Communication? - My Illinois State
Download
Report
Transcript Communication? - My Illinois State
Can One Not “Not
Communicate?
Proseminar in Communication—COM 422
John R. Baldwin—Illinois State University
Pragmatics of Communication
Background
(Watzlawick, Beavin, & Jackson, 1967)
Gregory Bateson and the study of schizophrenic
children
Hmmm…The problem may not be in the child…it
must be in the ____________.
– Communication double-binds
– Discrepancy in messages (especially verbal and
nonverbal)
What’s going on in this video?
– Lindenstrasse (German Soap Opera)
– Erich, Helga, Marion (22:00)
WB&J’s 5 Axioms
One cannot not communicate
All communication has content +
relationship
The nature of relationship depends upon
how partners punctuate sequences
Humans communicate digitally and
analogically
All interchanges are symmetrical or
complementary
Some thought questions
How do the axioms relate to family or
relational “systems” (something we may
talk about later in the course?)
For WB&J, what defines
– Communication?
– Message?
– Interaction?
Compare and Contrast
Relationship/ Analog
Content / Digital
“Defines relationship, “imposes
behavior”
“Describes things” (report)
One Cannot Not
Communicate
What do the authors mean?
When would this axiom apply for WB&J?
How do other axioms relate to this one, if at
all? (some may relate more than others!)
Applying the axioms
Honey, I Shrunk the Kids!
More on communication…
Language in a System:
Communication
Sending
Receiving
Meaning
All of
These
Interpreting
Pragmatic
Conceptual
ALL COMMUNICATION
SYSTEMS HAVE
A MODE OF TRANSMISSION
– SIGNS
– SIGNALS
ALL COMMUNICATION
SYSTEMS HAVE
PRAGMATIC FUNCTION
TRUE LANGUAGE-BASED
COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS HAVE
CONCEPTUAL FUNCTION
INTERCHANGEABILITY
CULTURAL TRANSMISSION
ARBITRARINESS
DISCRETENESS
DISPLACEMENT
PRODUCTIVITY
Language productivity (continued)
EMERGENT
EVOLVES
BUT ALWAYS RULE GUIDED (set by
language and culture)
–
–
–
–
Phonetic
Semantic
Syntactic
Pragmatic
A thought question:
A first look at a class exercise