lecture18_decisionmaking
Download
Report
Transcript lecture18_decisionmaking
Decision Making in
Groups
Outline
I. Problems in Decision Making
Failure to share information
Risky shift/polarization
II. Video: GroupThink
Are Group Decisions Always Good?
Of course not.
Why do groups sometimes fail?
Information Sharing Problems in
Groups
Fail to pool unshared information effectively
Tendency to oversample shared information
This tendency is exacerbated in tasks without
‘correct’ decisions
Leaders can prompt members to revealed
unshared information
Group Exercise
Completely
Disagree
1
Completely
Agree
5
10
Using the scale above, indicate your agreement
with the following statement (write your name on
your paper):
The final exam in this course should be an essay
exam rather than multiple choice/short answer.
Groups: Moderating or Polarizing?
Common belief:
Groups exert a moderating effect on their
members
Groups more moderate decision makers than
individuals
But then…
In the early 1960s researchers questioned this
assumption
Risky Shift Research
Choice Dilemmas Questionnaire (CDQ)
12 life-situation problems involving a central
person with a choice between more or less risky
courses of action.
The participant's task is to choose the lowest
likelihood of success he or she would demand
before recommending the risky alternative.
SS complete the CDQ alone, after
discussing it with a group, and again alone
Risky Shift Research
Comparing individual responses to group
responses:
SS generally advocated riskier decisions in
groups!
This change carried over to later individual
choices
This is the RISKY SHIFT
Risky Shift Research
Researchers found risky shifts on many
attitudes, beliefs, values, judgements and
perceptions.
Some researchers found a different kind of shift:
Shift toward caution
Risky shift is part of a larger process!
Group Polarization
Discussion leads to group polarization:
Judgments made after group discussion will be more
extreme in the same direction as the average of
individual judgments prior to discussion.
The direction of the polarization depends on the
group members’ original viewpoints.
Thus, before we can predict how the discussion will
polarize the group, we must know the initial
opinions of the members.
Group Polarization
Risky Shift
Cautious Shift
1
Risk
5
7
3
A
B
9
C&D
E
F
Caution
Why?
Why do we shift our judgments to match
the position that our group initially values?
Two theoretical explanations:
Persuasive arguments theory
Social comparison theory
Persuasive Arguments Theory
After discussion, we can generate more
arguments favoring the more valued
alternative.
With the CDQ, arguments favoring risk rather
than caution are more plentiful.
Social Comparison Theory
During group discussion people actively
compare themselves with others
When they discover that some members of the
group have stronger attitudes than they do, they
begin endorsing more extreme positions.
Groupthink
…mode of thinking in a cohesive,
insulated, high success, prestige
group with strong minded,
powerful leader (with Praetorian
Guard). Desire for unanimity
overrides motivation to evaluate
alternatives properly.
Illusion of invulnerability
Assumptions of morality
Realisations
Stereotyping
Self-censorship
Illusions of unanimity
Mind-guarding
Direct pressure
Consequences
discussion curtailed, limited alternatives
limits on information seeking and re-evaluation of facts
outsiders less credible so fail to import expert advice
weak contingency planning
Video: Groupthink