Transcript EVOLUTION - Carol Lee Lab - University of Wisconsin–Madison

History of
Evolutionary Thought
Dr. Carol Eunmi Lee
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Today’s OUTLINE:
(1) Development of Darwin’s Thought
(2) Lamarck vs. Darwin
(3) The Contribution of Darwin
(4) The Contribution of Mendel
(5) Conflict between “Mendelism” and “Darwinism”
(6) The “Evolutionary Synthesis” of Mendel and Darwin
Key Points:
(1) What exactly were the components of
Darwin’s theory of Evolution, and what was
missing?
(2) What exactly did Mendel contribute?
(3) What is the difference between Lamarck
vs. Darwin’s ideas, and how does Lamarck’s
ideas contribute today?
Charles Darwin (1809-1882)
Origin of
Species
is one of the
most influential
texts of this
century
Charles Darwin (1809-1882)






His father was a doctor (Richard Darwin) and his
grandfather was Erasmus Darwin, also a doctor and a
prominent scholar who was already thinking about
evolution
Initially he studied Medicine at the University of Edinburgh
He neglected his studies and could not stand the sight of
surgery or the sight of blood (had nausea, fainted)
Sent by his father at Christ’s College, Cambridge University
to become an Anglican priest
He still neglected his studies, but he did pursue a
passionate interest in Natural History
He became close to botany professor Rev. John Henslow
and met other leading naturalists who saw scientific work
as religious natural theology (and viewed adaptation [i.e.
evolution] as God acting through laws of nature)
Reverend John Stevens Henslow (1796–1861)
“I fully believe a better man never walked this earth”
Charles Darwin to J.D. Hooker, 1861




Darwin’s Botany professor at Christ’s College
(Divinity School), Cambridge University
Henslow encouraged students to make observations
of their own, rather than being spoon-fed
After Darwin completed his final examination in 1831,
Henslow persuaded him to begin studying geology, and
made arrangements for him to take Adam Sedgwick’s
geology course and a trip to map geological strata in
North Wales
Shortly thereafter, in 1831, Henslow encouraged
Darwin to join the Voyage of the Beagle as the
ship’s naturalist
More on Henslow:
Darwin's Mentor: John
Stevens Henslow
1796–1861
By Walters & Stow
Voyage of the Beagle
HMS Beagle, a ship sent by
British Navy to chart coastline of
South America
HMS Beagle off of South America
During the 5-year Voyage



Darwin was supposed to be primarily a
geologist; He had some expertise in
geology, beetle collecting and dissecting
marine invertebrates
He made observations on geological
formations as the ship was mapping the
coastline
At Punta Alta in Patagonia he made a
major find of fossil bones of huge extinct
mammals in cliffs beside modern
seashells, indicating recent extinction with
no signs of change in climate or
catastrophe (“extinctions happen”)
The Galapagos Islands
Archipelago of volcanic
islands distributed around
the equator in the Pacific
Ocean, 972 km (525 nmi)
west of continental
Ecuador
The Galapagos Islands
Why were these islands so important in
shaping Darwin’s thinking?
The Galapagos Islands
• As an archipelago, there were many islands with different
populations of a “species” on each island
• The populations were related, but were slightly different on each
island… (not clear boundaries)
• This led Darwin to conclude that the populations descended from a
common ancestor… and he ultimately concluded that they had
evolved and were evolving…
•  led Darwin to question the stability of the concept of a “species”
Darwin’s Mockingbirds
"My attention was first thoroughly aroused by
comparing together the various specimens ... of
the mocking-thrush"
C. Darwin, The Voyage of the Beagle (1839)
• On Sept 17 1835, Darwin disembarked from the Beagle in the Galápagos
near Sappho Cove on Chatham Island (now known as Isla San Cristóbal),
and was struck by the bold, terrestrial mockingbird.
• The bird is known today as Mimus melanotis, the San Cristóbal
Mockingbird. Over the next 6 weeks that Darwin spent in the Galápagos, he
observed mockingbirds on three other islands.
• Darwin noticed the mockingbirds differed between islands. Nicolas
Lawson, acting Governor of Galápagos, told Darwin that the tortoises also
differed from island to island.
• Towards the end of the voyage, Darwin speculated that the distribution of
the mockingbirds and the tortoises might "undermine the stability of
Species”. Species might not be fixed entities, but are changing over
time…
Galapagos Islands
Darwin’s Mockingbirds
(he did not focus that much on the finches; they
were studied more later by the Grants)
Tortoises and other animals



Mockingbirds on different islands differed slightly in
size, shape and coloration
And all shared some traits (homologous traits)
He concluded that these birds must have shared a
common ancestor--and were not independently
created

Mockingbirds on different islands differed slightly in size, shape
and coloration (species not immutable discrete entities)

And all shared some traits (homologous traits)

He concluded that these birds must have shared a common
ancestor--and were not independently created  Branching,
Tree-like thinking (rather than ladder)
Significance of
the HMS Beagle
Voyage
• Collections to study later
• Exposed Darwin to geological formations, fossils embedded in
strata – animals that no longer exist today and are clearly extinct –
this was known, but Darwin got to see this himself
• Exposure to animal diversity, related populations within species
living in different habitats:
1. “Species” are not immutable fixed entities
2. Organisms are related by common ancestry (tree-like
branching)
3. They are changing and branching in response to the
environment
Return to England



Returned and discussed his
geological and biological finding
with other scholars, influenced
by Malthus, etc.
Married the wealthy Emma
Wedgewood
Did not have to work, and could
study the samples he collected,
perform experiments, make
observations, think, and write
books for the rest of his life
Historical Context:


By mid-1800s scientific context was in place
for development of theory of Evolution
Developments in Geology:
Discovery that earth is more than 6,000 years old
Fossil Record showed change in species over time

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/evotmline.html
Influences on Darwin



Geology: Darwin had Lyell’s Principles of Geology on
board the HMS Beagle
Lamarck ’s (1744-1829): Concept of Adaptation,
Inheritance of acquired characteristics
Malthus (1766-1834): Competition within species
and struggle for survival
Influences on Darwin





Geology: Darwin had Lyell’s Principles of Geology on
board the HMS Beagle, given to him by captain of the
HMS Beagle (Robert FitzRoy)
Fossil record:
The earth is old
Many animals that once existed are now extinct
There are layers (strata) in the fossil record
show a pattern of change
 the idea that species change over time and that some
go extinct
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck



French Naturalist (1744-1829)
“Professor of Worms and
Insects” in Paris
The first scientific theory of
evolution (inheritance of
acquired characteristics)
Influences on Darwin
Lamarck ’s (1744-1829) theory of Evolution
Inheritance of acquired characteristics


Proposed the most influential mechanism of
evolution before Darwin:
Introduced the idea of Adaptation, though he
was mostly incorrect on the predominant mechanism
(though sometimes correct; will discuss Epigenetic Inheritance)
Influences on Darwin
Thomas Malthus (1766-1834):
“Essay on the Principle of Population”
Population
The idea of competition:



food
Malthus’ calculations showed that rate of population
growth was greater than rate of increase in food supply
Thus, not all individuals could possibly survive
Based on this fact of competition, Darwin concluded that
individuals that are better adapted would be the ones that
survive and leave more offspring (and win the competition)
Malthus

From Malthus, Darwin
came up with the idea of
competition and the
“struggle for survival” as
a component of Natural
Selection


With these influences on this thought
and data from the Galapagos Islands…
Darwin developed the theory of
Evolution via Natural Selection…
The scientific community was
primed for a theory of Evolution




Darwin was one of many scholars at his time that were
thinking about Evolution
Many scholars accepted the idea of Evolution at the
time… what puzzled them was the mechanism
In fact, Alfred Wallace (1823-1913) came up with the idea
of natural selection independently
Darwin rushed to publish Origins in 1859 when he
learned of Wallace’s work
Alfred Russel Wallace (1823-1913)
“On the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely from
the Original Type”


Based on his work in the
Malay Archipelago
He also studied populations
on different islands and came
to the same conclusion as
Darwin
Alfred Russel Wallace (1823-1913)
Father of Biogeography… focused on adaptation to
the environment




In 1858 Wallace sent Darwin a copy of
his manuscript
Darwin was shocked that Wallace came
up with the idea of natural selection
independently
They decided on a joint presentation at
the Linnean Society in 1858, but it
received little attention
After which Darwin rushed to publish his
book in 1859
Charles Darwin (1809 -1882)
On the Origin of Species (1859)
 Living
species are related by
common ancestry
 Change
through time occurs at
the population not the organism
level
 The
main cause of adaptive
evolution is natural selection
Darwin’s Main Points:
(1) Organisms Evolve (Darwin not first)
(2) Common Descent: species arise from common
ancestors, in a tree-like branching process (Wallace
also)
(3) Gradualism: changes are gradual (we now know that
this is not always true)
(4) Population Speciation: change in proportions of
individuals having a trait in a population
(Darwin’s original idea) (Wallace also)
(5) Natural Selection: is the mechanism (Wallace also)
So… Darwin did NOT originate
the idea of Evolution…
… BUT he provided a plausible
Mechanism (along with Wallace)
… and much evidence
Lamarck
vs Darwin
Before Darwin had developed his ideas on the
mechanism of evolution, Lamarck had proposed an
alternate mechanism that was popular at the time
Lamarck
vs Darwin
(1) Different View on pattern of Evolution
Lamarck: Linear progression
 Darwin: Tree-like branching process

(2) Different View on Mechanism of Evolution
Lamarck: inheritance of acquired traits (not mutations)-Individual evolution
 Darwin: Evolution at the Population Level via Natural
Selection

Lamarck’s View on Pattern of
Evolution

Continuum between physical and
biological world (followed
Aristotle)
Being
Realm of
Being



Scala Naturae (“Ladder of Life”
or “Great Chain of Being”)
“Transmutation of Species” –one
species turns into another
Linear progression from primitive
to advanced
God
Angels
Demons
Man
Animals
Realm of
Becoming
Plants
Minerals
Non-Being
What is wrong with a ladder?



Evolution is not linear but
branching
Living organisms are not ancestors
of one another
The ladder implies progress
Darwin envisaged Evolution as a Tree
The affinities of all the beings of the same class have
sometimes been represented by a great tree. I believe
this simile largely speaks the truth……
…The green and budding twigs may represent
existing species; and those produced during former
years may represent the long succession of extinct
species…..
….the great Tree of Life….covers the earth with
ever-branching and beautiful ramifications
Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species; pages 131-132
The only figure in Origin of Species
Lamarck’s View on Mechanism
of Evolution


Individuals are evolving
If you got a tan, you’d pass it on
Lamarck’s View on Mechanism
of Evolution


Individuals are evolving
If you got a tan, you’d pass it on
Some balls get tan
during their lifetime
Lamarck’s View on Mechanism
of Evolution


Individuals are evolving
If you got a tan, you’d pass it on
Tan balls pass on their acquired trait to their offspring
(We now know that acquired traits could get passed on sometimes
when epigenetic modifications are inherited)
Darwin’s View on Mechanism of
Evolution

Natural Selection
A heritable difference
(now known to be due
to different mutations)
Darwin’s View on Mechanism of
Evolution

Natural Selection
Selection might
favor this mutation
Darwin’s View on Mechanism of
Evolution

Natural Selection
Greater Fitness: individuals with
this mutation survive and leave more
offspring
Darwin’s View on Mechanism of
Evolution

Natural Selection
The individuals themselves are not changing, but the
population is changing in composition (% of alleles)
Darwin’s contribution:
“Population Speciation as a result of Natural Selection”

More offspring are produced than can survive

Limited resources and competition for resources
(“The Struggle for Survival”)

There is variation in a population

Individuals better adapted to environment survive

Survivors leave more offspring (“Survival of the
Fittest”)

Thus, average character of population is altered
But… Darwin’s theory was not
complete



Because Darwin knew nothing about mutation, he had
no idea how variation was generated in populations
Because Darwin knew nothing about genetics or genes,
he had no idea how variation was passed on to
offspring (Mendel & Hardy-Weinberg)
Darwin did not know about nonadaptive evolutionary
forces, such as Genetic Drift
Sample Exam Question

Which of the following was NOT part of Darwin’s
theory of Evolution?
(1) Natural Selection
(2) Populations as the units of Evolution
(3) Mutations as sources of genetic variation
(4) Survival of those who produce more offspring
Mendel’s work held part of the key to what was
missing in Darwin’s Theory


Mendel published in 1865…
was ignored until 1900
Presented a mechanism for
how traits got passed on
“Individuals pass alleles on to
their offspring intact”
(the idea of particulate (genes)
inheritance)
Hardy-Weinburg
Equilibrium
(Lecture 3)

Wilhem Weinberg


January 13, 1908
G. H. Hardy

July 10, 1908 in Science
The Mathematical
expression of Mendel’s
Principles of Inheritance
Hardy-Weinburg
Equilibrium
(Lecture 3)

Wilhem Weinberg


G. H. Hardy


January 13, 1908
July 10, 1908 in Science
Could mathematically show
expectations of Mendelian
inheritance and whether
expectations are realized in
nature
PROBLEMS!
BUT… Mendel and Darwin’s ideas
seemed Incompatible


Mendel’s principles: dealt with particulate (discrete)
traits (e.g. yellow vs. green, wrinkled vs. smooth)
BUT, Darwin observed continuous traits (e.g. beak size,
body length)
Q: So, how would continuous traits get
passed on?
Selection vs Mutations

Mutations discovered after 1900
Q: If mutations are arising, why need
selection... … if things are just
mutating?
Controversy between
Mutationists vs Darwinists
Mutationists (+Mendelianism)
 They thought that evolution required only
mutations and passing on of discrete traits
Darwinists
 They thought that evolution required only
Natural Selection on continuous variation
Discrete vs Quantitative Traits

Darwin was unable to clearly see the pattern of
inheritance because he studied quantitative variation
• Discrete trait: a trait that has distinct values,
rather than a range of phenotypes, usually
encoded by one or a few genes.
Frequency
Examples: number of fingers, color of Mendel’s peas,
sickle cell anemia, ABO blood type, number of eggs in a
bird clutch, presence/absence of human widow’s peak,
presence/absence of dimples, etc.
• Quantitative (continuous) trait: a trait that has
a continuum of phenotypes and is encoded by
multiple genes.
Examples: body size, height, weight, intelligence
(IQ), Running speed, beak shape, hair color, skin
color, milk yield of cows, lifespan, etc.
Type
Frequency
Type
Controversy between
Mutationists vs Darwinists
Controversy persisted for ~30 years up till
the 1930s, during which little progress
was made
Problem caused by:

Binary thinking (Black or White thinking): it’s this
or that… “if I’m right, you must be wrong”
 When in fact the two or more factors might
interact

Inability to see overarching mechanism that could
explain a wide range of phenomena: “How could
your Hardy-Weinberg (Mendel) explain the inheritance of
5.1 cm, 5.5 cm beak length (continuous characters)?”
 When in fact, another factor might make it possible
(think multiple genes, rather than one gene)
Genetic Drift (Lecture 5)




A concept as important as Natural Selection
But, not as prominent on people’s minds
1872 Gulick: Neutral Theory (Genetic Drift)
1921 A.C. Hagedoorn produced data to support
Neutral Theory of Genetic Drift
The Modern Synthesis
1930s ~ 1940s
The synthesis of population genetics
(role of mutation, genetic drift),
paleontology, systematics
Darwin and Mendel Reconciled!!!
(Next Lecture)
The Modern Synthesis
1930s ~ 1940s
Also called the “Synthesis of Evolution and
Genetics”
Among the Greatest Scientific
Revolutions of the Century
Three of the "architects" of the evolutionary synthesis:
G. Ledyard Stebbins, Jr., George Gaylord Simpson, Theodosius Dobzhansky
Photograph from Smocovitis, V. B. 1997. G. Ledyard Stebbins, Jr. and the evolutionary
synthesis (1924-1950). American Journal of Botany 84: 1625-1637.
The Evolutionary Synthesis was important
because many scientists from different
fields convened to discuss the evolutionary
mechanisms and clear up confusion and
inconsistencies
Some Key Tenets of the Modern Synthesis





Populations are the units of Evolution
Mendel vs Darwin: continuous traits are also coded by
particulate genes, but many genes
Mutation vs Selection: Mutations are sources of genetic
variation upon which Selection acts
Natural Selection and Mutation are not the only
evolutionary forces. Examples: Genetic Drift, Recombination
Microevolutionary processes, such as Drift, Selection,
Mutation, lead to Macroevolutionary changes (such as
speciation)
Some Tenets of the Evolutionary Synthesis











The phenotype is different from the genotype
Acquired characters (phenotypic plasticity) are not inherited
Traits are inherited via genes, and they do not “blend” with other genes
(Darwin was wrong about this one)
Genes mutate, resulting in different alleles
Evolution occurs at the population level, due to a change in proportions of
individuals with different genotypes
Changes in proportion in a population could occur via random genetic drift
(Sewall Wright) or Natural Selection… the rate of mutation is usually too low
to cause large changes in proportions
Even very weak natural selection could cause substantial changes over a
longer time scale
Mutations generate the genetic variation upon which natural selection acts
Microevolutionary processes lead to Macroevolutionary changes (speciation)
All organisms on the planet are related to one another in a great “tree of
life”, and have diverged by branching from common ancestors
Gaps in the fossil record are likely due to incompleteness of the fossil
record. Gradual changes seen in many parts of the fossil record suggest
gradual changes over time
Mutation vs Selection
and Reconciling Mendel and Darwin
Mutation vs Selection

And Reconciling Mendel and Darwin
 continuous
and discrete traits could follow the same
principles of inheritance (Mendel), just that
continuous traits are coded by many genes (loci)


If there are many genes (loci) coding for a trait, rather
than one, the offspring look intermediate between the
parents (looks like “blending inheritance”)
BUT, the SAME Mendelian patterns of inheritance
apply, it’s just that you don’t see the particulate
inheritance of each gene in the offspring, but the
average effect across all the genes affecting the trait
How do you deal with quantitative traits?
(2nd point below)

Hardy Weinberg: multiple alleles:



3 alleles: (p + q + r)2 which expands to...
p2 + 2pq + q2 + 2pr + 2qr + r2 =1.0
4 alleles: (p + q + r + s)2
Hardy Weinberg: multiple loci


HW principle still applies to each locus
independently
Need to use principles of Quantitative
Genetics to examine effects of multiple loci
The Population Geneticists
JBS Haldane
Sewall Wright
Mathematical theory of population
genetics showed that mutation and
selection TOGETHER cause adaptive
evolution:
RA Fisher
Mutation is NOT an alternative to
Natural Selection, but the raw material
upon which natural selection acts.
Fisher vs Wright
Both appreciated the importance of
Natural Selection AND Genetic Drift
But they argued about the relative
importance
Ronald Aylmer Fisher (1890-1962)
Background in math,
physics, astronomy, and
genetics
Made key contributions
to the field of Statistics
Ronald Aylmer Fisher (1890-1962)
• Natural selection occurs in large populations
• Many genes are involved
• Mutations are the main substrate for selection
Other Contributions:
• Adding mathematical rigor into the
theory of selection
• Elegant synthesis of Mendelian
inheritance into the Theory of Selection
• Important developments in Statistics
(ANOVA)
Sewall Wright (1889-1988)
Heavily influenced by
examples from agriculture
Worked for the US Dept of
Agriculture: breeding in
guinea pigs and cattle
Became a professor at
UW-Madison in Genetics
Sewall Wright (1889-1988)
• Inbreeding and Genetic Drift are
important for creating new gene
interactions
• These new gene interactions
(epistasis caused by new
recombinations) are the main
substrate for selection
The Population
Geneticists
If you want to read more about this
topic, this book is a good read
Reconciling Microevolutionary Mechanisms
and Macroevolutionary processes
Microevolution  Macroevolution
Ernst Mayr
George Gaylord Simpson
G. Ledyard Stebbins
Bernhard Rensch
and others
Ernst Mayr
George Gaylord
Simpson
Microevolutionary processes within species account for
macroevolution among species (Lecture #18)
That is, mutation, recombination, natural selection, and
other processes that act within species (microevolution)
are the SAME mechanisms that account for the origin of
new species and major long term evolution
(macroevolution) (Lecture #18)
James F. Crow (1916-2012)
University of Wisconsin, Madison
His work has touched on nearly
every area of evolutionary genetics
-will discuss some of his contributions in Lecture #7
http://www.genetics.wisc.edu/CATG/crow/index.html
Moral of the Story



Scientists from different fields should talk to
each other
Should avoid binary thinking (this vs that, right
vs wrong), as different mechanisms might
work together in an integrated fashion
We are often biased by what we study
(example of continuous vs discrete traits)
After the Evolutionary Synthesis
The Importance of Natural Selection vs Genetic Drift
Ongoing debate after the Evolutionary Synthesis
Even after the synthesis the relative importance of
Natural Selection and Genetic Drift was debated
• During the Evolutionary Synthesis, Sewall Wright focused
more on importance of Genetic Drift, whereas Fisher focused
on Natural Selection
• Shortly after the Evolutionary Synthesis many focused on
selection to the point of assuming that most phenotypes were
the result of Natural Selection
• Emphasis on Genetic Drift resurged in the 1970s, 80s with
Kimura’s “Neutral Theory”
• Then in the 2000s and 2010s interest in Selection increased
with the ability to detect signatures of Natural Selection in
genome sequence data
Motoo Kimura (1924-1994)
The Neutral Theory of
Molecular Evolution
Classic Paper: Kimura, Motoo. 1968.
Evolutionary rate at the molecular level.
Nature. 217: 624–626.
Classic Book: Kimura, Motoo (1983). The
neutral theory of molecular evolution.
Cambridge University Press.
The Neutral Theory of
Molecular Evolution (Lecture #6)
• The Neutral theory posits that the vast majority
of evolutionary change at the molecular level is
caused by random genetic drift rather than
natural selection.
Motoo Kimura
• Neutral theory is not incompatible with Darwin's theory of
evolution by natural selection: adaptive changes are
acknowledged as present and important, but hypothesized to be a
small minority evolutionary change.
• Recent tests of selection have found that in many cases evolution
is not neutral, even in non-coding regions of the genome.
• Nevertheless, the neutral theory is useful as a null hypothesis,
against which selection could be tested.
While the Evolutionary
Synthesis was a HUGE
leap in the right direction,
there were a few tenets
that required modification
(as a result of new
discoveries in Genetics)
Some Tenets of the Evolutionary Synthesis











The phenotype is different from the genotype
Acquired characters (phenotypic plasticity) are not inherited –not always true
Traits are inherited via genes, and they do not “blend” with other genes (Darwin
was wrong about this one)
Genes mutate, resulting in different alleles
Evolution occurs at the population level, due to a change in proportions of
individuals with different genotypes
Changes in proportion in a population could occur via random genetic drift (Sewall
Wright) or Natural Selection… the rate of mutation is usually too low to cause large
changes in proportions
Even very weak natural selection could cause substantial changes over a longer
time scale
Mutations generate the genetic variation upon which natural selection acts
Microevolutionary processes lead to Macroevolutionary changes (speciation)
All organisms on the planet are related to one another in a great “tree of life”, and
have diverged by branching from common ancestors
Gaps in the fossil record are likely due to incompleteness of the fossil record.
Gradual changes seen in many parts of the fossil record suggest gradual changes
over time –not always true
Completing the Synthesis
Advances in Genetics


Epigenetic Inheritance (Lecture #9)
Some genetic changes could lead to radical
changes in phenotype (Lecture #7)
 Polyploidization
seen often in plants
 Changes in developmental genes
 Regulatory Evolution
 Transposons
Evolution at the Molecular Genetic Level
Which types of mutations predominate and contribute to
adaptations more often?

Structural vs Regulatory?


Is phenotypic evolution occurring predominantly at the level
of gene products (e.g. proteins) or at the level of gene
regulation (e.g. transcription, RNA processing, translation,
etc.)?
cis-Regulation vs trans-Regulation?

Is regulatory evolution occurring predominantly at the level of
cis-regulatory elements (e.g. promoter, enhancers) or at the
level of trans-acting factors (e.g. transcription factors, etc.)?
More on Lectures on Molecular Evolution (Lecture #13)
The role of Epigenetics
(Lecture #9)



Lamarck Revisited
Lamarck was incorrect in thinking that the
inheritance of acquired characters is the main
mechanism of evolution
However, we do now know that the inheritance of
acquired characters does happen sometimes,
through the inheritance of epigenetic modifications
Evolution of
Development
(Lecture #26)


How small changes in
developmental genes
(like Hox genes) could
radically cause the
evolution of body plans
Will talk more about this
when I get to lecture on
Animal Diversity
Role of Genomics
(Lectures #15, 16)



How does the whole
genome evolve?
How does selection act on
networks of interacting
genes?
How many and which
genes are involved in the
formation of new species?
Today: Genome Evolution and Systems Biology




How do multiple genes interact?
How do multiple genes affect a phenotype?
Systems Biology: How does selection act on
interacting gene networks?
Evolution of Genome Architecture
Questions:
(1) What were the intellectual influences on Darwin’s thought?
(2) What role did the discoveries from the Beagle’s voyage play
in the development of Darwin’s thought?
(3) What were Darwin’s main conclusions?
(4) How did Darwin’s thought differ from that of Lamarck?
(4) What did Darwin’s theory leave out?
(5) What was Mendel’s contribution?
(6) What were the sources of confusion between the proponents
of Darwin and Mendel’s ideas?
Questions:
(1) What were the sources of confusion regarding evolutionary
mechanisms prior to the Evolutionary Synthesis?
(2) What was the Modern (Evolutionary) Synthesis?
(3) What were the main tenets of the Evolutionary Synthesis?
(4) What is the relationship between natural selection, genetic drift,
mutations, and recombination?
(5) What were some of the limitations of the Evolutionary Synthesis?
(6) What were some key developments since the Evolutionary
Synthesis?
(7) What gaps remain in our understanding today?
CONCEPTS
Evolution
Population
Natural Selection
Evolutionary Adaptation
Fitness
Mutation
Genetic Drift
Recombination
Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
Development of Darwin’s thought
Lamarck vs Darwin
Darwinists vs Mendelists
Evolutionary Synthesis
Sample Exam Questions
1.Which of the following is TRUE regarding Darwin’s contribution to the theory
of Evolution?
(A) Darwin formulated the first comprehensive theory incorporating all
mechanisms of evolution
(B) Darwin recognized that evolution occurs at the population level (in terms of
changes in frequency of traits within populations)
(C) Darwin proposed that selection acts on mutations and other forms of genetic
variation
(D) Darwin agreed with Larmarck’s idea of inheritance of acquired characters,
but included the concept of fitness.
(E) Darwin incorporated Mendel’s work on the particulate inheritance of alleles
2. For several decades "Darwinists" and "Mendelists" battled over
the mechanisms of evolution. Which of the following did NOT
contribute to this particular conflict?
(a) Geneticists/Evolutionary biologists did not understand that
continuous and discrete traits follow the same principle of
inheritance
(b) Geneticists/Evolutionary biologists did not understand that
natural selection acts on mutations in a population
(c) Mendel worked with discrete traits, whereas Darwin worked
with continuous traits, leading to differences in perspectives on
inheritance
(d) Darwin was unaware of the mechanism or unit of inheritance
(e) Darwin was unaware of the mechanisms of Genetic Drift
3. Darwin’s development of the theory of evolution by natural
selection was NOT influenced by which of the following?
(a) The concept of adaptation to the environment, which was
proposed by Lamarck
(b) Fossils of extinct organisms
(c) Each island of an archipelago having a population with
morphological differences from those on other islands
(d) Malthus' demography showing exponential growth of
populations
(e) Changes in frequency of discrete characters from generation to
generation
Sample Exam Question
Which of the following was NOT a tenet of the Evolutionary
Synthesis?
(a) Evolution occurs at the level of populations, in terms of changes
in allele frequencies, rather than changes at the individual level
(b) Selection could act on traits that are coded by multiple genes
(c) Selection acts on genetic variation in traits that are caused by
mutations
(d) Natural Selection and Mutation are the only causes of
evolutionary change
(e) Microevolutionary processes within populations lead to
Macroevolutionary changes among populations

Answer: d

Additional Optional Slides (for
your interest)
Chapters of Origins (1859)
On the Origin of Species by Means of
Natural Selection, or the Preservation of
Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life
1 Variation Under Domestication
2 Variation Under Nature
3 Struggle for Existence
4 Natural Selection
5 Laws of Variation
6 Difficulties on Theory
7 Instinct
8 Hybridism
9 On the Imperfection of the Geological Record
10 On the Geological Succession of Organic Beings
11 Geographical Distribution
12 Geographical Distribution continued
13 Mutual Affinities of Organic Beings: Morphology: Embryology:
Rudimentary Organs
14 Recapitulation and Conclusion
Other books by Darwin on
Evolution




The Variation of Plants and Animals under
Domestication
The Descent of Man
The Expression of the Emotions of Man and
Animals
Full list of books by Darwin:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin_bibliography
Charles Darwin's 1837 sketch, his first
diagram of an evolutionary tree from his
First Notebook on Transmutation of
Species (1837) on view at the the Museum
of Natural History in Manhattan.
Interpretation of handwriting: "I think case
must be that one generation should have as
many living as now. To do this and to have
as many species in same genus (as is)
requires extinction . Thus between A + B
the immense gap of relation. C + B the
finest gradation. B+D rather greater
distinction. Thus genera would be formed.
Bearing relation" (next page begins) "to
ancient types with several extinct forms"