Stats - Epsom VTS
Download
Report
Transcript Stats - Epsom VTS
Stats Facts
Mark Halloran
Diagnostic Stats
Disease
present
Disease
absent
TOTALS
Test
positive
a
b
a+b
Test
negative
c
d
c+d
TOTALS
a+c
b+d
a+b+c+d
Formulae (1)
Sensitivity = a / (a+c)
Specificity = d / (b+d)
LR+ =
sens / (1-spec)
LR- =
(1-sens) / spec
PPV =
a / (a+b)
NPV =
d / (c+d)
(LR+ = Likelihood ratio for a positive (+) result)
(PPV = Positive Predictive Value, NPV = Neg predictive value)
Formulae (2)
Prevalence = (a+c) / (a+b+c+d)
Pre-test odds = prev / (1-prev)
Post-test odds = pre-test odds x LR
Post-test probability =
Post-test odds / Post-test odds + 1
TB treatment RCT
Control group
(bed rest)
Death from TB
Yes
No
total
14
38
52
51
55
Experimental
4
Group
(streptomycin+
bed rest
Formulae (3)
Control event rate
= number of events/total for control group
14/52 =0.27 (CER)
(the risk of dying in the control group is 27%)
Experimental event rate
=number of events/ total for experimental group
4/55 =0.07 (EER)
(the risk of dying in the experimental group is 7%)
Formulae (4)
Absolute risk reduction for the outcome - death:
ARR= risk of event in the control group – risk of event in the
experimental group
ARR=CER-EER= 0.27 – 0.07 = 0.2 or 20%
Relative risk reduction for the outcome - death:
RRR= absolute risk reduction/ risk of event in control group
RRR =(CER-EER)/ CER = (0.27 – 0.07)/ 0.27 = 0.2/0.27
= 74%
Number Needed to Treat (NNT)
A more useful statistical expression for
doctors and patients
NNT = 1 / ARR = 1 / 0.2 = 5
i.e. (in this study) five patients must be
treated with streptomycin to prevent one
death one death from TB
Number needed to harm (NNH)
What about non-maleficence?
NNH = NNT but for an undesirable event
To calculate the number needed to harm
we need to construct another table, this
time with the figures for the adverse
outcome which was VIIIth nerve damage
Risk and Odds
9 horse race, all equal chance of winning.
The risk (probability) of your horse winning = 1 /
total number of potential winners = 1/9.
The odds of your horse winning are 1 / number of
horses not winning = 1/8
Using the example of a couple expecting a baby:
The risk (probability) of having a baby boy is
calculated as the likelihood of that outcome/number
of possible outcomes = ½
The Odds of having a boy is calculated as the
likelihood of that outcome/likelihood of it not
occurring = 1/1 =1
Back to the streptomycin:
risk and odds of death
Risk of death in control group= 14/52 =
0.27 (same as CER)
Risk of death in experimental group =
4/55 = 0.07 (same as EER)
Risk ratio (relative risk) for death in the
experimental group compared to the
control group= 0.07/0.27 = 0.26
Odds ratio
The odds of death = the number of people dying/
number of people not dying:
Control group: odds of death= 14/38=0.37
Experimental group: odds of death 4/51= 0.078
Odds ratio = odds in experimental group/ odds in control
group = 0.078/0.37 = 0.21
Formulae (23)
Standard Deviation: σ2 = 1/n Σ(xi - μ)2
Coefficient of Variation = (sd x 100) /
mean)
Standard Error
Standard Deviation
Confidence Interval
Single observation: 95% CI = mean ± 1.96sd
Mean of new sample: 95% CI = mean ±
1.96se
Study Designs
Types of Studies
Cross Sectional: Sample looked at at one
point in time to attempt to find associations
Case-Control: Comparing subjects who
have a condition to those who do not to
identify factors that may contribute
Cohort: Group of people followed to see
how variables affect outcome
Levels of Evidence
Ia: Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Ib: At least 1 RCT
IIa: At least one well-designed controlled study (not randomised)
IIb: At least one well-designed quasi-experimental study eg cohort
III: Well-designed non-experimental descriptive studies eg case-control
IV: Expert committee reports, opinions ± clinical experience of
respected authorities