Research Methods
Download
Report
Transcript Research Methods
The Need for
Science/Research
and
Research Methods
Chapter 1
Why we need Psychological
Science and Research
Three reasons: 1. Intuition, 2. Hindsight Bias , 3.
Overconfidence
Intuition = gut instinct
Hindsight Bias = after you find out the outcome you
believe you knew the outcome all along
That feeling inside of you telling you something is right or wrong
Examples: Columbia Disaster, Gulf oil spill, Man on the
moon(1969)
Overconfidence = thinking we know more than we do
about something; tend to be more confident than correct
Examples man will never reach the moon(1957),”[Ronald]
Reagan doesn’t have the presidential look.” 1964, “Heavier than
air flying machines are impossible.” 1895
The Scientific Attitude and
Critical Thinking
The scientific attitude
includes being curious,
skeptical and humble
Explore, ask questions and
be willing to make or admit
mistakes
Accepting those three
characteristics allows one
to think critically
Critical thinkers:
Are open minded
Can live with uncertainty
Distinguish fact from
opinion; rely on science
rather than personal
experience
Realize the world is
complex; don’t over
simplify
View all available evidence
before reaching a
conclusion
The Scientific Method
Research Methods
Descriptive Method
Descriptive Method
Observe,
collect, record data
Describes but does not explain
Easy to collect data
Little or no control over variables, biases
and behaviors
Three types
Naturalistic observation, survey method, case
study
Naturalistic Observation
Watching
and recording the behavior of an
organism in their natural environment
Only describes the behavior
Ex: Counting the number of people who
wear hats on a college campus
Survey Method
research asks a representative sample (target group) of
people oral or written questions
to find out about their attitudes, behaviors, beliefs,
opinions, and values.
mail, face-to-face, by telephone, and the Internet
Standardized, Inexpensive, replicable, large amount of
data quickly
Describes doesn’t explain
Ex: Student survey of risky behavior
Case Study
detailed in-depth investigation of a single case
concerning a person, a family, an organization,
or an event.
detailed in-depth information
Can lead to a hypothesis for further study
Doesn’t explain, cannot be replicated, reliability
and validity are in question
Ex: effects of smoking on one individual
Experimental Method
Experimental Research
Manipulation
and control of variables
Identifies cause and effect
Allows researcher precise control over
variables
Ethical concerns, practical limitations,
artificiality, uncontrolled variables, biases
Steps for Experimentation
1) Theory - idea
Sugar rots your teeth
2) Hypothesis/Operational Definition –
testable, measurable, verifiable
- Eating one bowl of sugar cereal every
morning rots your teeth
3) Variables
-Independent Variable (IV): manipulated variable
(types of cereal, amount of cereal )
- Dependent Variable (DV): actual outcome
(rotten teeth)
- Confounding Variable: any variable other
than the IV that could effect the outcome
4) Groups
- Control Group: does not receive treatment
(Placebo)
- Experimental Group: receives treatment
(cereal)
How groups are selected
Population
People that the sample is drawn from
• Ex: Swampscott High School
Sample
Subjects drawn from a particular population; target
group
• Ex: 9th grade boys
Random Sample
Randomly choosing from a population
• Ex: picking every 10th student who walks through the door
Control Measures
Single Blind
Controls subjects awareness
Researcher knows who is receiving active drug and
who is receiving placebo
Researcher can influence results
Double Blind
Controls both subject and researchers awareness
Third party controls distribution
Less bias
More scientific
Hypothesis: Drinking Vodka causes aggressive behavior
Drink
Belief
Belief
Vodka Tonic
Believed drinking Vodka
Believed drinking Tonic
Water
Tonic Water
Believe drinking Vodka
Believed drinking tonic
water
Behavior
More aggressive
Behavior
Less aggressive
Conclusion: Belief affected behavior more than actual drink
Correlation Method
Correlation
Correlation Research
Statistical analysis of relationships between variables
Identify relationships and how well one variable
predicts another
Helps clarify relationships between variables that
can’t be examined by other methods and allows
prediction
Does not allow researchers to identify cause and
effect relationships
Correlation
causation
Types of Correlation
Perfect
Positive
When both factors go up
(left-right)
0 - +1.0
Negative
Rarely occurs
When one factor goes up
and the other goes down
(right – left)
0 - -1.0
Zero
No relationship
Statistical Measures
Mean (average) =
Median (middle) =
Mode (most frequent)=
Range (difference between hi/lo) =