The Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act of 2005 S. 1151
Download
Report
Transcript The Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act of 2005 S. 1151
The Climate Stewardship and
Innovation Act of 2005
S. 1151
Tess C. Barton
Environmental Policy
8 December 2005
History of Legislation
Climate Stewardship Act of 2003
Climate Stewardship Act of 2005
Introduced 22 June 2003
Voted down, 43-55
Introduced to Senate 10 February 2005 (S. 342)
Introduced to House 10 February 2005 (H. 579)
Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act of 2005 (S. 1151)
Introduced 26 May 2005
Voted down, 38-60
Specifics of S. 1151
Sponsored by John McCain (R-AZ) and Joseph Lieberman (D-CT)
Caps emissions of 6 GHGs at 2000 levels by 2010 and 1990 levels
by 2016
Subsidizes development of 3 Nuclear Power Plants
Establishes Flexible Mechanisms (up to 15%)
Tradable Emissions, Carbon Sequestration, Non-Covered
Entities, Borrowing against future allowances
Establishes a National Greenhouse Gas Database
Establish standards for measurements for emissions
Establishes a Climate Change Credit Corporation- distribution of
funds for assistance
Includes fellowships and grants for research on climate change and
impacts
Incentives for cleaner technologies
Non-compliance results in penalty of 3 times market price of
allowances
Arguments
In favor of S. 1151
Most Environmental NGOs
Environmental Defense, National Resource Defense Council, African
American Environmentalist Association, National Wildlife Federation
Conference of Catholic Bishops
Opposed to S. 1151
Energy Sector
Oil Industry
Some Environmental NGOs- nuclear development
Minnesota Environmental Action Network
Strategies and Philosophies
Strategies
Re-introduction of same Act
Introduction of similar versions in House and Senate on
same day
Introduction of updated Act
Philosophies
Market-based Allocation (Flexible Mechanisms)
State-based Scientism (Government funded research)
Liberal Pluralism (Incorporation of different interests)
Conclusion
Great step toward proactive U.S. climate
policy
Considers great number of interests
Poor, Threatened wildlife, Farmers
Flexible mechanisms- economic
consideration
Research and educational development
Nuclear development not necessary