Managing chest pain
Download
Report
Transcript Managing chest pain
MANAGING CHEST PAIN
Dr Carl Shakespeare, Consultant Cardiologist MD FRCP FACC FESC
BMI The London Independent Hospital
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
The Killers
Coronary Disease
Aortic Dissection
Pulmonay Embolism
v
Cardiac Entrapment
Nodule
Pericarditis
Atelectesis
v
Hiatus
Hernia
PE
GERD
NICE Guidelines
The diagnosis of stable angina is made from:
a clinical assessment alone
or in combination with
a diagnostic test
v
NICE Clinical Guideline 95. 2010 www.nice.org.uk/guidance/C G95
Exclude Other Causes
Cardiac Causes
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aortic Stenosis
Myo-Pericarditis
Non-Cardiac Causes
v
Musculoskeletal
Gastric
Pulmonary causes (incl: PE, pneumonia )
Non Anginal Type Symptoms
Continuous or prolonged symptoms
Unrelated to activity
Pleuritic
Gastric: relationship to eating, nocturnal
v
Making The Diagnosis
“Pre-test probability” has emerged when trying to
diagnose angina.
Typicality of symptoms
Age
Risk factors
ECG abnormality
v
Pre-Test Probability
The method of:
“% Likelihood of having coronary disease”
<10%
10-29%
30-60%
60-90%
>90%
v
Pryor DB et al, Annals of Internal Medicine 1993 118; 81-90
“Typicality” of Symptoms
Angina Pain is:
Constricting/tight in front of chest, neck,
shoulders, jaws or arms
Induced by physical exertion/mental stress
Relieved by GTN in < 5v minutes
Typical Angina: all the above symptoms
Atypical Angina: two of the above features
Not Angina: one or none of the above
Atypical Symptoms...
Ischaemic equivalents:
Dyspnoea on exertion
Reduced effort tolerance
Palpitations
Atypical Description: (especially women!)
Shortness of breath, palpitations
Nausea, indigestion,
Fatigue, sweating,
Back and jaw pain
v
Cardiac Symptoms in Women
Less “exertional symptoms” than men
More atypical: prolonged, neck, throat, rest
More angina less angiographic disease (50%)
50% continue to have chest pain, hospitalisation, and
diagnostic uncertainty.
2X increase in non-fatal MI
v
Common: angiographically
normal NSTEMI (10-25%)
Risk Factors
The presence of risk factors may add to the
diagnosis
The absence of risk factors doesn’t exclude the
diagnosis (25% coronary events occur in the
absence of significant risk factors)
High risk includes: Smoking,
Diabetes, Lipids
v
RACE?
ECG
Don’t rule out angina based on normal ecg
Consider: LBBB
Pathological Q waves
ST, or T wave abnormalities
v
An abnormal ECG increases the probability in any group
Identifying CV Risk
Age
LDL-c
Smoking
HDL
Systolic Blood Pressure
Diabetes
Triglycerides
Family History
Snoring
Poor church attendance
v
Age
Increased Pre Test Probability in any group
Male> 70 years 90% in typical and atypical symptoms.
Women > 70 years
(atypical) 60-90%
(typical + high risk) >90%
v
Pre Test Probability
v
Pre Test Probability
(10-90%)
Blood Tests to exclude exacerbants
Rx Aspirin
Consider Diagnostics based on PPP
Treat risk factors
Treat as Angina
v
(>90%)
Rx as Angina
Unstable Angina
PPP (10-29%)
Offer Calcium Scoring (low radiation 1mSv)
= 0 : Investigate other causes
1-400:
Cardiac CT
Angiography
Yes: Rx as Angina
U: Functional Imaging
v No: Other causes
>400 Cardiac Catheterisation
Calcium Scoring
v
Cardiac CT Angiography
v
The diameter of the
Total lesion (bulk)
predicts events
Bulky –
at risk
Bulky –
inflamed
Healing –
Remodeled
PPP (30-60%)
Offer Non-invasive Functional Imaging
Reversible Myocardial Ischaemia?
Uncertain
Cardiac
Catheter
Yes v
No
Rx: Angina
Other
causes
Non-Invasive Functional Testing
Consider availability and expertise:
Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy SPECT
Stress Echocardiography
Cardiac MRI with perfusion imaging
v
PPP (60-90%)
Consider Cardiac Catheterisation
No
Yes
Offer Functional Imaging
Reversible Ischaemia
Other Ix
Offer Cardiac Catheter
v
Rx as Angina
Imaging
Significant Disease
Functional
Other Ix
Cardiac Catheterisation
Risks
Proceed to PCI
Value in women
v
> 90% Probability
No need for investigations
Treat for Angina
Further Management:
Progressive Symptoms
Intolerance to medication
Associated Symptoms
v
ANGIOGRAPHY
What About the Exercise Test?
Poor diagnostic test?
Functional Assessment
Therapeutic Value
Effort Tolerance
Prognostic value
Especially in women
Chronotropic response
v
Treatment
Treat with Aspirin and Beta blocker
Be guided by symptoms
Refer to Rapid access Chest Pain Clinic
Treat before considering intervention
v
Assumptions about Women
“... Their hormones protect them....”
“... Women represent less risk than men..”
“... Women’s tests are usually
false positives
v
Realities about Women
Their hormones do protect them until age 45
Women’s incidence then becomes similar to
men’s
Women’s outcomes are worse than men’s
v
Women behave
differently to men
Pathophysiology- Differences
Less anatomical obstructive coronary disease
Erosive Coronary disease
Microvascular dysfunction
v
Abnormal Coronary Reactivity
Novel Risk Factors
Traditional risk factors underestimate IHD risk in women
Higher CRP in women
Inflammatory basis
Raised autoimmunity
hsCRP relates to:
DM II
Metabolic syndrome
Hormone deficiency
v
Worse Outcomes
Women not taken seriously
Less diagnostic tests
Angiographically normal
Less adherence to guidelines
Clustering of risk factors + novel risk factors, and loss of
oestrogen activity
v
Greater exposure to inflammation
Coronary Reactivity: Microvascular
Dysfunction
Angina + Ischaemic Test + Normal Coronaries
Greater frequency of plaque erosion
Retinal artery narrowing (clinical indicator in women)
More prominent positive remodelling
More microvascular ischaemia:
v
Endothelial Dysfunction
Key component of atherogenesis; predicts CV
events
Assessed with: coronary, Brachial artery
vasodilatation Nitric oxide dependent pathway
Abnormal activity associated with 4x mortality
Restoration of Endothelial Function
v
associated with improved outcome
Abnormal reactivity not associated
with risk factors
Bonetti PO JACC 2004 44; 2137
Peripheral Hypereactivity
v
Rubenstein R 2010 EHJ 31:1142
Treatment in Women
Restoration of endothelial dysfunction associated with
improved prognosis
Risk Factor Modification
Asprin + Statin + ACEI
Imipramine
Ranolazine
v
Statistics
No decrease in sudden death in women
Symptomatic women have more persisting symptoms
Higher hospitalization
Greater adverse outcomes than men despite <
significant anatomical
disease and > systolic function
v
Shaw LJ Circulation 2008 117, 1787