L02v1PhysChemProp
Download
Report
Transcript L02v1PhysChemProp
GEOS 470R/570R Volcanology
L02, 16 January 2015
Handing out
Copies of slides
Review of minerals
One-page questionnaire
“Write it on your heart that every day is the best
day of the year.”
--Ralph Waldo Emerson
Who are you?
Why are you here?
Class
Major
E-mail
Questionnaire
Photo courtesy of M. D. Barton
“Did you arrive with a particular
career in mind?”
“Goodness, no. I not only didn’t feel prepared, I
had no idea what course of study I should
follow. . . . You needed some language credits
and some math credits; some science. So your
registration sheet filled up with required areas
pretty fast.
“I took a geology course and absolutely adored it,
and I really thought, gosh, maybe that’s what I
should study. But I ended up majoring in
economics.”
--Who said this?
“Did you arrive with a particular
career in mind?”
“Goodness, no. I not only didn’t feel prepared, I
had no idea what course of study I should
follow. . . . You needed some language credits
and some math credits; some science. So your
registration sheet filled up with required areas
pretty fast.
“I took a geology course and absolutely adored it,
and I really thought, gosh, maybe that’s what I
should study. But I ended up majoring in
economics.”
--Sandra Day O’Connor, Stanford BA ’50, JD ’52
Interview in Stanford magazine, 2006
Readings from textbook
For L02 from Lockwood and Hazlett
(2010) Volcanoes—Global Perspectives
Chapters 3 and 4
For L03 from Lockwood and Hazlett
(2010) Volcanoes—Global Perspectives
Chapter 3
Assigned reading
For today
None
First assignment due
26 January 2015
Hildreth (1981)
Last time: The volcanic center
Course overview
Tectonic settings of volcanism
Definitions
Igneous and volcanic materials
Lavas and pyroclastic rocks
Pyroclastic depositional processes
Volcano
Volcanic landforms
The volcanic center
Summary: The volcanic center
Course is designed to provide perspectives on
Volcanologic processes and active volcanoes
Working with partially eroded, altered, and deformed volcanic rocks
Applications to petrology, mineral resources, extraterrestrial volcanism,
hazards, climate change, geothermal energy
Volume of volcanism: ridges > arc > intraplate settings
Igneous materials: melt, magma, lava, pyroclast
Flows (coherent mass movements): lava flows, pyroclastic flows
Pyroclastic falls, flows, and surges
Lahars: volcanic debris, transitional, and hyperconcentrated flows
Shapes and main types of volcanoes mainly reflect
Lava composition or chemistry (viscosity) and eruptive style
The volcanic center: fundamental mapping and stratigraphic unit
Volcanic stratigraphy depends on
Geologic mapping, chemical characterization, radiometric dating
Next time: Physical and chemical properties of magmas
Lecture 02: Physical and
chemical properties of magmas
Time, length, area, volume, and energy scales
Chemical and mineralogical characterization of
volcanic rocks
Physical properties
Temperature T°
Viscosity η
Density ρ
Thermal conductivity k
Crystallization rates
Time scales
Quenching of a pyroclast during ejection from a vent
10-7 – 10-6 yr (seconds)
Cooling of a single lava flow
10-2 – 100 yr (weeks to months)
Lifetime of single cinder cone (crystallization of small
gabbroic stock)
100 – 101 yr (a few years)
Lifetime of a composite volcano (crystallization of a
dioritic intrusive complex)
105 – 106 yr (~500 ka)
Lifetime of silicic caldera complex (crystallization of
large granitic composite pluton)
105 – 106 yr
Lifetime of a volcanic field
107 yr (10 m.y.)
Length scales
Diffusion distance for components near
interface of growing crystal or bubble
10-4 – 10-2 m (millimeters or less)
Height of a composite volcano
(stratovolcano)
103 – 104 m (1 – 3 km)
Height of a volcanic plume
104 – 105 m (10 - 40 km)
Area scales
Area occupied by a typical rhyolite dome
100 - 101 km2
Area occupied by a composite volcano
~102 km2
Area occupied by silicic caldera
101 - 103.5 km2 (25 - 2500 km2)
Area of plinian fall deposits at 1-m isopach
101 - 104 km2
Area of flood basalt provinces
105 – 106.5 km2 (160,000 – 3,000,000 km2)
Volume
scales and
frequencies
Sizes of
eruptions and
their frequency
anywhere on
Earth
Fisher et al., 1997, Fig. 2-5
Eruptive volumes
DRE = dense-rock equivalent
Vdre ≈ 0.6 V for tephra
Vdre ≈ V for lavas
Volumes (DRE) for eruptions of the last century
Katmai-Novarupta, AK
Pinatubo, Philippines
Mount St. Helens, WA
June 1912
June 1991
May 1980
13 km3
5 km3
0.5 km3
Comparison
Huckleberry Ridge, Yellowstone 2.0 Ma
Bishop Tuff, Long Valley, CA
0.7 Ma
2500
600
km3
km3
Hildreth, 1981; Wohletz and Heiken, 1992; Wolfe and Hoblitt, 1996
Eruptive
volumes
Volumes (DRE)
of erupted
magma
Historic,
prehistoric, and
Pleistocene
eruptions
Basalts in gray
All were
explosive except
for Laki,
Lanzarote, and
Nyiragongo
Schmincke, 2004, Fig. 4.17
Energy released in an eruption
Heat (main component for Hawaiian
eruptions)
Radiation of heat
Conduction away from surface by convecting
air
Conduction into surrounding rocks
Transport outward by gases
Explosive energy (main component for
Krakatau)
Earthquakes
Energy scales
Press and Siever, 2001, 18.11
Magma
Completely or partly molten natural
substance that, on cooling, solidifies as a
crystalline or glassy igneous rock
Melt ± crystals ± vapor
Constituents of magma
Liquid
Generally silicate: modified Si - O framework
Rarely carbonate, sulfur, etc.
Lacks long-range periodicity and symmetry (as in
crystalline solids) but has short-range order
Solid
Crystals, glass
Phenocrysts, microphenocrysts, microlites
Gas
Dissolved
Exsolved separate phase
Definitions
Phyric
Contains
phenocrysts
Aphyric
Lacks phenocrysts
Vitrophyric
Contains
phenocrysts in a
glassy matrix
Le Maitre, 2002, Table 2.1
Role of elements in silicate liquids
Si, Al
Network formers (strong bonds with O)
Fe, Mg, Ti, others
Network modifiers
Alkalis: Na, K, Rb, Cs
Network formers in peraluminous and metaluminous
melts
Network modifiers in peralkaline rocks
Volatiles: H2O, F, Cl
Network modifiers
We will see these groupings reflected in
classification schemes for rocks
Silica content
Ultramafic
<45 wt% SiO2
Mafic
45 - ~ 52 wt% SiO2
Intermediate
~52- ~63 wt% SiO2
Silicic
>~63 wt% SiO2
Some prefer to use a
higher division between
intermediate and silicic
rocks (e.g., 65 to 68),
instead of 63 wt% SiO2
Analogy with crystalline solids
Increasing polymerization from
Orthosilicates—isolated Si - O tetrahedra
Single chain structures
Double chain structures
Sheet structures
Framework structures
Melts can also display varying degrees of
polymerization of Si - O tetrahedra
Review of petrology
Rogers and Hawkesworth, 2000, Fig. 2
Classification of volcanic rocks by
modal phenocryst content
Q-A-F-P diagram
Quartz (Q)
Alkali feldspar (A)
Feldspathoid (F)
Plagioclase (P)
What is a limitation
on the usefulness of
this classification
scheme?
Wohletz and Heiken,
1992, Fig. 1.3
Chemical classification of volcanic
rocks
TAS (total
alkalis vs.
silica)
diagram
Rogers and Hawkesworth, 2000, Fig. 1
Chemical classification
of volcanic rocks
TAS (total alkalis vs. silica)
diagram
Covariation
of other
components
Wohletz and Heiken, 1992, Fig. 1.2,
adapted from Cox et al., 1979
Silica content
Ultramafic
IUGS divisions commonly
followed for ultramafic to
andesite
No agreement on terms for
silicic rocks
<45 wt% SiO2
Basalt
45 – 52%
Basaltic andesite
52 – 57%
Andesite
57 – 63%
Dacite
63 – 68%
Rhyodacite (quartz latite)
68 – 72%
Rhyolite
72 – 75%
High-silica rhyolite
75 – 77.5%
IUGS has only two terms for
SiO2 > 63 wt% (dacite and
rhyolite)
Many people who work on
non-alkalic silicic rocks use a
subdivision similar to what is
at left
Silica content
Ultramafic
<45 wt% SiO2
Basalt
45 – 52%
Basaltic andesite
52 – 57%
Andesite
57 – 63%
Dacite
63 – 68%
Rhyodacite (quartz latite)
68 – 72%
Rhyolite
72 – 75%
High-silica rhyolite
75 – 77.5%
Rogers and Hawkesworth, 2000, Fig. 1
Characterizing volcanic rocks
Reminder about handout on minerals
Begin Lecture 04 with further discussion
of petrologic classification schemes
(especially chemical)
Now we will move on to physical
properties
Physical factors that influence
volcanic processes
Sigurdsson, 2000, Table 1
Physical properties of lava flows
Kilburn, 2000, Table 2
Temperature T°
Importance
Influences magma viscosity (more later)
Affects energy available for rise of eruption plume
Units
Kelvin (K)
Celsius (°C)
Measure directly with
Optical pyrometer (mafic lavas only)
Color when viewed with unaided eye
Thermocouple
Lockwood and Hazlett
“Red” vs. “gray” volcanoes
Optical pyrometer
Essentially a telescope in which a wire filament
is visible at same time as the glowing object
(e.g., lava)
Pass current through filament, causing it to glow
Color of filament varies with strength of current
Various corrections/calibrations required
Have significant uncertainty
Problems with smoke/haze
Are not measuring T° of interior—only exterior
crust
Macdonald, 1972
Color viewed with unaided eye
Use old principle
Blacksmiths
Operators of steel furnaces
Temperatures related to color
Valid when seen in dark (e.g., at night)
Valid only if clear line of sight (not any
intervening brownish fume clouds)
Macdonald, 1972
Visual calibration at night
Kilburn, 2000, Table 2
Thermocouple
Method subject to the least error
Pair of metallic wires of different composition
welded together at both ends
One end immersed in hot material
Generates an electrical current in the circuit
Strength of current depends on difference in T
between hot and cold ends
Cold end kept at 0° C with ice water bath
Current measured with ammeter near cold end
Can calculate T of hot end
Practical limitations
Lava too viscous to insert
Thermocouple can be damaged by movement/flow
Thermocouple
Temperature
measurements
in an active
lava flow at Mt.
Etna, Italy
Obtained with a
thermocouple
during an
eruption in
1991
Stix and Gaonac'h, 2000, Fig. 11
Actual field measurements for
eruption temperatures
Tholeiitic basalt, Kilauea, HI
1050-1190°C
Hawaiite, Mt. Etna, Italy
1050-1125°C
Basaltic andesite, Parícutin, México
943-1057°C
Dacite, Mount St. Helens, WA
850°C
No data on rhyolites
No eruptions measured or even viewed since Vulcan,
Italy, in 1700’s
Cas and Wright, 1987, Table 2.2
Temperature summary
Composition
Temperature (°C)
Rhyolite-rhyodacite
700-900
Dacite
800-1100
Andesite
950-1170
Mafic (tholeiites)
1050-1250
Alkali basalts and
nephelinites
Ultramafic (komatiites)
900-1100
1400-1700 (est.)
Williams and McBirney, 1979, Table 2-2; Cas and Wright, 1987, Table 2.3;
Kilburn, 2000, Table 2
The high-T° end: Availability of
any “superheat”?
Aphyric rocks are unusual
In other words, few, if any, lavas are hotter than the
temperature at which they first begin to crystallize
Exceptions
Rare glassy basalts
Some aphyric rhyolites (volatile-rich; heated by coeval
hotter, underplating basalt?)
“Superheat” generally not available, especially in
silicic magmas (e.g., for melting rocks at or near the
surface)
Cannot cool without nucleating and growing crystals
The low-T° end
Erupted rocks are only partly crystalline
Uncommon for volcanic rocks to have much
>50% phenocrysts
Why don’t we see cooler lavas with
greater phenocryst contents?
Limitations on the low-T° end
Low-T end observed for a given
composition probably corresponds to
upper limit on viscosity for magmas of
those compositions to remain mobile
Migrate in crust
Flow on surface
Implies a “gap” in time between last
extrusion from a magma chamber and its
final crystallization as a pluton
No geologic record for this interval
Eruptive temperatures of
prehistoric volcanic rocks
No way to directly measure temperature
Mineral geothermometers
Return to in L04
Viscosity η
Definition
Resistance to flow, or
Ratio of shear stress (σ) applied to a layer of
thickness z to the rate at which it is permanently
deformed in a direction x parallel to the stress
Williams and
McBirney, 1979,
Fig. 2-1
Importance of viscosity
Viscosity affects
Fluidity of magmas and mobility of lavas
Geometry and morphology of lavas and
associated volcanoes
Exsolution and nucleation of bubbles
(vesiculation)
Growth of bubbles
Rise and escape of bubbles from magmas
Fluid flow state: Laminar vs.
turbulent
Turbulent behavior of magmas (or pyroclastic
and epiclastic aggregates) during flow is
promoted by
Increasing velocity
Increasing irregularity of channel bottom and walls
Decreasing viscosity more turbulent (i.e., more
viscous less turbulent)
We will return to this when we discuss lava
flows, pyroclastic flows, pyroclastic surges, and
lahars
Classification of fluids on basis of
rheology (viscosity, yield strength)
Newtonian fluid (linear
relationship)
Zero yield strength (σ0=0)
Linear relationship of shear
stress to strain rate
Good approximation for
silicate melts (but not for
multiphase suspensions or
glasses)
Bingham fluid (one of many
non-Newtonian fluids)
Finite yield strength (σ0>0)
Linear relationship of shear
stress to strain rate
Good approximation for
magmas
Cas and Wright, 1987, Fig 2.3
Shear stress vs. strain rate
Note: slopes = viscosity η
Bingham fluids (magmas)
If a stress less than the yield strength is
applied (σ> σ0), resulting strain is
Elastic (recoverable)
If a stress greater than the yield strength
is applied (σ> σ0), resulting strain has two
components
Elastic (recoverable)
Viscous (non-recoverable)
Viscosity η
Units
kg / m s = Pa s
1 poise = 1 g / cm / s = 0.1 Pa s (pascal second)
Measure directly with penetrometers (data only
for basalts)
Estimate from velocities down channels
(underestimates)
Calculate from partial molar viscosities
Pioneered by Bottinga and Weill and Shaw
Viscosity η
Melt viscosity issues
Temperature [η ↓ with ↑ T]
Dissolved volatile content, especially water
content [η ↓ with ↑ H2O]
Chemical composition, especially silica
content [η ↑ with ↑ SiO2]
Additional issues for magmas
Rheological properties of magmatic
suspensions (crystals, vapor bubbles) [η ↑
with ↑ volume fraction solids]
Viscosity vs. temperature
Log viscosity vs.
temperature, as a
function of composition
(volatile-free)
Rhyolites—more Si - O
bonds to break
Greater resistance to
flow (higher viscosity)
Basalts—fewer Si – O
bonds to break
Less resistance to flow
(lower viscosity)
Spera, 2000, Fig. 4
Viscosity vs. dissolved water
content
Log viscosity
vs. dissolved
water content,
as a function
of composition
Spera, 2000, Fig. 5
Viscosity comparison
e.g., Hawaiian tholeiite
1200°C
1130°C
By comparison, H2O
25°C
η = 500 poise = 50 Pa s
η = 8000 poise = 800 Pa s
η = 0.01 poise =
0.001 Pa s
If basalts are much more viscous than
water, why, then, do basalts flow fairly
rapidly?
Viscosity: Network formers and
Network modifiers
Network formers contribute to η ↑
Network modifiers contribute to η ↓
Si, Al
Network formers (strong bonds with O) (η ↑)
Fe, Mg, Ti, others
Network modifiers (η ↓)
Alkalis: Na, K, Rb, Cs
Network formers in peraluminous and metaluminous
melts (η ↑)
Network modifiers in peralkaline rocks (η ↓)
Volatiles: H2O, F, Cl
Network modifiers (η ↓)
Why do basalts flow fairly
rapidly?
Aided by gravity
Flow down slopes of a shield volcano
High density
Have a density considerably greater than
water
Viscosity vs. dissolved water
content
Log viscosity
vs. dissolved
water content
for rhyolitic /
granitic
melts, as a
function of
temperature
Wallace and Anderson, 2000, Fig. 14
Viscosity vs. volume fraction solids
Log viscosity vs.
volume fraction
solids
Spera, 2000, Fig. 6
Viscosity changes during flow
Typically increases by 2 to 10X from vent
to toe of flow
Primarily because of loss of volatiles
Minor effect of cooling
Density ρ
Definition: mass per unit volume
Units
kg / m3
g / cm3
Melt density is a function of
Temperature [ρ ↓ with ↑ T]
Pressure [ρ ↑ with ↑ P]
Dissolved water content [ρ ↓ with ↑ H2O]
Density decreases (volume increases) on
melting
Changes in density ρ
Temperature dependence of density
Coefficient of thermal expansion
Similar for most compositions:
~2 – 3 X 105 deg-1
Pressure dependence of density
Compressibility
Increases sharply in the melting range
Density vs. temperature
Density of melt
vs. temperature,
as a function of
composition
Spera, 2000, Fig. 1
Density vs. pressure
Density of model
basaltic melt vs.
pressure, for
temperatures of
1800 and
2800°C
Spera, 2000, Fig. 3
Density vs. dissolved water content
Density of melt
vs. dissolved
water content, as
a function of
composition
Spera, 2000, Fig. 2
Density summary
(at liquidus temperature and anhydrous,
except as noted)
Composition
Granite / rhyolite
Granite / rhyolite
(2 wt% H2O)
Granodiorite /
dacite
Gabbro / basalt
Komatiite
Liquidus Density Density
T° (°C) (kg/m3) (g/cm3)
900
2349
2.35
900
2262
2.26
1100
2344
2.34
1200
1500
2591
2748
2.59
2.75
Spera, 2000, Table 3
Importance of density
Important control on rise of magmas
through crust
Strong control on fluid dynamics of
magmas
Petrologic implications for mixing of magmas
Transport of magmatic heat
Convection
Heat transported by bulk flow
Conduction (phonon conduction)
Phonon = quantized thermal waves
Heat transported by atomic vibration of lattice
Radiation
Electromagnetic phenomenon involving
photon transfer
Thermal conductivity k
If
k = thermal conductivity
κ = thermal diffusivity
ρ = density
Cp = specific heat,
Then the thermal conductivity k = ρ Cp κ
Units
J / (m K s) = W / (m K)
Most melts, rocks, and minerals are characterized by
low thermal diffusivity and thermal conductivity
Specific enthalpy of fusion Δhf
Definition
Heat per unit mass needed at constant
pressure to transform a crystal or crystalline
assemblage to the liquid state
Units
kJ / kg
Very high for magmas, with wide variation
100 – 300 kJ / kg for crustal phases
~1000 kJ / kg for refractory phases that are
components of mafic and ultramafic melts
Enthalpy of fusion--Implications
Anatexis of crust by heat exchange
between mafic magma and crust is
thermally efficient
Heat required to completely melt Earth’s
mantle, 3 x 1030 J
Is <10% of the kinetic energy delivered to
Earth by impact of a Mars-sized body (15% of
mass of Earth) with an impact velocity equal
to Earth’s escape velocity of 11.2 km/s
Molar isobaric heat capacity Cp
Definition
Heat needed at constant pressure to raise
temperature of one mole by one Kelvin
Units
J / kg K
Low for magmas (< half that of water)
Silicic anhydrous melts 1300 – 1400 J / kg K
Mafic – ultramafic anhydrous melts 1600 – 1700 J /
kg K
Implies mafic and ultramafic magmas are better
transporters of magmatic heat
Crystallization rates
Rate decreases as viscosity increases
Rate ↓ with ↑ η
Consequences
Rhyolites (high η) crystallize slowly glassy
groundmass
Basalts (low η) crystallize rapidly fine
crystalline groundmass
Recrystallization of glass
Rhyolitic glass silica mineral + alkali
feldspar (and/or clay minerals and zeolites
in alkaline lakes)
Hydrate and crack
Nucleate crystals along cracks
Summary
The time, length, area, volume, and energy scales of
volcanism and volcanic rocks
Each vary by many orders of magnitude, but
Characteristic features vary within fairly narrow ranges
Mineralogy is a function of chemical composition
Silica content and alkalinity are key compositional variables
The most important physical properties are
Temperature T°, Viscosity η, Density ρ, Thermal conductivity k, and
Crystallization rates
Impacts on viscosity
η ↓ with ↑ T; η ↓ with ↑ H2O and most other volatiles; η ↑ with ↑
SiO2; η ↑ with ↑ volume fraction solids (e.g., phenocrysts)
The properties are not independent of one another
Many can be linked to chemical composition of the magma
Many observations can be explained in terms of viscosity (e.g.,
shapes of volcanoes, eruptive style)
Next time: Volatiles