Transcript Slide 1

Microfossils
Brandon McKee
Overview
 What
are microfossils?
 Where are microfossils found?
 How are stromatolites formed?
 What are the techniques used in
determining a microfossil?
 Do microfossils occur elsewhere in
our solar system?
What are microfossils?
 Microfossils
are just as their name
implies, fossils that are microscopic.
 The oldest known and most familiar
fossils, are from cyanobacteria in
Archaean rocks.
 Fossil Evidence - for the origin and
evolution of early life is limited. Data
suggest that life is at least as old as
the oldest rocks now known.
Time Line
eon
era
period
when began
myrs ago
duration
myrs
Vendian
610
40
Sturtian
800
190
Karatau
1050
250
Yurmatin
1350
300
Burizan
1650
300
2200
400
2450
150
Randian
2800
350
Swazian
3500
700
Izuan
3800
300
Sinian
(late Proterozoic)
Proterozoic
Riphean
(middle Proterozoic)
Animikean
Huronian
Precambrian
Archaean
4000
Hadean
Priscoan
4560
760
Other types of microfossils




Aside from cyanobacteria, identifiable fossil
bacteria are not particularly widespread.
Under certain chemical conditions, bacterial cells
can be replaced with minerals, notably pyrite or
siderite (iron carbonate), forming replicas of the
once-living cells, or pseudomorphs.
Some bacteria secrete iron-coated sheaths that
sometimes fossilize.
Other bacteria may bore into shells or rocks and
form microscopic canals within the shell; such
bacteria are referred to as endolithic.
A chain of cyanobacterial cells,
Bitter Springs Chert of N. Australia

1 billion years old
Where are microfossils found?
Microfossils are found…
Microfossils are thought to be found in
stromatolites.
 Canada has three of the world's known
examples at Red Lake, Ontario, Steep
Rock Lake, Ontario, and near Yellowknife,
Northwest Territories.
 Samples have been studied in Western
Austalia and South Africa as well.

How are stromatolites formed?
 Stromatolites
- Mats of cyanobacteria
or blue-green algae.
 Mats trap carbonate mud.
 Cyanobacteria grow up through the
mud to form new mat layer.
 These structures trap sediment and
sometimes secrete calcium
carbonate.
Stromatolites Today
Best known site of stromatolite
development to day is Solar Lake, which is
located 90 feet away from the Red Sea on
the Sinai Peninsula.
 Seepage from the Red Sea overlies saline
water.
 The upper layer accumulates during winter
rains and acts like a lens, focusing the
sun’s energy into the deeper layer.





The suns energy makes it so hot, higher forms
of life cannot survive.
Near the shore, stromatolites lie matted on the
lake floor.
In the middle of the lake, a thick mat floats
some two feet below the water surface.
This makes it possible to walk on water!
How old are the fossils?
 Structures
thought to be 3.4 - 3.5
billion years old by stromatolites of
Western Australia.
 Filaments resembling cyanobacteria
are found in the Warrawoona Group
of Western Australia and 2.8-3.0
billion year old rocks of southern
Africa.
Testing Techniques
 There
are different methods in
testing whether or not an organism
is biological.
 The two I want to talk about are:
– The Fourier Analysis Technique and KPZ
equation
– Megnetosom Comparison
Fourier Analysis Technique
 This
is a method of recent study
used to determine if stomatolites
formed by biological organisms or by
a lifeless, physical process.
 Through mathematical analysis, two
Dr.’s (Grotzinger and Rothman) from
MIT learned that stromatolites can
sprout spontaneously on the seafloor.
Rothman took 1.89 billion year old
stromatolite and put it through the KPZ
equation.
 This equation was developed to describe
how particles settle out to form an
undulating surface.
 An example of this is snow falling. When
landing on a rocky terrain, there are basic
characteristics of a KPZ surface.
 This equation predicts how particles
behave as they form a surface—
sometimes sticking where they fall,
sometimes rolling downhill to stick
somewhere else.






Rothman transformed the hills and valleys on
graph paper so there was longitude and latitude.
Using the Fourier Analysis, he broke down the
irregular meanderings of the layers into smaller
undulations.
Emerging was a broad spectrum of symmetrical
little waves, that, when added back together,
would reproduce the complex patterning in a
stromatolite.
The KPZ equation was then used to generate a
similar spectrum of waves representing the hills
and valleys of the stromatolite.
Rothman was correct. The two spectrums were
very similar. Similar enough to conclude that this
ancient stromatolite could have been made by a
physical process.
The other type of testing technique is
magnetosom comparison.
 Martian meteorites have been analyzed to
determine biogenics.
 Magnetotactic bacteria produce well
ordered membrane-bounded intracellular
crystals of magnetite or greigite called
magnetosomes.
 They are generally arranged in chains
parallel to the long axis of the cell.
 The torque induced by the earths
magnetic field on the bacteria causes
them to align passively.

 Comparison
of a meteorite from Mars
and Earth could determine if there
has been life on mars.
 There are six distinctive properties of
magnetosomes.
– Narrow size range and shape
– Chemical purity
– Few crystallographic defects
– An unusual truncated hex-octahedral
morphology
– Elongation along the [111] axis
– Alignment of chains within cells.

The results of the comparison are as
follows:
– One fourth of the Martian magetites are
truncated hexa-octahedral which are
chemically and physically indistinguishable
from terrestrial samples except for chain
alignment.
– They share 5 of the six characteristics that
define the MV-1 biosignature
– Alignment of the chains within the cells was
not observed.
– This is due to when organisms die, the
membrane decomposes and the chain
collapses.
– Origin of the magnetites are possibly biogenic.
Conclusion
 We
have covered the following:
– What are microfossils?
– Where are they found?
– How are stromatolites formed?
– What are the techniques used to
determine a microfossil?
– Are there microfossils elsewhere in the
solar system?
References







Earth, Vol. 6 Issue 2, 24, April, 1997
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 98, Issue 5,
2164-2169, February 27, 2001
Natrual History, Vol. 107 Issue 7, 88, September
1998
Rocks and Minerals, Vol. 75 Issue 5, 300,
September/October 2000
Bioscience, Vol. 44 Issue 3, 181, March 1994
The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants. T.N. &
E.L. Taylor. 1993.
Hofmann, Grey, Hickman & Thorpe, 1999,
Geological Society of America Bulletin 111:12561262)