What is informed Consent? - Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Download
Report
Transcript What is informed Consent? - Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Identify
consent process requirements
Distinguish between IRB, PI/Designee consent
process responsibilities
Identify with what went wrong?
Summarize tips to avoid deficiencies
"A
word is not a crystal, transparent and
unchanged; it is the skin of a living thought
and may vary greatly in color and content
according to the circumstances and the time
in which it is used"
— Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
DHHS
– 45 CFR Part 46.116
Common Rule
FDA 21 CFR 50.25
Part 50 (Informed Consent)
Part 56 (IRB)
ICH GCP E-6 Section 4.8.10
“No investigator may involve a human being as a
subject in research… unless the investigator has
obtained the legally effective informed consent
of the subject or the subject’s legally authorized
representative
An investigator shall seek such consent only under
circumstances that provide the prospective
subject or the representative sufficient
opportunity to consider whether or not to
participate and that
minimize the possibility of coercion or undue
influence.
The information that is given to the subject or the
representative shall be in language
understandable to the subject or the
representative”
45 CFR 46.11
A document that provides a summary of the
research and explains the subjects rights as a
participant
It is designed to outline and be a reference
regarding what is expected of the participant
information exchange including
subject recruitment
materials,
verbal instructions,
written materials,
questions and answer sessions
and
signature documenting
consent with date.
Protecting study volunteers in research Cynthia McGuire
Dunn, MD & Gary Chadwick, PHARM.D, mph 1999.
Disclosure
of relevant information to
prospective subjects about the research;
their
comprehension of the information, and
their
voluntary agreement, free of coercion
and undue influence, to research
participation.
http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/info/sheet6.html
Detailed description of the method for
obtaining informed consent
Who
Where
The process submitted for IRB approval
Changes in the process are submitted as
amendments
PI assures the informed consent process in
research is an ongoing exchange of information
throughout the course of the research and it is
documented
Oral
Telephonic
E consent
Video
Facsimile
The person must be trained regarding informed consent
process and be knowledgeable about study
FDA Requirements:
IRB must know who will conduct consent process
FDA does not require the that the PI personally
conduct the consent process.
ECOG Requirements:
“Legally, it is the physician’s responsibility to discuss
the study with the patient and obtain the written
consent.”
“After an initial discussion it may be the physician,
nurse, or CRA who provides further details to the
patient.”
7.2.6 “Presenting the Consent Form to the Patient,” ECOG Protocol Management
41% Study nurse
21% PI
19% No one
12% Family member
8% Other
Source: 2002 Center Watch Survey of 1,561 Study Volunteers
Fetuses, Pregnant Women, and
Human In Vitro Fertilization
Prisoners
Children
Elderly
Cognitively Impaired
Minorities
Etc.
Cognition/capacity
Level of education
Social/cultural values
Language
Age
Environment
Anxiety/fear
Pain
Influence of medications
Quality of disclosed information
Readability of informed consent
“the belief that the purpose of a clinical trial is to benefit the
individual patient rather than to gather data for the purpose
of contributing to scientific knowledge”
The
subject believes that his medical needs
will determine his assignment to a treatment
group or the PI will modify the protocol to
serve his own medical need.
The
subject has unreasonable expectations
about the likelihood of benefit from study
participation. In this example the subject
believes the PI will not administer
treatment that might harm them, but rather,
will provide interventions that only help
them.
When the study is closed and final reports are
issued
At each interaction, the investigator must
reassure
Voluntary participation continues
New information is given to the subject
FDA Mandates
ICH/GCP 4.8 suggests
FDA
has no regulations
concerning delegation of
consenting although it is
discussed in the FDA
Information Sheets
FDA
only requires that a copy
of consent be provided to
subject
consent is obtained the
same day that the subject's
involvement in the study
begins, the subject's medical
records/case report form
should document that consent
was obtained prior to
participation
ICH allows the
delegation of the
informed consent
process to a designee
ICH recommends the
person conducting
the informed consent
process sign and date
the consent form
ICH recommends that
the subject receive a
signed and dated copy
of the consent form
If
research“FDA Consent information sheet”
FDA and ICH BOTH require the IRB to review:
The informed consent,
process,
protocol,
advertisements, and
the Investigator's Brochure
ICH/GCP 3.1 also recommends IRB review of:
Subject recruitment procedures
Written information provided to subjects
Information about subject compensation
Investigator's current CV and/or other
documents evidencing qualifications
DHHS
OHRP
FDA
Other Federal
Agencies (NIH,
CDC and CMS
State Law
Institution
IRB Policy
Policy
IRB Policy
Department
Policy
Research
Team SOP’s
Study
Protocol/
Contract
Depending on funding and/or Dept policy
ICH/GCP
Emergency,
life threatening situation that
requires intervention
Minimal
risk study with IRB approval
Ultimate protector of the subject’s rights
and safety
Be personally certain that each subject is
adequately informed and freely consents
to participate in the investigator’s research
Assure that every reasonable precaution is
taken to reduce risk to a minimum for the
subject
The investigator is responsible for whom
he delegates authority
Follow the protocol and IRB approved
study documents
Obtain
consent before initiating ANY studyspecific procedures
Provide a quiet, comfortable, and private
setting
Explain the consent procedures and process
to the subject
Ensure sufficient time to consider all options
Access the subject's reading abilities,
cognitive status now and throughout study
Access subjects understanding
Ensure the subject is the one who wants to
participate, free from coercion or other undue
influence
Consistent with IRB approved process
Provide additional safeguards as required
Provide new information promptly
Provide a copy of the consent document and each
revised consent document to the subject
During the interview be aware of the things you
might be saying that would affect voluntariness or be
coercive
“free drug” “free treatment” “I think this is best
for you” “do this for me”
Document process and response from patient
Know the protocol
Introduce yourself and
state who referred you
Do not depend on subject
enrolling
You are not a salesman
Provided consent
document for review
Methods of conveying
information differs
Check list
Read consent to subject
Read highlights /review
calendar
Video
Electronic
Web-based resources
Establish a relationship with the subject
Provide privacy
Assess views on research vs. standard of care
Keep the subject in the center of the process
Be an active listener
Ask open-ended questions (test back)
Be aware of non-verbal messages
Empathize with the subject’s concerns
Be a teacher by educating the subject and
verifying his understanding of the research study
Assure withdrawal is possible at ANY time
Inform other options are available
Be available anytime for any question
Do not rush the process or the subject
Informed Consent Worksheet
Date of Consent:__________________ Name of Study:_____________________________
IRB Study Number:__________________________
Patient Name:_____________________ Patient MRN:_________________ _Study ID#:__________
The following has been explained to the potential study subject, and the subject has been offered the opportunity to
ask questions regarding the study:
TOPIC
COMMENTS
Purpose of the study
_________________________________
Qualifications to participate
_________________________________
Location and participants
_________________________________
What will happen during the study
_________________________________
Risk and benefits
_________________________________
Study related injury or illness
_________________________________
Alternative treatments
_________________________________
Confidentiality
_________________________________
Study costs
_________________________________
Compensation
_________________________________
Who to contact with questions
_________________________________
Voluntary participation
_________________________________
Termination of participation
_________________________________
Questions or comments: __________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Does the patient state an understanding of the study and procedures and agree to participate? ___yes ___no
_____________________________________
Person administering consent
Signed copy given to patient? ___yes ___no
__________________________
Date / Time
Copy in patients chart? ___yes ___no
Ask
if problems arose since
last visit (A/E’s)
Provide new information if
applicable
Encourage questions each
visit
Talk about what comes next
Re-assess subjects desire
to continue each visit
Assess compliance (diary,
meds etc)
If
subject regains cognitive ability
New information becomes available
Significant protocol changes
New surrogate is identified
IRB instructs you to re-consent
Investigator has the option to re-consent for
longitudinal data collection time points
Non compliance
Complaints to the IRB,
the institution, the
OHRP or the FDA
Ongoing
Interactive process
Different for every subject
Different for every study
Essential for study success
IRB approved
Providing clear definition between where
standard of care leaves off and research
begins
Allows re-education
Requires re assessment of subject
understanding with each visit
Method of presentation appropriate for
type of study and population
Voluntary participation
Environment
Length of time devoted to the process
Adequate time offered to ask questions
How subject demonstrates understand
of the study and desire to participate
Promptness of reporting new
information
Auditing/Compliance Reviews
If
SOP’s exist are they followed
Confirm consent process IRB approved
Change implemented only after IRB approval
Consent signed prior to ANY procedures
Consenting person has appropriate training
Consenting person listed as KSP
You know you want to:
Volunteer
to have your consenting process
observed
Contact
Wendy Lloyd by phone (936-7106) or
by email ([email protected])
in advance or just prior to consenting
Signatures of subject and consenting person on different
dates
Consent and study procedures on same date
Consent was performed by an untrained or unqualified care
provider
Person consenting is not listed as KSP
Unable to locate consent for subject on study
Subjects not re-consented with revised consent as instructed
Multiple consent documents for same patient with no
explanation why
Person consenting did not state the purpose or procedures of
the study
Consent document left on clip board for subjects to
complete and return to nurse if interested
Person consenting the subject did not sign the form
Only use approved consent process
Confirm all personnel consenting subjects are KSP
Document training and qualifications of all KSP
Confirm person consenting knows the protocol
Conduct random audits of the consent process
documentation ( if form created, confirm use)
Review the FDA Warning Letters and FDA IRB
Information Sheets –“A Guide to Informed
Consent”
Become familiar with the Regulations, state law,
institutional and IRB Policies
Call the VHRPP
Know
the protocol
Only do what you are trained to do
Volunteer for consent observation
Ask
subjects if they felt fully informed
Seek
education
Stay organized
If you find something don’t hide it
Network
Become certified
If you don’t know ask
Although the regulations
place the burden of
responsibility on the PI, the
protection of human
research subjects is a
shared responsibility among
all research professionals
involved in the conduct of
the study
Members of a research team
have a moral obligation to
uphold the ethical and
regulatory standards by
which human subjects
research is conducted
Measure the immediate level of patient comprehension at the time
surgical consent is obtained and the effect of time on this level of
understanding.
100 subjects
consented
When test
administered
Percent of Correct
answers
98
Preoperatively
70.70
75
1st Post op (no more
than 2 weeks)
59.50
39
1st Post op (no more
than 2 weeks)
60.8
In addition, the effect of sex (no difference), education level
(college scored better), and age (<50 scored higher) on
comprehension.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22005875 2011 study Crepeau AE, McKinney
18
year old with
partial ornithine
transcarbamylase
deficiency
Usually fatal in
infancy
The first person to
die from gene
therapy
FDA
suspended all gene therapy
trials and other experiments
Hearings on quality of oversight and
safety
President Clinton demanded
improvements in consent and access
to information about gene therapy
research
Gelsinger
v. Univ. of Penn. (C.P. Phila.
Co., 2000)
18 year old boy died during a gene transfer
experiment for ornithine transcarba – mylase
deficiency.
PI founded company that sponsored trial –
owned 30% of stock
University of Pennsylvania owned 5% of stock
University’s Conflicts of Interest Committee
was aware of the potential conflict of
interest between the parties – allowed study
to proceed
Gelsinger v. Univ. of Penn.
One of the many counts Intentional Assault and
Battery
Informed consent process did not disclose
Monkey deaths
Previous adverse events
Relationship between PI and sponsor
True efficacy results
Confidential settlement
Sued University trustees, PI, sponsor and hospital
Each
interaction is different because every
subjects, circumstance, question,
communication style is different.
It
is up to each one of us to take the consent
process serious and fully inform each subject
By possibly increasing
subject recruitment and
retention on a wide scale
Playing a substantial role
in shaping public
perceptions of the value
of clinical research
For federal guidance on obtaining informed consent of human research
subjects, see the following websites:
General requirements for informed consent
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=50.20
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=50.23
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=50.24
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=50.25
Documentation of informed consent
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=50.27
Research involving pregnant women, fetuses or neonates
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.204
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.205
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.206
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.207
Research involving children (also found in 21 CFR 50.50-56)
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.404
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.405
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.406
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.407
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.408
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.409
Pediatric research “assent”decision matrix
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/panels/407-01pnl/riskcat.htm
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) informed consent tips
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/index.html
OHRP informed consent FAQ
http://answers.hhs.gov/ohrp/categories/1566
Vanderbilt IRB Policy
http://mcapps01.mc.vanderbilt.edu/IRB/policy&procedures.nsf/(WebTa
bleOfContents)/8AF759048966C29D86257731005ECD1F?OpenDocument
If you have additional comments or questions
feel free to contact me
Wendy Lloyd
[email protected]
615-936-7106