Messer_Tuning

Download Report

Transcript Messer_Tuning

Database Tuning
By Tim Messer
Agenda




Brief overview of tuning
General tuning techniques
Theory behind tuning
Lots of silly looking dogs
Agenda




Brief overview of tuning
General tuning techniques
Theory behind tuning
Lots of silly looking dogs
What is tuning?



Tuning is optimizing a database for a specific
purpose.
Often overlooked.
Can offer serious performance boosts.
What is tuning?

Can offer serious performance boosts.
Something bad becomes passable.
What is tuning?

Can offer serious performance boosts.
Something good becomes something great.
Tuning Theory

Consider all aspects of the system.


Remember that your database is just one part of
a larger whole piece of software, on a network of
hardware.
A few of the many things you can (and
should) check when tuning:





System downtimes
Batch job failures
Resource utilization history
Update history
Partner machine needs and stability (apps
servers, etc)
Priority list for tuning

Hardware stability


Hardware adequacy


Hardware on all machines is appropriate. No
ancient Pentium I processors holding everyone
up. Operating System and so forth is up to date.
Software design


No computers are crashing often. The network
cables and routers are reliable.
Database tables work well for application.
Software utilization

Software doesn't have outrageous demands
being made of it (bad SQL).
Hardware

Clearly the most important part. No amount
of tuning can compensate for bad hardware.
=
Hardware

Give your DB a good home before starting.
=
General Tuning Techniques

Keep table size down.


On particularly large databases undergoing large
queries, going from the hard drive to RAM and
RAM to CPU can be very taxing.
A good rule of thumb: Think of single tables in
terms of seconds of motherboard capacity.
This part's important don't look
away now

Example table calculation:







Data deliveries per second * size of deliveries =
throughput
Motherboard: Intel 3010, 1066MHz FSB CPU.
Front Side Bus (FSB): 1066 MHz, 32 bit.
((FSB Speed*1000) * Bit width) = throughput (in
bits)
Throughput/(1,048,576 * 8) = throughput (in MB)
(1,066,000 * 32)/(1,048,576 * 8) = 2.56 MB
So a 25 MB table is a 10-second table. A
5MB one is a 2-second table.
Seriously this part's useful

How long is too long?


This entirely depends on what the database is
doing. To get a reply out of a 10-second table,
you will need up to 10 seconds to get a result.
Honestly ask yourself: Is that going to annoy
people?
Some considerations for “annoyance”



How often is this table used per day?
Who uses it?
What else is going on while it's being used?
Table size

How to cut size down directly?




Archive old stuff
Divide tables up more finely (one table per user
instead of a big users table)
Eliminate redundant stuff
Kind of like grooming a dog.
Table size

Kind of like grooming a dog. (Cannot be the
only thing you do. The real world is wet tar to
your database.)
+
RESULT
General Tuning Techniques



Add better indexes and reference tables
Indexes allow searches to immediately
ignore data that is clearly not what it’s looking
for.
Reference tables allow quick lookups.
Indexes





Indexes are no different in theory from the index in
the back of a book.
When looking for a single String1 = String2
comparison, it checks the first letter, then the
second, and so on.
Instead of looking at all records, you look at only
records which sort of fit—looks like a tree structure.
Normal searches are “linear”, and require as many
operations as the table has records. Indexed
searches are much more efficient, and require
log(records) time.
All modern databases HAVE indexes—they are not
always properly used, however.
Indexes
This ignored area is commonly
hundreds of thousands of rows.
Reference table example

Example of reference table use:

Imagine an e-commerce website with keywords
on items.
Reference Table Example


Imagine we must find products based on
these keywords. Assume 100,000 individual
entries to the Product table, with an average
of 3 five letter keywords each. Search for
ONE keyword.
First option: Search the “keywords” field.

Obscenely slow. Requires as many operations
as the string is long; string length 5 requires 5
operations, length 10 requires 10, etc.



Called “linear(n) time with respect to string length.”
17 length keyword field * 100,000 records = 1.7
million operations for 1 search.
…many customers looking at the same time, too.
Reference Table Example

Option 2: make reference tables by keyword




Create Table “electronics”, and put anything with
“electronics” in the “keyword” field in there.
Can be done while system is otherwise idle.
Middleware can make new tables for new
keywords automatically.
Requires only 1 operation to finish. Select * from
(keyword).


Called “Constant time”.
This is how Google returns millions of webpages
in a fraction of a second.
Reference Table Example

This search would have taken years on the
best supercomputers in the world if simple
text searches were done.
Reference Tables and Interfaces

What does this do for you?



This makes the computer look at less useless
stuff when searching for something.
Resists huge and sudden increases in size and
subsequent drops in speed.
Doesn't address underlying problems.
General Tuning Technique

Doesn't address underlying problems
+
RESULT
General Tuning Techniques

Check the SQL being fed into the database.



All current databases keep logs of what SQL
they run.
Bad SQL can potentially hurt performance much
more than big tables or clunky interfaces.
Call up an audit and see if anything stands out
as particularly slow or taxing. Rewrite it if
possible.
SQL Monitoring

What does this do for you?


Keeps people from doing too many dumb things,
which they will despite your best efforts.
Again doesn't address any real problems with
the DB.
Monitoring tools

SQL Power Tools (http://www.sqlpower.com/)






Monitors a database remotely, giving no overhead.
Puts things into graph form.
Can monitor entire server farms (up to 250).
Web-enabled interface.
$1200. 
Freeware monitoring tools are few, far in
between, and usually pretty primative. Mostly,
they involve individual developers writing
frontends for already-existing feedback
programs like netstat and adding in alarms and
so forth. Hard to find online. Most freeware
programs you can find have serious flaws.
Monitoring Tools

SQL Monitor: (http://www.brothersoft.com/downloads/sqlmonitor.html)



Freeware
Only does SQL testing very well.
SQLXML 3.0
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/default.asp)



Comes free with Microsoft SQL Server.
Very useful in getting database schema into XML for
presentation.
Only works with MSSQL (very common problem!)
And many more

There are dozens and dozens of techniques
to tune a database. Parallelism (setting up
multiple computers to serve a single DB),
indexing, and caching are just a few words
that would work for all DBs...then there are
dozens more specifically for Oracle, mySQL,
MSSQL, and so forth. Reading and asking
informed questions is key! There is no one
procedure or good answer to a well tuned
database.
Sources
O'Reilly Databases, “RDBMS Tuning”. Steven Hauser.
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2003/11/13/rdbms_tuning.html
University of Arkansas, “Oracle Database Tuning”. Steve Rea.
http://www.uaex.edu/srea/tuning.htm
Database Tuning: Principles, Experiments, and Troubleshooting
Techniques. Dennis Shasha and Philippe Bonnet. (Paperback version:
http://www.amazon.com/Database-Tuning-Principles-ExperimentsTroubleshooting/dp/1558607536
Special Thanks to:
Google, for endless pictures of silly dogs.
Nikita Minter, for the Party Doog picture.