Law, Development, and Transition in East Asia POLS/SISEA/LSJ 469
Download
Report
Transcript Law, Development, and Transition in East Asia POLS/SISEA/LSJ 469
1
GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS OF CHINA
POLS 442/SISEA 449
Susan Whiting, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, University of Washington, Seattle
Introduction
2
Introducing my current research
(“What I did on my summer vacation”)
3
When Does Law Matter?
Perspectives
on “Rule of Law” in China
Two Motivating Questions
4
Why has an authoritarian regime led by the
Chinese Communist Party promoted the “rule of
law”?
When an authoritarian regime does promote
the “rule-of-law,” are citizens empowered?
1: Why promote “rule of law”?
5
Political legitimacy
Provide rationale for supporting the regime based on predictable,
transparent rules and procedures to govern society
Social stability
Channel and control expression of citizen grievances
Policy implementation
Better monitor the state’s own officials to elicit compliance with central
policy
Economic growth
Promote investment by securing property rights and enforcing contracts
International engagement
Facilitate international engagement by aligning more closely with
international discourse, norms and practices
5
Why Promote “Rule of Law”?
Social stability, among other reasons
6
A protester is dragged away from an
industrial park, the site of a 2006 land
dispute. (AP photo)
Why Promote “Rule of Law”?
Social stability, among other reasons
7
Promoting the “Rule of Law”
8
Major investments by
World
Bank, United Nations, International NGOs
Billions
Chinese
$ in the developing world, including China
state
China’s “Rule of Law” Initiative:
Promoted at the Highest Levels
9
9
1996 CCP General
Secretary Jiang Zemin
China is “building a socialist
rule of law state”
1999 Constitutional
amendment
“The People’s Republic of
China exercises the rule of
law, building a socialist
country governed according
to law”
China’s “Rule of Law” Initiative:
Explosion of new legislation
10
Passage of laws by
National People’s Congress
Across issue areas
Land law, for example
Land Management Law
(1998, revised 2004)
Rural Land Contracting
Law (2002)
Property Law (2007)
Labor
Environment
China’s “Rule of Law” Initiative:
Training of legal professionals expanded
11
China’s “Rule of Law” Initiative:
Training of legal professionals expanded
12
Average Annual Growth Rate of Graduates at the Master's and Doctoral Levels, 1994-2006 (%)
25
23.1
22.8
21.4
20
18.9
16.9
16.8
15
10
5
0
Economics
Law
Education
Engineering
Medicine
Administration
China’s “Rule of Law” Initiative:
Training of legal professionals expanded
13
Law graduates as of 2006
186,000/year (5% of all graduates)
Master’s and Doctoral 19,000/year (9% of all)
Bachelor’s
Law schools increased from 2 in 1978 to 640 now
China’s “Rule of Law” Initiative:
Growing legal profession
14
Lawyers
Licensed,
working in law firms full time
1983
8,600
2005
103,000
2009
150,000 licensed lawyers
Note—very low pass rate on bar
Highly
concentrated in major cities
China’s “Rule of Law” Initiative:
Legal profession in comparative context
15
Speed of China’s legal development impressive
China vs. Korea
Income
per capita, 2002
China
Korea
Lawyers
China
15
US $ 960
US $11,280
per 10 thousand population, 2002
1: 9,510
Korea
1: 9,383
Shanghai alone had more than 6,000 lawyers in 592 law firms
Nationwide, Korea had 6,273 lawyers in 258 law firms
China’s “Rule of Law” Initiative:
Legal professionals push boundaries
16
Ideological tug-of-war
Emerging cadre of public
interest lawyers
Push the boundaries of
acceptable advocacy
Farmers who lose their land
Victims of pollution…
State-controlled bar
Ministry of Justice
administers bar exam,
certifies lawyers, licenses
firms annually
China’s “Rule of Law” Initiative:
Judges and courts improving
17
Better trained judges
New court houses
But, courts subordinate to
local party-state
No tenure for judges
Local governments control
funding
Local party committee and
party political-legal
committee have influence
over
Court personnel
Acceptance of cases
Handling of cases
China’s “Rule of Law” Initiative:
Citizen legal consciousness promoted
18
Active government promotion of laws through public media
Two Motivating Questions
19
Why promote “rule of law”?
Multiple
motivations for China’s “rule of law” initiative
Major investment in “rule of law” initiative by Chinese
state
Next, are citizens empowered by the “rule of law”?
2: Are Citizens Empowered?
20
To answer this question, case study of cotton-growing community in
central China
Population
Rural population
590,540 people
75 %
GDP
Agriculture
Industry
Services
5 billion yuan
39 %
21 %
40 %
GDP per capita
9,000 yuan
Are Citizens Empowered?
What kind of legal issues do they face?
21
Land
Most valuable asset of farm households
Land disputes—“focal problem of rural China”
Background
Land
in urban areas: owned by state
Land in rural areas: owned by village collectives
Rural land is used exclusively for agriculture and rural housing
To develop industry or commercial real estate, land must be
converted to state land first
Are Citizens Empowered?
What kind of legal issues do they face?
22
14% of households in case study experienced land
disputes
Multiple types of land disputes
Most recent land dispute, by type
Compensation for land taking
Land readjustment
Abandoned/transferred land
Boundary/other
Total
Frequency
26
23
12
28
89
Percent
29.2
25.8
13.5
31.5
100.0
Are Citizens Empowered?
Land rights are established in law
23
Rights to 30-year land-use tenure for farmers
Equal land rights for rural men and women
No rights for farmers to sell land for non-agricultural uses
Procedural guarantees in government land takings for nonagricultural uses
Development of arable land for industrial parks, real estate
subject to higher-level approval and urban planning processes
Compensation standards set by state
Rights for farmers to sue in court to enforce laws, with legal
aid—if needed
Are Citizens Empowered?
Citizens do learn about their rights
24
Through What Channels
Do You Obtain Legal Information
Television
Talking with friends, colleagues
Government propaganda activities
Books
Village/school activities promoting law
Newspaper
Internet
Other (residual)
Total
Primary
Channel
%
67
9
5
5
5
5
0
4
100
Are Citizens Empowered?
Citizens do learn about their rights
25
Would you seek legal aid in a land dispute?
Percent
N= 628 (2007), 621 (2008)
Before
government
propaganda
activity
2.1
After
government
propaganda
activity
10.3
Are Citizens Empowered?
Obstacles to protecting their rights
26
Local officials have powerful incentives to violate farmers’ rights
Rights to land
Rights to compensation for land in context of government land takings
Fiscal incentives
Government sales of “requisitioned” farmland—biggest source of
government “off-budget” revenue
615 billion rmb, 3-4% of GDP (2004 estimate)
“Important and increasing role of land sales as a source of local finance”
Shades into corruption
Career incentives
Attracting investment big career booster
Key to promotion for local officials
Targets for attracting investment
Reduce compensation, offer “cheap” land to lure investors
Are citizens empowered?
Sources of grievances over land takings
27
Illegal land takings
Unapproved, no urban planning process
Inadequate/unpaid compensation for land taken
28
Are Citizens Empowered?
Government taking of farmers’ land
#1
2006 14 mu (small) land taking
for factory in industrial park
Each level of local government
kept 10s-100 thousand RMB in
revenue from land development
Only 40/71 households received
cash compensation
Average household compensation
~6,000 RMB = 800 US$
Per capita net income ~4,000
RMB = 5-600 US$
Only a few got jobs in new
factory
Are Citizens Empowered?
Government taking of farmers’ land #1
29
Some households excluded
Who is excluded?
From cash compensation
From readjustment of
remaining farmland
From jobs
Especially married daughters
and their families living in
natal village
Leads to lawsuits over land
takings compensation
Are Citizens Empowered?
Possible channels for dispute resolution
30
30
Direct negotiation
Mediation
Petition
Arbitration
Litigation* *venue where law likely to matter most
Other
People’s
Congress
Media
Protest/Demonstration
Violence
Are Citizens Empowered?
Exercising the right to sue in court
31
Disposition of court in woman’s land claim
Mixed
picture—some women successful; others not
Example in case study
Court refused to accept case
Court acknowledged right of plaintiff to sue
Court claimed inability to enforce any judgment
finding for plaintiff
Court told plaintiff to seek remedy through
petitioning government directly
Are Citizens Empowered?
Handling citizen grievances through legal channels
32
Recall 26 households reported disputes over land takings
compensation
80% reported great or very great impact on life
73% initiated some action in response
Outcomes of legal challenges to land
takings compared to other land disputes
33
Abandoned/
Differences
Land Taking Transferred
Land Boundary/ Significant
Compensation
Land Readjustment
Other
(Chi-Sq)
Percent Attempting
Mediation
Petition
Litigation
Other
39
46
19
19
50
8
0
0
39
17
0
4
50
29
4
11
0.77
0.05
0.02
0.21
Percent Resolved
35
83
52
64
0.03
Percent Extremely Dissatisfied
78
56
17
15
0.08
Number of cases
N=89
26
12
23
28
Does Law Matter?
34
Aspirationally, yes
In least contentious cases, yes
Most citizens
Little
contact with legal system
Only
14% had land disputes
Only 4% had land takings compensation disputes
Reservoir
of trust
Does Law Matter?
35
Rank Ordering of Trust in Local Government Agencies
Court
11
Mass Organizations
10
Media
9
Village Committee
8
Legal Aid
7
Lawyer
6
County Government
5
Township Government
4
Township Justice Bureau 3
Petition Office
2
Police
1
Does Law Matter?
36
But, some citizens experience intense grievances
Land
takings compensation
Actively use the legal system
Hard
to challenge interests of local governments in land
development
Hard to challenge power of village elites in distributing
compensation
Does Law Matter?
37
State has promoted law to increase the regime’s
legitimacy and to improve governance
Passed
and popularized laws to protect rights
Expanded courts and judiciary
Developed legal profession
Land rights, specifically
Part
of the “legislative explosion” (Fu 2009)
Also a major source of rural unrest
Conclusion
38
There are divisions within state apparatus itself
about how far law can go
“Rule by law”
Acknowledges
the power of political elites—like local
officials—to override the courts
“Rule of law”
Recognizes
law as the ultimate authority
Subject of debate within China itself