of Beta blockers post AMI-JAMA 1998
115,015 patients 65 and older
50% (USA av.) received a beta blocker post
AMI hosp. Discharge
30-38% in Oregon
Among ideal pts., 1 yr.. death rate was 7.7%
for those getting b-blocker; 12.6% for those
not getting the drug
7. Evidence-con’t-JAMA Oct
2000
Use of Beta blockers post AMI
% of patients who received beta blocker upon
discharge
National Ave 75%
Oregon 77%
Alaska 73%
California 68%
Washington 66%
Hawaii 51%
7. Evidence-con’t
Wide variation in use of coronary
angiography after AMI
rates of angiography inversely related to
risk of death from heart disease and risk
of heart events
Pts followed for 1-4 yrs after AMI
Prescribing Variations for Cox II
–Vioxx/Celebrex
27% Rxs were for lower back pain-not
approved indication
Over 50% had less than a 60 day supply over
a 1 year follow up, so drugs are not used for
long term therapy when stomach
bleeds/problems most common
50% were taking 325 mg ASA which negates
COX II effects
74% of pts had no history of GI risks
Celebrex as effective as naproxyn
8. Medical Practice Variations
on the Extensive Margin
Productivity can vary with amount of care
provided
Similar to previous slide “productivity
changes”..medical practice variations
drive productivity variations to some
degree
8. Con’t
Hospital Readmission RatesBoston/New Haven. NEJM 1994
Medicare Claims study
AMI, stroke, GI bleed, hip fracture,
surgery (breast, colon, lung cancer)
Boston’s hosp readmit rate was higher
No difference in outcomes
8. Con’t
Place of Death
Medicare data base
1992-1993
38.7% of all deaths occurred in hospital
Marked variations in all 306 hospital regions in
US
Low was 22.5 % in PDX
High was 53.5% in Newark
9. Variations in Physician
Practice Patterns
What is severity of illness adjusting-how
does it work?
Why do it at patient or hospital level
Software to study this subject
www.vips.com
9. What is SOI
Some patients, who have the same
disease, are more ill than others
There are a variety of computerized
systems that “risk adjust”
Some are based on key clinical findings
(abstract the medical record)
Others are based on information from
discharge abstracts
9. Do Different Systems
Produce Different Results?
MedisGroups-predicted death rates for
pneumonia & stroke well (medical record
abstracting)
Disease Staging-AMI (computerized
discharge abstracts)
MC Source/Episode Treatment Groups
9. Why do it?
Managed Care Report Cards will not go
away
No other way to dialogue with MDs re
quality of care
Avoid penalizing providers ( Hospital and
MD) who treat high risk patients
i.e.., New York CABG data by MD
B. How Insurance Effects
Demand for Medical Care
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Co-Payments, Deductibles
Co Insurance Rae
Indemnity
Max/Min out of pocket
Prior Authorizations
1. Co-Payments, Deductibles
Impact of Co-payments/Deductibles on
Utilization and Cost
Are Income sensitive
PERS-Data (AHCPR Study)
Group Health Study
Benefit Design, Federal Subsidies
(Designing a Medicare Rx Benefit-Health
Affairs 4/2000)
Medicare Benefit-Issues
What is covered-Formulary
Amount of Tax Subsidy
Who is eligible
Co-pays
Open Enrollment Period
Who will manage it? Feds or Ins/PBMs
Who has financial risk-Feds or Ins co.
Who has oversight?
2. Co-Insurance Rate
Patient pays a percent i.e.., 20%, Plan
the balance
Typical for indemnity/major medical
3. Indemnity
To indemnify-Protect against loss
Traditional Insurance, no MD or
Pharmacy network
Patient seeks out own provider, submits
a paper claim
4. Max/Min Out of Pocket
Patient must meet a front end deductible
Benefits Max out at a certain level of
spending
Common in Rx benefit design
5. Prior Authorizations
NEJM Study-Limiting Ambulatory Rxs
and LTCF Admits
NEJM Study-Limiting Psychotropic Rxs
and use of Acute Mental Health Services
PA on ambulatory Rxs by MCOs
Celebrex
Viagra
Enbrel; Prilosec; OHP--Claritin, Flonase
Guidelines for Submitting Clinical &
Economic Data-Formulary Consideration
Washington’s Regence Health Program ( King
County Medical)
Requires Drug Manuf to submit
Clinical
Prospective and Retrospective Economic
Evaluations
CBA, CEA studies
Same format used by Australia to determine drug
listings for their formulary
Quality of Care
What is quality?
How should it be measured?
Who should be held accountable for
providing quality health care?
What are the consequences of poor
quality?
C. Role of Quality in Demand for
Medical Care
1.
2.
3.
4.
Evaluation of Health Care Quality
HEDIS
Consumer Reports
Consumer Satisfaction Surveys
1. Evaluation of Health Care Quality-6
Challenges in Measuring Quality
1. Identify and balance competing
perspectives of major participants
Quality is in the eye of the beholder
Purchaser-how well are $ being spent/lack
of complaints/others??
Patients-cost/access/waiting times/any
problem can be fixed…
MDs-mixed: financial/own judgement/patient
demands
1. Evaluation-Con’t
2. Develop an Accountability Framework
Joint Commission (JCAHO)
NCQA-HEDIS
Public release of inf relation to quality of care
delivered by plan, hospital, medical group, MD-implies that the entity is responsible for results
reported
Reporting same measures for similar groups
implies it’s reasonable to compare?
1. Evaluation-Con’t
3. Establish explicit criteria for judging
performance (annual mammograms)
4. Indicators for External Reporting
(Which HEDIS indicators should be
reported)
5. Balance financial and quality goals
6. Facilitate Information system
development
HEDIS-NCQA www.ncqa.org
HEDIS is a set of standardized
performance measures designed to
ensure that purchasers and consumers
have the info needed to reliably compare
MCO performance.
Measures Process and some outcomes
www.ncqa.org
Process Measures-% Who
received
Flu Shots
Vaccinations
Diabetic eye exams
Breast Cancer screenings
Cholesterol Mgt. after AMI
Beta Blocker post AMI
Outcome Measures
Patient satisfaction with health plan
Patient functioning in daily lives
3/4. Consumer Reports/Consumer
Satisfaction Surveys
Oregon Coalition of Health Care
Purchasers
reviewed 11 HMOs and PPOs in PDX area
Did patient get information, was MD
courteous, MD communication skills, any
problems getting health care
random sample, no mention if patients
surveyed in each health plan were similardemographically...
III. Policy Issues in Health Care
Finance
A. Mandatory Employer Sponsored Health
Insurance
B. Uninsured Population
C. Health Care Rationing
D. Erosion of Plan Benefits
E. Rising Premium Costs
F. Managing Process of Care v Managing
Costs
G. Medicare Reform Efforts
A. Mandatory Employer
Sponsored Health Insurance
National Ave-per employee health care
costs 1998-$4,033/yr
Most small businesses oppose
mandatory ins.
Less than half of small business
employees now receive ins via employer
# declined between 1996/1998 from 52%
to 47%
B. Uninsured Population-NY
Times Feb 26, 1999
43.4 million lacked ins-1997(44.2 million lacked ins 1998-16.3% of pop)
(42.5 million lacked ins 1999-15.5% of pop)
Men more likely than women to go without ins.
18% v 15%
15% under age 18
30% between ages 18-21
23% between ages 25-34
17% between ages 35-44
14% between ages 45-64; 1 % over 65
B. Uninsured POP-Families USA
June 2004
43.6 million uninsured in US 2002
81.8 million 1 out of 3 or 32.2 % under 65 were
without health insurance for all or part of 20022003
65 % were uninsured for six or more months
84 % of those without health ins held jobs
14% of Oregon’s pop is uninsured
B. Uninsured Pop.
49% of full time workers with incomes
below poverty line lack ins. Compared to
17% of all full time workers
Hispanics-34%
Blacks 22%
Asians 21%
Whites 15%
All care is rationed, one way or anotherby employment, income, waiting lists,
availability.
OHP-Rationing
Prioritized all health care services into a
rank ordered list
Based on what is covered, not who
List of covered treatments is based on
relative effectiveness of medical service
OHP covers uninsured workers and
traditional Medicaid pop.
OHP-What is Covered
Treatments below the line are not
covered
Line is now 578
Line 1 is Head Injury
Line 2 is Diabetes
Line 745-Radial Karatotomy
Below the Line
Low Back Pain
Infertility
Allergic Rhinitis
Common cold
Most fungal infections
Oregonian Survey of OHP 2-399
75% of OHP eligibles received all the care
they needed 1997-1998
1 in 4 ran into some kind of barrier to the care
they needed
OHP Barriers to receiving necessary/desired
care
42% service not covered
38% physical/mental disability
34% service denied by MD/plan
OHP
Barriers
15% wanted to use alternative care provider
13% location
11% language
11% personal barrier
3% sign-language interpreter not available
D. Erosion of Plan Benefits
Increased patient co-payments
Increased patient pay premiums
Cost shifting in general
More non covered items
E. Rising Premium Costs
Previously reviewed
F. Managing Process of Care v
Managing Cost
What is the difference??
Which one is easier to accomplish??
G. Medicare Reform-The
Problem
Health care expenditures for Medicare pts
grow 4% more rapidly that the GDP
The # of elderly are growing 1% faster than
the rest of the population
Elderly consumption of care is growing rapidly
If current trends continue till 2020, cost/yr will
be $25,000 (1995 dollars) v $9,200 in 1995
G. Medicare Growth Caused by:
Growth in Technology
Use of services (no outpatient Rx)
7 Technologies
Angioplasty
CABG
Cardiac Cath
Carotid endarterectomy
Hip & Knee replacement
Laminectomy
G. Medicare: Who Pays Now?
89% of Medicare revenue from taxes
paid by people under age 65; income
taxes; interest on the Medicare Trust
Fund
11% from monthly premiums from
recipients
G. Medicare: Who Receives
Benefits?
34 million people over age 65
5 million of whom are permanently
disabled
284,000 of whom - end stage renal
75% have household annual Inc. under
$25,000
When Medicare per capita expenditures
Ave $4,083
G. Medicare: How Much Does
the Ave Person Contribute?
Most beneficiaries receive far more than they
contribute
A couple retiring in 1998, with one wage
earner
Who paid Ave Medicare Taxes since 1966
Paid in $16,790 + Employer contribution
Part A future benefits EST. $109,000
G. Medicare: What Can Be
Done?
1. Slow the growth of health care
spending
Decrease mat paid for services/products
Product more with fewer resources
Slow the rate of growth of services to
patients
Will cut quality of care
Quality of life will decline
Patients will complain to Congress
G. Medicare: What Can Be
Done?
2. Find ways to pay for more health care
More taxes
Higher Medicare premiums
Higher Co-pays
Implement a Voucher System
G. Medicare: What Can Be
Done?
3. Restructure the Delivery System
Mandatory MCOs?
Eliminate practice variations?
G. Medicare: Balance of
Payments/State
Oregon Taxpayers pay out $385 Million
more than we get from Medicare
Wash DC, receive $638 millions over
what they paid in taxes
Florida receive $6,822 millions
Pennsylvania receive $2,408 millions
IV. Health Care Finance: A Global
Perspective: Australia, Canada,
Germany, UK & Sweden
Harvard, Commonwealth Fund
Study-AU, Canada, NZ, UK, US
25% of respondents said their system
works “pretty well”
One in three called for “complete
rebuilding”-US, NZ, AU
23% of Canadians, 14% of UK would
“completely rebuild”
Major Concern
US-Affordability
Canada, NZ, UK, -Gvt Funding
AU, NZ, - Waiting Time
US
US families are most likely to report
access to care problem US has the highest proportion reporting
a time when they did not get needed
care
US-28% say getting needed care is
“difficult”
US-one in three have no regular MD
Access to Care
Canada and NZ - Access problem similar to
those in US
Canadians are particularly concerned about
access to specialists-50% say its difficult
Waiting Times-non emergency- longest in UK,
shortest in US
44% of UK pts-MD will come to their home
nights/weekends. (UK residents least likely to
report access difficulties
Western European Health Care Reforms
(Health Affairs-Mar/Apr 99) WHO Study
Four Reform Themes
1. Roles of State and Market
2. Decentralization
3. Patient’s Rights
4. Role of Public Health
1. Role of State and Market
Presumption of public primacy is being
reassessed
Some countries use elements of both
Combining market-style incentives with
continued public sector ownership and
operation of facilities
2. Decentralization
Decentralization of administrative and
sometimes policy authority to lower levels in
the public and private sector
This requires a supportive environment of:
Sufficient local Adm. and mgt. capacity
ideological certainty in implementing tasks
readiness to accept several interpretations of one
problem
3. Patients’ Rights
More patients want a greater say in
selecting a MD or hospital
Also want some say re clinical matters
4. Role of Public Health
Issues of health promotion and disease
prevention exist
In practice, health services have a
limited impact on health status of a
population
Education, housing, employment, &
agriculture have a greater impact
Strategies for Policy
Intervention-WHO
1.
2.
3.
4.
Confronting Resource Scarcity
Funding Health Care Systems
Allocating Resources
Delivering Services
1. Confronting Resource
Scarcity
Cost control--demand side
1. Cost sharing - most place little
emphasis on pt co-pays
2. Priority setting - Always existed in
Europe and was focused on implicit
choices made by MDs to explicit choices
made by a public political process
have restricted payments for a few things
1. Con’t
3. Supply Side strategies
a wide range of things here such as
reducing MD production
# of hospital beds
controlling price of health care workforce
global budgets
changing ways providers are paid...
2. Funding Systems
UK, Nordic Countries, Ireland--predominantly
tax-funded system and have universal access
These countries are committed to a public
sector role
Austria, Belgium, France, Germany,
Luxembourg, Switzerland--long established
statutory ins based systems
Are social ins systems & similar goals
3. Allocating Resources
1. Direct contracting (UK)
And this is an alternative to traditional
command and control
Gvt acts as a purchasing agent for citizens
2. Payment shifts
Change to performance related approaches
(ffs tied a negotiated schedule/capped
spending...
4. Delivery Services Efficiently
Quality of care programs
Outcomes assessment
Clinical guidelines
Problems are in lack of good data
How has all this worked?
Supply side reforms have worked quite
well-limit amt spent
Demand side-less successful
The few countries that tried to
incorporate privately accountable payers
within a public structure encountered
problems-Dutch, Swedes,
How is it worked?
Many European countries have rejected
cost sharing because of problems
related to equity,
Are now looking hard at Rx copayments…
But universal coverage remains a
bedrock of their cultures
Australia
Private ins in in a death spiral
Gvt wants to give private ins holders a
30% rebate
Gvt has shifted many costs to private
sector in recent years, so people quit
and went back to public programs
Private system will fail given current
trends without cost relief from gvt
Canada
Each province has its own system, with
fed/provincial funding-a Universal system
Fed share of funding has declined-increasing local funding problems
Some provinces have cut more than
others
Canada in 2002-Health Care
Reform Top Political Issue
Majority of citizens believe system needs
reforming
Medical Savings Accts/Improve Primary
Care Delivery/Contract with private for
profit providers etc.
Budget Problems driving change
Canada Waiting Times
Cancer pts wait 3 x longer than US pats for
treatment (1/3 longer than Canadian MDs
thought ok)
Weighted Ave wait for surgery is 6.8 weeks,not including wait to see surgery specialist of
5.1 weeks
Diagnostic assessment (MRI…) 3.7-11.1
weeks varies by province
MDs in BC went on strike last month
Germany
Has a century old universal system
Is an employment based ins system founded
by Chancellor Bismarck in 19th Century
Past 20 yrs-passed laws trying to control costs
and keep premium growth from exceeding
employee incomes
Most recent attempt is 1992 Health Structure
Law
Germany-Health Structure Law
Imposed global budgeting on MDs
Placed limits on # of MDs who be
admitted into Ins Practice
Fixed budgets for hospitals
Accelerated DRG system
Tight controls on Rx costs
Fundamental change locked in political
stalemate
Germany
Political stalemate It’s legal system largely blocks market driven
changes
It has a national “any willing provider law”
Has unified physician self governance (Direct
relationships between docs or groups of docs
and health ins funds is not possible)
UK
NHS was created in 1948-is a publicly
financed system-universal access
PM Thatcher introduced reforms in 1991
GPs and Hospitals could become mini
HMOs & have capitated risk for an pre
determined # of pts
UK
Concept partly developed by Prof.. Alain
Entohoven of Stanford author of “Managed
Competition”
GP & Hospitals compete for patients using
public dollars
-sounds to me a lot like the OHP
NHS hospitals are now called Trusts
Primary care providers now form General
Practice fundholders
UK
has it worked?
PM Tony Blair’s government has
dismantled the competition experiment in
favor of more central control.
Health Affairs Article 2002.
Sweden
Developed reforms like UK
The changes caused major problems
lack of trust between providers/purchasers
gvt feared losing control
posed a threat to their fundamental principles of
equal access
(prbls-lack of total cost control,poor mgt., gvts need
for central control)
2002 1 out of 6 working age Swedes is off work
because of illness or injury.
Disability pensions often larger than work income.
16% of ntl budget
END