Transcript Minimum Wage

INEQUALITY
Principles of Microeconomics
FALL 2006
Sources:
1947-79: Analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data in
Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America
1994-95, p. 37.
1979-2001: U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Income
Tables, Table F-3:
http://www.census.gov/hhes/income/histinc/f03.html
Thresholds: U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Income
Tables, Table F-1:
http://www.census.gov/hhes/income/histinc/f01.html
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Income
Tables, Table F-3:
http://www.census.gov/hhes/income/histinc/f03.html
Thresholds: U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Income
Tables, Table F-1:
http://www.census.gov/hhes/income/histinc/f01.html
The CBO data show that between 1979 and 2003:
o The average after-tax income of the top one percent of the population more than
doubled, rising from $305,800 to $701,500, for a total increase of $395,700, or
129 percent. (CBO adjusted these figures for inflation and expressed them in
2003 dollars.)
o By contrast, the average after-tax income of the middle fifth of the population
rose a relatively modest 15 percent, or $5,900, reaching $44,800 in 2003.
o The average after-tax income of the poorest fifth of the population rose just 4
percent, or $600, over the past 24 years.
o The top one percent of the population received 12.2 percent of national after-tax
income in 2003, up from its already-large 7.5 percent share in 1979.
o In contrast, the shares of national income received by various groups of low- and
middle-income people all fell. The middle fifth of the population received 16.5
percent of the national after-tax income in 1979, but only 15.5 percent in 2003.
The bottom fifth received 6.8 percent of such income in 1979, but just 5.0 percent
in 2003.
Average After-Tax Income by Income Group
(in 2003 dollars)
Income Category
Lowest fifth
Second fifth
Middle fifth
Fourth fifth
Top fifth
Top 1 Percent
1979
$13,500
$27,300
$38,900
$50,900
$89,700
$305,800
2003
$14,100
$30,800
$44,800
$63,600
$138,500
$701,500
% Change
1979-2003
$ Change
1979-2003
4.4%
12.8%
15.2%
25.0%
54.4%
129.4%
$600
$3,500
$5,900
$12,700
$48,800
$395,700
Source: Congressional Budget Office, Effective Federal Tax Rates: 19792003, December 2005
Find your own state:
http://www.cbpp.org/1-26-06sfp-states.htm
Greatest Income Inequality Between
the Top and the Bottom, Early 2000s
1. New York
2. Texas
3. Tennessee
4. Arizona
5. Florida
6. California
7. Louisiana
8. Kentucky
9. New Jersey
10. North Carolina
Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute,
Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends, January 2006
Greatest Increases in Income Inequality
Between the Top and the Bottom,
Early 1990s to Early 2000s
1. Tennessee
2. Connecticut
3. Washington
4. North Carolina
5. Utah
6. Texas
7. West Virginia
8. Pennsylvania
9. Florida
10. Maine
Sources: Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970;
National Bureau of Economic Research; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Note: Real wage is the nominal wage divided by the consumer price index.
Real Hourly Wage Changes, by percentile, 2003-2005
Source: Lee Price, “Why People Are So Dissatisfied with Today’s Economy,” EPI
Issue Brief #219, 28 January 2006
Average Executive to Average Production Worker
Pay Ratio, 1990-2004
Sources: Total executive compensation: Business Week annual compensation survey, various
issues, 1991-2005. Includes: salary, bonus, restricted stock, payouts on other long-term
incentives, and the value of options exercised. Average worker pay: BLS, Employment, Hours,
and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics Survey, Table B-2.
Cumulative Percent Change in Economic Indicators,
1990-2004 (in 2004 dollars)
CEO Pay
S&P
Profits
Worker Pay
Minimum Wage
319%
238%
87%
4.5%
-6%
Sources: Total executive compensation: Business Week annual compensation survey, various issues, 1991-2005.
Includes: salary, bonus, restricted stock, payouts on other long-term incentives, and the value of options
exercised. S&P 500 Index: Economic Report of the President, 2005 Table B-96; 1997, 2000 Table B-93; average
of daily closing index. Corporate Profits: BEA, NIPA, Table 6.16, with inventory valuation and capital consumption
adjustments. Average worker pay: BLS, Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment
Statistics Survey, Table B-2. Minimum wage: Lowest mandated federal minimum wage, nominal; US Dept. of
Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Wage and Hour Division. Adjustment for inflation: BLS, Average
Annual CPI-U, all urban consumers, all items.
Value of Minimum Wage, 1954-2004
[in 2001 dollars]
Minimum Wage, 1960-2005
current $
real $2005
1960
$1.00
$5.58
1968
1.60
7.51
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
3.10
3.35
3.35
3.35
3.35
3.35
3.35
3.35
3.35
3.35
6.94
6.86
6.48
6.22
5.98
5.79
5.68
5.50
5.30
4.08
1990
3.80
5.33
1995
4.25
5.40
1998
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
5.15
5.15
5.15
5.15
5.15
5.15
5.15
6.15
6.02
5.67
5.58
5.46
5.31
5.15
Source: Economic Policy Institute
http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/issueguides_minwage_minwage
A full-time worker (working 2,080 hours a year) earning
$5.15 an hour would earn $10,712 a year. . .
State Minimum Wages Greater than the Federal Minimum Wages
> 6 states just voted to increase the minimum wage: AZ, CO, MO, MT, NV, OH <
Source: Arthur B. Kennickell, "A Rolling Tide: Changes in the Distribution of Wealth in
the U.S., 1989-2001," Table 10. (Levy Economics Institute: November, 2003)
Source: Edward Wolff, Top Heavy (New Press: 1996), New Series Households data, pp.
78-79 (for years 1922-89) and "Recent Trends in Wealth Ownership, 1983-1998," Levy
Institute Working Paper No. 300, Table 2. (Levy Economics Institute: April, 2000)
o In 2003, the top one percent of the population received 57.5
percent of all capital income. This was larger than in any
other year examined by the CBO, with its data going back to
1979.
o The flipside of this trend is that the share of capital income
that is held by the rest of the population has dropped
markedly. In 2003, the bottom 80 percent of the population
received only 12.6 percent of such capital income, the lowest
share on record (with data back to 1979). As recently as
1989, for instance, the bottom 80 percent of the population
received 23.5 percent of capital income subject to taxation, a
share nearly twice as high.
Source: Congressional Budget Office, Historical Effective Federal Tax Rates:
1979 to 2003, December 2005
Forbes 10 Richest Americans
[net worth-September 2006]
1-Bill Gates
$53 billion
6—Jim C. Walton
$15.7 billion
2-Warren Buffett
$46 billion
7-Christy Walton
$15.6 billion
3—Sheldon
Adelson
$20.5 billion
7-S. Robson Walton
$15.6 billion
4-Lawrence
Ellison
$19.5 billion
5—Paul G. Allen
9—Michael Dell
$15.5 billion
9-Alice Walton
$15.5 billion
The World's Richest People
Making a billion just isn’t what it used to be. In its inaugural ranking of the world’s richest
people 20 years ago Forbes uncovered some 140 billionaires. Just three years ago they
found 476. This year the list is a record 793, up 102 from last year. They’re worth a
combined $2.6 trillion, up 18% since last March. Their average net worth: $3.3 billion.
Name
Citizenship
William Gates III
United States
Warren Buffett
United States
Carlos Slim Helu
Mexico
Ingvar Kamprad
Sweden
Lakshmi Mittal
India
Paul Allen
United States
Bernard Arnault
France
Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Alsaud
Saudi Arabia
Kenneth Thomson
Canada
Li Ka-shing
Hong Kong
Net Worth
($billion)
50.0
42.0
30.0
28.0
23.5
22.0
21.5
20.0
19.6
18.8
Residence
United States
United States
Mexico
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
France
Saudi Arabia
Canada
Hong Kong
Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 2002-03 (2003), Table 7.10.
Top 0.1 Percent Income Shares in the United States,
France, and the United Kingdom, 1913-1998
Source: T. Piketty and E. Saez, “Income Inequality in the United States, 19131998,” Quarterly Journal of Economics (February 2003): 36
Source: Shaohua Chen and Martin Ravaillon, “How Have the World’s
Poorest Fared Since the Early 1980s?” (World Bank)
Source: A. Maddison, The World Economy: Historical Statistics (2003)
Food for thought. . .
George A. Akerlof (2003 interview with Der Spiegel): "What we have here
is a form of looting. . .The rich don't need the money and are a lot less
likely to spend it—they will primarily increase their savings. Remember that
wealthier families have done extremely well in the US in the past twenty
years, whereas poorer ones have done quite badly.”
Paul Samuelson: "If we made an income pyramid out of a child's blocks,
with each layer portraying $1,000 of income, the peak would be far higher
than the Eiffel Tower, but almost all of us would be within a yard of the
ground.”
Mr. Spock of "Star Trek" (describing Ardana, where the rulers live in luxury
in a cloud city above miners working in misery): "This troubled planet is a
place of the most violent contrasts. Those that receive the rewards are
totally separate from those who shoulder the burdens. It is not a wise
leadership."