Transcript Finch? - Humble ISD

Chapter 22~
• Descent with
Modification:
A Darwinian View
of Life
Evolution
• Evolution:
the change over time of the
genetic composition of populations
• Natural selection:
populations of organisms can
change over the generations if
individuals having certain heritable
traits leave more offspring than
others (differential reproductive
success)
• Evolutionary adaptations:
a prevalence of inherited
characteristics that enhance
organisms’ survival and
reproduction
November 24, 1859
Triassic
Permian
225
Carboniferous
350
Devonian
Silurian
Ordovician
Cambrian
Ediacaran
400
430
500
570
700
Precambrian,
Proterozoic,
&
Archarozoic 4500
Life’s Natural History is a record of Successions & Extinctions
Seed Plants
Land Plants
Birds
Mammals
Reptiles
Insects
Amphibians
Teleost Fish
Jawless Fish
Chordates
Molluscs
280
Flowering Plants
180
Dinosaurs
Jurassic
135
Arthropods
Cretaceous
63
Multicellular Animals
Tertiary
Green Algae
1.5
Photosynthetic Bacteria
Quaternary
Anaerobic Bacteria
mya
Evolutionary history
•
•
•
•
•
Linnaeus: taxonomy
Hutton: gradualism
Lamarck: evolution
Malthus: populations
Cuvier: paleontology
•
•
•
•
Lyell: uniformitarianism
Darwin: evolution
Mendel: inheritance
Wallace: evolution
Charles Darwin
• 1809-1882
• British naturalist
• Proposed the idea of
evolution by natural
selection
• Collected clear
evidence to support
his ideas
Voyage of the HMS Beagle
• Invited to travel around the world
– 1831-1836 (22 years old!)
– makes many observations of nature
• main mission of the Beagle was to chart
South American coastline
Stopped in Galapagos Islands
500 miles off coast of Ecuador
Darwin found… birds
Collected many different
birds on the Galapagos
Islands.
Thought he found Finch?
very different kinds…
Sparrow?
QuickTime™ and a
Photo - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Woodpecker?
Warbler?
But Darwin found… a lot of finches
Darwin was amazed to
find out:
All 14 species of birds
were finches…
But there is only one
species of finch on the
mainland!
Finch?
Sparrow?
Large Ground
Small Ground
Finch?
Sparrow?
QuickTime™ and a
Photo - JPEG decompressor
Finch
Finch
are needed to see this picture.
How did
one species
of finches become
so many different
species now?
Woodpecker?
Warbler Finch
Woodpecker?
Warbler?
Veg. Tree Finch
Warbler?
Darwin’s finches
• Differences in beaks
– associated with eating different foods
– survival & reproduction of beneficial adaptations
to foods available on islands
Warbler finch
Cactus finch
Woodpecker finch
Sharp-beaked finch
Small insectivorous
tree finch
Large
insectivorous
tree finch
Small ground
finch
Cactus
eater
Medium
ground finch
Insect eaters
Seed eaters
Vegetarian
tree finch
Bud eater
Large
ground finch
Darwin’s finches
• Darwin’s conclusions
– small populations of original South American
finches landed on islands
• variation in beaks enabled individuals to gather food
successfully in the different environments
– over many generations, the populations of finches
changed anatomically & behaviorally
• accumulation of advantageous traits in population
• emergence of different species
Seeing this gradation &
diversity of structure in
one small, intimately related group of birds,
one might really fancy that
from an original paucity of birds
in this archipelago,
one species has been taken &
modified for different ends.
Darwin’s finches
• Differences in beaks
allowed some
finches to…
– successfully
compete
– successfully feed
– successfully
reproduce
• pass successful traits
onto their offspring
More observations…
Correlation of species
to food source
Whoa,
Turtles, too!
Essence of Darwin’s ideas
• Natural selection
– variation exists in populations
– over-production of offspring
• more offspring than the environment can support
– competition
• for food, mates, nesting sites, escape predators
– differential survival
• successful traits = adaptations
– differential reproduction
• adaptations become more
common in population
Evolution evidence:
Biogeography
• Geographical
distribution of
species
• Examples:
Islands vs. Mainland
Australia
Continents
Evolution evidence:
The Fossil Record
• Succession of forms
over time
• Transitional links
• Vertebrate descent
Fossil Record
2006 Fossil Discovery of Early Tetrapod
• Tiktaalik
– “missing link” from sea to land animals
Evolution evidence:
Comparative Anatomy
• Homologous
structures
(homology)
• Descent from a
common ancestor
•
•
•
•
Homologous structures
Similar structure
Similar development
Different functions
Evidence of close
evolutionary relationship
– recent common ancestor
Homologous structures
spines
leaves
succulent leaves
needles
colored leaves
tendrils
Analogous structures
 Separate evolution of structures
similar functions
 similar external form
 different internal structure & development
 different origin
 no evolutionary relationship

Don’t be fooled
by their looks!
Solving a similar problem with a similar solution
Vestigial organs
• Modern animals may have structures that serve little
or no function
– remnants of structures that were functional in
ancestral species
– deleterious mutations accumulate in genes for noncritical structures without reducing fitness
• snakes & whales — remains of pelvis & leg bones of walking
ancestors
• eyes on blind cave fish
• human tail bone
Evolution evidence:
Comparative Embryology
• Pharyngeal
pouches, ‘tails’ as
embryos
Evolution evidence:
Molecular Biology
• Similarities in DNA,
proteins, genes,
and gene products
• Common genetic
code
Closely related species have
sequences that are more similar
than distantly related species
 DNA & proteins are a molecular
record of evolutionary relationships
Building “family” trees
Closely related species (branches) share same line of descent
until their divergence from a common ancestor
Artificial selection
• Artificial breeding can use variations in
populations to create vastly different “breeds” &
“varieties”
“descendants” of wild mustard
“descendants” of the wolf
Natural selection in action
• Insecticide &
drug resistance
– insecticide didn’t
kill all individuals
– resistant survivors
reproduce
– resistance is inherited
– insecticide becomes less &
less effective
Final words…...
• “Absence of evidence
is not evidence of
absence.”