Qualitative Content Coding

Download Report

Transcript Qualitative Content Coding

Qualitative Research

1. Coding

2. Analyzing

3. Writing
1. Coding Qualitative Data

1st Read through the data(transcript, speech, field notes)


2nd Build a code list, code book or rubric

Need an organized listing of your categories

Need a detailed description of each code/category


Take notes of what you think the data tell you

Define what would be included

Explain what would be excluded
Refine code list as you go

Move some things to subthemes

Combine some themes
3rd Connect actual data to each code

Quotes, lines, portions of text
More on step 2 of coding:
Building the coding list
•
Thematic analysis – select categories based
on data, objectives, sensitizing concept
–
Name some sensitizing concepts you have in
your studies
Some sensitizing concepts to
consider
•
Frame analysis: sort your data by the
interpretive frames within which people
construct meaning and understanding
–
Example: could sort interview responses into
the various frames you see respondents using
to describe the roles they play (e.g. parent, wife,
professor)
–
Example: how people talk about illness (pain,
cost, loss of lifestyle activities)
Some sensitizing concepts to
consider
•
Social network analysis: sort your data by the
relationships involved in the group
–
Example: if studying family communication
might look at family subsystems
•
•
•
•
Husband-wife communication
Wife-children communication
Husband-children communication
Sibling communication
Some sensitizing concepts to
consider
•
Event analysis: sort your data by the
perspectives represented in the interview
account
–
Example: person 1's point-of-view, person 2's
pov, etc
Some sensitizing concepts to
consider
•
Schema analysis: trying to get a window into the
mental architecture that underlie talk
•
Close reading of the text; try to discern why the
speaker(s) says what s/he says
•
Close attention to patterns of speech, key words, use
of metaphors, repetition of ideas
•
What ideas are repeatedly associated
•
What assumptions or meanings can you discern
•
e.g. What does “Bush a wimp” say about our
assumptions about qualifications for governance?
Some sensitizing concepts to
consider
•
Interpretive thematic analysis: code with your analysis in
mind; See themes as you read the data; group for similarity
(keep RQ and audience in mind);
–
Look for emerging topics within groupings
–
Compare and contrast each topic with other topics in a
cluster
–
Look for overlapping, distinctions, topics that should
be moved to a different cluster and topics that can be
eliminated
–
Adjust topics and clusters as you identify linkages and
themes – themes then guide your analysis
2. Analyzing Qualitative Data


Process of labeling your raw data and finding patterns
After coding, before writing, need to think analytically about your
research
–
Remember RQ and objectives
–
Use your data AND your coding of the data
–
What do your themes mean in terms of your RQ?
•
First order explanations – what YOU think is going on
•
Second order explanations – what research participants think is
going on
–
Consider patterns within and between categories
–
Compare emerging findings with existing theory
•
Agree?
•
Expand?
•
Change?
3. Writing Qualitative Findings
•
Specifically address your RQ
•
Include rich examples to support each finding
•
Explain how themes relate to each other
•
Present in a well organized manner
Parts of a qualitative write up
•
Title page (1 page)
•
Abstract (1 page, 100-200 words)
•
Introduction (may include literature review or lit rev may be a
separate section) (6-7 pages)
•
Research questions (1 paragraph)
•
Methods (5-6 pages)
•
Results (6-7 pages)
•
Discussions (5-6 pages)
•
Limitations and suggestions for future research (½ page)
•
References (3 pages)
Intro Ideas
•
Introduce topic, describe nature of situation,
provide overview
•
Justify topic
•
Preview paper
•
Tell how project furthers scholarly
understanding of communication and/or
•
Tell how project helps society at large
•
Segue to literature review
Lit Review Ideas
•
Justify topic
•
Introduce relevant theory
•
Summarize previous research in the area that
leads to your specific research questions
•
Conclude with explanation of why this certain
type of research on this topic is needed –
include your specific RQs
Method Section Ideas
•
Describe in detail what methodology you used (past tense)
•
Cite research to justify why you chose the method you chose
•
It should be clear how your method addresses your RQ
•
Define and describe your population and sample
•
Explain your sampling design (Who did you talk to, how many,
how, where, what, and when did you observe)
•
If you had IRB approval for human subjects, say so.
•
What were your variables and how did you define them
conceptually and operationally?
•
What sensitizing concepts did you use?
•
How did you code and analyze results?
Results & Discussion Ideas
•
Sometimes these are combined
•
Results explains and describes themes with
supporting quotes as evidence for each one
•
Discussion gives your big picture analytical
opinion of what this all means
–
how the research answers your RQ
–
how the research benefits society at large
Limits & Future Research Ideas
•
Limitations acknowledge restrictions on
applying research findings to all populations
•
Suggestions for future study should be based
not on limits but on your findings – Given what
you found in the study, what additional future
studies do you recommend to extend your
work?