Stakeholders Analysis
Download
Report
Transcript Stakeholders Analysis
STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS
Climate Change & Health
Presented on 29th March, 2011
@ CC Validation Meeting
Objectives
• To collate information with regards to health
and Climate Change works being carried out
and should include:
– information on current programs that could be
complemented/enhanced by the PCCAPHH
Project including institutional arrangements with regards to community based
approaches
– determination of who is doing what and where
including resource implications
– identification of existing community based
approaches adopted by key stakeholders and
drawing from opportunities and lessons learnt
Section 2
DATA COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY
• Identification of Stakeholders by PCCAPHH
• Formulation of tools
• Key Informants – approach for consent &
appointment
• In-depth interview – using structured
Questionnaire (18Q)
– Recorded interview – mixed method technique
– Transcribed
– Analysis – Excel, Atlas. Ti 6.2
Institution (Acronym)
Full title
DOE
Department of Environment
FMS
Fiji Meteorological Services
FRCS
Fiji Red Cross Society
LLEEF
Live and Learn Environmental Education Fiji
LUPS
Land Use Planning Unit, MPI
LWRMU
Land and Water Resources Management Unit, MPI
NDMO
National Disaster Management Office
PACESD
Pacific Centre for Sustainable Development, USP
PCDF
Partners in Community Development Fiji
SOPAC
South Pacific Applied Geosciences Commission
WAF
Water Authority of Fiji
WIO
Wetland International Oceania, Fiji office
WWF
World Wide Fund
PARTICIPANTS PROFILE
Position
Programme Coordinator
Country Manager/ OIC/
Director
Environment Officer
Principal Officer Climate
Training Officer
Scientist
PRO – Lands
total
Male
3
2
Female
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
8
7
Section 3
FINDINGS
Contents
• Climate Change Projects & partners
• Future Projects (proposed/pipeline)
– Partners and Alliance
• Policy Support
• Lessons Learnt
Institution
GO/NGO/Civil/ Academia
Role
DoE
Government
Coordinating CC activities at National Level.
Steering Committee member with WHO&MOH
FMS
Government
Support any CC initiatives/CC Country
Team/data resources/
Red X
NGO
Steering Committee Member with WHO&MOH
/CC team member with DOE Disaster
Preparedness Response.
Live and Learn
NGO
CC Country Team Member/Environmental
Education
LUP
Government
Land Conservations and Biodiversity
LWRD
Government
Coordinating CC project and activities @
Ministry level.CC Country Team
NDMO
Government
Disaster Management @ National level.
Coordinating activities/Training. CC team
member
PACE-SD (USP)
Academic/Training
Provide training based on the focal points of
UNFCCC.-Regional reps (Pacific Forum)
Institution
GO/NGO/Civil/ Academia
Role
PCDF
NGO
Partner in dev. with remote communities in Fiji
e.g. N/resources management, Capacity
building. CC team member
SOPAC
NGO
Provides technical support and information on
CC adaptation measure for PICs- achieving
MDG.
Water Authority
of Fiji
Government
Supply safe drinking water to consumers @
same time trying to expand to as many
consumer as possible.
Wetland Int.
Oceania
NGO/Academic
Conservation NGO. Bridging Environment and
Health sector gap i.e. build cases - to integrate
health and science of ecological health. CC
committee team member
WWF
NGO
Community based conservation and
Biodiversity conservation.
Climate Change and Health
Health Impact
Climate Change
Adaptation
• Diseases (Food/Water/
Vector borne)
• Extreme weather events
• Thermal stress
• e.g. Drought
• Legislative
• Technical
• Behaviour
• Culture
Q5: Current CC Project
Inst.
Project Title
Target Group
Date (Year)
Partners/
Progress /
Funding Agency Status
DOE
• Second
National
Communication
•Mainstreaming
CC in the Pacific
Islands Countries
All Govts.
Ministries &
NGOs
2010 2013
UNEP
• Piloting CC to
protect Human
Health
• Community
based early
warning system
Pilot sites
(Nausori)
None
-
FMS
FRCS
PICs
Ongoing
2010-2011 ADB
Ongoing
2011-2013 WHO/GEF
Ongoing
Local
2011-2013 JICA/Fiji Govt. Ongoing
Communities
in Ba water
catchments
-
-
-
Q5: Current CC Project
Inst.
Project Title
Target Group
Date (Year)
Partners/
Funding
Agency
Progress /
Status
LUPSMPI
1.Capacity
building &
Mainstream of
sustainable Land
Management-Fiji
Rural Comm;
Boarding
Schools,
Provincial
Administration.
2008-2012
UN/GEF
Ongoing
2.Coastal
Management
and Integrated
Resource
Management
Coastal Comm.
WWF/GEF
Ongoing
3.Nadi
Watershed
Management
Whole of Nadi
Basin comm.
GEF/IUNC
Ongoing
2009
2009
Q5: Current CC Project
Inst.
Project Title
Target Group
LWRDMPI
Pacific
Adaptation to CC
for Fiji (Food
Security Issues)
Pilot sites
2010
(Dry and Wet)
Rural
communities,
Farming
Communities.
UNDP/GEF/
SPREP/DOE
Live and Waste
Learn
Management.
(Composting
increase food
supply
production/food
security)
Remote Island 2009
community
i.e. Rotuma
WWF/MOH/ Ongoing
USP/FPAN
NDMO
-
-
None
Date (Year) Partners/
Funding
Agency
-
Progress /
Status
Ongoing
-
Q5: Current CC Project
Inst.
Project Title
Target Group
Date (Year) Partners/
Progress /
Funding Agency Status
PACE-SD CC Adaptation
(USP)
for Rural
Communities in
Fiji
Six (6)rural
communities
(focus water
supply, coastal
resources,
flooding, health &
sanitation.
2010
AUSAID/
UNDP
PCDF
-1.Environmental
Resources
Management
2.Mainstreaming
of Rural
Development
Innovation.
-
AUSAID, Fiji Water Found,
Road Trip Pacific Water
Flyer, Church based Org.
(Germany), FPSI,
Provincial office, Comm.
groups.
No Specific CC
project but
incorporated
CC into existing
programs/
activities.
Ongoing
Q5: Current CC Project
Inst.
Project Title
Target Group
Date (Year)
Partners/
Progress
Funding Agency / Status
SOPAC
No specific CC
project BUT
embedding CC into
existing programs.
-1.Water
Resource
Management
2.Water
Sanitation
Services
3.Water
Governance.
-
WHO,UNDP,U NESCAP,UNHA
BITAT,SPC,LLE
E,FPSI,MOH,
WAF & FNU
(DPH).
WAF
WAF Rehabilitation program (CDM )
2010
ADB / WHO
Ongoing
UNFCCC/Govt
Policy makers, 2009
communities
in catchments,
global CC
audience
Govt. of
Ongoing
Netherlands/S
OPAC
Wetland Wetland and
Int.
Livelihood (HYCOS
Modeling)
Q5: Current CC Project
Inst.
Project Title
Target Group
Date (Year)
Partners/
Funding
Agency
Progress /
Status
WWF
Looking @ element
of vulnerability to
potential CC
impact
(Community
based)
Vulnerable
Communities
(Coastal/
remote
islands)
2009
DOE/ USP /
Wildlife
Conservn.
Society/
Community
Groups.
Ongoing
DPHPCFSMed
1. CC and Dengue
outbreak
2. CC & Health to
vector indices
3. Student project
1. Fiji group
2. Fiji data
3. Various
setting
2010-11
1. WHO
On-going
2. WHO/UN
DP/FSMed
3. FSMed/FN
U/MoH
Q6: Previous Involvement in CC
Institution
Role
Project title
DOE
Capacity of PICs Two(2)Rakiraki
to adapt to CC rural
impact
communities
(Volivoli & Rarawai)
Env. officer CC
FMS
Actg. Principal
Officer
(climate)
LUPS-MPI
Snr. Research
officer
Target Group
Date
(Year)
Partners/
Funding
Agency
Progress/
Status
2005
Canadian
funded (1
year
duration)
Complete
(Feb,2011
Community
based CC
adaptation in
rural comms
Local community 2009
AUSAID
Completed
Sustainable
land use
management
(routine
activity)
Line Ministry
(Forestry),
Landowners,
villages, Schools,
Academic
institutions
(FNU,USP)
UN/GEF/Fiji
Govt.
Ongoing
2008
Q6: Previous Involvement in CC
Institution
Role
Project title
Target Group
Date
(Year)
Partners/
Donor Agency
Progress/
Status
Live &
Learn
River Care and
Water
Management
Schools, local
communities
2006
Line Ministry
(Education/
provincial
office
Completed
(2009)
First National
Communication
for Fiji- Fiji
Coordinator.
PICs - Fiji
Government
19982001
GEF/SPREP
Completed
1.CC Adaptation
for Coral Reef
and Mangroves.
Coastal Resources, 2009local communities, 2010
developers &
investors, policy
makers.
Policy makers, local 2010
comm, global CC
audience,
GEF/ WWF
Completed
Govt. of
Netherland,
MOH,SOPAC
Ongoing
Country
Manager
PACE-SD
(USP)/
Research
Fellow/
Coordinator
CC Activities
Wetland
Int. Org./
Scientist
2.Wetland &
Livelihood
Q6: Previous Involvement in CC
Progress/
Status
Institution
Role
Project title
Target Group
Date
(Year)
Partners/
Donor Agency
WWF/CC
1. Assessing
vulnerability of
Mangrove to CC
impacts
2. Ecosystem
based
Management
(Resource
Management
and Biodiversity
protection
Coastal and
isolated islands
communities in
Fiji.
Coastal and
isolated islands
communities in
Vanualevu
(Macuata) and
Gau.
20062010
Completed
DOE,
Community
groups, USP,
Wild life
Conservation
Society.
Completed
Marine
Science
Contact
2006
Community
groups.
Q6: Previous Involvement in CC
Institution
Role
Project title
Target Group
DPHFSMed
1. CC adaptation
in a water
stress situation
2. CC & health in
remote islands
of the Lau
group
3. Perspective of
CC effect as a
Push factor to
urban centres
4. Student
projects on CC
and Health in
relation to
Communicable
diseases
1. Selected
1. 2009
settings- West
division
2. Southern Lau
2. 2009
islands – Fulaga,
Research
Coordinator
– CC project
leader
Date
(Year)
Partners/
Donor Agency
Progress/
Status
On-going
1. MoH/
FSMed/
AusAID
2. DPH, Govt. Phase I, on
hold
agencies
Ogea, Vatoa &
Ono-i-Lau
3. 20093. Urban settings
10
in Suva area
3. DPHFSMed
4. Various
Settings in Fiji
4. FSMed/
FNU
4. 20082011
On-hold
On-going
Q7: Institutional CC involvement
Institution
Project title
Objectives
DOE
1.Capacity
of PICs to
adapt to CC
impact
1. Policy
2. Set up
demonstration
project for
climate change
impacted
communities
1. capacity
building &
improving
irrigation
system.
2.Introducing
crop drought
resilient on salt
tolerance crops
to communities
2. Pacific
Adaptation
for CC
Target Group
Date
(Year)
Setting
Progress/
Status
2005
Rural
Comm
unities
Complete
(Feb,
2011)
Pilot
sites
Ongoing
Two(2)Rakira
ki rural
communities
(Volivoli &
Rarawai)
Drought
stricken rural 2008
comm.
(Nausori)
Q7: Institutional CC involvement
Institution
Project title
Objectives
FMS
Community
based CC
adaptation
in rural area
Capacity
Rural
building & focus comm.,
on water supply, Farmers.
coastal resource,
flooding.
PACE-SD CC
(USP)
Adaptation
for Rural
Communitie
s in Fiji
(Phase 1)
Targeting sector
such as water
supply and
coastal
resources
Target Group
Date
(Year)
Setting
Progress/
Status
2009
Rural
commu
nities
Completed
Six (6)
Rural
Comm
unities
Phase 1
complete
d.
Rural
2004
villages,
Settlements
.
Q7: Institutional CC involvement
Institution
Project title
LUPS-MPI 1.Sustainable
land use
management
(routine
activity)
2.Coastal
Management
and
Integrated
Resource
Management
3.Nadi
Watershed
Management
Objectives
Target Group
Date
(Year)
Setting
Progress
/ Status
1. Food security in
boarding school
2. Land use plang /
biodiversity
protection & CC
impact.
3.Training support
Line Ministry
(Forestry),
Landowners,
villages,
Boarding
Schools,
Academic
institutions
(FNU,USP)
2009
Villages,
Boarding
schools,
Academic
insts
Ongoing
1.Combating
coastal erosion
and protection
coastal resources
2009
Coastal
Communities
Landowners
Tourism
1.Combating flood sector,
2009
Property
resilient and
developers &
mitigating flood
investors
and drought.
Villages
Tourism
sector,
Ongoing
investors
and
developers
Whole
Nadi Bay
basin
Ongoing
Q7: Institutional CC involvement
Institution
Project title
Live &
Green
Learn
School
Env. Ed.
2.Helping
our Earth
3.Hope for
Peace
4.River Care
& Water
Mg’t
Objectives
Target Group
Date
(Year)
Setting
1. Greening
schools env by
planting trees.
Schools in
Fiji
1992
School’ Complete
cpds.
1. Waste mg’t in
schools (RR).
2. Composting ↑
food supply pdct.
food security.
Schools in
Fiji
1994
School
1.Peace building
protecting our
environment & all
peace principles,
peace building.
Community 1994
based
1.Focusing in river
care and
managing water
resources
2006
Progress/
Status
Complete
Complete
Schools and
Villages,
sett.
Local
Comm. Complete
Schs,
local
comm'
Complete
Q7: Institutional CC involvement
Institution
Project title
Wetland 1.CC
Int.
Adaptation
for Coral
Reef and
Mangroves
Objectives
Target Group
1.management
of water and
wetlands for
fisheries
Coastal
2009Resources, 2010
local comm,
developers
& investors,
policy
makers
1.Climate
2.Wetland & Modeling to tie
Livelihoods Environmental
data to disease
data of those
watercatchment area.
Date
(Year)
Policy
makers,
2010
local comm
Global CC
Audience
Setting
Progress/
Status
Villages,
Sett;
devlpers
&
investors
Complete
Policy
maker,
Land
Owners.
Ongoing
Local
commun
ities in
Viti Levu &
Vanualevu
Q7: Institutional CC involvement
Institution
Project title
Objectives
Target Group
Date
(Year)
Setting
Progress
/
Status
WWF
1.Assessing
vulnerability
of Mangrove
to CC
impacts
1. Elements of
vulnerability to
potential
climate change
impacts.
2. Building
resilience (storm
damage or food
security),
Coastal and
isolated
islands
communitie
s in Fiji
20062010
Coastal
villages
and
isolated
islands
communi
ties
Comple
ted
2.Ecosystem
based Mg’t
Sustainable
Resource use &
Biodiversity
protection
Coastal &
isolated
islands
comm. in
Vanualevu
(Macuata) &
Gau
2006
Coastal
villages,
Ongoin
settlemen g
ts
Q7: Institutional CC involvement
Institution
Project title
Objectives
DPHPC FSMed
• Establishing •To increase
the CC
awareness of CC
Project
issues and also
to start the CC
focus
•Water Stress •To examine the
situation
community
perspective in
water stress
•Disease
investigation situation
in relation to LTD
•NCD’s –
CC
asthma, CVD’s,
RHD’s etc.
•Student
Projects
•EH perspective
Target Group
Setting
Progress/
Status
Academics / 2006
Institutions
DPHPC
Decommisio
ned to
Research
Unit
West
communes
West
Secondary
data
analysis
communitie
s
Date
(Year)
2009
2008date
On Hold
Fiji
wide
Ongoing
Fiji
Ongoing
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Institutio Thematic/
n
Focus area
Objectives
Target Group Settings
Other
comments
DOE
Development
CC Policy
(No CC Policy
in Fiji)
1.It will provide
guidance to future
CC work in Fiji.
2.Will identify and
include relevant CC
partner to work
with in the future.
Govt.
National
Ministries, CC team
NGOs,Civil
Society and
Communiti
es. Donors
agencies.
Future CC
projects
have to go
through the
DOE for the
NCC to vet
& approve
FMS
FMS do not directly implement any CC projects. However provides supports
in terms of advise, steering committee membership on the science of
climate ,data resources and expertise in project management.
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Instituti Thematic/
on
Focus area
Objectives
Target Group
Settings
Other
comments
PACED 1.AUSAID -CC
-USP
Adaptation
for Rural
Communities
Broadening our
focus to target
sector such as
water supply,
coastal resources,
flooding, health
and sanitation
and also food
security
Rural
isolated
communitie
s in Fiji (6
more sites)
Isolated
provinces,
Districts
such as
Lau,
Namosi,
Serua.
Phases demethodolog
y - new
sites, just
focusing on
the most
prominent
problem. E.g.
2. EU funded- 1.research on CC,
CC adaptation 2.training and
capacity building;
at Regional
level
3. community
adaptation in the
region.
Policy
maker,
researchers,
training
institutions
&
community
(Proposed 3rd
phase)
lack of water
or inundation,
salt intrusion,
- adaptation Regional
vector borne
Countries,
(most
institutions prominent
communiti problem).
es
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Instituti Thematic/
on
Focus area
Objectives
Target Group
Settings
Other
comments
SOPAC 1.Water
Resource
Mg’t
Program
1.To get all people
work together &
protect water
resource …
PIC’s and its
alliance or
partners on
CC
Vulnerable
1. Drinking
1.To improve access PICs and its
of Pacific people to alliance on
safe drinking water CC
& sanitation and to
promote good
hygiene practices.
3.Water
PICs policy
Governance 1.To help in the
makers and
program
governance of
other
water structure
partners in
(national &
water and
sanitation
CC
committee.
2.Water &
Sanitation
program
Communit Water Safety
ies in PICs. Planning recognized
by UNFCCC PICs local best practice
communit adaptation to
ies,
CC.
2. Integrated
PICs
governanc water
resource Mg’t
e policy.
-recognized by
GWPS as the
best practices
for CC
adaptation.
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Institution Thematic/ Focus
area
Objectives
Target Group
Fiji Red
Cross
1.Capacity building
with Organization on
technical skills and
expert on CC.
1. to be able to isolate
and prove the effect of
Climate Change on
water and how it affect
health.
2.advocate and build
the awareness within
the communities.
Organization Workplaces &
policy, human Communities
resources,
Finances and
Network
partners
1.Development
of technical &
expertise skills
on CC
2.Impact of CC
on water.
Vulnerable
communities
Settings
Disaster
prone
communities
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Institution Thematic/ Focus
area
Objectives
Target Group
Settings
LPU-MPI
1.Focusing on
inundation and sea
level rise.
2.Related to the
deforestation and
increase drought and
its effects on different
kinds of crops
Regional
project and
the focal
point is Fiji.
Coastal and
inland
ecosystem.
All
communities
in Fiji.
1.GTZ- Pacific
Climate Change
Adaptation
program
2.Review of
Regulation/Act.
To review Act and
incorporate modern
day CC elements as
future development
control measures.
Land and
Conservation
Improvement
Act.
Organization
Policy
relevant to CC
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Institution
Thematic/ Focus
area
LWRD-MPI 1. Adaptation
and Food
Security on
Climate issues.
Objectives
Target Group
Settings
1.Crop adaptation
researches.
2. Develop or research
into some crop variety,
which can stand salt
water intrusion or salt
tolerance variety.
3. Develop Model &
run it in other disaster
situation (such cyclone,
Salt water
intrusion.
Pilot
Sites.
Disaster
prone
communities
in through
out Fiji
hurricane and other climate
change activities such as
temperature variation).
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Institution Thematic/ Focus
area
Objectives
Target Group
Settings
Live &
1.Community
Learn
Education
Env. Educ. Program
1.How community‘s
can built on existing
resources and ensuring
it’s sustainable for
future.
Youth group,
women’s
group and
community
as
a whole.
Informal
settlement,
villages and
other
settlement
2. Collaborate with
relevant stakeholders,
to ensure initiative is
taken practical,
relevant and
sustainable.
Children,
Schools
Teachers and through out
Fiji
School
management.
2. Formal
Education
program
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Institution Thematic/ Focus
area
Objectives
NDMO
1.Faciliting the
Governments Divisional
development of
Ministries.
and District
community’s
level.
disaster
preparedness and
response plan.
Disaster Risk
Program
2.To teach people life
saving skill to
reduce casualties
during disasters.
Target Group
All
communities
in Fiji.
Settings
Community
Level.
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Institution Thematic/ Focus
area
Objectives
Target Group
Settings
PCDF Fiji
1.to help the
community prepare
better for the disaster.
Vulnerable
communities
in Fiji
Coastal,
Isolated
villages,
Settlements.
1.MORDI
Awareness
program on
Disaster Risk
Management.
2.NRM
programCommunity
based coral reef
protection
project.
2.help to reduce the
impact of disaster
when it strike.
1.To reduce the
destruction of coral
reef but also the
impact of climate
change has been seen
on the reefs in the iqoliqoli the reduction
in the food source.
Serua
Identified
province &
coastal
Lomaiviti
communities. province
(Batiki and
Motoriki
Islands.)
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Institution Thematic/ Focus
area
Objectives
Target Group
Settings
WA-Fiji
1.Need partner or
organization that can
train our staff in
technical and expert
skills in managing our
waste water more
effectively and
efficiently.
Organization
policy,
activities,
technology,
finance.
Treatment
plants and
related
infrastructures
.
Polluters
Industries,
Municipalities,
Developers &
Commercial
sectors.
1.Develop
technical and
expert skills in
waste water
Management
2.Drafting of
Trade waste
policy
1.Need to have a
policy in place and to
be enforced amongst
polluters and at the
same time waste
water is well
managed.
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Institution Thematic/ Focus
area
Objectives
Target Group
Settings
Wetland
Int. - Fiji
1.Mangrove
Ecosystem for
Climate Change
and Livelihoods
(MESCAL)
1.Building capacity
with various
governments to
response to climate
change through the
management of
Mangroves.
PICs. Regional 5 Pacific
focus
Island
countries
2.Wetland and
Livelihoods
1.Climate Modeling
(HYCOS) to tie
Environmental data to
disease data of those
water-catchment area.
Policy
makers,
communities
in the
catchments,
global CC
audience
Villages,
settlements
in major
islands in
Fiji.
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Institution
Thematic/ Focus
area
Objectives
Target Group
Settings
WWF
Protection of
critical habitats,
coastal inshore
fisheries or
offshore and
climate Change.
•To have an adaptive
capacity
•To look at adaptive
management (strategies
Policy makers
@ National,
district
provincial and
community
level
Local
communities
in Fiji. Govts
policies.
that have been outline for the
protection of critical habitats,
coastal inshore fisheries or
offshore) and
change
climate
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Instn
DPHPCFSMed
Thematic/
Focus area
•Using LTD
data with CC
and health
Objectives
Target Group
Settings
Comments
•To examine the •Secondary
relationship
data
between LTD and
CC
•NA
•This is an ongoing project
between
DPH/MoH
•Use GIS in CC
research to
forecast
outbreaks
•To map
•Secondary
outbreak areas of data
VBD and larval
indices to
estimate future
outbreaks
•NA
•An initiative of
the EH
discipline
•Behavioural
changes to CC
and Health
adaptation
•How do rural
communities in
vulnerable
settings adapt to
changes in
environmental
degradation and
natural disasters
•Rural areas, •On-going, next
vulnerable
phase of Momi
areas, coastal project
areas, inland
•Selected
communities
in Western
division
Q8: Future CC Projects (2yrs.)
Instn
DPHPCFSMed
Thematic/
Focus area
•Infectious
diseases with
CC
Objectives
Target Group
Settings
Comments
•TBD
•TBD
•TBD
•Initiative from
the LTD project,
new areas to
research in
•Adaptation & •To evaluate
•Rural settings •Communitie •Joint project
Vulnerability in community
s
ADRA/DPH
rural settings
understanding of
activities in
adaptation and
vulnerability
•New initiative
•Food security •To evaluate the •Communities •Coastal &
issues in
effect of CC on
inland areas
coastal and
supply and food
inland areas
demand
•TBD
•TBD
PCCAPHH – CLIMATE CHANGE & HEALTH ADAPTATION &
VULNERABILITY IN FIJI
SUMMARY
Stakeholder
Health
Adaptation
Vulnerability
POLICY
DoE
DPHPC
FMS
Fiji Red X
LUPS
LWRD
Lands
Live & Learn
NDMO
PCDF
PACE-SD
SOPAC
WWF
Water Authority
Wetlands
PCCAPHH
Stakeholder
DoE
DPHPCFSMed
FMS
Fiji Red X
Live & Learn
Interest
(Current & Future
Projects)
Effect Importance for
+ 0 - Success of Project
Policy
+
Mainstream CC in PIC
+
CC & Diseases
+
Behavioural changes
+
Vulnerability/Adaptation
+
Advisory
+
Climate science
+
Disaster support
+
Water & health
?
Adult Education
0
Informal education
0
U – Unknown
1 – Little/No importance
2- Some importance
3- Moderate importance
4 – Very Important
5 – Critical Player
Degree of Influence
U – Unknown
1 – Little/No Influence
2- Some Influence
3- Moderate Influence
4 – Significant Influence
5 – Very Influential
5
5
5
4
5
5
3
3
3
2
PCCAPHH
Stakeholder
Interest
Effect
+0-
Importance for
Success of Project
U – Unknown
1 – Little/No importance
2- Some importance
3- Moderate importance
4 – Very Important
5 – Critical Player
LUPS – MPI
Coastal Management
+
Integrated Res. Mgt.
+
Food Security
+
LWRD
Food Security
Lands Dept.
Degree of Influence
U – Unknown
1 – Little/No Influence
2- Some Influence
3- Moderate Influence
4 – Significant Influence
5 – Very Influential
4
4
+
3
2
Global mapping
-
U
U
NDMO
Disaster Management
+
4
5
PCDF
Disaster training
+
U
U
Coral reef protection
0
PCCAPHH
Stakeholder
Interest
Effect
+0-
Importance for
Success of Project
U – Unknown
1 – Little/No importance
2- Some importance
3- Moderate importance
4 – Very Important
5 – Critical Player
PACE-SD
Adaptation
+
Training in CC
+
Water
+
Adaptation
+
WWF
Conservation
Water
Authority
Wetland
SOPAC
Degree of Influence
U – Unknown
1 – Little/No Influence
2- Some Influence
3- Moderate Influence
4 – Significant Influence
5 – Very Influential
5
4
4
5
+
3
2
Desalination
+
4
4
Water
+
Conservation
+
4
3
Ecology and Health
+
PCCAPHH
Influence of
Stakeholder
Unknown
Importance of Activity to Stakeholder
Unknown Little/No
Some
importance importance
Lands,
Moderate
importance
Very
Important
Critical
Player
Little / No
Influence
Some
Influence
Moderate
Influence
Significant
Influence
Very
Influential
PCDF,
Live/Learn,
LWRD, WWF
Red X
Wetland
LUPS, WA
DPHPC,
PACE-SD
NDMO,
SOPAC
DoE/FMS
Partners and Alliance
Institution
Current
Future
Live & Learn
WWF, Ministry of Agriculture,
Provincial offices, the district offices,
the Ministry of Education, the
community people,.
AUSAID, UNDP, JASS, WHO ,
Government - Mineral Resources,
Land and Water Resource
Management, Agriculture, Health and
some other NGOs.
Steering Committee members, WHO,
MOH, IFRC
UN agencies - UNICEF, WHO, SOPAC,
FSPI, UNDP
PACE-SD
Fiji Red X
WWF
NDMO
All these partners are important to us
Anyone valuable input into CC,
(intellectual property, skills and
finance)
Environment NGOs, environment focus Wide range of technical expertise,
NGOs., line Ministries, the
local partners a very strategic.
Environment, Forestry, Fisheries,
Institutes if relevant .
JICA, AUSAID NLTB, Lands and Mineral SOPAC and AFDP and US aided
resources Dept., SOPAC
organization
Partners and Alliance
Institution
Wetland
SOPAC
LUPS – MPI
DoE
Water
Authority
FMS
Lands Dept.
Current
SOPAC, DoE, MoH, Forestry &
Fisheries, WASH coalition
Pacific Wash Coalition - consortium of
14 agencies, WHO, UNDP, UNESCAP,
UN-Habitat, NGOs - Live and Learn,
FSPI, and FNU
DoE, Forestry, NLTB, Lands Dept,
Landowners & farmers, land
developers, DTCP, FSC, Fiji land care
steering committee and NGOs
All Govt. Ministries & NGOs, Donor
Agencies (UNEP, ADB) & PACESD-USP
ADB, UNFCCC is funding our CDM
project.
WHO/GEF,JICA/Fiji Govt., AUSAID. - All
climate sensitive sectors
Future
Same as current and others
DoE, NLTB, DTCP
Other GO’s and donors
Strong links with the water utility
with water resources in the country. WHO, Ministry of Health., existing
partners
We will continue with our existing
partners.
All line Govt. Ministries that are
relevant to CC.
International organization.
MPI, Tourism and other climate
sensitive sectors.
Partners and Alliance
Institution
Current
Future
LWRD
Still trying to identify who are our real
stakeholders: “talk to the DOE for CC
country team, they are also trying to
identify who their stakeholders are –
no road map”
MoH, FNU - CMNHS, Finance,
National Planning, Government
division
UNDP
MOH is trying to do some bits and pieces, Nausori
Town Council is trying to do some river flood
protection, NDMO is doing some bits and pieces
and yet we need to synergize all these. So MPI is
doing something on food security and food
production.
PCDF
DPH-FSMed
AusAID, WWF, Civic societies, Fiji Water
Foundation, Rotary, Road Trip Pacific
Water Flyer,
Anybody who has an interest in CC and
Health, we would like to be the other
health partner apart from MoH USP/SOPAC/ WHO/UNDP/ UNEP/GEF/
etc
Same and other potential partners
Current partners and other GO’s and
NGO’s who work on CC, UNDP, Donor
agencies (Consulate/Embassies)
Policy – CC & Health
27%
67%
Yes
No
34%
Health
7%
General CC
Policy change to support CC
36%
Yes
No
64%
Demonstrate support
training
Revison of Act & Legislation
realign to CC activities
PH expertise
networking/meet partners
Implement with changes
expertise
evolving needs
Env Consultant
Eco-Forum talk
desalination
CC research to develop policies
Available data
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Policy support - Challenge
unusual to change policy
training
threat - new officer
meet partners
lack of knowledge
confusion on role in CC & hlth
no policy
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Lessons Learnt
Institution
Strength
Eye opening Exp.
Live &
Learn
1. Environmental education,
2. qualitative research- RAP
(Research of Aspiration
Perception),
3. participatory inclusive
1. Community dynamic,
2. Diverse issues - you go in with one
issue and come back with many
issues - only a part of the bigger
pictures capacity,
3. Looking at funding
PACE-SD
1. Training – postgraduate level,
2. building on services
1. wakes up and refocus our attention
2. climate change awareness on
communities - art to work with
communities
3. vocabulary & the pace
Red X
1. pioneering project
1. direct impact of CC on disasters and
health
WWF
1. communication savvy network,
2. way we work with community
1. Network, consultation,
2. Planning, implementation,
monitoring & evaluation,
3. communicating your outputs,
4. The strive to survive – how do we
adapt to CC
Lessons Learnt
Institution Lesson Learnt – Strength
Eye opening Exp.
NDMO
National level
we are trying having people to be
proactive
Wetlands
Int.
1. doing all the science and field
work &
2. organizing cross- sectoral
engagement.
3. have the experience doing that.
1. have good health people there you
2. have a good cross-sectoral mix right
from the very beginning,
3. budget across organizations and
institutions is really difficult to do
well.
4. how much cross over there really is
between the sectors,
5. value to be added to that from
working more closely together,
SOPAC
1. adaptation measures – we
recognize that CC is happening
2. we try to plan for it in a risk
assessment and a risk.
3. we look at CC As something that
we should managed
1. strengthen the link with the Climate
office, Meteorological office, NDMO,
2. behavioral change,
3. a lot of existing issues are blamed
down on climate change,
4. people are leaving those behind and
are running after CC now
Lessons Learnt
Institution Lesson Learnt – Strength
Eye opening Exp.
LPU – MPI
1. informal process,
2. only unit in MPI
1. management skills,
2. work with communities – depart and
it dies,
3. communities not aware of their
resources,
4. incorporate income generating
activities in their work
DoE
Policy level (??? No policy!)
1. the pool of money that is available
for projects to be implemented
Water
Authority
strength in our organization is our
engineers
1. Desalination
LWRD
1. Capacity building, training and
workshop for better
understanding of CC impacts,
2. application of models to predict
CC
3. Revision of Drainage Act –
include CC impact
1. Community engagement,
2. community knows better,
3. No road map to CC & Health
Lessons Learnt
Institution Lesson Learnt – Strength
Eye opening Exp.
DPHFSMed
1. Public Health expert in 9
discipline,
2. facilities,
3. research capacity,
4. support between staff
1. Meaning of Climate change to the
community,
2. the breadth and scope that CC and
Health entails,
3. perspective of climate change to
stakeholders,
4. Climate change projects not
recognising the health effect,
5. the duplication of work and activities,
6. the opportunities missed, the
opportunities that could happen in
the future,
7. the network and stakeholders that
we can partner with to create more
awareness on CC and Health, etc.
FMS
1.
2.
3.
4.
1. Improve robust communication/
system feedback,
2. there are skills, talents, out there that
need to be pooled together
data,
science based,
expertise,
computing power
Lessons Learnt
Institution Lesson Learnt – Strength
Eye opening Exp.
PCDF
1. appreciate the challenges, the
difficulties they face in the
communities
2. how much can the project give to
help in to sort of ease some of these
challenges
3. Minimal resources are protected and
conserved
1. SWOT analysis on all project
2. Networking with partners
3. capacity building -community
project sustainability
4. bottom-up approach to
empower the community
5. Community relationship –
realign their projects to meet
needs
No road
map
Still trying to
identify who
are our real
stakeholders
CHALLENGES
HEALTH
Priority is
Conservation,
NOT HEALTH
Community
conscious
of CC
Doing their
own thing,
no
networking
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Strengthen Health component
Human kind – 1 life
CC affects health
CC and diseases
CC and places
Adaptation & vulnerability
2. Formulate & Adopt a Evidence Based Climate
change & Health policy
3. Networking of stakeholders
RECOMMENDATIONS
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Clear definitions - Climate change concepts
Collaborate projects – with Clear objectives
Involve the community
Baseline studies on CC in communities
Lessons learnt – share findings and
methodology
CC affects all, cannot be controlled, everybody’s
responsibility ALL TAKE PART
RECOMMENDATION
9. Stakeholders to identify the pressing:
Priority CC issue in their organisation
CC issue
CC & Health issue
CONCLUSION
• The major challenges in the climate change
health research in Fiji are:
– lack of a cross-sector, interdisciplinary
collaborative approach in research and
– inadequate budgetary allocation to health sector
and health research,
– lack of awareness about the climate change and
its health hazards among the general populations.
– deficiencies in surveillance system,
CONCLUSION
• Understanding climate change and human
health requires:
– locally relevant knowledge on climate change.
– More resources are needed to provide climate
change information at a local scale.
– POLICY FORMULATION – evidence based
• More research collaboration and sharing of
data
END OF PRESENTATION
ANY QUESTIONS!