Transcript Slide 1
Recap
Heisenberg uncertainty relations
p x x
2
E t
2
The
product of the uncertainty in momentum
(energy) and in position (time) is at least as
large as Planck’s constant
1
Conjugate variables
(Conjugate observables)
{px,x}, {E,t} are called
conjugate variables
The conjugate
variables cannot in
principle be measured
(or known) to infinite
precision
simultaneously
2
Example
The speed of an electron is measured to have a
value of 5.00 x 103 m/s to an accuracy of
0.003%. Find the uncertainty in determining the
position of this electron
SOLUTION
Given v = 5.00 103 m/s; (v)/v = 0.003%
By definition, p = mev = 4.56 x 10-27 Ns;
p = 0.003% x p = 1.37x10-27 Ns
Hence, x ≥ h/4pp = 0.38 nm
p = (4.56±1.37)10-27 Ns
x = 0.38 nm
x
0
x
3
Example
A charged p meson has rest energy of 140 MeV and a
lifetime of 26 ns. Find the energy uncertainty of the p
meson, expressed in MeV and also as a function of its
rest energy
Solution
Given E = mpc2 = 140 MeV, t = 26 ns.
E ≥h/4pt = 2.0310-27J
= 1.2710-14 MeV;
E/E = 1.2710-14 MeV/140 MeV = 910-17
“Now you
see it”
Exist only for
E ±E
t = 26 ns
“Now you
DONT”
4
Example
estimating the quantum effect on a macroscopic particle
Estimate the minimum uncertainty velocity of a billard ball
(m ~ 100 g) confined to a billard table of dimension 1 m
Solution
For x ~ 1 m, we have
p ≥h/4px = 5.310-35 Ns,
So v = (p)/m ≥ 5.310-34 m/s
One can consider v = 5.3x10-34 m/s
(extremely tiny) is the speed of the
billard ball at anytime caused by quantum
effects
In quantum theory, no particle is
absolutely at rest due to the Uncertainty
Principle
v = 5.310-34 m/s
A billard ball of
100 g, size ~ 2 cm
1 m long billard
table
5
A particle contained within a
finite region must has some
minimal KE
One of the most dramatic consequence of the
uncertainty principle is that a particle confined
in a small region of finite width cannot be
exactly at rest (as already seen in the
previous example)
Why? Because…
...if it were, its momentum would be precisely
zero, (meaning p = 0) which would in turn
violate the uncertainty principle
6
What is the Kave of a particle in a
box due to Uncertainty Principle?
We can estimate the minimal KE of a particle confined in
a box of size a by making use of the UP
Uncertainty principle requires that p ≥ (h/2p)a (we
have ignored the factor 2 for some subtle statistical
reasons)
Hence, the magnitude of p must be, on average, at least
of the same order as p: | p | p
Thus the kinetic energy, whether it has a definite value or
not, must on average have the magnitude
K ave
2
p2
p )
2
=
~ 2 m ~ 2 ma 2
2
m
ave
7
Zero-point energy
p
p )
K ave =
~ 2m ~ 2m a2
2
m
av
2
2
2
This is the zero-point energy, the minimal
possible kinetic energy for a quantum
particle confined in a region of width a
a
Particle in a box of size a can never be at rest
(e.g. has zero K.E) but has a minimal KE Kave (its
zero-point energy)
We will formally re-derived this result again when
solving for the Schrodinger equation of this system
(see later).
8
Recap
Measurement necessarily involves interactions between
observer and the observed system
Matter and radiation are the entities available to us for
such measurements
The relations p = h/l and E = hn are applicable to both
matter and to radiation because of the intrinsic nature of
wave-particle duality
When combining these relations with the universal
waves properties, we obtain the Heisenberg uncertainty
relations
In other words, the uncertainty principle is a necessary
consequence of particle-wave duality
9
Introductory Quantum
mechanics
10
Probabilistic interpretation
of matter wave
11
A beam of light if pictured as monochromatic wave (l, n)
l
Intensity of the light beam is
A=1
unit
area
I = 0c E
2
A beam of light pictured in terms of photons A = 1
unit
area
E=hn
Intensity of the light beam is I = Nhn
N = average number of photons per unit time crossing unit area
perpendicular to the direction of propagation
Intensity = energy crossing one unit area per
unit time. I is in unit of joule per m2 per second
12
Probability of observing a photon
Consider a beam of light
In wave picture, E = E0 sin(kx–wt),
electric field in radiation
Intensity of radiation in wave
picture is I = c E 2
0
On the other hand, in the photon
picture, I = Nhn
Correspondence principle: what is
explained in the wave picture has to
be consistent with what is explained
in the photon picture in the limit
Ninfinity:
13
I = c E 2 = Nhn
0
Statistical interpretation of radiation
The probability of observing a photon at a point in unit
time is proportional to N
2
However, since Nhn = 0c E
the probability of observing a photon must also E 2
This means that the probability of observing a photon at
any point in space is proportional to the square of the
averaged electric field strength at that point
Prob (x) E 2
Square of the mean of the square of
the wave field amplitude
14
What is the physical interpretation
of matter wave?
we will call the mathematical representation of the de Broglie’s wave /
matter wave associated with a given particle (or an physical entity) as
The wave function, Y
We wish to answer the following questions:
Where is exactly the particle located within x? the locality of a particle
becomes fuzzy when it’s represented by its matter wave. We can no
more tell for sure where it is exactly located.
Recall that in the case of conventional wave physics, |field amplitude|2 is
proportional to the intensity of the wave). Now, what does |Y |2
physically mean?
15