Tree Inventory Overview - i-Tree
Download
Report
Transcript Tree Inventory Overview - i-Tree
Sampling in i-Tree
Concepts, techniques
and applications
Introduction
Sampling is so pervasive in
i-Tree that we have factored it
out for a separate discussion
Overview
Concepts
Techniques
Applications
Concepts I
Random sample
Data collection in which every member of the
population has an equal chance of being selected
Population = the set of people or entities to which
findings are to be generalized.
The population must be defined explicitly before a
sample is taken
Can sometimes break population into subgroups
(stratification) for better numbers
Mind tricks easily, so need rigorous method
Source: http://www.negrdc.org/counties/madison/comprehensiveplans/newcomp/maps/8_01ExistLandUseMadisonCo.jpg
Concepts II
Variance
= (SD)2
Measure of how spread out the distribution is,
i.e., how much individual samples vary
The less the individual measurements vary from
the mean (average), the more reliable the mean
In an urban forest, different traits to investigate
(variables) may have different variances
Species distribution (high?) vs. population size (low)
Hurricane debris (high?) vs. ice storm debris (low)
Source: Dave Nowak
and Jeff Walton,
personal communication
(DRG data)
Concepts III
Sample size
Will need to be larger
the weaker the relationships to be detected
the higher the significance level being sought
the smaller the population of the smallest subgroup
the greater the variance of the variables
Can be smaller as these factors change,
especially as variance goes down
Source: Dave Nowak, personal communication
Concepts IV
Standard error (SEM)
The Standard Error (Standard Error of the Mean)
calculates how accurately a sample mean
estimates the population mean.
Formula: SEM = SD/N , where SD = “standard
deviation” of the sample, and N = sample size.
Note that as SD goes down or N goes up, SEM
gets smaller—i.e., estimate becomes better.
Commonly represented by “±” after a number.
Source: blogaloutre http://www.ontabec.com/fatigue.jpg
Techniques I
Get random
numbers
Tables
Telephone book (final
digits!)
Electronic
randomizers
Online
Desktop
PDA
Techniques II
Select plots
Use map techniques
Grid overlay for maps/photos
Simple edge rulers also work
Pick randomly from list
Street, with replacement
Block number
Create random coordinates
Spreadsheet
GIS
Techniques II
Easy way to get
random list of street
segments
Bring TIGER/Line files
as shape file from ESRI
into a GIS
Details in Appendix B of
the Manual
Techniques III
Reserve
Create more plots than needed
Something like 10%
Take replacements from list in order
when plot must be thrown out
Non-existent
Unfindable
Inaccessible
No bias!
Application I
Inventory types
Complete Inventory
Costly, time-consuming
Partial Inventory
Complete inventory of some forest segment
Sample Inventory
Randomly-selected trees inventoried for large-
scale interpretation
Cost-efficient
Good for planning
Not suitable for day-to-day field management
Application I
Sample inventory benefits
Increase public safety
Facilitate short- and long-term planning
Improve public relations
Justify budgets
Estimate tree benefits
Large gain for small investment
i-Tree promotes the value of sampling
Applications II
Manual sampling techniques
valid, but tedious for larger areas
i-Tree v. 1.0 will include
applications to automate the
process for two types of plots:
Linear (street) plots/segments
STRATUM/MCTI, SDAP
Spatial (park, any area) plots
UFORE
Applications II
Linear plot selector
STRATUM/MCTI
SDAP
Final testing
Requirements
ArcMap 8.3 or 9.0
Polygon file delimiting study area boundary
Road shape file (TIGER/Line data)
Applications II
Spatial plot selector
UFORE
Final testing
Requirements
ArcMap 8.3 or 9.0
Polygon file delimiting study area boundary
Raster-based file of strata (e.g., land uses)
within study area
Digital aerial photos (optional)
Final sampling thoughts
Sampling is our friend
Both tool and product
in i-Tree
Understanding of
validity of what i-Tree
offers will depend
critically on
understanding the
process and capability
of sampling