the NETT and COPDgene
Download
Report
Transcript the NETT and COPDgene
Nathaniel Marchetti, DO
Temple University
Philadelphia, PA
The National Emphysema
Treatment Trial (NETT)
NETT Productivity
>75 peer reviewed publications using NETT data
Who should and should not have LVRS?
What did we learn about emphysema?
Pathobiology of emphysema
Genetics
Role of hyperinflation
Hemodynamics in advanced emphysema
Measurements of lung function in severe empysema
Racial differences in severe emphysema
Mortality in emphysema
Medical therapy in severe emphysema
Oxygen use in severe emphysema
Criner et al, AJRCCM, 2011
NETT Design
17 clinical centers
Randomized 1,218 patients to medical therapy or medical
therapy plus LVRS
Screened 3,777
Pulmonary function
FEV1 15% to 45%
TLC >105%
RV > 150%
No significant cardiac disease or pulmonary HTN
No other pulmonary diseases present
Bilateral emphysema amenable to LVRS
Upper lobe predominant
Diffuse
NETT Research Group Chest, 1999
NETT Design
Pulmonary rehab
16-20 sessions pre-randomization
10 sessions post-randomization
Long term maintenance
Aggressive bronchodilator therapy
Surgical therapy
Bilateral stapled resection of 25-30% of lung
Median sternotomy at 8 centers
VATS at 3 centers
6 centers randomized to MS vs VATS
NETT Research Group Chest, 1999
NETT Design
Anesthesia
Intra-operative care standardized
Median sternotomy patient has epidural catheters
Extubation within 2 hours
Physical therapy started on 1st post-op day
NETT Research Group Chest, 1999
Outcomes
Primary
Survival
10 W improvement on CPET
Secondary
Quality of life
Cost effectiveness
Pulmonary function
CT scans and nuclear perfusion scans
Oxygen requirement
6 minute walk distance
Cardiovascular measures (echo)
NETT Research Group Chest, 1999
Survival
Surgical 90-day mortality = 7.9%
Medical 90-day mortality = 1.3%
NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
Survival
High risk group
FEV1 < 20% predicted
+
Either DLCO < 20% or
homogeneous emphysema
Surgical 30-day mortality = 16%
Medical 30-day mortality = 0%
NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
Survival excluding high risk
Surgical 30-day mortality = 2.2%
Medical 30-day mortality = 0.2%
NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
Survival
UL and low exercise = YES
UL and high exercise = NO
NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
Survival
Non-UL and low exercise = NO
Non-UL and high exercise = NO
NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
Exercise performance all patients
Months
6
12
24
10 watt improvement
LVRS
Medical Rx
28%
4%
22%
5%
15%
3%
p value
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
Durability of LVRS
High risk patients excluded
Naunheim et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
Durability of LVRS
UL/Low Exercise
UL/high Exercise
Naunheim et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
Durability of Exercise
UL/Low
UL/High
Naunheim et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
Quality of Life Durability
MCID for SGRQ is -4 but a
priori was -8 for NETT
Naunheim et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
PaO2 Following LVRS
Snyder et al, AJRCCM 2008
O2 needs following LVRS
Snyder et al, AJRCCM 2008
LVRS Enhances CO2 Elimination
During Exercise
Sub-study CPET
with a-line (n=47)
Criner et al, Chest 2009
LVRS Improves f/VT Index
Criner et al, Chest 2009
LVRS Reduces Exacerbations
Surgical 0.27 exacerbations/patient-year
Medical 0.37 exacerbations/patient-year
30% reduction (13-48%, p=0.0005)
Washko et al, AJRCCM 2008
Most important lessons from
NETT?
LVRS works!!
Interventions to improve survival
Smoking cessation
Oxygen
LVRS
LVRS improves
Oxygenation and oxygen requirements
Favorable alters breathing patterns
Reduces exacerbations
Who should not get surgery?
NETT Research Group NEJM, 2001
Who should not have LVRS?
Criner et al, PATS 2008
Durability of non-UL/high exercise
Naunheim et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
Who should not have LVRS?
Criner et al, PATS 2008
α-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency
16 patients had severe deficiency (<80 mg/dL)
10 randomized to surgery
7 had upper lobe predominant emphysema
Compared to the 6 that had medical Rx
LVRS mortality was higher (20% vs 0%)
Compared to normal α-1 AT levels
Less improvement in exercise
Less improvement in FEV1 response
Stoller et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2007
What did NETT teach us
about surgical
techniques?
LVRS and Air Leaks
580/608 patients had surgery
Air leak data available on 552
90% had air leak in first 30 days
Presence of air leak not effected by
Surgical approach (VATS vs MS)
Use of any buttressing agent (fibrin glue, etc)
Stapler brand
Intraoperative procedures
Pleurodesis
Tenting
DeCamp et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
Duration
Median 7 days
DeCamp et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
Consequence of air leak
No difference in mortality
Longer hospital stay (11.8+6.5 vs 7.6+4.4 d,
p=0.0005)
Increased pneumonia (20% vs 7.4%)
Increased ICU admission (9.3% vs 1.9%)
DeCamp et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
Risk Factors
Increased risk and duration
Lower diffusion capacity (p=0.06)
Upper lobe disease (p=0.04)
Presence of moderate to severe adhesions (p=0.007)
Increased Duration
Caucasian race (p<0.0001)
Use of inhaled steroid (p=0.004)
Lower FEV1 (p=0.0003)
DeCamp et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
Video Assisted Thorascopy (VATS)
vs Median Sternotomy (MS)
8 centers used MS
3 used VATS
6 randomized to either
Total patients: 359 MS vs 152 VATS
Randomized patients: 77 MS vs 71 VATS
McKenna et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004
VATS vs MS
30 day mortality
2.8% MS vs 2.0% VATS (p = 0.76)
90 day mortality
5.9% MS vs 4.6% (p = 0.67)
No mortality difference for randomized patients
Intra-operative hypoxemia more common in VATS
(0.8% vs 5.3%)
No difference in days with air leak
Median hospital LOS of 10 d in MS vs 9 in VATS
(p=0.01)
Randomized patients: 15d for MS vs 9d for VATS
(p<0.001)
McKenna et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004
Costs of VATS Compared to MS
VATS = MS for outcomes and complications
Shorter hospital stay with VATS
Less expensive
McKenna et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004
Pathologic Lessons
Small Airway Disease in Emphysema?
Thickened Epithelium
Inflammation
Subepithelial
Fibrosis
Smooth
Muscle
Hypertrophy
Nature of Small Airway
Obstruction in COPD
159 patients across all GOLD stages
59 GOLD III/IV patients from NETT
100 GOLD 0–III patients
Measure small airway (<2mm) luminal content and the
amount of inflammation in airway
Correlated luminal occlusion and airway edema with
FEV1
Hogg et al, NEJM 2004
Luminal Occlusion
Hogg et al, NEJM 2004
FEV1 falls as lumen occludes
r = -0.505, p=0.001
Hogg et al, NEJM 2004
FEV1 falls as the airway thickens
r = -0.687, p<0.001
Hogg et al, NEJM 2004
More inflammatory cells with
increasing GOLD stage
Hogg et al, NEJM 2004
Significance of Small Airway
Disease in Emphysema
Airway thickening is possibly tissue remodeling
Decreased mucociliary clearance leading to
obstruction
Increased lymphoid follicles possibly secondary to:
Repeated infection
Bacterial colonization
Persistent inflammation may explain the decline in
lung function even after smoking cessation
All NETT subject non-smokers >6 months
Hogg et al, NEJM 2004
Decreased Survival with Luminal
Occlusion
OR 3.28, 1.55-6.92; p=0.002
Hogg et al, AJRCCM 2007
Effect of ICS or Oral Steroids
No effect on airway thickness or luminal occlusion
r = -0.505, p=0.001
Less airway associated lymphoid follicles for those on
oral steroids
Represents decreased adaptive immunity
Could this explain increased pneumonia?
Hogg et al, AJRCCM 2007
Mortality and
Emphysema
Predictors of mortality in severe
emphysema
609 patients in the medical arm of NETT
Well characterized
Severe disease with high mortality
High quality long term follow up
Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2006
Mortality in Medical Arm NETT
Predictor
Age 70-83
O2 use
TLC% 140-203
RV% 262-412
Low Watts CPET
Lower lung pred
emphysema
HR
p
1.64(1.23-2.18) 0.001
1.46(1.02-2.10) 0.04
0.68(0.46-1.00) 0.05
1.57(1.03-2.39) 0.04
1.54(1.17-2.03) 0.002
1.74(1.19-2.57) 0.005
Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2006
BODE in multivariate model
Predictor
Age 70-83
Hb 9.1-13.3
RV% 262-412
Low Watts CPET
Lower lung pred
emphysema
DLCO % 6-21
HR
1. 72(1.31-2.26)
1.38(1.00-1.89)
1.48(1.04-2.37)
1.48(1.12-1.94)
1.74(1.19-2.57)
p
<0.001
0.05
0.03
0.006
0.005
1.36(1.01-1.84)
0.04
BODE 7-10
1.48(1.07-2.05)
0.02
Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2006
Not predictive
FEV1 alone (i.e. not in BODE)
Total % of emphysema on CT scan
DL
was
weak
in
multivariate
CO
PaO2 was not predictive while O2 use was
Oxygen increases mortality or epimarker of
disease severity?
LOTT
Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2006
mBODE Change in COPD Predicts
Mortality
BODE change in medical and surgical arms NETT
Divided group into BODE classes
Decrease by 1
No change
Increase by 1
Data missing
Used to predict death
Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2008
Changes in mBODE
Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2008
mBODE Change in Surgical Cohort and
Mortality
P<0.01
Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2008
HR for Change in mBODE
P<0.01
Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2008
Genetic Epidemiology of COPD
(COPDGene) Study Design
Multi-center (21) observational study
Designed to identify genetic factors associated with
COPD
Genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis to be
done
Will permit identification of radiographic and clinical
phenotypes to be identified
Regan et al, COPD 2011
COPDGene Study Population
10,000 subjects enrolled with 2/3 non-Hispanic whites
and 1/3 African American
Enrollment goals were met early
Inclusion criteria
Self identified as non-Hispanic white or African
American
Age 45-80 with 10 pack-years smoking history
Regan et al, COPD 2011
COPDGene Study Population
Exclusion criteria
Pregnancy due to CT imaging
Other lung disease except asthma
Prior LVRS or lobectomy
Active cancer
Suspected lung cancer
Metal in the chest
Recent AECOPD requiring therapy
Recent eye surgery
1st or 2nd degree relative already in study
History of chest radiation therapy
Regan et al, COPD 2011
Data Collected
Blood for genetic and biomarker analysis
Inspiratory and expiratory HRCT scans with sub-
millimeter thickness
Pre and post bronchodilator spirometry
ATS respiratory questionnaire
medical history, medications
St George’s respiratory questionnaire
BMI, blood pressure, oxygen saturation
Six minute walk test
Regan et al, COPD 2011
Analysis
HRCT phenotyping
Emphysema quantification
Gas trapping
Airway wall thickness
GWAS: look for genes associated with following:
COPD status defined by GOLD criteria
FEV1% as a continuous variable
HRCT parameters listed above
Regan et al, COPD 2011
Epidemiology of
COPD
GOLD Undefined Subjects
Data from 1st 2,500 subjects
9% of current or ex-smokers with
Low FEV1 but preserved FEV1/FVC ratio
GOLD-U has been described previously
Stable pattern
Associated with increased mortality
Associated with significant symptoms
COPDGene provided largest database with both
clinical and radiographic data
Wan et al, AJRCCM 2011
Comparison of GOLD U to Controls
and COPD Cases
Wan et al, AJRCCM 2011
GOLD-U Comparison
GOLD-U
Controls
COPD
Wan et al, AJRCCM 2011
GOLD-U Predictors
Wan et al, AJRCCM 2011
Significance of GOLD-U
Represents significant # of smokers/ex-smokers
Clinical course largely unknown
?progression
Are these changes related to obesity alone?
BMI contributes but changes in FEV1 are > than
previously reported
No reduction in FRC compared to smoking controls
Early Onset COPD: Differences of
Race and Sex
First 2,500 subjects only
Early onset definition:
Age <55
FEV1/FVC < 0.7
FEV1 <50% predicted
Comparator group
Age >64
FEV1/FVC < 0.7
FEV1 <50% predicted
Foreman et al, AJRCCM 2011
Demographic & Clinical Differences
Foreman et al, AJRCCM 2011
Multivariate Analysis
Foreman et al, AJRCCM 2011
Significance of Findings
Early onset COPD is rare
African Americans and women disproportionately
affected
Smoked less
Maternal history of COPD is important
Genetic follow up studies pending
Foreman et al, AJRCCM 2011
Racial Differences in Quality of Life in
COPDGene
African Americans smoked less, were younger but had the
same lung function
Han et al, Chest 2011
St George Respiratory Questionnaire
African Americans had worse SGRQ scores (higher)
Han et al, Chest 2011
Multivariate Analysis
After adjustment for age, sex, pack-years smoking,
education level, MMRC dyspnea, 6MWD, and current
smoking status no difference in quality of life in those
without exacerbations
African Americans with history of prior exacerbation
(1.887 for every exacerbation, p = 0.006)
Han et al, Chest 2011
Family History as a Risk for COPD
COPD >GOLD II
Hersch et al, Chest 2011
Multivariate analysis
Controlling for demographics, parental history of
smoking, parental history of COPD, childhood ETS
Parental history of COPD OR 1.73 (1.36-2.2), p = <0.001
Paternal history COPD 1.66 (1.24-2.22), p = 0.006
Maternal history COPD 1.51 (1.10-2.09), p = 0.011
Hersch et al, Chest 2011
Clinical Phenotypes COPD
Chronic Bronchitc Phenotype
Variable
Age
Smoking, pk-yr
Current smoker %
Men %
MMRC
SGRQ total
TLC, L
FRC, L
Mean WA%
CB+ (n = 290)
62.8 + 8.4
57 + 30
48
57
3 (2-4)
49.9 + 19.7
6.30 + 1.50
4.22 + 1.19
63.2 + 2.9
CB- (n = 771)
64.6 + 8.4
52 + 25
27
50
2 (1-3)
36.6 + 20
5.88 + 1.40
3.92 + 1.28
62.6 + 3.1
P
.002
0.006
<0.001
0.027
<0.001
<0.001
.004
.002
.013
Kim et al, Chest 2011
Chronic Bronchitics and AECOPD
Kim et al, Chest 2011
Radiographic Features of
Frequent Exacerbation
Phenotype
Han et al, Thorax 2011
Frequent vs non-frequent
exacerbators
Han et al, Thorax 2011
Effect of Airway Wall Thickness and %
Emphysema on Exacerbations
Han et al, Thorax 2011
Multivariate Analysis
Han et al, Thorax 2011
Smoking Related ILD
on HRCT
Ground glass or reticular abnormalities
Diffuse centrilobular nodules
Non-emphysematous cysts
Honeycombing
Traction bronchiectasis
Washko et al, NEJM 2011
ILA vs No ILA
Variable
No ILA
(n = 1361)
Age
60 (52-67)
BMI
27 (24-31)
Pack-yr smoking
40 (29-54)
GOLD > stage 2 (%)
41
Unclassified GOLD %
7
% emphysema
4.1 (1.3-12.4)
TLC, L
5.7 (4.8-6.78)
ILA
(n = 194)
64 (56-72)
28 (25-33)
44 (31-63)
32
14
3.3 (0.9-9.7)
5.21(4.38-6.270
P
<0.001
0.006
0.01
0.02
0.002
<0.001
.004
Washko et al, NEJM 2011
Multivariate Analysis
Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, COPD (except for COPD model)
Washko et al, NEJM 2011
ILA and lower 6MWD
Doyle et al, AJRCCM in press
Genetics
Three genetic loci identified as being associated with
COPD susceptibility
4q24
6p21
5q33
Low BMI associated with COPD
Pts from Eclipse, Norway-Bergen cohort, NETT and
COPDGene
Found an association of low BMI in SNP at FTO gene
FTO gene has been associated with obesity
Castaldi et al, AJRCMB 2011
Wan et al, AJRCMB 2011
Summary
NETT
Most of analysis is done
LVRS improves survival, exercise performance, QOL
Small airway disease is important even in emphysematous
phenotype
Use of BODE to track response to therapy
COPDGene
Most of analysis not yet done
Genetics
Definition of phenotypes which may lead to better directed Rx
Radiographic
Chronic bronchitis
Smoking related diseases other than COPD exist
GOLD U
Interstitial changes on CT
Conclusion
Large multi-centered studies in COPD are feasible and
lead to important findings
NETT
COPDGene
ECLIPSE
TORCH
Continued co-operation amongst investigators will
lead to new advances in COPD