Finite N Index
Download
Report
Transcript Finite N Index
Finite N Index and Angular
Momentum Bound from
Gravity
“KEK Theory Workshop 2007”
Yu Nakayama, 13th. Mar. 2007.
(University of Tokyo)
Based on hep-th/0701208
0. Introduction
Classification of (S)CFT
2 dimension CFT (BPZ…)
Central charge
Character
2 Dimension SCFT
Witten index
Elliptic genus
Similar classification exists for 4-dimensional SCFT?
Witten
index
Central charge (a-theorem, a-maximization)
Character?
Index for 4-dimensional SCFT
Geometrical classification via AdS-CFT?
Witten index for supersymmetric field theory
Witten Index on R4 (or T3 ×R) captures vacuum
structure of the supersymmetric (field) theories
Bose-Fermi
Only vacuum (H=0) states contribute
Does not depend on
Many
cancellation
applications
Study on vacuum structure
Implication for SUSY breaking
Derivation of index theorem (geometry)
The index for 4d SCFT
Consider SCFT on S3 × R. The index (Romelsberger,
Kinney et al) can be defined by a similar manner.
Properties
Only short multiplets (Δ=0) states contribute
Does not depend on β
No dep on continuous deformation of SCFT
The index is unique (KMMR)
Captures a lot more information of SCFT!
AdS-CFT @ Finite N
Index does not depend on the coupling constant
Index can be studied in the strongly coupled regime
AdS/CFT duality
Large N limit SUGRA approximation
Excellent agreement
N=4 SYM (KMMR)
Orbifolds and conifold (Nakayama)
Finite N case?
1/N
~ gs
Quantized string coupling?
What is the fundamental degrees of freedom?
Finite N Index and
Angular Momentum
Bound
Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound
from Gravity
Yu Nakayama
Index for N=4 SYM (gYM = 0)
Only states with
will contribute.
Contribution to Index
Chiral LH multiplets and LH semi-long multiplets
contribute to the Index
Chiral LH multiplet
LH semi-long multiplet
Computation of index from matrix model (AMMPR)
Path integral on S3 ×R reduces to a matrix integral over
the holonomy (Polyakov loop)
Strategy to determine Seff
Count Δ=0 single letter states
Integrate over U
Or direct path integral
Large N Limit vs Finite N
Explicit integration is possible in the large N limit
Introduce eigenvalue density evaluate saddle point
Saddle point is trivial leading contribution is just
Gaussian fluctuation
Finite N seems difficult.
Even for SU(2), we have to evaluate
Maximal Angular Momentum Limit
We propose a new limit, where the matrix integral is feasible
We take
Only
states with
will contribute.
Why do we call maximal angular momentum
limit?
The
limit prevents us from taking too large j1 with fixed
j2.
Not
protected by any BPS algebra!!
Index in maximal angular momentum limit
Index is trivial nontrivially! No finite N corrections!
For SU(2), we have
Similarly, they are trivial for SU(N).
Agrees with gravity (large N limit).
No finite N corrections
Partition function
Partition function is nontrivial with finite N corrections
For SU(2)
For SU(3)
For SU(∞)
Partition function does have finite N corrections
in the maximal angular momentum limit
Does not agree with gravity computation
Maximal Angular
Momentum Limit from
Gravity
Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound
from Gravity
Yu Nakayama
Physical meaning of angular momentum bound?
SUGRA admits only massless particle spin up to 2!
No consistent interacting theory with (finitely
many) massless particles spin > 2.
Gives the maximal angular momentum bound for
dual CFTs.
Highest weight state should satisfy j1 ≦ 1, j2 ≦1.
Only
decoupled free DOF contributes to the index in
this limit.
Any CFTs with dual gravity description (e.g. any
Sasaki-Einstein) should satisfy this bound.
Again there is no general proof from field theoy.
Nontrivial bound!
Contribution from BH?
In high energy regime, black holes may contribute to the index
Asymptotically AdS (extremal = BPS) Black
holes have charge
They do not satisfy maximal angular momentum
bound.
consistent with our results
They are not exhaustive?
Summary and
Outlook
Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound
from Gravity
Yu Nakayama
Summary and Outlook
Counting states (index) for finite N gauge
theory is of great significance.
Basic
building blocks for nonperturbative
string theory
Nature of quantum gravity
Difficult problem in general.
Maximal Angular Momentum Limit was
proposed.
No finite N corrections for index in this limit.
Finite N corrections for full index?