here is the PowerPoint presentation
Download
Report
Transcript here is the PowerPoint presentation
Hypothesis Tests for Means
The context
“Statistical significance”
Hypothesis tests and confidence intervals
The steps
Hypothesis
Test statistic
Distribution
Alpha, and the rejection region
Result
p-Values
One-sided vs. two-sided tests
Hypothesis tests for proportions
The context
PARAMETERS
= population mean (unknown)
= population SD (might be known)
STATISTICS
n = sample size
xx = sample mean
s = sample SD (using n-1)
ALSO
0 = conjectured value of
Statistical significance
We’re trying to decide whether is equal to 0.
As usual we use x
x as an estimate of . Usually x
x is at
least a little different from 0. But could the
difference be due to random variation?
IF YES – then we DO NOT REJECT the hypothesis that
is really equal to 0. We say that x is not
significantly different from 0.
IF NO – then we REJECT the hypothesis that = 0.
We say that x IS significantly different from 0.
Hypothesis tests are just confidence intervals
If we only cared about hypothesis tests for means, we could make
this a lot simpler.
Just construct a confidence interval for ,
based on n, x,
x, s (or ) and your favorite confidence level C.
If 0 is outside the confidence interval, then we reject the
hypothesis that = 0. The significance level is = 1 – C.
That’s all there is to it. So why all the complex ritual of a
hypothesis test?
Because there are other hypothesis tests, for other hypotheses
(difference of two means, for example). For those tests, we
need the ritual.
Hypothesis Test for
Cookbook using rejection regions
1. Choose hypotheses – H0 and HA.
2. Define a test statistic.
3. Predict the distribution of the test statistic,
assuming that H0 is true.
4. Choose C and . Pick a rejection region.
5. Look at the observed value of the test statistic.
Is it in the rejection region? If so, reject H0.
Hypothesis Test for
Cookbook using rejection regions
1. Choose hypotheses – H0 and HA.
2. Define a test statistic.
3. Predict the distribution of the test statistic,
assuming that H0 is true.
4. Choose C and . Pick a rejection region.
5. Look at the observed value of the test statistic.
Is it in the rejection region? If so, reject H0.
Choose hypotheses
Two-sided test:
H0: = 0
One-sided tests:
H0: = 0
or
H0: = 0
HA: 0
HA: > 0
HA: < 0
Working rule: Always use two-sided tests.
Hypothesis Test for
Cookbook using rejection regions
1. Choose hypotheses – H0 and HA.
2. Define a test statistic.
3. Predict the distribution of the test statistic,
assuming that H0 is true.
4. Choose C and . Pick a rejection region.
5. Look at the observed value of the test statistic.
Is it in the rejection region? If so, reject H0.
Define a test statistic
x 0
Choose
z
or
x 0
t
s
n
n
Do you know ? Maybe it comes with the null
hypothesis. If so, use it.
Hypothesis Test for
Cookbook using rejection regions
1. Choose hypotheses – H0 and HA.
2. Define a test statistic.
3. Predict the distribution of the test statistic,
assuming that H0 is true.
4. Choose C and . Pick a rejection region.
5. Look at the observed value of the test statistic.
Is it in the rejection region? If so, reject H0.
Distribution of the test statistic
ASSUME H0 IS TRUE.
Then (if you know ) z has a STANDARD NORMAL
distribution.
Or (if you’re using s) t has a “t” distribution with
n-1 degrees of freedom.
Hypothesis Test for
Cookbook using rejection regions
1. Choose hypotheses – H0 and HA.
2. Define a test statistic.
3. Predict the distribution of the test statistic,
assuming that H0 is true.
4. Choose C and . Pick a rejection region.
5. Look at the observed value of the test statistic.
Is it in the rejection region? If so, reject H0.
(Standard normal case)
The rejection region is a range (or double-range) of values of the
test statistic that are
(a) UNLIKELY if H0 is true
(b) roughly consistent with the alternative HA.
The rejection region should have probability (given H0).
Two-sided case:
Rejection region
consists of two
parts, each with
probability /2.
- z*/2
z*/2
Predicting the distribution
• If you’re using t, just use t-critical values.
• For the one-sided case:
Rejection region
probability , all in
one tail.
z*
Chance of a Type I error
Note:
IF H0 is actually true, then there is still a
probability of that you will reject the null
hypothesis.
- z*/2
z*/2
Chance of a Type I error
There are two possible bad results:
TYPE I ERROR (“act of commission”) – reject H0, when
H0 is actually true.
The probability of a Type I error is
(given that H0 is true)
TYPE II ERROR (“act of omission”) – don’t reject H0,
when H0 is actually false.
The probability of a Type II error depends
on the actual value of
Hypothesis Test for
Cookbook using rejection regions
1. Choose hypotheses – H0 and HA.
2. Define a test statistic.
3. Predict the distribution of the test statistic,
assuming that H0 is true.
4. Choose C and . Pick a rejection region.
5. Look at the observed value of the test statistic.
Is it in the rejection region? If so, reject H0.
Tradeoff
High (say, 10%) then you have a good chance of
having a statistically significant result, but it won’t
impress anyone.
MORE TYPE I ERRORS
Low (say, 1%) then your significant results are more
convincing, but you’ll have fewer of them.
MORE TYPE II ERRORS
Is there a way to avoid choosing in advance?
Determine p-value
The “p-value” is the answer to this question:
What fraction of x ‘s are more extreme than the one
you actually obtained?
If HA: 0 this means, what fraction are further
from zero than the value you obtained?
If HA: > 0 this means, what fraction are more than
the value you obtained?
If HA: < 0 this means, what fraction are less than
the value you obtained?
Determine p-value
Example:
Do a test of H0: = 0 vs. HA: 0 .
Get test statistic z = 2.30.
What’s the p-value?
tail: 0.0107
z=2.30
Probability of seeing 2.30 OR MORE: 0.0107
Probability of seeing 2.30 OR MORE EXTREME: 0.0214
p-value for 2-sided test: 0.0214
Determine p-value
Keep it simple?
p-value =
(for 1-sided test with z) = NORMSDIST ( 1 - |z| )
(for 2-sided test with z) = 2 × NORMSDIST(1-|z|)
(for 1-sided test with t) = TDIST ( |t|, n-1, 1 )
(for 2-sided test with t) = TDIST ( |t|, n-1, 2 )
df
number of tails
Determine p-value
The p-value is the border between ’s for which
we reject H0 and ’s for which we do not
reject H0.
REJECTION REGION VERSION: Pick , and the
rejection region, in advance.
In this story, the p-value is an afterthought.
p-VALUE FIRST VERSION: Find the p-value first.
Then if anyone has a favorite , you can…
Reject H0 if p <
Do not reject if p > .
Example: 1969 Draft Lottery
Null hypothesis (informally): The numbers for the
second half of the year were drawn randomly from
the population 1, 2, …, 366.
(Note: The mean of these numbers is 183.5, and
their standard deviation is 105.6547. )
Null hypothesis (formally): H0 : = 183.5
(and this is one of those cases where = 105.6547
comes with the null hypothesis)
Alternative:
HA : 183.5
Example: 1969 Draft Lottery
H0 : = 183.5
HA : 183.5
0 = 183.5
= 105.6547
160.92
Experiment: n = 184, xx = _________
Test statistic:
p-value: 0.00375
z
x 0
n
x 183.5
= - 2.898
7.789
Conclusion: REJECT H0 (even at 1% significance level)
Hypothesis tests for proportions
PARAMETER
p = population proportion
STATISTICS
n = sample size
k = number of “hits”
p̂p = k / n = sample proportion
Hypothesis tests for proportions
Test statistic:
pˆ p0
z
SE
pˆ p0
p0 (1 p0 )
n
(Minor subtlety: The distribution of the test statistic
is based on H0, so we use p0 in the formula for SE.
This is different from what we do in confidence
intervals, but not by much.)
Another example
Suppose we have flipped 10000 coins, and obtained 5100
heads. Is this result statistically significant?
Another example
Suppose we have flipped 10000 coins, and obtained 5100
heads. Is this result statistically significant?
Choose:
H0: p = 0.50
HA: p 0.50
Another example
Suppose we have flipped 10000 coins, and obtained 5100
heads. Is this result statistically significant?
Choose:
H0: p = 0.50
Conditions? OK.
HA: p 0.50
Another example
Suppose we have flipped 10000 coins, and obtained 5100
heads. Is this result statistically significant?
Choose:
H0: p = 0.50
HA: p 0.50
Conditions? OK.
Distribution of p^, given H0:
Normal, mean 0.50, SD=0.005
Another example
Our value of p^ is 0.51. That’s 2.0 SD’s above the mean.
What fraction of p^ values would be further from zero
than 0.51 ?
Another example
Our value of p^ is 0.51. That’s 2.0 SD’s above the mean.
What fraction of p^ values would be further from zero
than 0.51 ?
ABOUT 4.5%, counting both tails. So, P-value is 0.045.
Result of test
Is a P-value of 0.045 good enough to reject H0?
Result of test
Is a P-value of 0.045 good enough to reject H0?
If we choose = 0.05, then yes. But that’s a very mild
test for such an extraordinary claim.
Result of test
Is a P-value of 0.045 good enough to reject H0?
If we choose = 0.05, then yes. But that’s a very mild
test for such an extraordinary claim.
If we pick = 0.05, then 5% of all our experiments will
end in rejecting H0, even though H0 is true every
time.
Result of test
Is a P-value of 0.045 good enough to reject H0?
If we choose = 0.05, then yes. But that’s a very mild
test for such an extraordinary claim.
If we pick = 0.05, then 5% of all our experiments will
end in rejecting H0, even though H0 is true every
time.
So we should choose a lower value of . In this case,
our result isn’t really “statistically significant.”
Result of test
Is a P-value of 0.045 good enough to reject H0?
If we choose = 0.05, then yes. But that’s a very mild
test for such an extraordinary claim.
If we pick = 0.05, then 5% of all our experiments will
end in rejecting H0, even though H0 is true every
time.
So we should choose a lower value of . In this case,
our result isn’t really “statistically significant.”
We need a bigger sample!