Quantum Algorithms
Download
Report
Transcript Quantum Algorithms
Debasis Sadhukhan
M.Sc. Physics, IIT Bombay
1.Quantum Algorithm
2. Canonical Groverβs Quantum
Search Algorithm
3. Generalized Quantum Search
Operator: Selective Inversions of
Two States
4. Generalized Quantum Search
Operator: Selective Inversions of
Three States
*An algorithm is a well defined procedure or a set of
instructions to perform an information processing task.
*Complexity Classes: P , NP
*Quantum algorithms are those that uses quantum
mechanical principles at the time of itβs execution.
*Advantage of Quantum Algorithm: Superposition
principle allows a quantum algorithm to exploit an
exponentially large number of quantum components
using only polynomial recourses.
Hard to design !
Unsorted Database Search Problem
A database is nothing but a collection of items.
Number of items: N
Classical Search:
Average number of query to succeed: N/2
In the worst case, we need N-1 query to succeed.
If there are M solutions, then we require O(N/M) trials to
succeed.
But using Groverβs Quantum Search Algorithm
require
only π
π
π
*
trial to succeed.
1.
2.
Start with 0
β¨π
Apply Hadamard (π» β¨π ) gate on each state to get
uniform superposition of all states
1
2π β1
π = π π=0 |πβ©
2
π =
3.
Apply πΌπ‘ : 1 β 2|π‘β©β¨π‘|
4.
Apply πΌπ : 1 β 2 π π
π
π
t +
*
πβπ
|πππ‘βππ β©
π
*Letβs start with the uniform superposition of all the states.
i.e. the source state |π β©.
*Our solution is the target state |π‘β©.
G = βπΌπ πΌπ‘ , where, πΌπ‘ : 1 β 2|π‘β©β¨π‘| & πΌπ : 1 β 2|π β©β¨π |
Iteration Required (m):
*
* Now,
π π‘ = cos
so,
π
π
π
2
βπ
= sinπ β π
* So, no. of iteration required is π = π4
π
π
β
1
2
β‘ π(
π
)
π
Groverβs algorithm drives a quantum computer from a known initial
state (source state) to an unknown final state (target state) by using
selective phase inversions of these states.
Grover's operator performs the selective inversions only on a unique
source state and a unique target state.
Here, in this project, we make our search operator to perform
selective inversions on more than one source and target states.
The generalized algorithm is simply a successive iteration of the new
Generalized Grover's search operator πΊ2 = βπΌπ 1 ,π 2 πΌπ‘1,π‘2 , where
πΌπ 1,π 2 = 1 β 2 π 1 π 1 β 2 π 2 π 2 and πΌπ‘1,π‘2 = 1 β 2 π‘1 π‘1 β 2|π‘2 β©β¨π‘2 |
The generalized search operator: Selective phase
inversions of two source states and two target states.
The operator πΊ2 = βπΌπ 1 ,π 2 πΌπ‘1 ,π‘2 ,
where,
πΌπ 1 ,π 2 = 1 β 2 π 1 π 1 β 2 π 2 π 2
and πΌπ‘1 ,π‘2 = 1 β 2 π‘1 π‘1 β 2|π‘2 β©β¨π‘2 |
Here,
By the property of Walsh-Hadamard transform,
*
Let us take,
We need to construct a four dimensional orthonormal basis to
analyze the operation.
New Basis:
|π‘β₯1 β©, |π‘β₯ 2 β©, |π‘1 β©, |π‘2 β©
Where,
and
*
The Generalized search operator found in the new four dimensional
orthonormal basis is,
=
=
4
π
Where π = cos β1 (1 β ).
Analysis is similar to the case of canonical Groverβs Algorithm.
Analysis for all β¨ππ |ππ β© to be positive or negative:
We choose,
Define,
|π β β© is perpendicular to π‘1 , π‘2 & π + . So, πΊ2 does not induce any coupling between these
states and |π β β©.
Then the search problem effectively reduces to the conventional Grover's search problem
where we have one unique source states |π + β© and multiple target sates |π‘1 β© and π‘2 .
Summary: The results are mainly distributed in two main category:
1.
The problem is reducible into two Grover's search problem in two different
subspace, spanned by
π‘β₯1 , π‘1 and π‘β₯2 , |π‘2 β© .
2.
The analysis of the problem is similar to a Grover's search problem which can be
analyzed in conventional π‘β₯ , |π‘β© basis for all β¨π π |π‘π β© to be positive or negative.
Formulation:
The new search operator is the selective phase inversions of three source
states and three target states.
The operator πΊ3 = βπΌπ 1 ,π 2 ,π 3 πΌπ‘1 ,π‘2 ,π‘3 ,
where, πΌπ 1 ,π 2 ,π 3 = 1 β 2 π 1 π 1 β 2 π 2 π 2 β 2 π 3 π 3
and πΌπ‘1 ,π‘2 ,π‘3 = 1 β 2 π‘1 π‘1 β 2|π‘2 β©β¨π‘2 | β 2|π‘3 β©β¨π‘3 |
And
Again we need to find out the new search operator πΊ3 in a 6 dimensional
orthonormal basis.
But, this problem is hard to analyze analytically, so we perform numerical
calculations on some specific cases.
We find orthogonal basis states π‘β₯1 , |π‘β₯ 2 β©, |π‘β₯ 3 β©, using Gram-Schmidt
orthogonalization.
The initial states in the
be
basis will
Now, we construct the matrix πΊ3 in the new orthonormal basis and find
the eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
Result:
So, for the three states also we can categorized our results in two
different classes.
Now, we have taken some specific examples of this two classes and
analyze them numerically.
*
For the first example we have chosen π11 = 1, π12 = 0, π13 = 1, π21 =
0, π22 = 1, π23 = 0, π31 = 1, π32 = 0, π33 = 1.
This case corresponds to the case of two different π.
For n=16, we got,
Same for all the target states.
For different n, we have,
Plot:
Formula:
For the second example we have chosen π11 = 1, π12 = 1, π13 = 0, π21 =
0, π22 = 1, π23 = 1, π31 = 0, π32 = 0, π33 = 1.
This case corresponds to the case of three different π.
For n=16,
Plot: For |π‘1 β© & |π‘3 β©,
For |π‘2 β©,
For different n, we got
Formula: For π‘1 &|π‘3 β©,
For |π‘2 β©,
1.
The maximum amplitude of the target states after the optimal
number of iteration is independent of the dimension of the search
space.
2.
Depending on the maximum amplitude, we need to iterate the
generalized Groverβs operator suitable number of times to make the
maximum amplitude nearly equal to 1.
3.
For each case, the required number of iteration to get the target
states with almost 100% probability is the same as the time taken by
the canonical Grover's search operator.
4.
So, the performance of our new generalized algorithm is the same as
the conventional Groverβs search algorithm that performs selective
inversions only on a unique source state and a unique target state.