Transcript Document

Cochlear Implants and Meningitis: A
Case for Collaborative Surveillance
Krista Biernath/Pam Costa
2005 EHDI Conference
Atlanta, Georgia
March 3, 2005
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center on Birth Defects
and Developmental Disabilities
TM
Background
 June 2002, FDA received first reports of bacterial
meningitis in cochlear implant recipients.
 Subsequent investigation identified meningitis episodes
from 1/1/97 – 9/15/03.
 Incidence of meningitis in children with cochlear
implants caused by S. Pneumoniae was 30 times higher
than general population.
 Post-implant meningitis was significantly associated
with use of a positioner.
TM
Background
(Continued)
 Models with the positioner were available from 1999–
July 2002.
 On-going cases of post-implant bacterial meningitis
among cochlear implant users prompted a new
investigation.
 Need to be vigilant during post-operative period for all
and long-term for children with positioners.
 Vaccine recommendations apply for all children with
cochlear implants. http://www.cdc.gov/nip/recs/childschedule.htm
TM
The Concern
 Ongoing evidence that children with cochlear
implants are developing meningitis
 Currently, state surveillance of these events is
uncoordinated or not occurring
 Without accurate data, the potential public
health question can not be adequately
addressed
TM
Current Status-Infectious Disease
Reporting
 States differ in what types of meningitis are
reportable under their infectious disease
requirements: some state comments
◊ “only meningitis cause by Neisseria meningitides
and H-Flu”
◊ “bacterial and viral”
◊ “disease specific, including Neisseria, H-Flu,
Strep. Pneumoniae, some viral-LaCrosse, West
Nile)
TM
Infectious Disease Reporting Cont.
 States differ as to what data are collected on
infectious reporting forms, with regard to
cochlear implants
◊ Most states report cochlear implant status not
collected routinely, if at all
 2 years ago, asked “Could forms be changed?”
◊ Yes, no, not easily, probably-if there is evidence
that it would be useful
TM
Current Status-EHDI systems
 Some EHDI systems are set-up to gather
information about device type, including
cochlear implants
 Unknown if any state EHDI systems currently
collecting information about meningitis
occurrence
 Few EHDI programs have on-going
relationships with state infectious disease
surveillance
TM
CDC Next Steps
 CDC EHDI will continue to be in contact with
state epidemiologists
 CDC EHDI will be requesting that all states
modify their infectious disease reporting forms
to include at least two questions:
◊ Is the person deaf/hard of hearing
◊ Does the person have a cochlear implant
TM
State/Territorial Next Steps
 Encourage state/territory’s EHDI programs to
collaborate with their infectious programs
 Learn what is reportable in your state/territory
 Determine if data can be shared
 Work with audiologists/medical home for other
opportunities for reporting-Strep. Pneumoniae
not reportable for many states/territories
TM
National Next Steps
 CDC EHDI will continue to work with FDA
 CDC EHDI will encourage states/territories to
report cases (de-identified) to CDC EHDI
◊ Date of birth
◊ Type of meningitis
◊ Perhaps other common variables (?)
 Need for continued surveillance to address
public health concern
TM
Further Information
 CDC-EHDI
– http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/ehdi/
 Recommended vaccination schedule
– http://www.cdc.gov/nip/recs/child-schedule.htm
TM