Programme Approach for FTPP 2 and FTFP

Download Report

Transcript Programme Approach for FTPP 2 and FTFP

Programme Approach for FTFP
and FTFP II
FTPP/FTFP WORKSHOP
Bishkek, 14 – 16 December 2015
FAO
Why Programme Approach?
• To increase impact
• - by mapping of similar and parallel activities, by
other funding sources
• - by mapping together programme of FTFP and
FTPP II as two wings of the same building
• - by creating synergy, avoiding duplication of
efforts
What does it mean, in practical
terms
• No major change to FTPP I
• Projects are still recognized as projects
• Operational Framework will be a product adopted
jointly by all stakeholders, meeting every party’s
requirement
What does a common Results
Matrix look like
FTPP Focal areas
Food Security and
Nutrition
Food Safety
Country Priority Strategic
(CPF/UNDAF)
Objective
RIs
Country Priorities
(CPF/UNDAF)
FTFP Focal areas
FO Management
Agriculture and Rural
Development
FO Product + Ecosystem
Service
Environment, Wildlife
and Biodiversity
NRM
Agril Policy
Governance
Monitoring + Reporting
SLM and Climate Change
UNDAF, UNDCS,
National Strategies
and Documents
Cross-cutting areas
(Gender, Climate
Change, Governance)
Drought Impact
Mitigation
LD
UNDAF, UNDCS,
National Strategies and
Documents
Cross-cutting areas
(Gender, Climate Change,
Governance)
Why a common Results Matrix ?
• align with major thematic areas of FTPP/FTFP;
• in line with CPF priorities
• link to FAO Strategic Objectives (SOs) and
Regional Initiatives (RIs)
Added Value of
Programming Approach
Address multi-focal areas, priority at larger
geographical areas
• Flexibility to make necessary modifications as new
information emerges during implementation
• Sustainability of effective interventions at larger
scales
• Programmatic approach reduces operational and
financial cost on both FAO and donor side
•
30 Nov 2015
FTPP/FTFP WORKSHOP
Challenges
• Involves high level of engagement between
programme planners, implementing agency, donor,
stakeholders and partners, policy makers, and
recipient countries, including communities and
targeted groups
• More complex operational framework, results
matrix, indicators .etc
30 Nov 2015
FTPP/FTFP WORKSHOP
Minimum agreement among
parties
• Reporting requirement – at what level?
• Approvals – of the entire Results Matrix, or by
project, with simplified procedure?
• How often should there be review?
Thank you
30 Nov 2015
FTPP/FTFP WORKSHOP
9