CONTINUITY OF CARE AT THE END-OF
Download
Report
Transcript CONTINUITY OF CARE AT THE END-OF
CONTINUITY OF CARE
AT THE END-OF-LIFE
An oxymoron?
James Hallenbeck, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Director, Palliative Care Services
Care Involves:
People
Places
Time
Tools
Knowledge/Information
Behavior
Continuity involves
Relationships among people
Transitions across venues of care
Temporal synchronization
Communication of information
Transitions in the use of technology
Coordination of skill sets
Forces at Work in the
Background
Health care reimbursement system
Different payment structures in different venues
Structure of health care system
Organized primarily for cure, not care –
especially care of the dying
Culture
Of Medicine – “cult of cure”
Macro-culture – slow adaptation to new ways
of dying
N= 340 pts, 332 family members,
361 physicians, 429 others
Steinhauser, et. al. Factors Considered Important at the
End of Life by Patients, Family, Physicians, and Other
Care Providers. JAMA. END-OF-LIFE CARE.
284(19):2476-2482, November 15, 2000.
People
Family
Friends
Community
Clinicians
Self…
Venues of care
Movement across venues at the end-of-life
common – usually associated with acute hospital
stay
Usually associated with dys-continuity in terms of:
Health care providers
Reimbursement
Information flow
Family involvement
Where Do We Die
25%
8%
42%
25%
ICU
Acute Care
Nursing Home
Home
Great regional variation in final
venue – generally hospital deaths
greatest in the East and lowest in the
Northwest
Time
Care needs of the dying unpredictable – can
occur day or night
Few systems of care responsive at home
outside of hospice
911 fast-track to acute care
Coverage in nursing homes –off hours poor
Transfer to hospital common prior to
death
Tools and technology
Technology often a barrier to transitions across
venues for dying
Patients often “shackled” by technology used in
ICUs and acute care
Use of technology a means for clinicians to
display caring
Often technology continued beyond clinical
efficacy as technology a link between clinicians
and patients
Example: blood transfusions
Information and Communication
Poor systems for data flow across different
venues
Communication about end-of-life issues
challenging – requires high-level skills
In many cultures communication about
dying is indirect, non-verbal and through
the context
Skills in Caring
Educational deficiencies abound in palliative and
end-of-life care
Where skill exists, difficulty accessing skilled
practice
Example: lack of palliative care consults
Lay skill deficiencies:
As most people die in institutions, most people
lack basic skills
Need for coaching
Nothing is certain in life but
death and taxes…
Not just a statement of probability
What is needed
System level
Improved reimbursement system
Recognition of good care of the dying as
a core mission in health care
Especially in “nursing homes”
Valuation of care beyond the acute care
hospital
Address educational deficiencies
What is needed
Personal responsibility: Like the Boy Scouts, “Be
prepared!”
Discussion of goals and values, advance
directives
You are most likely going to die in an
institution – plan for it!
Money, save it – the government is not going to
be enough
Discuss family roles in illness, who does what
Educate yourselves
Advocate