Aversive Control of Behavior
Download
Report
Transcript Aversive Control of Behavior
Aversive Control
of Behavior:
Punishment &
Avoidance
Lesson 16
Life: The School of Hard Knocks
Learning with aversive stimuli
pain
sickness
Positive Punishment
B aversive outcome
Negative RFT
escape & avoidance
Classical conditioning
pair neutral stimulus w/ shock ~
B aversive SR
What type of punishment?
Positive punishment
Difficult to do human, ethics
but some human evidence
Mostly animal research ~
Factors that influence efficacy
Punishment is associative process
Trials effect
R
punished B aversive S
greater suppression
Intensity (magnitude)
greater intensity greater efficacy
Delay of punishment
longer delay less effective ~
Factors that influence efficacy
History of punishment
start w/ weak ineffective punishment
more intense punishment less effective
Habituation occurs
Alternate routes of reinforcement
Provide alternate responses to gain
reward after punishment
increases effectiveness ~
Human Case Study
NOT an experiment
9 month old boy w/ chronic vomiting
near death before treatment
Recorded precise muscle activity
identified muscle activity that
preceded vomiting ~
Procedure
Vomiting muscle activity observed
Punished w/ shock
produced startle response
but not crying
Results
Vomiting eliminated after 5 trials
over 3 days
BUT… ~
Potential Side Effects
Unintended & undesirable
Response generalization
other responses to aversive stimuli
anger/fear/aggression
avoidance
Global effects
can be worse than behavior punished ~
Monkey Study
Learn to push button to get food
opens a door
Put toy snake in food dish
quit pushing button after a few trials
Side effects
lost interest in eating
lost social status
lower in hierarchy ~
Painful Stimuli & Aggression
College women
1 teaches another words
1 group of teachers hand in warm water
Other while hand in ice water
Results
Ice water group verbally aggressive ~
Alternatives to Positive Punishment
Time-out
Remove opportunities for RFT
Response cost
Fines, loss of privileges
Differential RFT of …
Other Behaviors (DRO)
Incompatible Behaviors (DRI) ~
Escape & Avoidance:
Negative Reinforcement
Escape / Avoidance
Shuttle Box
2 compartments
Can jump over
barrier
Electrified grid
Speaker/light
emits signal ~
Shuttlebox
speaker
Tone on
Shuttlebox
speaker
Shock on
Shuttlebox
speaker
Jumps barrier
Shuttlebox
speaker
What is outcome?
Shuttlebox
Jumping over barrier terminates shock
More trials responds more quickly
learns to avoid shock ~
Shuttlebox
speaker
Tone on
Shuttlebox
speaker
Jumps barrier before shock on
Shuttlebox
speaker
What is outcome?
Shuttlebox Results
Early trials: escapes shock
After may trials: avoidance
Shift from
escape avoidance
Why? ~
Mowerer’s 2 Process Theory (1947)
2 processes involved in escape/avoidance
Operant & Classical Conditioning
Early trials escape (operant)
shock (SD) jumping (B) escape (SR)
Later trials avoidance (CC involved)
Tone (CS) evokes fear (CER)
B reduces fear drive
strengthens response ~
So...
Avoidance = escape from fear
fear is classically conditioned
D & CS
Tone = S
Avoidance no shock?
Does extinction occur?
2 process view suggest cyclical
performance ~
Observed performance
Hi
avoidance continues
Avoidance
Escape
Lo
# of trials
But extinction does NOT occur ~
Avoidance & Extinction
Avoidance behavior
Persists
Resistant to extinction
Explanation?
failure to avoid is punished
Cognitive Theory
(Annau & Kamin, 1961)
Conservation of Anxiety Theory
(Solomon & Wynne, 1954) ~
Expectancy Theory
Cognitive theory
Early trials consistent w/ 2 process
tone Fear avoidance
More experience expectancy
expectancy = no shock
Avoidance (B) satisfying outcome
Avoidance response strengthened
Difficult to extinguish ~
Conservation of Anxiety Theory
Fear of CS doesn’t fully extinguish
Immediate avoidance short latency
Delayed avoidance
Exposed CS longer
No extinction for later portion CS
Strengthens fear of early CS
Behavior Therapy
Exposure to sequential CSs
Exposure therapy - fear hierarchy ~