Transcript Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Judicial Review and Civil Rights
LANDMARK US SUPREME COURT
RULINGS AND THE ROLE OF THE
COURT
Michael Quinones, NBCT
www.socialstudiesguy.com
APK: Activation of Prior Knowledge
___________________________________________________
Write at least 2-3 sentences describing a time when…
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
You
believed you were denied a right, privilege or freedom and
___________________________________________________
then did your best to gain/regain that lost right, privilege or
___________________________________________________
freedom.
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
Question of the Day
___________________________________________________
How
does Judicial Review provide equality for
___________________________________________________
all
U.S. citizens (is this even really possible)?
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
[Remember
to use specific evidence from the
___________________________________________________
cases in your responses]
Name and facts of the
Case
Plaintiff’s Constitutional Question or
reason for appealing to High Court
Constitutional Grounds for Supreme
Court’s Opinion
Name and facts of the
Case
Plaintiff’s Constitutional Question or
reason for appealing to High Court
Constitutional Grounds for Supreme
Court’s Opinion
The Elastic
Clause/Necessary & Proper
Clause-“Congress has the
power…to make all laws
which shall be necessary
and proper…”
Commerce Clause“Congress has the power to
regulate commerce…among
the several states…”
Commerce=trade,
buying/selling.
Supremacy Clause-“The
laws of the United States
which shall be made…shall
be the supreme law of the
land…and every state shall
be bound [by them]…”
14th Amendment/Equal
Protection’s Clause-No one
can be denied “equal
protection of the laws” or
“deprived of life, liberty or
property without due
process…” [organized legal
process with rules].
Commander in Chief
Clause-The president shall
be Commander in Chief of
the Army and Navy of the
United States, and of the
militia of the several
states…
13th Amendment“Involuntary servitude…
[slavery] shall not exist
within the United States…”
Content Preview Questions
1.
What is judicial review and what
effect can it have?
2.
What does it mean for a branch of
the government to have an
implied power and what is an
example the Judicial Branch has?
3.
4.
Why is the so-called
Elastic/Necessary and Proper
Clause an example of an implied
power?
What does it mean for a branch of
government to have an expressed
power and what are examples the
President and Congress both
have?
5. What does the Commerce
Clause allow the Congress to do
and how is it an example of an
expressed power?
6. What does the Commander-inChief Clause allow the POTUS
to control and how is it an
example of an expressed
power?
7. What is the purpose of the
Supremacy Clause?
8. How do the 13th and 14th
Amendments guarantee the
promise of equality to all U.S.
citizens?
Judicial Review
•
Judicial Review is the power of judges
in a court to decide or rule that a law is
unconstitutional.
•
Here is what might cause a court to
use judicial review: A law passed by a
legislature may be considered unfair or
discriminatory by someone.
•
Citizens affected by these “unfair” laws
[ex. arrest and convictions in court] may
decide to sue a government, person or
organization or appeal their cases to a
higher court.
•
Here are possible outcomes of judicial
review: A court may affirm (keep),
overturn, reverse or strike down any
law if it believes it does or does not
violate any portion of the U.S.
Constitution.
Implied Powers
•
Judicial Review is an example of an
implied power the Judicial Branch
possesses.
The word imply means to indirectly say or
do something without using specific
words.
Article II, Section II of the U.S. Constitution
states:
“The judicial Power shall extend to all
Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this
Constitution, the Laws of the United
States…”
Does the quote above, in your opinion, give
the Supreme Court the implied power to
interpret laws (say what the laws mean)?
The Elastic Clause a.k.a. The Necessary and Proper Clause
[This is an example of an implied power]
•
“Congress has the power…to
make all laws which shall be
necessary and proper…”
•
Does the quote above imply the
following?:
•
The Elastic Clause gives Congress
the power to adjust to the future
with the ability to address anything
that can affect the nation. This
power called Elastic because it can
stretch to meet any need just as a
rubber band does.
•
However, as the clause states the
power to make laws must be limited
to whatever shall be necessary
[needed] and proper [appropriate,
justified].
Expressed Powers
• These are powers that
are specifically given to a
branch of the
government as written in
the U.S. Constitution.
• This idea is connected to
the principle of
separation of powers that
states certain branches
of the government have
specific expressed
powers.
The Commerce Clause
•
“Congress has the power to
regulate commerce…among the
several states…”
•
The Commerce Clause is an example
of an expressed power because it is a
specific power given to the U.S.
Congress.
•
Commerce relates to any activity
aimed at earning money by
manufacturing, buying, selling or
trading items of value.
•
Commercial advertizing [commercial
for short] is designed to get people to
want and buy goods or services.
The Commander-in-Chief Clause
•
The president shall be
Commander in Chief of the
Army and Navy of the United
States, and of the militia of the
several states…
•
The Commander-in-Chief Clause
gives the president the power to
order military forces into battle.
•
The Framers probably intended for
this power to enable the president
to protect the nation against all
enemies foreign and domestic.
The Supremacy Clause
•
“The laws of the United States
which shall be made…shall be the
supreme law of the land…and
every state shall be bound [by
them]…”
•
The Supremacy Clause was designed to
maintain a clear example for all of the
United States to follow.
•
Each state in the United States may have its
own government and laws but they must
not conflict with federal [national] laws or
the U.S. Constitution. U.S. law and the U.S.
Constitution are the supreme law of the
land.
•
If state laws do contradict [conflict] U.S.
law or Constitution the U.S. Supreme Court
can overturn those laws.
13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
• This was the first of the so-called
“Reconstruction Amendments”
that was added to the U.S.
Constitution after the U.S. Civil War
in 1865 to help bring the nation
back together.
• The amendment immediately
outlawed (ended) slavery
everywhere in the United States.
14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
• This was the second of the so-called “Reconstruction
Amendments” that was added to the U.S. Constitution after
the U.S. Civil War in 1865 to help bring the nation back
together.
• This amendment was meant to provide full U.S. citizenship
rights for freed slaves after the U.S. Civil War whether they
were born in the U.S. or elsewhere by granting “equal
Section 1. All persons born or
protection of the laws.”
naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are
citizens of the United States and of the
State wherein they reside. No State
shall make or enforce any law which
shall abridge the privileges or
immunities of citizens of the United
States; nor shall any State deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor deny
to any person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws.
Marbury vs. Madison 1803: The “Job Case”
Established the Supreme Court’s right
to Judicial Review of all laws and
actions of government officials
Facts of the Case:
Outgoing President John Adams issued 42
appointments for magistrates [judges].
Congress had just passed a law called the
Judiciary Act of 1789 which gave President
Adams the chance to appoint the new judges.
The magistrates were confirmed by the Senate
and President Adams ordered his Secretary of
State, James Madison, to deliver all of the
appointments.
But…it just so happened that James Madison
was the in coming president’s new vice
president.
Madison was able to deliver 38 of the 42
appointments of Adams to the new magistrates.
After becoming president, Thomas Jefferson
who was a rival of John Adams, decided to stop
delivery of the remaining 4 appointments so he
could select his own people for jobs.
One of the 4 appointees, William Marbury,
decided to sue so he could receive his job as
allowed by the Senate’s confirmation and the
Judiciary Act of 1789.
President John Adams
President Thomas Jefferson
Marbury vs. Madison 1803: The “Job Case”
Constitutional Question:
• The Court had to decide
whether the actions of
James Madison acting
on orders of new
president Thomas
Jefferson were valid. This
was complicated by the
fact that the
appointments had
already been confirmed
by the Senate. Was
Article 1 and 3
challenged?
Supreme Court’s Ruling:
The Court’s opinion was that
the Judiciary Act of 1789 was
“unconstitutional” which
made the appointment of
Marbury unenforceable by the
Supreme Court. This was the
first time the Court had ever
“reviewed” laws passed by
Congress . The chief justice
declared that it was the
Court’s job to “say what the
law means.”
McCulloch vs. Maryland [1819]: The “Bank Case”
Facts of the Case:
Alexander Hamilton, the Secretary of the
Treasury, convinced Congress that the
United States needed national banks to
help strengthen the new nation by
funding projects to modernize the
country. So the federal government
started creating banks.
Many people decided to take their
money out of state banks to deposit
into national/federal banks.
Since Maryland state banks now
had to compete for customers with
the national/federal banks
Maryland decided to tax them to
cut into their profit.
In Maryland, the national/federal
bank manager, refused to pay a
hefty $15,000 tax by the state.
Maryland sued to recover the tax
and won several cases but the
national/federal bank decided to
appeal what it thought were biased
decisions by Maryland courts.
McCulloch vs. Maryland [1819]: The “Bank Case”
Constitutional
Question(s):
Did the Congress have
the power to pass a law
creating a national
bank?
Did the state of
Maryland have the
power to tax or enforce
a law against the
national/federal
government?
Supreme Court’s Ruling:
The Court ruled that Congress had
the power to establish a
national/federal bank because of
the Elastic/Necessary and Proper
Clause.
Although the exact/specific
power to create a bank was not in
the Constitution it was implied as
one of their powers.
Whenever there is a conflict
between the national/federal
government and a state the
national/federal government must
prevail [win] as stated in the
Supremacy Clause.
Gibbons vs. Ogden [1824]: The “Boat Case”
Facts of the Case:
Aaron Ogden purchased exclusive rights
to operate steamboats in state waters
between New York City and a town in
New Jersey.
Thomas Gibbons, one of his competitors in
the steamboat business, had a federal
federal license with exclusive rights to
operate steamboats in the very same area.
Ogden believed his license to be superior
to Gibbons’ license and sued to shut down
his rival competitor.
Gibbons vs. Ogden [1824]: The “Boat Case”
Constitutional Question(s):
Which license was superior
the federal license or the
state license?
Which jurisdiction was more
powerful (state or federal)?
Did Congress have the power
to regulate commerce
between states
Supreme Court’s Ruling:
The opinion of the Court was
that Congress had the
expressed power to regulate
commerce [trade,
buying/selling, finance].
• Also, the Supremacy Clause
states that…
• Whenever there is a conflict
between the national/federal
government and a state the
national/federal government
must prevail [win, triumph]
Plessy v. Ferguson [1896]: The “Train Car” Case
Facts of the Case:
Constitutional Question(s):
Louisiana state law allowed for separate
train cars for whites and blacks.
Was Homer Plessy entitled to equal
Protection/treatment under the law?
A “justice” committee with members who
were white and black decided to challenge
the law because they thought it was racist and
unfair.
The “justice” committee found a man named
Homer Plessy, who was of mixed race so he
would be allowed to but a ticket in the “white
section.” They also raised money and got a
lawyer to challenge the law just in case Plessy
was arrested.
After Plessy boarded the train he announced
that he was black and was told to go the
“black car.” He refused and was arrested.
He was found guilty and fined $100.
He lost his appeals in a Louisiana state court
but was granted Certiorari 4 years later in the
Supreme Court..
Supreme Court’s Ruling:
The opinion of the Court was that separating
people by race was not unfair or racist and
Plessy’s rights were not violated.
The dissenting minority opinion heavily
criticized the majority decision!
Decision’s Effect:
The court’s ruling led to a legal
precedent to the doctrine
[belief/concept] of Separate but Equal.
This ruling led to many years of
government supported racism.
Ruling allowed de jure [by law or legal]
segregation [separation].
Brown v. Board of Education [1954]: The “Separate Schools” Case
Facts of the Case:
A third grade student named Linda Brown
Was forbidden from going to an all-white
school 7 blocks from her home.
Instead she was forced to walk 6 blocks
Across train tracks and past junk yards to
wait at a bus stop to attend a “colored”
school 1 mile from her home.
Constitutional Question(s):
Would the legal precedent set in the Plessy
case be overturned?
Were racial segregation [separation]
laws allowable?
Supreme Court’s Ruling:
Her parents were persuaded by the
NAACP to sue the school, system after trying
to register their child and being refused.
The opinion of the Court determined
All their appeals were rejected because of
the precedent [stare decisis] set by the
Plessy case decision which allowed
separate but equal public facilities .
also harmed their self image.
The Brown family was granted an appeal
[certiorari] to the Court in 1954.
Separate but Equal effected black children’s
ability to learn because based on studies
The Court’s previous ruling in Plessy was
overturned because they believed the 14th
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution allowed
equal protection under the law.
Korematsu vs. United States [1944]: The “Japanese” Exclusion Case
Facts of the Case:
President Franklin Roosevelt issued an
Executive Order excluding/removing all
Japanese-Americans from the West Coast
of the United States. After the 1941
Japanese attack on the U.S.
Japanese-Americans were forced to sell
their homes and businesses. They were
then relocated to “camps” in Arizona, New
Mexico and Texas.
Many Japanese-Americans had been in the
U.S. for several generations and almost all
were natural born citizens.
Constitutional Question(s):
Was the executive order issued by the
President allowable and within his
power?
Were Japanese-Americans treated
unfairly during a time of war?
Supreme Court’s Ruling:
The opinion determined that as
Commander in Chief the president had
the duty, power and responsibility to
use his judgment to determine how
to handle war time emergencies
Many sued to be released but all failed in
their appeals.
Fred Korematsu sued for his release and was
granted certiorari in 1944.
so the “temporary” relocation was
not considered a violation of
Korematsu’s rights.
Swann vs. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education [1971]:
The “Forced Busing” Case
Facts of the Case:
Constitutional Question(s):
After all efforts to desegregate schools in
North Carolina schools in the CharlotteMecklenburg system remained heavily
racially segregated [separated by color].
Was the ruling in the Brown case being
obeyed by this school district?
The parents of black 6-year old James Swann
believed that not being able to go to a
school of their choice beyond their
neighborhood was preventing the child
from receiving a proper education.
The parents believed that busing should be
provided to insure that desegregation was
really happening and their child was going
to a school that was appropriate.
All lower courts ruled in the school district’s
favor because all but most elementary schools
were busing students.
Must a state government agency “go out of
its way” to insure constitutional rights?
Supreme Court’s Ruling:
The opinion of the court stated that without
forced busing of students to even
out the racial mix of schools the district was
not doing enough to make sure schools were
not racially segregated.
Forced busing become mandatory if the
schools wanted to do it.
Sources
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/150/2940~New-York-SkylineDay-Posters.jpg
http://cache.wonkette.com/images/2006/03/supreme%20court%201.jpg
http://community.theolympian.com/albums/album220/23plaintiff_attny_hand.
jpg
http://www.mentalfloss.com/wp-content/images/facts/dfdt.jpg
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/law/witt/images/lect9/fx23_william_marbury.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitutio
n
http://www.americanpictures.com/genealogy/descent/photos/Thomas.Jefferson.jpg
http://www.priceofliberty.net/wp-content/images/adams-vi.jpg
http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/anthropology74/ce1.htm
http://www.landmarkcases.org/korematsu/cartoon1.html
www.stus.com