Transcript Modeling augmentations

Modeling augmentations
Maja Žumer
University of Ljubljana
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
Examples of augmentations
• Text with illustrations (or illustrations with text)
• Text with foreword, notes
• Music and words
• Music and choreography
Not the best term, because it implies that one
content part is more important...
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
Delsey (1998)
• Document part:
•
Examples: physically separate component of a
multipart document, accompanying material,
issue of a serial
Content part:
“Individual component of the intellectual or
artistic content of document or document part
(article in a serial, chapter/section/part,
illustration for a text, sound aspect of a film...)”
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
Our augmentation
• Content part
– segmental (foreword and text)
– systemic (words and music)
– Dependent (choreography)
– Independent (foreword)
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
FRBR and parts
Whole/part relationship
• Work
• Expression
Complement, supplement (work-to-work,
expression-to-expression of different
works, expression-to-work)
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
Categories of parts in FRBR
• Dependent:
Component parts of a work that are intended to be
used in context of the larger work and depend on the
context of the larger work for their meaning
• segmental (prefaces, chapters, sections, parts)
• systemic (illustrations)
• Independent:
They do not depend on the context provided by the the
larger work for their meaning
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
Examples in FRBR
• Supplement (referential)
– index, concordance, teacher’s guide
• Complement (referential)
– libretto, choreography
• Whole/part
– illustration for a text
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
Page 70:
“There will often be no reason for a
dependent part of a work to be separately
identified or described in a bibliographic
record. In certain instances ... it may be
considered useful to identify and describe
the component in its own right.”
• Added entry
• Contents note
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
Issues
• Is there always the ‘main work’?
• Should segmental and systemic parts be
modeled differently?
• Should dependent and independent parts
be modeled differently?
• Should the model take into account the
context in which the “combination”
occured?
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
Most manifestations embody more
than one expression (work)
For example:
• text
• illustrations
• editor’s contribution
• layout design
• cover design
• ...
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
Possibilities
• Choose the ‘main work’ and treat as a new
expression of this work
• Treat as embodiment of several
expressions
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
work
T
I
expression
M
T
manifestation
I
M
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
work
expression
T+I+M
T
manifestation
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
work
expression
T
I
M
manifestation
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
work
expression
T
I
M
manifestation
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005
Proposal
• Embodiment of several expressions
• Treat as composite work if necessary
• Record all expressions (works) important
for the intended user
FRBR Workshop
May 2, 2005