Transcript File

Paradigms & Methodology
Frame Work /Paradigm/
Culture/Methodology
•Positivist - Scientific Method, Empiricism,
Reductionism
•Phenomenology - Interpretavist
•Post-modern
•Feminist
•Marxist
Ontology, Epistemology,
Methodology
• Ontology: being, existence , reality
• Epistemology: knowledge (nature and
limits)
• Methodology: approach adopted
Process
•Inductive
•Deductive (Note: sometimes Positivism is called
hypothetico-deductive )
Method
•Qualitative
•Quantitative
Key interpretations of the natural and social world
Theological
Social
Postmodernism
Phenomenology
Feminism
Positivism
Scientific
Method
Natural Science
The
beginning
of
the
Enlightenment (modern era)
<1600
1700
1900
Bryan Mills
1800
2000
Positivism
•Concerned with experience and empirical knowledge
•Personal knowledge backed up by scientific
verification - objective.
•Named by in the 19th Century by Auguste Comte
(French Mathematician and Philosopher) - though its
origins date back to the Enlightenment.
Think of an
idea
Test
Report
result
• Deep in the human unconscious is a
pervasive need for a logical universe that
makes sense. But the real universe is
always one step beyond logic.
• -Frank Herbert, Dune
Positivism…
•Logical Positivism (just one of many
offshoots) Wittgenstein. Moore, Russell
(1920s/30s),
•And then Logical Empiricism;
•Both of which saw movements still further
away from metaphysics and towards logic and
empiricism, claiming that the positivist belief in
scientific verification is itself unverifiable.
How to identify Positivism …
•Has an interest in cause and effect (this is caused by
that) and generalisability (the findings are true for all)
•uses the testing of hypotheses,
•seeks objectivity and believes that an external object
truth exists,
•will emphasise correlation,
•will probably be quantitative (numerical) but may also
include qualitative work (interview, etc.)
Hypotheses
A hypothesis is a "statement that can be falsified"
Coates (1996) gives us 5 'virtues' that make up a
hypothesis:
1. Simplicity
2. Generality
3. Refutability
4. Modesty
5. Conservatism
It is possible to see from this list why hypotheses are
used by positivists, or, inversely, why
phenomenologists have no use for them.
Hypotheses
H1 Team working improves productivity in medium
sized, labour intensive, manufacturing companies.
H0 Null - Team working has no measurable effect on
productivity in medium sized, labour intensive,
manufacturing companies.
But:
If you hit a tuning fork twice as hard it will
ring twice as loud but still at the same
frequency. That's a linear response. If you
hit a person twice as hard they're unlikely
just to shout twice as loud. That property
lets you learn more about the person than
the tuning fork.
-Neil Gershenfeld
Phenomenology
• Interested in events as they appear to the
consciousness, without reference to theory,
deduction or assumptions
• Named by Edmund Husserl (1913) - the study of
structures of consciousness that enable
consciousness to refer to objects outside of it.
• Adapted by sociologists (Schutz) and emphasises
peoples' experiences rather than scientific deduction
- subjective.
• Criticised for its habit of producing: Descriptions and
uncontrolled hypotheses rather than explanation
How to identify Phenomenology
• Very unlikely to have any quantitative work.
• Will use interviews, case studies, logs or focus
groups.
•
• May even use ethnography (living/working amongst
subjects).
• Seeks interpretation - not cause and effect.
• May use action-research or grounded theory
Post Modernism
• Towards the middle of the last century a shift began
away from the importance of personal interpretation
to the importance of discourse.
• Positivists believed in an external objective world,
phenomenologists in an internal subjective one and
post-modernist in a world created by discourses.
• Thus to understand the world we have to understand
the discourse we operate within.
• These discourses (conversations) can be actual
conversations (creating cultural discourses), the
media, academic disciplines, religions, professional
discourses, etc
• The world is not made of molecules, the
world is made of stories.
•
• -Muriel Rukeyser
Deductive and/or Inductive Process
Deductive and/or Inductive Process
Triangulation
• You believe staff are not happy.
• Qualitative interviews with staff: Pay is too
low, more pay needed.
• Quantitative research shows: Pay is
better than equivalent firms, there are no
problems.
Triangulation
• BOTH TOGETHER Whilst pay is better
than could be expected the staff still have
a feeling of being ‘hard done by’.
• This may indicate a problem with
management style or morale, more
research is clearly required.
• On their own neither approach would have
produced the right 'answer'.
Validity & Reliability
Validity
• The research must lead to the collection of valid
data. How valid will depend on the method used
and the type of information elicited. Research is
valid if it is what it claims to be - truly
representative
Reliability
• Replicability and measurability are of prime
importance. It is this requirement of replicability
that encourages positivists to use quantitative
methods. The 'rule' is - you must be confident
that another researcher would match your
findings.
Hypothesis
deductive
Positivist or
Scientific
Problem or
lack of
understandin
g
Methodology
Choice
phenomenologica
l
Post Modern
Discourse
analysis ?
Mostly
quantitative
inductive
qualitative