Transcript lecture_33_Apr-02_Evasion of immunity

The hostparasite relationship is based on the subtle
interplay between parasite survival strategies and host
defence mechanisms
• Successful parasites have evolved strategies for
survival & development in both invertebrate and
vertebrate hosts.
• The goal of a parasite is to propagate within the host
and be transmitted to the next host.
• The goal of the parasitised host is to cure or limit the
infection.
• These 2 goals are in conflict…. Who will win?
Parasite Immune Evasion strategies.
Parasites need time in host to complete complex
development, to reproduce (sexually or asexually) & to
ensure transmission.
Chronic infections (from a few months to many years) are
normal, therefore parasite needs to avoid immune
elimination.
Parasites have evolved immune evasion strategies.
Protozoan immune evasion strategies.
1. Anatomical seclusion in the vertebrate host.
Parasites may live intracellularly. By replicating inside host cell parasites avoid
immune response.
Plasmodium lives inside Red Blood Cells (RBC’S) which have no nucleus, when
infected not recognised by immune cells. Other stages of Plasmodium live inside
liver cells.
Leishmania parasites and Trypanosoma cruzi live inside macrophages.
2. Anatomical seclusion in the invertebrate host.
Plasmodium ookinetes develop in serosal membrane & are beyond reach of
phagocytic cells (hemocytes).
3. Antigenic variation.
In Plasmodium, different stages of the life cycle express different antigens..
Antigenic variation also occurs in the extracellular protozoan, Giardia lamblia,
and in the trypanosome T. brucei. Trypanosomes have “gene cassettes” of
variant surface glycoproteins (VSG’s) which allow them to switch to different
VSG. VSG is switched regularly. The effect of this is that host mounts immune
response to current VSG but parasite is already switching VSG to another
type which is not recognised by the host
4. Shedding or replacement of surface e.g. Entamoeba histolytica.
5. Immunosupression – manipulation of the immune response e.g.
Plasmodium.
6. Anti-immune mechanisms - Leishmania produce anti-oxidases to counter
products of macrophage oxidative burst.
Helminth immune evasion mechanisms in the vertebrate host.
1) Large size. Difficult for immune system to eliminate large parasites.
Primary response is inflammation to initiate expulsion, often worms are
not eliminated.
2) Coating with host proteins. Tegument of cestode & trematode worms,
is able to adsorb host components, e.g. RBC Ags, thus giving the worm
the immunological appearance of host tissue. Schistosomes take up
host blood proteins, e.g. blood group antigens & MHC class I & II
molecules, therefore, the worms are seen as “self”.
3) Molecular mimicry. The parasite is able to mimic a host structure or
function. The discovery in schistosomes of antigens common to both
vertebrate and invertebrate hosts, followed by the extension of these
observations to numerous parasites has led to the concept of molecular
mimicry.
4) Anatomical seclusion – Oddly, even Trichinella spiralis can live
inside mammalian muscle cells for many years.
5) Shedding or replacement of surface e.g. trematodes,
hookworms.
6) Immunosupression – manipulation of the immune response.
High burdens of nematode infection often carried with no outward
sign of infection.
Growing evidence that parasite secreted products include antiinflammatory agents which act to suppress the recruitment and
activation of effector leukocytes, or which block chemokine-receptor
interactions.
Evolutionary/ecological consequences of being a parasite
The good news: In some ways, you are in a beautiful, warm, predictable
environment. Imagine yourself sitting on the beach with food washing up on the
tide, all you have to do is pick it up ... the host takes care of homeostasis (after
all, it needs to regulate a constant environment for the sake of its own internal
function) and goes to the effort of foraging and processing food for you.
The bad news: At the same time, it's in the host's interest to get rid of you.
Unless you can minimize your impact or find some way to contribute to the
"internal ecology" of the host, the host is going to spend all of its time evolving
tricks to kill you or convince you to leave. The energy that hosts spend on
defense against parasites can be huge, because the alternative is allowing a
continuing drain on resources.
There are many parallels with free living organisms, e.g. the trade-off between
allocating resources to competition within a patch or to dispersal between
patches. However, the big difference between parasites and non-parasites is
that in parasite biology the "patches" are living, coevolving, and actively hostile.
Therefore there are trade offs: evolutionary and physiological
Life, including aspects of this course, is full of trade off
scenarios.
Does natural selection favour:
Maximum fecundity
Maximum survival
These two objectives cannot be maximized because resources
invested in reproduction are not available for survival and vice
versa. The solution to this trade off will depend on other factors,
both biotic and abiotic.
Parasitol Res (2009) 104:217–221
DOI 10.1007/s00436-008-1297-5
REVIEW
An update on the use of helminths to treat Crohn’s and
other autoimmunune diseases
Aditya Reddy & Bernard Fried
Abstract This review updates our previous one (Reddy
and Fried, Parasitol Research 100: 921–927, 2007) on
Crohn’s disease and helminths. The review considers the
most recent literature on Trichuris suis therapy and Crohn’s
and the significant literature on the use of Necator
americanus larvae to treat Crohn’s and other autoimmune
disorders.
The pros and cons of helminth therapy as related
to autoimmune disorders are discussed in the review. We
also discuss the relationship of the bacterium
Campylobacter jejuni and T. suis in Crohn’s disease. The
significant literature on helminths other than N. americanus
and T. suis as related to autoimmune diseases is also
reviewed.
Helminth therapy with N. americanus
Hookworm infection with both N. americanus and A.
duodenale occurs predominantly among the worlds most
impoverished people and is a common chronic infection,
with an estimated 740 million cases, mainly in areas of
rural poverty in the tropics and subtropics (de Silva et al.
2003). The major hookworm-related injury in humans
occurs when the adult parasites cause an iron-deficiency
anemia resulting from intestinal blood loss (Hotez and
Pritchard 1995; Stoltzfus et al. 1997; Albonjco et al. 1998).
The chronic anemia associated with moderate to severe
hookworm infection is a handicap to the affected human
and limits the individual’s prospects of a better future
(Joven et al. 2005).
Despite its associated morbidity,
hookworm infections have apparent beneficial effects on
hosts suffering from diseases including CD which are linked
to overactive immune systems.
Some researchers have infected themselves with hookworms and
reported good results in regard to alleviating preexisting symptoms
associated with a disease state (Svoboda 2006). Lawrence claims his
severe asthma and seasonal allergies went into remission using the same
helminthic therapy offered herein (Svoboda 2006).
Helminth therapy with T. suis: Summers et al. (2005a, b, c, 2006) have
successfully utilized the pig whipworm, T. suis, in patients with IBD
and further clinical trials are anticipated. T. suis is a porcine
whipworm and though genetically similar to T. trichiura, does not
propagate in the human intestinal tract (Bee 1976).
Hymenolepis diminuta treatment against colitis in a rat model
Further reasons to proceed carefully with helminth therapy for colitis
related disorders was presented by Hunter et al. (2007) who examined
the ability of the tapeworm H. diminuta to affect the course of
oxazolone-induced colitis (a TH2 model) in the rat. Hunter et al. (2007)
found that infection with H. diminuta caused a significant exacerbation
of oxazoloneinduced colitis. Interestingly, Hunter et al. (2007) have
shown that H. diminuta infection is beneficial in other models of colitis.
The information from their study is presented as a caveat to the
position that parasitic helminths in general can be considered as a
therapy for different inflammatory disorders without necessitating
careful analysis of the immunologic basis of the condition.
Other autoimmune diseases
Based on the hypothesis that chronic inflammatory bowel disease
might be inhibited by stimulating a Th2 immune environment,
Summers et al. (2005a, b) modified disease pathology in 29 CD and
54 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients by inoculating them with TSO.
Previous studies involving animals have shown that parasite
infection can alter the course of autoimmune diseases (Reddy and
Fried 2008).
Understanding mechanisms by which helminths manipulate immune
responses and modulate autoimmune diseases such as IBD,
rheumatoid arthritis and Type 1 diabetes may help to develop novel
therapies for these diseases.
CAN WE USE PARASITES TO ALLEVIATE DISEASE?