Transcript abridged - Intranasal.net

Intranasal Drug Delivery – Clinical
Implications for EMS
Lecture outline
 Why use intranasal medications?
 Intranasal drugs indications with clinical cases
and personal insights:
• Pain Control
• Sedation
• Seizures
• Opiate overdose
 Drug doses and optimizing absorption
 Resources
Why do I think nasal drug delivery is
important in prehospital care?
Efficacy, speed and ease of delivery



No delivery delays (no IV)
Can deliver to anyone with an exposed nose
Rapid onset of action (Pain control, Sedation, seizure, overdose)

As effective and fast as IV drugs in most situations
Safety


No needle stick risk
Lower risk of respiratory depression (compared to IV)
Easier to proceed with additional care


Start IV in children or agitated adult
Calm the agitated patient
Intranasal Medication Cases
Pain Control
Case: MVC
pinned in car
A 35 year old male pinned in a car following an MVC.
Bilateral upper arm fractures, femur fracture, likely
other injuries. Screaming in pain.
 Clinical Needs: Pain control, sedation, rapid
extraction, then IV access (cannot do so now).
 Treatment: 1.5 mcg/kg of intranasal fentanyl plus 5
mg IN midazolam


In 7 minutes his pain is much better controlled and he is
calmer
Extraction requires 20 minutes, then full trauma
assessment and care proceeds.
Case: Pediatric
Hand burn
A 5 year old burned her hand on the stove
 Clinical Needs: Pain control, Transport for wound
care
 Treatment: 2.0 mcg/kg of intranasal fentanyl (40
mcg – 0.8 ml of generic “IV” fentanyl)



Within 3-5 minutes her pain is improved
She is transported to a nearby medical facility
15 minutes later the patient easily tolerates cleansing of
the burn and dressing application.
Literature to support these cases - pediatrics
Nasal
Intravenous
Borland, Ann Emerg Med 2007
Intranasal Ketamine for pain ?:
Literature support
US Army IN
ketamine data
 Compared IN
ketamine to IV
morphine for
severe pain
 IN ketamine (50
mg) as fast and as
good as IV
morphine (7.5 mg)
w/o side effects.
But - are nasal drugs safe?
Pain control –
Literature support
Over a decade of prehospital and ER literature exists for
burn, orthopedic trauma and visceral pain in both adults
and children showing the following:






Faster drug delivery (no IV start needed) so faster onset
Equivalent to IV morphine
Superior to IM morphine
Care givers are more likely to treat pediatric severe pain
Highly satisfied patients and providers
Safe
The Doubters: Surely IN drugs
can’t be as good as an injection
for pain control!
Nasal
Intravenous
ACTUALLY – They are equivalent or better (in these settings)




Borland 2007 – IN fentanyl onset of action and quality of pain control
was identical to IV morphine in patients with broken legs and arms
Borland 2008, Holdgate 2010, Crellin 2010 - time to delivery of IN
opiates was half that of IV and more patients get treated
Kendal 2001 – IN opiate superior to IM opiate for pain control
Conclusions
 IN opiates are just as good as IV
 IN opiates are delivered in half the waiting time as IV
 IN opiate are preferred by patients, providers and parents over
injections
IN opiates for Pain control – My
insights
• I use nasal opiates in my practice - daily.
• Our statewide ambulance services –IN fentanyl is the first line
pain treatment in all children, adult option. ?Nasal ketamine soon?
• Generic concentrations available in U.S. work fine and are
inexpensive ($1-4/vial)
• Efficacy: Very effective – and it can be titrated.
• Segway to IV therapy in the appropriate situation (fear, agitation)
Intranasal Medication Cases
Sedation
Case: Excited Delirium
A 27-year old male is apprehended by police and
paramedics for extremely violent, out of control
behavior following use of cocaine.



He is at significant risk of injuring himself and others.
It is too dangerous (needle stick risk) to give him an
injection of sedatives.
The paramedic administers 10 mg of IN midazolam and
7 minutes later he is calm and can be transported safely
to the hospital.
Sedation –
Literature support
Hundreds of articles dating back into the 1980’s. Most
used midazolam.
 Effective only if adequate dose is given (0.4 to 0.5 mg/kg in
kids, 10 mg straight dose in adults)
 Effective in children and adults (even exited delirium in EMS)
 Safe – no reports of respiratory depression
IN Benzos for sedation – my insights
 The EMS literature is just emerging: Many cases reported,
few good actual studies
 Timing: Sedation onset with midazolam at about 5-10
minutes, maximal at 10-20 and starts to wear off at 25-30.
 Efficacy: Sedation is not deep but it takes the edge off and
can make further care less stressful or dangerous
 Lorazepam?: More data needs to be obtained for
lorazepam. My experience – lasts longer, 75% effective.
 Ketamine?: Mixed results, doses of at least 5 mg/kg
needed, more data needs to be obtained in prehospital and
ER environment before conclusions can be made.
Intranasal Medication Cases
Seizure Control
Case: Seizing child
The ambulance is transporting a 13 y.o. girl suffering a grand
mal seizure.
 Despite trying, no IV can be successfully established.
 Rectal diazepam is unsuccessful at controlling the seizure.
 IV attempts in the clinic / hospital are also unsuccessful.
 However, on patient arrival a dose of nasal midazolam
(Versed, Dormicum) is given and within 3 minutes of drug
delivery the child stops seizing.
Seizure Therapy Literature support
Lahat 2000; Fisgin 2002; Holsti 2006; Ahmad 2006; Arya 2011;
Holsti 2011; Javadzadeh 2012; Thakker 2012:
 IN midazolam is superior to rectal diazepam for seizure control and
is preferred by care givers
 IN midazolam is superior to intramuscular injection of paraldehyde
 IN midazolam/lorazepam is equivalent to intravenous delivery for
stopping seizures, much faster at stopping them due to no IV start
needed and it leads to less respiratory depression and less need for
airway management that either IV or rectal drugs
 IN midazolam can be delivered by family at home safely and
effectively
The Doubters: Surely IN drugs
can’t be as good as IV for seizures!
ACTUALLY – They are equivalent or better (in these settings)




Lahat 00, Mahmoudian 04, Arya 11, Thakker 12, Javadzadeh
12 – IV and IN are equivalent for stopping seizures rapidly,
but IN works faster due to no delays
Holsti 2007, Fisgin 2002 – IN is superior to rectal
Holsti 2011 – IN is safe at home with immediate results
Conclusions



IN seizure medication are just as good as IV, better than rectal
IN seizure medication are delivered much more rapidly so seizure stops
sooner.
Anyone (Parents, care givers, nursing home staff, ambulance driver,
etc.) can administer the medication so seizure length is shorter.
IN benzodiazepines for
seizures – My insights
Very effective, very fast: Rapid seizure resolution
without IV access.


Should be first line therapy in ALL prolonged acute
seizures while IV access is being established (if at all)
Effective and safe at home, in prehospital setting, in
hospital
More effective, less expensive and preferred by
providers when compared to alternative (rectal
diazepam).
Intranasal Medication Cases
Opiate Overdose
Case: Heroin
Overdose
The ambulance responds to an unconscious, barely breathing
patient with obvious intravenous drug needle marks on both
arms – consistent with heroin overdose
 After an IV is established, naloxone (Narcan) is
administered and the patient is successfully resuscitated.
 Unfortunately, the medic suffers a contaminated needle stick
while establishing the IV.
 The patient admits to being infected with both HIV and
hepatitis C. He remains alert for 2 hours with no further
therapy in the ED (i.e.- no need for an IV) and is discharged.
Case: Heroin Overdose
 The medic now needs treatment - HIV prophylaxis
 The next few months will be difficult for him:



Side effects that accompany HIV medications
Personal life is in turmoil due to issues of safe sex with
his spouse
Mental anguish of waiting to see if he develops HIV or
hepatitis C.
 He wonders why his system is not using MAD nasal
to deliver naloxone on all these patients.
Opiate overdose –
Literature support
Intranasal naloxone literature
 Barton 02, 05; Kelly 05; Robertson 09; Kerr 09; Merlin 2010;
Doe Simkins 09; Walley 12:




IN naloxone is at least 80-90% effective at reversing opiate
overdose
When compared directly it is equivalent in time of onset and in
efficacy to IV or IM therapy.
IN naloxone results in less agitation upon arousal
IN naloxone is lay person approved in many places. It is safe, has
saved many lives and reduces medical resource consumption
IN naloxone for opiate overdose
– my insights
Why not? Is there a downside?





High risk population for HIV, HCV, HBV
Difficult IV to establish due to scarring of veins
Elimination of needle eliminates needle stick risk
They awaken more gently than with IV naloxone
New epidemiology shows prescription drugs (methadone, etc)
are causing many deaths that naloxone at home could reverse.
 Simple enough that lay public can administer and not even call
ambulance
Every ambulance system, police agency and many clinics and
families with high risk patients should be utilizing this
approach.
Drug doses
Scenario
Drug and Dose
Important Reminders
Pain Control
Fentanyl: 2 mcg/kg
? Ketamine 1 mg/kg
•Titration is possible
•Half up each nostril
Sedation
Midazolam: 0.5 mg/kg
•Use concentrated formula
Seizures
Midazolam: 0.2 mg/kg
Lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg
•Support breathing while waiting
•Use concentrated formula
Opiate Overdose Naloxone: 2 mg
•Support breathing while waiting
Optimizing absorption of IN
drugs
Critical
 Minimize volume - Maximize concentrationConcept


0.2 to 0.3 ml per nostril ideal, 1 ml is maximum
Most potent (highly concentrated) drug should be used
 Maximize total absorptive mucosal surface area

Use BOTH nostrils (doubles your absorptive surface area)
 Use a delivery system that maximizes mucosal
coverage and minimizes run-off.

Atomized particles across broad surface area
Dropper vs Atomizer
Absorption
 Drops = Oral drug via the
nasal passage
 Atomizer = nasal mist onto
broad mucosal surface
Usability / acceptance
 Drops = Minutes to give,
cooperative patient, head
position critical
 Atomizer = seconds to
deliver, better accepted
Intranasal medications summary
 Another tool for drug delivery to
supplement standard IV, IM, PO–very
useful when appropriate
 Supported by extensive literature
 Inexpensive
 Speeds up care in many situations
 Safe
Questions?
Educational Web site:
 www.intranasal.net