Transcript Slide 1

Topics
•
•
•
•
Acoustic Optical Modulator
Faster scanning methods
Laser trapping
Fluorescence lifetime imaging
Acousto-optic modulator
0th order
RF (100 MHz) on
Transducer sets up
Acoustic wave in
Second crystal,
Forms grating
Bragg Diffraction: sound waves diffract light
Can achieve ~90% diffraction efficiency into 1st order spot
Double-slit Experiment
Condition for
Constructive interference:
a sinθ = nλ
n = 0, 1, 2,  3 …
After focusing:
d=fλ/a
Applications of Acousto-optic Modulators in microscopes
1) Select Wavelength (tunable filter AOTF): vary drive frequency:
Achieve same angle of deflection
(wavelength dependent, spacing of grating)
2) Control Laser Power: vary RF power to change diffraction fraction
3) Control Beam angle for fast scanning: vary frequency for same ,
fixed power (achieves different deflected angle)
Laser line selection
AOTF to select laser line and power
(drive frequency and RF power, respectively)
Acousto-optic beam deflector
Sweep beam by
Changing deflection
(linearized)
Scanning in a confocal microscope: very fast
Compared to galvo mirrors ~100 fold (paper next week)
Faster Imaging than with two galvos: line scanning + one galvo
Detection on line-scanning microscope
Slit pinholes
Linear CCD
Scanning via spinning disk
Spinning disk microscopy
Uses White light: convenient but very poor light budget
Modern Design
Microlens focuses on
Pinholes, conjugate
To specimen plane
CCD detection,
Much higher
quantum efficiency
Than PMT
Light contamination between
adjacent pinholes
Spinning disk microscopy
Advantages:
1. Can image very rapidly ( image collection not limited
by scanning mirrors
2. Use of cooled CCD camera yields lower noise than
PMT (un-cooled) higher quantum yield
Disadvantages:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Light path not efficient (need powerful light source)
Fixed pixel size
Disk needs to match objective
Lose spatial control of excitation field
Problem with very thick samples
Laser Trapping
Light Can Be Bent by Air
• Dielectric material
• n > n(surroundings)
• Force range is in pN
How to measure the force?
Stochastic force
Langevin equation
F ( x)  x  x
Langevin equation
F ( x)  x  x
k BT
power spectrum S ( f )  2 2
 ( f  f c2 )
Position sensing with Quadrant photodiodes
x = [(B+D) - (A+C)] / [A+B+C+D]
y = [(A+B) - (C+D] / [A+B+C+D]
Direct observation of base-pair
stepping by RNA polymerase
Abbondanzieri EA, Greenleaf WJ, Shaevitz JW, Landick R, Block SM
Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):460-5
www.bact.wisc.edu/landick/research.htm
Simple
But low resolution
Stepping size per base pair = 3.4 Å
The Dumbbell Setup
The Concept of Force Clamp
Summary:
1. Decouple from stage
2. Helium environment
3. Passive force clamp
HOT
Holographic
Optical
Tweezers
Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging
Sensitive to environment: pH, ions, potential
SNARF, Calcium Green, Cameleons
Perform in vitro calibrations
• Results Not sensitive to bleaching artifacts
• Not sensitive to uneven staining (unless self-quenched)
• Not sensitive to alignment (intensity artifacts)
Fluorescence Quantum Yield φ: important for dyes
Ratio of emitted to absorbed photons
Quantum Yield:


kf
k f  k isc
(k is rate,
Inverse of time)
kf
k f  k isc  k nonrad
 0 1  k f
Natural lifetime
 1  k f  kisc
Measured lifetime is sum of
Rates of natural lifetime
and non radiative decay paths
Unquenched and Quenched Emission
Unquenched emission:
Normal QY, lifetime

kf
k f  k isc
Quenched emission
Decreased QY, lifetime
e.g. metals, aggregation

kf
k f  k isc  k nonrad
2 general approaches: time domain and frequency domain
Short pulse laser modulate CW laser
Frequency Domain Methods for Lifetime Measurements:
Modulate laser and measure phase change of fluorescence
Use cw laser (e.g. argon ion)
Modulate at rate near
Inverse of emission lifetime
10-100 MHz
Measure phase change
with Lockin amplifier
Time-domain Widefield Lifetime imaging with ICCD
Variable delayed gate is scanned
To sample exponential decay:
Many frames
ICCD has no time intrinsic response: slow readout
Gated gain
Two-photon has short pulse laser for time-gating
Time-correlated single photon counting:
•most flexibility, most accurate,
•samples whole decay
•Best time response
Measures time of flight of photons
After excitation pulse
Bins data at each time interval
Rather than gating
Collect enough photons to
approximate exponential:
Slower than gating but
Better measurement,
Can separate biexponentials:
Multiple components
Principles of time-correlated single photon counting
TAC or TDC measures time of flight, bins photons
B&H addon to Zeiss Laser scanning confocal
Electronics all in one PCI board, ~50K addon
Time gating measurements of fluorescence decay
Temporal Resolution defined by IRF (laser, detector, electronics)
Ideal IRF
IRF=instrument response function,
Must be (much) shorter than
fluorescence lifetime
(delta function)
to avoid convolution
Real IRF
Gate away from IRF
(laser pulse, PMT response)
Lose photons
Measure IRF with reflection
or known short lifetime
e.g. Rose Bengal (90 ps)
PMT Detectors for Lifetime measurements
Dispersion in time of flight
across 14 dynodes
Limits time response
~300 picosecond resolution
Better with deconvolution
Cost ~$500
Microchannel plate photomultiplier: full of holes, kick off electrons
~30 picosecond resolution
No dispersion
Cost ~$15000
fragile
PMTS have low quantum yield
(10-20%), MCP worse ~5%
Intensity vs fluorescence lifetime image
Same dye, different lifetime because of environment
FRET Outcomes
Donor
decreases
Acceptor
increases
Intensity
Lifetime
CFP and YFP FRET by Lifetime Imaging
Channel changes conformation, distance changes,
Donor quenching occurs due to FRET
Short lifetime is FRET from Donor
For given pixel Ratio of fast to slow decay coefficients
is estimate of FRET efficiency
FLIM as Diagnostic of Joint Disorder
H&E staining
Fixed, thin sections
Widefield
fluorescence
Little info
Widefield
FLIM
Detail revealed by FLIM
Effects of Pinhole Size
Intensity and lifetime measurements
CFP-YFP linked by short peptide chain
Energy is transferred from CFP to YFP
Lifetime reveals info intensity does not