Table of Contents Table of Contents
Download
Report
Transcript Table of Contents Table of Contents
Chapter 2
The Research Enterprise in
Psychology
The Scientific Approach: A Search for
Laws
Empiricism
Basic assumption: events are governed by some
lawful order
Goals:
– Measurement and description
– Understanding and prediction
– Application and control
Goal of theory testing in science: refutation not
proving – Karl Popper
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Five steps of
the Scientific
Method
Table of Contents
The Scientific Method: Terminology
Operational definitions are used to clarify precisely
what is meant by each variable
Participants or subjects are the organisms whose
behavior is systematically observed in a study
Data collection techniques allow for empirical
observation and measurement
Statistics are used to analyze data and decide
whether hypotheses were supported
Findings are shared through reports at scientific
meetings and in scientific journals – periodicals
that publish technical and scholarly material
– Advantages of the scientific method: clarity of communication and relative
intolerance of error
Research methods: general strategies for
conducting scientific studies
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Peer Review of Scientific Articles
The process of publishing scientific studies
allows other experts to evaluate and critique
new research findings.
They carefully evaluate each study’s
methods, statistical analyses, and
conclusions, as well as its contribution to
knowledge and theory.
The purpose of the peer review process is to
ensure that journals publish reliable findings
based on high-quality research.
Table of Contents
Figure 2.4 The peer
review process for
journal submissions.
Table of Contents
Experimental Research: Looking for
Causes
Experiment = manipulation of one variable under
controlled conditions so that resulting changes in
another variable can be observed
– Detection of cause-and-effect relationships
Independent variable (IV) = variable manipulated
Dependent variable (DV) = variable affected by
manipulation
– How does X affect Y?
– X= Independent Variable, and Y= Dependent Variable
Table of Contents
Experimental and Control Groups:
The Logic of the Scientific Method
Experimental group – subjects who receive some
special treatment in regard to the independent
variable
Control group – similar subjects who do not receive
the special treatment
– Logic:
• Two groups alike in all respects (random assignment)
• Manipulate independent variable for one group only
• Resulting differences in the two groups must be due to the
independent variable
ExtraneousVariable: variable, other than the independent
variable, that may influence the dependent variable.
Confounding variables: occurs when participants in one
group of subjects are inadvertently different in some way from
participants in the other group, influencing outcome.
Table of Contents
The basic elements of an experiment
Table of Contents
Experimental Designs: Variations
Expose a single group to two different conditions
– Reduces extraneous variables
Manipulate more than one independent variable
– Allows for study of interactions between variables
Use more than one dependent variable
– Obtains a more complete picture of effect of the independent
variable
Table of Contents
Manipulation of two independent variables in an experiment
Table of Contents
Strengths and Weaknesses of
Experimental Research
Strengths:
– conclusions about cause-and-effect can be drawn
– Probabilistic causality
Weaknesses:
– artificial nature of experiments
– ethical and practical issues
Table of Contents
Descriptive/Correlational Methods:
Looking for Relationships
Methods used when a researcher cannot manipulate
the variables under study
• Naturalistic observation
• Case studies
• Surveys
– Allow researchers to describe patterns of behavior and
discover links or associations between variables but cannot
imply causation
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Statistics and Research: Drawing
Conclusions
Statistics – using mathematics to organize,
summarize, and interpret numerical data
• Descriptive statistics: organizing and summarizing
data
• Inferential statistics: interpreting data and drawing
conclusions – use of probability
Table of Contents
Descriptive Statistics: Measures of
Central Tendency
Measures of central tendency = typical or average
score in a distribution
Mean: arithmetic average of scores
Median: score falling in the exact center
Mode: most frequently occurring score
– Which most accurately depicts the typical?
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Descriptive Statistics: Variability
Variability = how much scores vary from each other
and from the mean
– Standard deviation = numerical depiction of variability
• High variability in data set = high standard deviation
• Low variability in data set = low standard deviation
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Descriptive Statistics: Correlation
When two variables are related to each other, they
are correlated.
Correlation = numerical index of degree of
relationship
– Correlation expressed as a number between 0 and 1
– Can be positive or negative
– Numbers closer to 1 (+ or -) indicate stronger relationship
Table of Contents
Figure 2.13 Positive and negative correlation
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Correlation: Prediction, Not
Causation
Higher correlation coefficients = increased ability to
predict one variable based on the other
– SAT/ACT scores moderately correlated with first year
college GPA
2 variables may be highly correlated, but not causally
related
– Foot size and vocabulary positively correlated
– Do larger feet cause larger vocabularies?
– The third variable problem
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Inferential Statistics: Interpreting
Data and Drawing Conclusions
Hypothesis testing: do observed findings support the
hypotheses?
– Are findings real or due to chance?
Statistical significance = when the probability that the
observed findings are due to chance is very low
– Very low = less than 5 chances in 100/ .05 level
– Other factors might account for the results
Table of Contents
Evaluating Research: Methodological
Pitfalls
Sampling bias a sample is not representative of the population
Placebo effect when a participant’s expectations lead them to
experience some change even though they receive empty, fake, or
ineffectual treatment
Distortions in self-report data:
– Social desirability bias socially approved answers to questions
about oneself
– Response set tendency to respond to questions in a particular way
(agree with everything, etc.).
Experimenter bias
– the double-blind solution
– Research protocol of clinical trial for drugs – FDA in U.S.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
The Internet and Psychological Research
Internet-mediated research refers to studies in which
data collection occurs over the web.
Possible Advantages
– Samples that are much larger and much more diverse than
the samples typically used in laboratory research
– Have the potential to yield more diverse and representative
samples
Potential Disadvantages
– Sampling bias resulting from self-selection may be a more
troublesome issue in Internet-mediated research
• Web users tend to be younger, brighter, and more affluent than
nonusers
– Data are collected under far less controlled conditions than
in traditional studies
Table of Contents
Ethics in Psychological Research: Do
the Ends Justify the Means?
The question of deception
The question of animal research
– Controversy among psychologists and the public
Ethical standards for research: the American
Psychological Association
– Ensures both human and animal subjects are
treated with dignity
Table of Contents
Table of Contents