Introduction - PACS at Leuven
Download
Report
Transcript Introduction - PACS at Leuven
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
PACS Instrument Overview
A. Poglitsch
MPE
Instrument Design/Development Overview
and
System Performance
PACS Instrument Overview
1
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Instrument Concept
•
Imaging photometry
– two bands simultaneously (60-85 or
85-130 µm and 130-210 µm) with
dichroic beam splitter
Focal Plane Footprint
32 x 16 pixels
6.4” x 6.4”
64 x 32 pixels
3.2” x 3.2”
– two filled bolometer arrays (32x16
and 64x32 pixels, full beam sampling)
– point source detection limit ~3 mJy
(5s, 1h)
•
Integral field line spectroscopy
– range 57 - 210 µm with 5x5 pixels,
image slicer, and long-slit grating
spectrograph (R ~ 1500)
– two 16x25 Ge:Ga photoconductor
arrays (stressed/unstressed)
– point source detection limit
3…10 x10-18 W/m2 (5s, 1h)
PACS Instrument Overview
2
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Observing Modes
• Combinations of instrument modes and satellite
pointing modes
• Instrument modes:
– dual-band photometry
– single-band photometry
– line spectroscopy
• observation of individual lines
– range spectroscopy
• observation of extended wavelength ranges
• Pointing modes:
– stare/raster/line scan
– with/without nodding
PACS Instrument Overview
3
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Instrument Overview and Subsystem Responsibilities
DEC/MEC 1
FPU Cold
FocalPlaneUnit
MEC I/F-Module
BlueGe:GaArray
&CRE
MPE/ASTEQ/IMEC
BOL/COOL
DPU
nominal
SPU
nominal
IAC-Tenerife/TU-Wien
BOL/BAU
DSP Module
BOL 1
Module
BlueBol
BAU
BlueBolArray
&Read-out
CEA
BlueDEC Module
BOL 2
Module
RedBol
BAU
RedBolArray
&Read-out
CEA
Base/PSU
Cooler
Control
CSL-Liege
CEA
RedGe:GaArray
&CRE
MPE/ASTEQ/IMEC
CEA
0.3K Cooler
CEA
DEC/MEC 2
DPU
redundant
IFSI-ROME
Warm Interconnecting
Harness
SPU
redundant
MEC I/F-Module
Redundant
Grating Assy
CSL-Liege
DSP Module
Redundant
Chopper Assy
MPIA
RedDEC Module
2FilterWheels
KT
Base/PSU
Redundant
2CalSources
KT
IAC-Tenerife/TU-Wien
PACS Instrument Overview
CSL-Liege
KT/MPE
4
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
FPU/Optics
Photometer
Optics
Blue
Bolometer
FPU Cold
FocalPlaneUnit
Filter Wheel I
Slicer
Optics
0.3 K Cooler
Red
Bolometer
Grating
Grating Drive
Encoder
sGeGaDetector
Red Spectrometer
Spectrometer
Optics
Chopper
Calibrator I and II
Calibrator
Optics
Entrance
Optics
PACS Instrument Overview
BlueGe:GaArray
&CRE
MPE/ASTEQ/IMEC
BlueBolArray
&Read-out
CEA
RedBolArray
&Read-out
CEA
RedGe:GaArray
&CRE
MPE/ASTEQ/IMEC
0.3K Cooler
CEA
Grating Assy
CSL-Liege
Filter Wheel II
Chopper Assy
MPIA
GeGa Detector
Blue Spectrometer
2 FilterWheels
KT
2 Calibrators
KT
KT/MPE
5
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Design/Development Status of Technically
Critical Components
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Optics
FPU/Structure
Photoconductors, CRE
Bolometers
Chopper
Grating assembly
Warm electronics
PACS Instrument Overview
6
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Optics
• Design of FPU optics unchanged, manufacturing of
mirrors complete, filters partly delivered
• Alignment of QM optics in progress, specs fulfilled so
far
• Analyses (geometrical-optical, diffraction) done; to be
complemented by measurements with IL tests/
calibration
• Baffle design and manufacture for QM FPU finished;
optimisation for FM in progress
• Calibration sources manufactured and tested
Details from N. Geis / D. Kampf
PACS Instrument Overview
7
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
FPU Status
• Detailed design of FPU structure finished, but thermal
strap interface issues open.
• Manufacture of QM structure complete, manufacture
of FM started
• Cryo-vibration performed on STM
–
–
–
–
–
Photometer STM including cooler and Focal Plane Assembly
Grating STM, including new launch lock (without motor)
One of two filter wheels
Both photoconductor arrays (partly dummies)
Dummy chopper
Details from J. Schubert and D. Kampf
PACS Instrument Overview
8
PACS IHDR
PACS Instrument Overview
12/13 Nov 2003
99
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Photoconductor Arrays
• All QM detector “sixpacks” (2 highstress, 2 low-stress) delivered to
MPE / MPIA for testing
• Tests of all low-stress modules
finished at MPIA, all high-stress
modules + a few low-stress
modules tested at MPE after repair
at ASTEQ
• QM schedule tight (critical path) –
see below
– Integration of modules with
housing + filters has to start
• FM schedule driven by
– CREs: FM wafers (CRE v06)
processed, AIT in progress
– New contact (?) problem
PACS Instrument Overview
Details from H. Richter
10
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
“Blue” Ge:Ga QM Detector Test Results
A/W
Sixpack2_MPIA
Responsivity of modules in Sixpack1_MPIA
(left: before vibration, right: after vibration)
PACS Instrument Overview
NEP ~ 5x Herschel/PACS BLIP (with QM CRE)
11
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
“Red” Ge:Ga QM Detector Test Results
600
QM7: responsivity at T=1.9K, C=0.52pF, t=0.25s
P = 4.8e-15 W
detector1
1E-15
QM7: NEP at T=1.9K, C=0.52pF, t=0.25s
P = 4.8e-15 W
detector1
detector 2
detector 2
detector 3
500
detector 3
detector 4
detector 4
detector 5
NEP [W / Hz]
r [A/W]
detector 5
detector 6
400
300
200
detector 6
detector 7
detector 7
detector 8
detector 8
1E-16
detector 9
detector 9
detector 10
detector 10
detector 11
detector 11
detector 12
detector 12
detector 13
BLIP
detector 15
Herschel/PACS
detector 16
100
detector 13
detector 14
0
20
FM14,0 FM12, FM11
QM12, QM11, QM8
40 QM7, QM9,
60 QM3 80
FM11,
QM12,
QM11,
QM8
bias [mV]
100
detector 14
detector 15
1E-17
0
20
40
bias [mV]
detector 16
60
80
100
• NEP (even with QM CRE) approaching advertised value
• Some “weak” pixels, varying from cooldown to cooldown
• Few “dead” pixels (open channels)
PACS Instrument Overview
Details from U. Grözinger
12
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Cryogenic Read-Out Electronics
• CQM run (v05)
– Integrated in QM modules + test modules
– Tested extensively – current noise too high (at least for
low-stress array – by factor ~5)
– CQM not suitable for FS, but useful for QM ILT
• FM run (v06)
–
–
–
–
Significant design modifications (3 variations implemented)
Wafers processed
First tests very promising in terms of noise performance
Delivery starting Nov/Dec ’03
• FS run my become necessary to reach all specs
– should come in time to allow allow detector swapping
Details from P. Merken
PACS Instrument Overview
13
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
QM CRE (v05) Performance
Raw ramp
•
Linearity
: <3%
non-linearity
Blind channel
subtracted
over >2V
•
Cross talk between channels:
<1% full range
• Linearity, cross talk
meet requirements
– with blind channel subtraction
• Noise too high by factor ~5
PACS Instrument Overview
14
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Bolometer/Readout Development
Blue Focal Plane
PACS Instrument Overview
• QM blue focal plane array
mounted at LETI
• The working arrays showed a
very large responsivity (good!)
• The working arrays show very
large noise and very slow
response of the clocks, due to
high contact resistance (~MΩ)
at the 2K Buffer Unit level
(known error in QM buffer run
causing poor indium bumps
hybridization)
• A new blue focal plane is being
mounted with FM Buffer Unit
to be used in the CQM
More from L. Rodriguez et al.
15
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Bolometer/Readout Development
Red Focal Plane
16
Reference
Red array
• A red focal plane with two sub arrays has been assembled
• No tests because of known Buffer Unit problems. Decision to
replace the BU right away
• This detector is now completed and under test
• The measured noise levels are good everywhere except for a few
pixels on each array
Wavelength in microns
• Spectral response measured with FTS; absorption ~80% in band
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
500
550
600
1
0.9
0.8
PACS band
Absorption
0.7
0.6
calculated
0.5
0.4
measured
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Wavelength in microns
PACS Instrument Overview
16
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Bolometer Performance Tests
requirement
• Detector bandwidth
measured ~4 - 5 Hz
• “1/f” noise “knee”/
stability measurement:
no significant
increase down
to 0.05 Hz
^ 10-16 W/√Hz (requirement)
=
goal
PACS Instrument Overview
requirement
17
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
3He
Sorption Cooler Development
6 10
350
300
Note : HCR#3/upside down
Level 0 at1.66 K
HCR#1 - horizontal
HCR#1 - right side up
HCR#1 - upside down
HCR#2 - horizontal
HCR#2 - right side up
HCR#2 - upside down
HCR#3 - horizontal
HCR#3 - right side up
HCR#3 - upside down
4 10
-5
3 10
-5
2 10
-5
1 10
-5
0
250
0
20
40
60
Cooling power (µW)
First test with 10 µW
applied load:
35 hours @ 291 mK
PACS Instrument Overview
CQM PACS
SPIRE- -Autonomy
Autonomytests
tests
CQM
Nominal
conditions
L0
=
1.7 K
K //L1
L1 ==44 K
K
Nominal conditions - L0 = 1.7
5 10-5
-1
1/time (s )
Temperature (mK)
CQM PACS - Thermal tests June - August 2003
Comparison HCR #1 HCR#2 and HCR#3
Level 1 (titanium frame) : 2 K
Level 0 (cryostat cold plate) : Å 1.6 K
-5
80
100
Theoretical curve
yy==5,3392e-06
+ 0,22163x
R= 0,99898
4,11371e-06
+ 2,09004e-07x
R= 1
0
5 50
10
-5
100
150
0,0001
0,00015
Applied load (µW)
200
0,0002
• extra load of 8-10 µW identified
(potential heat switch problem)
• 10% undercharged
Details from L. Duband
18
250
0,00025
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Chopper
• QM delivered for integration in
FPU
• Performance demonstrated
• Scratches on mirror
– t.b. avoided with FM
• Tests of chopper control with
DECMEC and LM concluded
• Adjustment of control
parameters for QM only during
IL tests
Details from R. Hofferbert
PACS Instrument Overview
19
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Grating Assembly
• Grating Mechanism/Drive
– STM including new launch-lock (without actuator) passed cryovibration test
• STM mechanism shows better dynamic characteristics than before
vibration. The apparent "friction" torque is roughly reduced by a factor
2 to 3.
• Bearings qualified: no movement noise or hard point over the useful
stroke
– Transformer for Inductosyn position readout shows excellent cold
performance. Dissipation measured 1.5 mW
– CQM delivered to CSL
•
•
•
•
•
Few minor NCRs, one major (connectors swapped)
Functional/performance tests performed
FUB QM transformers integrated in QM ILT
Launch-lock actuator will be integrated
Loose spring washer, shaft-to-bearing coupling part has moved in cryovibration test
PACS Instrument Overview
20
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Grating Assembly
• Diffraction grating
– QM grating fully
characterised
– Test of grating
constant
and grating
periodicity: all
parameters in
or near spec
(accepted
by optics SE)
PACS Instrument Overview
21
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Warm Electronics: AVM Instrument Level Tests
PACS Instrument Overview
22
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Status of AVM Tests (1)
• CDMS simulator upgrade to V2.4
– Has solved some counter overrun problem and the time bug
(now we have correct TAI)
– Burst mode for PACS implemented
• DPU OBSW: several updates
– Mainly for 1355 link loss investigation
– But solving only the other known problems (EEPROM, jump
to application software)
– Bug found in DPU ISR routine (by comparison with DECMEC)
– New problem with 1553 interface discovered. HW? SW?
DPU problems not solved in >1 year – start of ILT at risk!
• DECMEC OBSW is pretty stable
PACS Instrument Overview
23
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Status of AVM Tests (2)
• AVM SPU
– Identified HW problem fixed
– A small problem related to the SPU-DMC 1355 link initial
self-test has been found, but apparently this is inherent to
the SMCS chip. Either the SPU_SUSW and/or the user
manual need to be updated.
• SPU HLSW upgraded to version 6.0
– It contains some performance improvements both with
respect to CPU work load and compression ratio
– Parallel mode will require small update
– Goal for CQM is to develop, in parallel, an improved strategy
(noise estimate from averaged ramp per pixel) and test it
• Down-link of “near-raw” data to allow ramp modeling / glitch
removal on ground
• CPU load down presently still too high, optimisation in progress
PACS Instrument Overview
24
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
SPU Ground Simulator
Ground simulation of SPU code useful for several reasons:
• Use PACS “raw data” transmission mode to redo, on
ground, the same operations as performed by the onboard S/W
• Dispose of a test bed to try out new compression
algorithms before they are up-linked and used by onboard S/W
• Subject PACS simulator data to same artifacts, i.e.
compression and reduction, as on-board obtained
data
• New version of on-board SPU has been “grounded” in
less than five minutes work
PACS Instrument Overview
25
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Instrument Performance
• Instrument Requirements
– Photometer
– Spectrometer
• Instrument Model
– Optical performance
– Sensitivity budget
• optical transmission
• background
• detector performance
PACS Instrument Overview
26
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Photometer Performance Requirements
• Image quality
– blur: telescope limited
– distortion: ±1 pixel; alignment: <1/3 pixel
• Sensitivity (point source detection)
– requirement: 5 mJy (5s), 1h of integration
– goal:
3 mJy (5s), 1h of integration
• Dynamic range
– detection from 3 mJy to >1000 Jy (goal: 3000 Jy)
– contrast of up to 1:500 in one field
• Post-detection bandwidth
– requirement: 0.5 - 5 Hz
– goal:
0.05 - 5 Hz
PACS Instrument Overview
27
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Spectrometer Performance Requirements
• Image quality
– blur: telescope limited
– distortion: ±1 pixel; alignment: <1/4 pixel
• Sensitivity (point source detection)
– requirement: 3x10-18 W/Hz1/2 (5s), 1h of integration
– goal:
2x10-18 W/Hz1/2 (5s), 1h of integration
• Dynamic range
– detection from ~1x10-18 W to >10-13 W
– contrast of up to 1:100 in one field
• Post-detection bandwidth
– requirement: 5 Hz
– goal:
10 Hz
PACS Instrument Overview
28
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Optical Performance
• Optical design / implementation fulfills requirements
regarding
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
field of view
spatial sampling
distortion
geometrical spot sizes (Strehl ratio)
alignment
internal calibration capability
chopping
spectral coverage and resolution
transmission / diffraction losses
Details from N. Geis / D. Kampf
PACS Instrument Overview
29
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Parameters of PACS Instrument Model
(Present estimate, partly based on measurements)
optical element
Lyot stop
filters
mirrors
slicer diffraction
level
telescope
baffle
“15 K” optics
“4 K” optics
T
(K)
80
65
15
5.5
0.05
0.01
0.05
0.15
efficiency
photometry
0.9
0.4
0.85
-
effective transmission
photometry spectroscopy
0.31
0.15
0.34
0.16
0.34
0.16
10(b)
4(b)
spectroscopy
0.9
0.4
0.74
0.85
relative bandwidth
photometry
spectroscopy
2.9-1 /2.4-1/2.2-1 (a)
1000-1-4500-1
2.9-1 /2.4-1/2.2-1 (a)
1000-1-4500-1
-1
-1
-1 (a)
2.9 /2.4 /2.2
1000-1-4500-1
1.5-1
1.5-1
(a) Values for the photometry modes from 60-85 or 85-130 µm / 130-210 µm, respectively.
(b) The formal transmission of >1 takes into account the acceptance solid angle of the
photoconductor light cones / bolometer baffles which differs from the beam solid angle.
PACS Instrument Overview
30
Spectrometer Performance
PACS IHDR
eff_g i
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
eff_g j
eff_g k
12/13 Nov 2003
eff_ti
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
Telescope efficiency
(main beam)
Grating diffraction order efficiency
0
60
80
100
5000
120
6
140
6
i 10 j 10 k 10
160
180
0
60
80
100
6
120
140
i 10
160
180
6
1
4000
0.8
Ri
3000
Rj
Rk
eff_pi 0.6
2000
0.4
1000
0.2
Main beam / pixel coupling
Resolving power
0
60
80
100
120
6
140
6
i 10 j 10 k 10
PACS Instrument Overview
160
6
180
0
60
80
100
120
i 10
140
6
160
180
31
Spectrometer Performance
PACS IHDR
4 10
14
4 10
17
3 10
14
3 10
17
2 10
14
2 10
17
1 10
14
1 10
17
BLIP NEP [W/Hz1/2]
Background power [W]
0
60
80
100
120
140
160
12/13 Nov 2003
0
180
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
17
1 10
8 10
18
6 10
18
4 10
18
2 10
18
Sensitivity [W/m2]
(5s, 1 hour)
0.3
i
j
0.2
k
off-position
chopping
0.1
on-array chopping
Requirement
Detective quantum efficiency
0
60
80
100
120
6
140
6
i 10 j 10 k 10
PACS Instrument Overview
160
6
180
0
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
32
PACS IHDR
12/13 Nov 2003
Photometer Sensitivity
R
(m)
60 – 85
85 – 130
130 – 210
2.9
2.4
2.2
Telescope
efficiency
0.64
0.73
0.77
Point source detection limit
(5s, 1h) [mJy]
4
goal
3
2
1
0
50
100
150
200
pixel (a)
0.16
0.11
0.18
Background
(W)
4.8 10-12
3.1 10-12
5.1 10-12
BLIP NEP(b)
(W Hz-1/2)
1.8 10-16
1.2 10-16
1.2 10-16
• Assumed detector QE: 80%
(based on FTS
measurements)
• Assumed detector NEP: 10-16
W/Hz1/2 (based on electrical
noise and responsivity
measurements)
• Margin for requirement, goal
likely to be met
Wavelength [µm]
PACS Instrument Overview
33