JTO`s perspective and investment in HEL systems

Download Report

Transcript JTO`s perspective and investment in HEL systems

JTO’s Perspective and Investment
in High Energy Laser Systems
8 Nov 2004
LCDR Rich Nguyen
NAVY Rep, HEL JTO
1
Outline
•
•
•
•
•
•
JTO Organization
JTO Portfolio
JHPSSL
FEL
FY05 S&A Call for Papers
MRI
2
JTO Programmatic Organization
DUSD(S&T)
Technology Council
Contractor
Technical
Support
S&T Executives
(Army,Navy, AF,
MDA, DARPA, DTRA)
Director, Joint
Technology Office
Executive
Assistant
Army
Representative
Tech Area,
Contracts Monitor
Budget/Finance
Navy
Representative
Air Force
Representative
Tech Area,
Contracts Monitor
Tech Area,
Contracts Monitor
MDA
DARPA
DTRA
USMC Reps
Technology Area Working Groups
3
JTO Mission, Vision, and
Objectives
• Mission:
To lead DOD’s development of HEL weapon
technology
• Vision:
Lasers will be a viable weapons in modern warfare
• Objectives:
Make HELs Lightweight, Affordable, and
Supportable
4
JTO Thrust Areas
Laser Device
Thermal Management
- Solid State
- Chemical
- Free Electron
- Advanced
Heat
Beam
Combining
Beam Control
Lethality
Atmospheric Propagation
- Thermal Blooming
- Turbulence
Laser-Target
Interaction
Pointing
Beam Conditioning
& Adaptive Optics
Heat
Power Conditioning
Wavefront
Sensor
Windows &
Mirrors
Engagement
Modeling
Illuminator
Fire Control
Example: Solid
State Laser
5
JTO Portfolio
• JTO maintains a portfolio of approx 80
Projects/Programs
• Addresses all thrust areas of HEL system
• Typical program size is $1M/yr
• Have larger programs in Electric Laser
Initiative
 JHPSSL
 FEL
6
JTO Investments
(Larger Programs)
•
JTO – 25KW JHPSSL

•
AFRL – 25KW JHPSSL

•
$26M (FY03/04)
JTO – 10KW Free Electron Laser

•
$10.2M (FY03/04)
Army – 25KW JHPSSL

•
$15M (FY03), $15M (FY04), $3.7M (FY05)
$4M (FY03), $4M (FY04)
Navy – 10 KW Free Electron Laser

$14.1M (FY03/04)
7
Joint High Power Solid State
Laser Program (JHPSSL)
Mission: to significantly accelerate development of
solid state laser technology for future High Power
Tactical Laser programs
•
•
Near Term Goal: Demonstration and Fabrication of a 25 kW
Laser System with near diffraction limited beam quality and
useful metrics
Ultimate Goal: Demonstration of 100 kW Militarily
Significant Laser System
8
JHPSSL Technical
Requirements
SOA: P=500W, BQ=1.1xDL, Eff<5%, <2W/kg
Parameter
Desired Value
Development Goals
Output Power
 25 kW
> 100 kW
Beam Quality
<1.5 xDL (goal: 1.2)
1.1 x DL
Run Time
 300 s
300 s
Start-up Time
 1 s (goal: 100 ms)
10 ms
Wall-Plug Efficiency
> 10 %
> 20%
Output Power-to-Mass
20 W/kg
50 W/kg
Beam Jitter
5%
5%
Temperature Range
Operate: 5 to 35 °C
Store: –29 to 49 °C
Operate: 5 to 35 °C
Store: –29 to 49 °C
9
JHPSSL
Program Plan
•
25 KW lab demonstrations is scheduled in Jan-Mar
2005 at all three facilities (LLNL, Raytheon, NGST)


Raytheon & NGST contracts are fully funded
LLNL will need 1QFY05 funds from Army
•
Gov’t team (MIT/LL, JTO, ARL, SMDC, & AFRL)
perform BQ and power measurements at each
facility, Mar 2005
•
100KW RFP plan in 3QFY05 (open competition); Tech
Council decision for contract(s) award Sep 2005


BAA solicitation/ technical criteria set by joint team
FY05 JTO funds available for kick-off effort
10
FEL -- Surface Navy Threats
Protection
11
FEL
Tactical System Goal
Injector & Accelerator
Top Level




Power = 1 to 3 MW, controllable
down to 100 kW
λ = 1 - 3 µm
BQ < 2 times diffraction limit
Duty Cycle = 30 seconds run time,
repeatable after 5 minutes
 ~ 0.5 Amp average current & ~ 0.5 nC/bunch per MW
 2 °K Superconducting RF (500 - 750 MHz) linac
 100 MeV Beam with Energy Recovery
Wiggler & Resonator
 Short Rayleigh length
 1% - 2% Extraction efficiency wiggler
 Near concentric resonator
12
MW-Class FEL
Key Technical Issues
•
Photoinjectors with ~ 1 A average current, ~ 1 nC/bunch injector


•
Development needed to achieve all requirements simultaneously
Issues with photocathodes, drive lasers, and emittance control
Anchored Models & Simulations

Coherent synchrotron radiation (CSR) and other beam break-up effects degrade
the electron beam quality when focusing & bending

•
Efficient wiggler & compact, survivable optical resonator


•
Where are the limits? - More data & better models are required to manage effects
High intracavity power & small beam stress conventional resonators & optics
Need short Raleigh length wigglers, resonator concepts & improved optics/coatings
Propagation efficiency of an intense FEL beam

Effects of maritime and other tactical atmospheric paths not yet adequately
understood

•
Effect of the FEL pulse format on beam propagation (degrade or enhance?)
Optimum FEL concept for scale-up

Trades required to balance the challenges faced by the evolving subsystem
requirements and competing approaches
13
FEL
Photo Injectors
•
Three classes of potentially scalable Photo Injectors are
being developed


•
DC guns (Jlab & AES)





•
Accelerate the electron bunch using a DC electrostatic field (~500 kV)
Inject 500 kV electrons into SRF cavity to accelerate to 5 – 10 MeV
Have demonstrated continuous (hi rep-rate), low charge/bunch operation
Challenge: large charge/bunch without space charge effects degrading emittance
Most mature, probably leading candidate for 100 kW FEL
RF guns (LANL & AES)





•
All generate free electrons by striking a photocathode emitter with a pulsed laser beam
All need robust, long life drive lasers and high QE photocathodes in visible
Accelerate/control the electron bunch using RF fields & focusing magnets
Uses normal conducting RF accelerators if are required
Have demonstrated low rep-rate, high charge/bunch operation
Challenge: thermal management of room temperature RF accelerator at high accelerator
gradient
Less mature than DC gun, probably lowest risk for MW FEL
SRF guns (BNL & AES)




Accelerate the electron bunch using RF fields in SRF linac cavities
Cryogenic photocathode
Challenge: thermal management of cryogenic and superconducting portions of the injector
with high power drive laser beam and high average current
14
Least mature but best fit to SRF FEL if technical challenges can be addressed
FY05 S&A Call
FEL
•
FEL: 01) High Average Current Electron Gun and
Injector Technology
•
FEL: 02) Amplifier Technology Development
•
FEL: 03) Technologies To Reduce FEL Construction
Costs
•
FEL: 04) Compact RF Sources
15
FY05 S&A Call
FEL: 01
•
FEL: 01) High Average Current Electron Gun and
Injector Technology
“ Proposals in this area should address technologies
that support low-emittance consistent with 1 micron
wavelength FELs and average currents approaching
1 ampere. Robust electron gun technology, e.g.
employing photocathodes, is required that permits
long term operation in realistic vacuum environments
with a quantum efficiency leading to workable power
requirements for the cathodes drive laser.
Superconducting and normal conducting
technologies are of interest.”
16
Multi-Disciplinary Research
Initiative Projects
•
High Average Power Diode Pumped Solid State Lasers


•
Affordable High Energy Laser Systems


•

PM: Michael Berman, Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Principal Investigator: Dr. William McDermott, Denver University
High Power, Closed-Cycle Chemical Lasers


•
PM: Arje Nachman, Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Principal Investigator: Dr. Jerry Moloney, University of Arizona
High Power, Closed-Cycle Chemical Lasers

•
PM: John Zavada, Army Research Office
Principal Investigator: Dr. Robert Byer, Stanford University
PM: Michael Berman, Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Principal Investigator: Dr. Wayne Solomon, University of Illinois UrbanaChampaign
Atmospheric Propagation & Compensation of HEL


PM: Kent Miller, Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Principal Investigator: Dr. Steve Gibson, University of California-Los Angeles
17
Multi-Disciplinary Research
Initiative Projects (Cont’d)
•
High Power, Lightweight Optics


•
PM: Charles Lee, Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Principal Investigator: Dr. Hubert Martin, University of Arizona
FEL -- High Quantum Efficiency Robust Dispenser Photocathodes
PM: Quentin Saulter, Office of Naval Research
 Principal Investigator: : Dr. Patrick O'Shea, University of Maryland
Issues: Photocathodes are a weak link in FELs

Goal: High quantum efficiency, robust dispenser photocathode using green light
or IR drive laser
Approach: Theory and Experiment with a focus on dispenser photocathodes
•
FEL -- Diagnostics & Control Methods
PM: Quentin Saulter, Office of Naval Research
 Principal Investigator: Dr. Todd Smith, Stanford University
Issues: Need Better Phase Space Mapping techniques for High-Quality Beams
Goal: Develop techniques for measuring high average current beams that are
suitable for interface with control system
Approach: New schemes using: Optical Diffraction radiation, Optical pepper
pots, Optical synchrotron interferometry

18
Questions?
19