Compliance and Obedience

Download Report

Transcript Compliance and Obedience

Compliance
Type of social influence in which a person
changes attitudes or behavior in response
to another’s direct request
 Six principles involved in getting people to
comply with requests




Friendship/Liking
Commitment and
Consistency
Scarcity



Reciprocity
Social Validation
Appeals to Authority
1
Compliance

Friendship/Liking



Ingratiation: If someone likes you, they are
more apt to agree with your request
Self-enhancement: If you look good, use
appealing nonverbal behavior, people will
come to like your request as well! (think of
classical conditioning)
Enhancing the other: flattery will get you
places; gifts and favors work too
2
Compliance

Commitment and Consistency





Once we make a choice or take a stand, we
encounter pressure to behave consistently with
that commitment
Foot-in-the-door
Lowballing
Bait-and-switch
Effortful commitment
3
Effortful Commitment

Aronson & colleagues

Female participants came to the lab to join a
‘discussion group’
 Control participants: Asked to read a neutral
passage to the male experimenter
 High-Effort participants: Asked to read an
explicit passage from an erotic novel
4
Effortful Commitment

Aronson & colleagues


They discover that the group is BORING!
High-effort participants rated the discussion
group as
more interesting
 more fun
 they were more willing to come back to the group


than the control participants
5
Compliance

Scarcity



Opportunities seem more valuable when they
are less available
Limited number—Item is rare and hard-to-get
Limited-time offer
6
Compliance

Reciprocity



We should try to repay what another has
provided us
Door-in-the-face
That’s not all
7
Compliance

Social Validation


We view a behavior as correct in a given
situation to the extent we see others
performing that behavior
Bystander intervention
8
Compliance

Appeals to Authority


Authority provides benefits to society
Automatic compliance with authority can cause
trouble
Titles
 Material culture
 Experts agree…

9
Obedience

Type of social influence in which a person
obeys a direct order from another to
perform an action

Nazi Germany—Many people were simply
following orders. Is this legitimate? Are
normal people capable of true evil when
‘following orders’?
10
Stanley Milgram’s Obedience Experiments


40 males, aged 20 to 50,
each paid $4.50 for a study on
learning and memory
Participant is the ‘teacher’—
teach a list of word pairs to the
‘learner’ and shock him in
increasing levels if he gets it
wrong
11
12
Stanley Milgram’s Obedience Experiments
At certain levels, the ‘teacher’ hears the
‘learner’ protest
 If the ‘teacher’ asks to end the experiment,
the experimenter responds with a verbal
prod
 How far would you go? How far do you
think the average person would go?

13
Stanley Milgram’s Obedience Experiments
Every participant went to 300 volts
 26 participants — 65% — went all the way
to 450 volts (“X X X”)
 Many showed signs of considerable distress
 Participants were carefully debriefed and
follow-ups conducted

14
Stanley Milgram’s Obedience Experiments

Replications





Distance from participant to ‘learner’
Distance from participant to experimenter
Outside the Yale University setting
Women, other cultures
Autonomy of participant
15
What Breeds Obedience?

Emotional Distance of the Victim



If ‘learner’ is in same room, full obedience
drops to 40%
If ‘teacher’ has to hold ‘learner’s’ hand to a
shock plate, full obedience drops to 30%
Depersonalization
16
What Breeds Obedience?

Closeness and Legitimacy of Authority


If experimenter gives commands by phone, full
obedience drops to 21%
If experimenter leaves, and a ‘clerk’ decided
that the shock should be increased, 80% of
participants defied the illegitimate authority
17
What Breeds Obedience?

Institutional Authority


Authority of Yale University influenced
volunteers
Milgram replicated the experiment in
Bridgeport, Connecticut – 48% fully obeyed
18
What Breeds Obedience?

Disobedience of a fellow group member
liberates us from obedience

If another person defied the experimenter,
only 10% of Milgram’s participants fully obeyed
19
Intense Indoctrination: Cults
20
Intense Indoctrination: Cults
Compliance breeds acceptance
 Foot-in-the-door
 Charismatic leader
 Vivid, appealing message
 Potential converts are often at a turning
point in their lives
 Isolation from outside influences
 Social validation

21