only `green` international credits will be recognized for Canadian
Download
Report
Transcript only `green` international credits will be recognized for Canadian
Greening Canada’s
International Purchases
Climate Law Symposium
December 3, 2005
Warren Bell, IISD
Why should Greening be important
to Canada? (1)
Greening is key for Canadian compliance
Canada will need to make substantial international
purchases
“Hot air” completely unacceptable in Canada
Greening offers economic benefits
In exchange for AAUs, Canada could provide services,
technology and capacity building
Opportunities in gas transmission, energy efficiency
and conservation
Why should Greening be important
to Canada? (2)
Greening is key to effectiveness and credibility of
international emission trading
IET a cornerstone of climate regime
….but without greening, AAU trading may be very limited
Implications for post-2012
Greening can increase environmental effectiveness
of Kyoto Protocol
Additional reductions in 2008-2012
Long-term transformation
Canadian Climate Change Plan
Climate Fund purchases of international credits:
“100 percent of the proceeds from the purchase
must be reinvested in projects and activities that
contribute to GHG emission reductions in the
seller country.”
Large Final Emitters with regulated targets:
“only ‘green’ international credits will be
recognized for Canadian compliance purposes.”
What might Canadian Greening
look like?
Wide range of possible projects/activities:
From specific emission reduction projects (e.g. gas
pipeline leaks)…
…to strengthening climate change policy capacity…
…to supporting transformation in energy production
and use
Dimensions:
Quantification – “hard” vs. “soft” greening
Timing – 2008-2012? Post-2012?
Canadian purchases may reflect a mix
“Hard” Greening
Projects/activities that achieve quantifiable
emission reductions
Direct relationship between greened AAUs and
reductions achieved
Greening offers flexibility:
Timing – reductions beyond 2012
Ratio of AAUs to reductions
May have higher credibility with Canadian
stakeholders
“Soft” Greening
Reductions not easily quantified
Address opportunities not easily captured by
project-based trading:
Government programs that fund energy efficiency,
renewable energy, fuel switching
Outreach and education
Clean energy technology demonstration projects
Strengthen climate change policy capacity – including
completing inventories and registries
Greening and Long-term
Transformation
Greening could help effect long-term transformation to a
low-carbon economy in host countries
Build enabling environments for investment in sustainable
energy
Support policy changes – energy sector market reform, energy
efficiency standards
Address hard-to-tackle sectors like transportation
Part of a broader, strategic approach linked to other
initiatives
Export credit agencies, Industry Canada, Foreign Affairs
Implementation Issues
Main Canadian buyer will be the Climate Fund
Bilateral agreements with seller countries
Possible scope for multilateral approach?
What role for Canadian private sector?
Partnerships with government
Joint ventures
Credibility is overriding concern
Monitoring, reporting, verification
Governance and management
Host Country Implementation
Host countries will need to:
Screen projects and proposals, provide funding, carry
out monitoring and reporting
Finance projects – where AAU funding is not all
delivered at once
Lever additional funding
Provide different types of greening services to different
buyers
Significant capacity needs
Role of existing institutions
Path Forward
In Canada
Climate Fund preparing for launch
Informal consultations on elements of greening
Main challenge is public/stakeholder perception
International emission trading = “hot air”
AAU market at early stage of development
Canada and other countries can play a leading role in
defining the market