Inferential statistics, cont`d., Reading, writing, and
Download
Report
Transcript Inferential statistics, cont`d., Reading, writing, and
Single sample
One-tailed versus two-tailed tests
t-test:
Use
Significance level (type I and II errors)
Degrees of freedom (df)
Two samples
Unpaired or independent samples t-test
Paired or dependent samples t-test
Non-parametric statistics
Chi-square Test (χ2): Used with nominal variables in two
independent categories
Works by comparing the actual scores to probability estimates
Rank-order methods: Scores transformed into ranks
Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks test: For dependent
samples
Mann-Whitney U test: For independent samples
Multigroup statistical methods
ANOVA (Analysis of Variance)
Saves time
Reduces probability of significance by chance
Rationale: Between group and within group variance
Is variability between groups > variability within groups
Statistic: F ratio and df
One-way ANOVA: Similar to independent samples t-test
Two-way ANOVA: Two independent variables
Two main effects and one interaction
Multiple comparison methods: Post-hoc tests
Scheffe (unequal sample size)
Tukey (equal sample size)
Randomized blocks ANOVA (RBANOVA): For repeated
measures designs
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): Controls for variables
that might affect data
Non-parametric multigroup tests
Friedman two-way analysis of variance
Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance
Complex statistical methods
Multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA): More than one
dependent variable
Discriminant analysis: Estimates the contribution of each
dependent variable in separating groups.
Factor analysis: Organize observations into underlying
constructs
Research proposal outline
Title
Abstract
Table of contents, budget, resources, biographical
sketches
Research protocol
Specific aims
Background and significance
Methods
Ethical issues: IRB
References
Title page
Title: Short, succint, unambiguous.
“A study to investigate physiological measures of
anxiety and their relation to stuttering adaptation
during oral reading trials under two levels of audience
complexity”
Investigator details (degree, affiliation, contact)
Agency to which being submitted
Abstract
100-200 words
Summary of proposed research
Budget: Equipment, subject payments, salaries, travel,
consultants, administrative costs.
Biography: Education, skills, abilities. Resume, pilot
studies, completed investigations, existing grants.
Research protocol
Specific aims: Objectives, rationale
Background and significance: Existing knowledge,
Priliminary work, Theoretical and practical consequences,
Clinical applications.
Methods: Sampling, subjects, measurements,
procedures, data analysis.
Ethical issues: IRB, human/animal subjects protection
References
Appropriate citations
Watson, Jensen, Smith, and Kelly (1987)
Watson et al. (1987)
(Miller, 1991)
(Miller, 1991; Killion, 1992)
Complete references.
Author (year). Title. Ear and Hearing, 36, 776-781.
Writing
Concise, clear, efficient, effective
“ The results of the study indicated that when faced with
hyperactive children with short attention spans (AD-HD) who were
clearly unmotivated and who eventually became unresponsive to
test stimuli because of their distractibility, clinicians were prone to
modify their instructional techniques by terminating reinforcement
followed by the introduction of a “time out” phase, during which
time the training program was suspended for a period of few
minutes or more.”
When the rate of the response being trained decreased by 10%, the
clinicians suspended the training program for 5 to 10 minutes.
Resources: APA, AIP