Transcript Final Presentation

9/11, the perfect
crime
Michael Berry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfSQLMIRld0
What they want us to
believe:
19 hijackers, directed by Osama B. Ladin, took over
4 commercial Jets with box cutters and knives, and
while evading the air defense system (NORAD), hit
their intended targets. In turn, trade towers 1, 2,
and 7 collapsed due to structural failure through
fire in a pancake fashion, while the plane that hit
the pentagon vaporized upon impact. The 9/11
Commission found that there were no warnings for
this act of terrorism, while multiple government
failures prevented adequate defense.
“We could have never
anticipated these
attacks”
The president was aware that bin Laden, of course, as
previous administrations have well known, that bin Laden
was determined to strike the United States. In fact, the label
on the president's (presidential daily briefing) was 'Bin
Laden Determined to Strike the United States,'" White
House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer said Friday. – fox
news (august 2001)
Egyptian President Mubarak through his intelligence
services warns the US that bin Laden's Islamic terrorist
network is threatening to kill Bush and other G8 leaders at
their July economic summit meeting in Italy. The terrorists
plan to use a plane stuffed with explosives. [NY Times]
(july 2001)
Don’t warnings refute
talk of conspiracy?
It can be argued that although these warnings bring about
discrepancies in the official story, they also provide
justification for blame.
Had warning signs of Bin Laden’s plan to destroy the
Twin Towers and the Pentagon not been exposed prior to
the attacks, they would not have the strong premises that
help lead to the official story’s conclusion.
Hijackers arrive at
airports & board
flights
Hijackers Mohamed Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari board a Colgan Air
flight from Portland, Maine, to Boston. They are filmed going through
security in Portland. This is the only footage of the hijackers in airports
on 9/11, and it's not even one of the suicide flights.
Computer screening program FAILS
detect knives, mace, box-cutters.
9/19 hijackers were flagged for additional screening
Despite additional screening, all hijackers make it on intended flights.
Box-cutters, knives, bomb  did not trigger any alarms.
to
Atta’s luggage
doesn’t make it on to
flight 11
gate agent @ Logan Airport calls Donald Bennett (crew chief for
flight 11) & inquires about Atta’s 2 suitcase whereabouts.
he’s told that the suitcases have arrived late, and the baggage
compartment had already been locked.
 Conveniently enough, these suitcases will later serve as indicators
of the hijacker’s master plan.
Arabic language flight training manuals, Quran, video tapes on
how to fly an airplane.
Flight 11 is hijacked
BETWEEN THE TIMES OF
8:13 & 8:21
THERE IS DEBATE OVER EXACT TIME THE PLANE’S
TRANSPONDER WAS TURNED OFF.
Initial reports claim it was at 8:13 that the plane disappeared on BFC’s radar
AMY SWEENEY & BETTY ONG CALL BOSTON FLIGHT
CONTROL CONFIRMING HIJACKING AT 8:20
“they just gained access to the cockpit” – 7 mins after transponder was
turned off.
So who, if not the hijackers in the cockpit, had turned the transponder off around
8:13?
Faa protocol requires cockpit
doors remain closed and locked
HOW DID HIJACKERS GAIN ACCESS TO THE
COCKPIT?
9/11 COMMISSION REPORT ADMITS, “WE DO NOT
KNOW EXACTLY HOW THE HIJACKERS GAINED
ACCESS TO THE COCKPIT...”
Talkback button
consistently pushed
throughout flight
This, conveniently, allowed Boston Flight controllers to hear Atta’s
announcement to the passengers – which ultimately reconfirmed that a
hijacking was taking place.
It is believed that the pilot was activating it to communicate with flight control
in an attempt to alert them of the hijacking
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noSAPiLIk7w
It was after this was heard, that they felt they had grounds to declare flight 11 a
hijacking.
Sweeney and Ong’s testimonies did not suffice?
Why did all 4 pilots fail to to dial standard “HJCK” distress code?
This is something they are trained to do in case of a hijacking
BOSTON FLIGHT CONTROL
LEARNS OF HIJACKING AT
8:20
FAA protocol states that the center that reported the
hijacking must immediately notify the military.
NORAD IS NOT NOTIFIED UNTIL 8:38
Almost 20 minutes after hijacking has been confirmed by
Sweeney and Ong.
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRJbg2fXXjU
US military planners had actually practiced and conducted
simulating hijacked planes flying into the WTC’s 2 years
prior to the attack.
6 minutes went by before fighters were ordered
http://standdown.net/noradseptember182001pressrelease.ht
m
Norad did all that it
could to prevent attacks
Failure to scramble: NORAD, once notified of the off-course aircraft,
failed to scramble jets from the nearest bases.
Failure to intercept: Once airborne, interceptors failed to reach their
targets because they were ordered to fly at small fractions of their top
speeds.
Failures to redeploy: Fighters that were airborne and within interception
range of the deviating aircraft were not redeployed to pursue them.
Who was commanding
norad?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iw_XDxnciGs&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRJAI4e7Xw&feature=related
both of these videos further justify the connection between
government officials (in this case, Cheney) and the
NUMEROUS discrepancies that ultimately hindered any
chance of the US stopping the attacks from occurring.
If obl’s intent was to
destroy the united
states,
THEN THE IDEAL TERRORIST TARGET WOULD HAVE BEEN
INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS.
“FLIGHT 11” WAS FLYING DIRECTLY OVER IT AT ONE POINT
SEVERAL CALLS MADE FROM
CELL PHONES
“Travelers could be talking on their personal cell phones as early as 2006.
Earlier this month [July 2004], American Airlines conducted a trial run
on a modified aircraft that permitted cell phone calls.” (WP, July 27,
2004)
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/infotech/view/2007062372888/Safe_phone_calls_from_planes_now_possible
IT IS POSSIBLE, BUT CLAIM IT COULD’VE HAPPENED BY 2007 –
THAT’S FAR LATER THAN 2001.
Wireless communications networks weren’t designed for ground-to-air
communication. Cellular experts privately admit that they’re surprised
the calls were able to be placed from the hijacked planes, and that they
lasted as long as they did.
George w. bush witnessed
first plane hit the tower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUXglJU2w6U
BUILDINGS COLLAPSED DUE TO
STRUCTURAL FAILURE
Controlled demolition is the reason for collapse of the twin towers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gzc-TAgOrzQ (2:40)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rIvm0GDbCQ
the 3 peaks at the base coincide with the 3 explosions heard in the first
tower in the previous video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAKfBA8lBYg
When commenting on the attacks, Bush refers to explosives in the
building?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USnxe7hxP4I&feature=related
PASSPORTS FOUND AMID DEBRIS
AND RUBBLE
The passports found further justified Osama Bin Laden’s
connection with the attacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-QycTzwV7c
unfortunately, no black-box was found.
WORLD TRADE
CENTER—
BUILDING 7
BACKGROUND
INFORMATION:
--47 floors
--steel frame
--collapsed at 5:21PM
--no airplane flew into it
--collapsed in 6.5
seconds
OFFICIAL
STORY
NIST (national institute of standards and technology) claims that building 7 was
“The first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building”.
The building was set on fire from falling debris from the collapse of BUILDINGS
1&2
9/11 commission report neglects to mention the WTC 7 collapse and fails to
elaborate on what has been said about its collapse in the media and by officials
concerned with 9/11.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73qK4j32iuo
Building 7
When reporting on building 7, it had yet to have collapsed
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NefExHDu3s
 Larry Silverstein admits what caused building 7’s
collapse:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100
** Is it plausible to believe that two out of the three towers
affected were hit by planes, yet collapsed in an identical
manner to the 3rd tower, which was later admitted to have
collapsed due to controlled demolition?
1988
•First Interstate Bank building fire in Los Angeles, CA
•Burned for 3.5 hours
•Took out 4 floors out of 64 floor building
1991
•Meridian plaza building in Philadelphia, PE
•Took out 8 floors out of 38 floor building
Both of these fires were far more severe then fires in BUILDING 7
but both buildings did not collapse.
SEPTEMBER 1
o
o
o
o
o
Fires start around 9AM in building 7
Fires burned slow all day, only lasting 20 minutes in each given area
Most floors did not have fires
No fires along the base of the building
FIRES HAVE NEVER DESTROYED A STEEL BUILDING
Possible theories
Collaborative effort between the United States and Israel to pursue a
hidden agenda (NEW WORLD ORDER + STIMULATE
ECONOMY)
Collaborative effort between all three parties (Israel, US, OBL)
Collaborative effort between US and the Mujahideen
Possible Undeclared Motives
for Invasion of Iraq
1.) Control of Iraqi Oil
2.) Creating a Country to Neocon Design
3.) Creating a Haven for Investment
“THE SMAREST THING TO
DO IS PULL IT”
“Pull it” is one of the main expressions used in the
demolition industry to describe the collapsing of a building.
A building can NOT be properly demolished in a several
hour time span. At the very least, it would need to take
weeks of preparation.
Why would Silverstein and team even collapse WTC7 if it’s
“That obvious”
-Maybe he did the CIA, who’s largest offices were inside
WTC7, a favor by destroying all evidence.
Suspicious Activity at
the twin towers
Newsday Article published on September 12, 2001.
“The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened
security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security
personnel said yesterday.
Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had
been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous
phone threats. But on Thursday, bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly
removed.
Suspicious Activity
(Con’t)
Multiple employees have confirmed that a power outage had
occurred in the World Trade Center towers on the weekend
prior to 9/11, including security guards.
From Saturday, September 8 at 5pm until Sunday, September
9th around Noon, the south tower experienced a power
outage, with no security cameras, no security locks, and
many engineers coming in and out of the building.
Scott Forbes, a database administrator at the WTC was told
several days before the power outage to shut down all
systems before the power went out. He then spent the entire
Sunday evening/Monday morning re-booting the systems.
Suspicious Activity
(Con’t)
On multiple attempts, he tried to contact the 9/11 commission
report, but they never responded to him. Here is one letter he sent
to them:
“On the weekend of 9/8,9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC
tower 2, the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no
electrical supply for approx 36hrs from floor 50 up. I am aware of this
situation since I work in IT and had to work with many others that
weekend to ensure that all systems were cleanly shutdown beforehand ...
and then brough[t] back up afterwards. The reason given by the WTC for
the power down was that cabling in the tower was being upgraded ... Of
course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on
doors and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower. I was at
home on the morning of 9-11 on the shore of Jersey City, right opposite the
Towers, and watching events unfold I was convinced immediately that
something was happening related to the weekend work ...”
THE PENTAGON
FLIGHT #77
Chain of occurring events on the day of the
“attack”
On September 11, 2001 flight number 77 departed from
Washington D.C. for L.A. at 8:20 a.m.
Declared ‘hijack’
Was the military informed?
Transponder off at 8:56 a.m.
Travelers undetected for 36 minutes
FBI was notified at 9:20 a.m.
Military informed? (Mineta)
Cheney order on #77: “still stands” at 9:26a.m.
Dulles radar finds plane at 9:32 a.m.
Military informed??? - 9:34 a.m.
IMPACT (east side) at 9:38
A plane flying into the Pentagon, a heavily reinforced building
built to withstand a severe blow, would not leave behind an
imprint like a snow-angel.
A plane flying into the Twin Towers, a building with the majority
of its surface area glass, would leave behind an imprint.
MCINTYRE:
“You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up
inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near
the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the building that’s
crashed in [emphasis added], and as I said, the only pieces left that you
can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There are no
large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere
around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the
side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse [emphasis
added].”
Computer animation of the plane just before it hits the Pentagon.
A corporate jet crashed into a side of a warehouse in New Jersey in 2005.
Notice the plane is viewable and the amount of debris. No one was killed
in that crash.
Before the Pentagon collapsed, after plane hit. There is no
fuselage of airplane visible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmP2Vy8K0i0&fe
ature=player_embedded
Fuel damage?
Picture taken 4 days before September
11th. Clearly shows a marking in the grass
that the plane took when it crashed. It is
viewable from above but not easily
viewable from the ground.
Video Of Impact
Notice the Date in the bottom left, Sept. 12??
This is the only video of what happened available to the public.
All other video resources that captured the crash were quickly
confiscated by the government and yet to be released.
Frame 1, White vapor behind a flying object. Do commercial airlines leave a
white vapor behind their engines? A missile or an unmanned drone would.
Final Frame, Clearly visible white smoke and impact in side of Pentagon.
Does the fireball indicate a commercial airliner hit the Pentagon?
Official Entire Flight Path
•
The 270 Degree
Very unlikely the pilot had
Turn or skill to
the experience
fly a commercial aircraft
with such precisions.
• Going at the reported
speed of 450 mph, a 270
degree is such a risky
maneuver for an
experience military pilot
for a person with such a
lack of experience it is
unlikely.
Eyewitnesses to Flight Path
13 different eye witnesses from six different vantage points all
have the plane coming from a more northern approach as
opposed to the official report which has the flight path coming
more from the south.
North of the navy annex and north of the Citgo gas station
Flight Path of #77
Conflicting Data
Flight Path Animation supplied and plotted by National
Transportation Safety Board.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQ8nSEeUec&feature=player_embedded#!
Animation supports the claims of 13 eyewitness’ flight path
Hijackers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Rqe3WeSyN0&feature=pl
ayer_embedded
After the September 11th attacks, the “Loose Change”
documentary stated that all of the hijackers were in fact alive in
other countries. Rather presumptuous since it is possible for
two different people to have identical names. But they did raise
a good point; how did the passports of the terrorists survive the
explosion? In the aftermath of the attacks, passports and
identification were found as evidence. Many skeptics question
how identification made out of paper survived an explosion,
which destroyed buildings.
The Pilot of
flight 77
• Hani Hanjour
• He didn’t have a ticket, so
how did he get on the
plane?
• He wasn’t listed on the
flight manifest, so there is
not any proof that he was on
the plane in the first place.
Where did his name come
from?
• Failed and dropped out of
private flight school in
Arizona.
• His instructor testified that
he was clueless and would
never make it as a pilot.
• A man of these
qualifications could never of
flown Flight 77.
Hani Hanjour
More on hijackers
Mohammed Atta, one of the main hijackers of Flight 11 that crashed
into the WTC North Tower.
There’s a report that he was wired $100,000 dollars by General
Ahmad of Pakistan shortly before the attacks; why would he need that
money if he was going to die?
Passports of Satam al Suqami (flight 11), Ziad Jarrah, and Saeed alGhamdi (flight 93) were reportedly found at the crash sites. How
could the passports have been placed so strategically after the blast
and did not catch fire?
On September 23, 2001, BBC and the Daily Telegraph reported that
some of the hijackers were alive and well. Waleed al-Sheri (flight 11)
was reportedly found in living in Morocco.
More on hijackers
Abdulaziz al-Omari, Saeed Al-Ghamdi, and Khalid al-Midhar were all also
reportedly still alive and living in the Middle East after the attacks. All reports have
since been a referred to as mistaken identity cases by the FBI.
Another defense used by the FBI in regards to the mistaken identity cases is that
many of the hijackers varied the spelling of their names, for example Hani Saleh
Hanjour, also used "Hani Hanjoor", "Hani Saleh", "Hami Hanjoor” But if they had
the wrong names from the beginning, thn who are the pictures of that were
released to the media??
Majority of pilots were flight school dropouts like Hanjour so how could they have
performed these attacks with such percision?
Mohammed Atta: "His attention span was zero."
Khalid Al-Mihdhar: "We didn't kick him out, but he didn't live up to our
standards."
Marwan Al-Shehhi: "He was dropped because of his limited English and
incompetence at the controls."
Salem Al-Hazmi: "We advised him to quit after two lessons."
Hani Hanjour: "His English was horrible, and his mechanical skills were
even worse. It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. I'm still to
this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not
fly at all."
This is somewhat a
blue print of the
pentagon itself
illustrating the
damage and the
specific side where
flight #77 targeted
• 9/11 is not something that can be planned
overnight.
•Obviously it took time and a lot of effort to come up
with a plan.
•If it were supposedly a terrorist attack they
obviously did not go into the operation without any
preparations such as finding blue prints of the
pentagon or flight pathways etc..
•If that case is true then wouldn’t we assume that
the terrorists would want to target very important
parts of the pentagon rather than “the peaceful side”
or the side where very few individuals occupy.
•In addition, why would they target a part that is not
as significant as the army wing, or the navy or even
the air force wing
The part that was actually targeted by the airplane was the with
that contained a meteorology center, communications, technical
room, operations room, etc…
This part wouldn’t cause as much damage as it would have caused
if these more important parts were targeted. So why target the
“peaceful wing”
United 93
What they want us to believed
happened!
Four al-Qaeda members hijacked United 93 with the aim to
crash somewhere in DC.
That Several of the passengers made telephone calls to loved
ones, and rebelled against he hijackers crashing the plane in
Shanksville, PA
The Plane Crash
Where did the plane go, it is nowhere to be seen in the photos
of the crash site when there should be remains of a plane,
luggage and bodies.
United 93 plane crash
Other Plane Crash
So Where Did United 93 Go?
Phone Calls From United 93?
37 Phone calls where made from United 93Two from cell phones, and 35 from the
onboard phones.
The Cell Phone Calls
The Cell Phone calls that where made where made from
around 30,000 ft in the air.
Successful Cell Phones calls could be made only at
heights of under 2000 ft, with the technology that exist
today.
At the time of Sept. 11 2001 there was no such
technology to make cell phone calls from airplanes.
How Where these two Cell phone call made?
Phone Calls From United 93?
Phone calls made from onboard phones.
These Phone calls where fake!
Why?
The loved ones that received the calls from passengers on the
plane described that during the calls the passengers where claim
and the background seem very quiet and claim for being a
hijacked plane
Mark Bingham!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryuYLUVX4VM
Phone Calls From United 93?
Tom Burnet
Except for saying his wife's name a few times during the
calls he never mentioned a name.
For example during his final call, when he asked about
his children, he only referred to them as the kids, which
is not completely surprising, but when his wife told him
the kids wanted to talk to him, he said “I’ll talk to them
later”, why would man certain that he was facing death,
say I will talk to them later this would have been the last
time and chance to say I love you to his children.
The probable reason why he didn't’t want to talk to the
children is that the “Tom” on the phone would not have
to demonstrate knowledge of the children or of their
names.
Where was the military?
Why, with the knowledge of the prior days events, would there
be no military action against the hijacked plane?
There was enough time to respond to the plane from the time the
plane was declared hijack, to the Impact in PA.
There was 35 minutes to act on the plane, 35 minutes that were
supposedly wasted!
There had to be military action within those 35 min!
So What really Happened?
From the facts that where presented it is most
probable that the plane was shot down.
There was no large plane debris in the crash site
The calls that were made were fake.
The amount of time that was available for military
action
In fact, According to investigative reporter
Wayne Madsen, 3 employees of the NSA
confirmed that UA 93 “was shot down over
rural PA by US Air force jets scrambled from
Andrews Air Force base in Maryland”
Why would a government do
this to their own people?
To push their own agenda that the fear and anger from the
attacks would cause
The U. S wanted control over the resources in the Middle
East, so what better way to get control over a land and its
resources, than to bring war onto that land and take it over.
What better way to push a governmental agenda than to
bring fear to the masses and that is what 9/11 did.
In Conclusion
The investigation by the government has many holes in it
This has led to the conspiracy theories
If they wanted to stop the speculation they could answer our
questions or …..
RELEASE THE TRUTH