2008ISBI_VesselSegmentation_RichardSocher

Download Report

Transcript 2008ISBI_VesselSegmentation_RichardSocher

Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Learning Based
Hierarchical
Vessel Segmentation
 Presenter:
 Richard Socher
www.socher.org
 Authors:
 Richard Socher
 Adrian Barbu
 Dorin Comaniciu
Overview
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
• Background
– Machine Learning
• Marginal Space Learning
• Probabilistic Boosting Trees
– Visual Features
• Haar and Steerable Features
• Hierarchical Vessel
Segmentation
• Results and Future Work
2
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Marginal Space Learning
• General Framework which
tackles problem of high
dimensional parameter
spaces
• Posterior distribution of the
parameters lies in a small
region of the n-dimensional
parameter space
• Idea: Start in small marginal
spaces and increase
dimensionality of the search
space
• Fewer parameters
have to be examined
• Large speed-ups
3
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Marginal Spaces of Vessels
• Marginal Space 1:
Gradient Candidates
• Marginal Space 2:
Cross Segments
• Marginal Space 3:
Quadrilaterals
4
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Machine Learning: Probabilistic Boosting Trees
• Each node is a strong
boosting classifier:
f T (x) =
1
Z
P
T
t = 1 ®t ht (x)
• Transform into probability:
q(+ 1jx) =
ex p( 2f T ( x ) )
1+ ex p( 2f T ( x ) )
• During training, samples
are divided into subnodes
• During testing, the top
recursively collects the
probabilities:
p~N (yjx)
=
q(+ 1jx) p~r i ght (y)
(3)
+
q(¡ 1jx) p~l ef t (y)
(4)
5
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Visual Features
• Sample features and use
them as input to classifier
• Haar Features
– Thousands of cheap
features through integral
image:
• Steerable Features
– Useful for finding the
orientation and scale of an
object, given its location
– Intensity, gradient,…
6
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
1. Learning Based Edge Detection
2. Cross-Segment Detection: Width
3. Quadrilateral Detection: Length
4. Dynamic Programming
7
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Level 1 – Learning Based Edge Detection
•
Goal: Rough estimation of vessel borders
•
Candidates are pixels with large gradient
•
Annotation used to create positive and
negative samples for the PBT learning
•
Fast and little limitation for higher levels
Original Frame
Large Gradients
Samples with gradient direction (gy,-gx)
M x ;y = PPBT(I (x ;y) = edgejHaar x ;y )
8
Level 2: Cross Segment Detection
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
• Goal: cross segments, loosely corresponding to width of vessel
• Candidates are created by going in opposite gradient direction
from all locations of Level 1, until another point from Level 1 is hit
• Segments and their Haar
Features are given to a PBT
9
Level 3: Quadrilateral Detection
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
•
•
•
•
Goal: find pairs of cross segments that, if connected as a quadrilateral,
capture an area of the vessel.
The probability of such a quadrilateral shows how likely two cross segments
are connected in the complete vessel.
Steerable Features are sampled and used for training a PBT:
Gradient, grey value; probability map of Level 1, differences in grey value
Coordinate System for steerable Features
Positive and Negative Training Samples
10
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Level 4: Dynamic Programming
•
Goal: Final vessel segmentation, the most likely connection of cross segments
•
Formulation as lowest cost path in weighted graph G = (V,E)
V = cross-segments,
E = edges between segments, if they form a quadrilateral
Weight(e(v1,v2)) = log((1-p)/p)
p = P(Quadrialateral(v1,v2))
•
Solved by dynamic programming
11
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Results
12
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Results on unseen data of very low quality
13
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Results on Testing Set
• Training on 134 frames
• Testing on 64 frames
• Detection Rate: 90.1%
False Alarm 29%
• Example of distracting side vessel
14
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Future Work
• Extension to full vessel tree through a
junction point detector
15
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Conclusion
• Hierarchical learning based vessel segmentation method
– highly driven by data: applicable to any tube like structure
– generalizes well to lower quality X-ray images.
• New representation of a vessel consisting of three marginal spaces:
border points, vessel width and vessel pieces (quadrilaterals)
• Novel use of MSL and steerable features in segmentation of objects
without a mean shape.
• Results for single vessel segmentation are preliminary but promising
• Work in progress: time consistency, full tree, …
• More details in my thesis: www.socher.org
16
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
Thank you!
Questions?
1. Learning Based Edge Detection
2. Cross-Segment Detection: Width
3. Quadrilateral Detection: Length
4. Dynamic Programming
17
References
Learning Based Hierarchical Vessel Segmentation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Friedman, J. H., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R., "Additive Logistic Regression: a
Statistical View of Boosting." (Aug. 1998)
A. Torralba, K. P. Murphy and W. T. Freeman. (2004). "Sharing features: efficient
boosting procedures for multiclass object detection". Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE
Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
Pp 762- 769.
http://people.csail.mit.edu/torralba/shortCourseRLOC/boosting/boosting.html
T. Zhang, "Convex Risk Minimization", Annals of Statistics, 2004.
Zhuowen Tu, “Probabilistic boosting-tree: Learning discriminative models for
classification, recognition, and clustering.,” in ICCV, 2005, pp. 1589–1596.
http://www.stat.ucla.edu/~ztu/publication/tu_z_pbt.pdf
Y. Zheng, A. Barbu, B. Georgescu, M. Scheuering, and D. Comaniciu, “Fast
automatic heart chamber segmentation from 3d ct data using marginal space learning
and steerable features,” in IEEE Int’l Conf. Computer Vision (ICCV’07), Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, 2007.
http://www.caip.rutgers.edu/~comanici/Papers/HeartSegmentation_ICCV07.pdf
P. Viola and M. Jones, “Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple
features,” 2001.
http://research.microsoft.com/~viola/Pubs/Detect/violaJones_CVPR2001.pdf
18