Effects of spontaneous and forced running on activation of

Download Report

Transcript Effects of spontaneous and forced running on activation of

Effects of spontaneous and
forced running on activation
of hypothalamic
corticotropin-releasing
hormone neurons in rats
Introduction
Stressors such as immobilization,
restraint, foot shock, &
communication box activate CRHcontaining neurons in the PVN
 Acute physical stress – treadmill
running – induces strong CRH
mRNA expression in the PVN

Introduction
Physical exercise = stressor
 Physical exercise triggers the HPA
axis starting with the CRH neurons
 CRH neurons project to brain areas
involved in mood/affect

HPA axis
Introduction
Forced physical exercise
(running/swimming) produces
negative adaptations to stress
responses with activation of CRH
neurons
 Therefore, physical exercise could
alter psychological effects

Introduction
Spontaneous physical exercise
could be beneficial to all aspects of
health, so…
 Effects of CRH neuron activation by
physical exercise should differ
between spontaneous & forced

Purpose of the Study

Compare hypothalamic CRH
neuronal activation during
spontaneous wheel runners (SWR)
& forced wheel runners (FWR) with
double-staining for c-Fos and CRH
in the PVN
Materials & Methods
Twenty adult male Wistar rats
 Individual housed cages attached to
voluntarily accessible running
wheels unlocked in all cages for
habituation 1 week before testing
 12h light/dark cycle
 Ad libitum access to food and H2O

Figure 1
M&M
FWR distance = SWR distance
 1 hr spontaneous or forced wheel
running in the dark cycle
 FWR were “softly” prodded when
they stopped running
 Control rats were left in locked
wheels for 1 hr without wheel
running or prodded 25-30 times

M&M
30 mins after running, rats were put
to sleep by injection and perfused
by heparin, other stuff, and PBS
 Brains frozen, cut on coronal plane,
and collected in PBS + Na+ azide
 Antibodies were used to visualize
c-Fos & CRH

Figure 2
M&M
Anti-CRH antibody reacts only with
CRH peptide
 c-Fos localized to cell nuclei and
appeared as a dark gray-black stain
 CRH localized to cell cytoplasm and
appeared as light-brown staining

M&M
Quantitative analysis performed on
all PVN coronal sections
 c-Fos & CRH counted on PVN
sections
 c-Fos counted in the LC sections

Figure 3
Results
Double Fos/CRH-positive cells
↑FWR, ↓SWR & controls
 Increase of FWR was extremely
significant
 Prodding alone did not increase
c-Fos/CRH cells significantly
 Both FWR & SWR enhanced Fos
expression in the LC compared to
controls

Figure 4
Discussion
Forced physical exercise = strong
stressor
 Previously, forced swimming
strongly induces CRH mRNA in
PVN

Forced Swim Stress
↑CRH hnRNA after 10 min swim
stress and then returned to baseline
 AVP hnRNA in PVN (colocalization
w/CRH) remained relatively the
same @ 10min
 Significantly ↑AVP 2h after stress
 Pre-Tx w/dexamethasone → no
CRH/AVP increase after stress

Figure 1
Figure 2
Discussion
Synergistic effects of FWR +
prodding likely comprised the
significant rise in Fos/CRH-positive
neurons
 Previously, several negative
adaptations were revealed during
treadmill running (equivalent to
FWR)

Discussion
Chronic HPA axis stimulation
produces negative physiological
adaptations such as depression
and anxiety
 Spontaneous exercise training
could improve stress response
 SWR = mild stressor

Discussion
FWR & SWR enhanced Fos in LC
which conflicts with CRH neuronal
effects in the PVN
 Both FWR & SWR ↑NE levels
 Acute stress ↑effects on LC & PVN

neurons → ↑Fos
 This study showed CRH activation
might depend on exercise type
Discussion

Acute exercise effects on CRH
activation definitely depends on
modality rather than intensity
ByeBye!