Advanced Physics PCS 436
Download
Report
Transcript Advanced Physics PCS 436
CT
Seeram: Chapter 1
Computed
Tomography
- An
Overview
Early History
“tomos”
Greek word meaning section
Sectional imaging methods first developed in
1920’s
Early History:
Conventional Tomography
first used in 1935
image produced on film
Image plane oriented
parallel to film
Anatomy in plane of
fulcrum stays in focus
anatomy outside of
fulcrum plane
mechanically blurred
Conventional Tomography Blurring
Image produced on film
Objects above or below
fulcrum plane change position
on film & thus blur
Conventional vs Axial
Tomography
Conventional Cut
CT Axial Cut
CT Image
Not produced on film
Mathematically reconstructed from many
projection measurements of radiation intensity
Digital Image calculated
Acme
MiniComputer
Digital Image
How Did We Go From…
The story concerns these men.
What was their Link?
???
Godfrey
Paul, Ringo, George, & John
It Was the Late 1960’s
A lot of the money was going here
Follow the Money
Electronic and Musical
Industries LTD
Measure Intensity of a Pencil Beam
X-Ray
Source
Radiation
Detector
CT Image
Measure a bunch of pencil beam intensities
CT Image
Now make measurements from every angle
CT Image
When you get done, multiple pencil
beams have gone through every point
in body
Image Reconstruction
X-Ray
Source
Acme
MiniComputer
Radiation
Detector
Projection
(raw)
Data
Pixel
(calculated)
Data
Digital Image
2-dimensional array of image points
each point called a pixel
picture element
each pixel has a value
value represents x-ray transmission
(attenuation)
Digital Image Matrix
125
25
311
111
182
222
176
199
192
85
69
133
149
112
77
103
118
139
154
125
120
145
301
256
223
287
256
225
178
322
325
299
353
333
300
Numbers / Gray Shades
Each number of a digital image corresponds to
a gray shade for one pixel
Image Reconstruction
Math developed in 1910’s
Other Applications
Astronomy (sun spot mapping)
Electron microscope imaging
Nuclear medicine emission tomography
MRI
Acme
MiniComputer
Digital Image
CT History
First test images in 1967
First clinical images ~ 1971
First commercial scanner 1972
CT History
CT math developed in 1910’s
First commercial scanner 1972
What took so long?
CT History
CT made possible by high speed minicomputer
CT Computers
Old mainframe computers too expensive & bulky to be
dedicated to CT
The
st
1
Computer Bug
Data Acquisition
cross sectional image reconstructed from
many line transmission measurements
made in different directions
Tube
Detector
Translate / Rotate
CT Early Units
4 minute scans
1 slice
5 minute reconstruction
80 X 80 matrix
head only
water bag fit tightly around head
Beam Translation
beam collimated to small round spot
collimated at tube and collimator
X-ray
Tube
Detector
Beam Translation
Tube/detector translates left to right
Entire assembly rotates 1o to right
Tube/detector translates right to left
X-ray
Tube
Detector
Translate - Rotate
180 translations in alternate directions
1 degree rotational increments between translations
Projection Measurements
Radiation detector generates a voltage
proportional to radiation intensity
Image Reconstruction
Minicomputer does its thing
Analog to Digital
(A to D)
conversion
Digital Image Matrix
Digital Matrix contains many numbers
which may be
Displayed on monitor
Manipulated
Stored
125
25
311
111
182
222
176
199
192
85
69
133
149
112
77
103
118
139
154
125
120
145
301
256
223
287
256
225
178
322
325
299
353
333
300
Digital Image Manipulation
Window
Level
Smoothing
Edge enhancement
Slice reformatting
3D
derived from multiple axial slices
Digital Image Storage
Magnetic Disk
CD
Tape
Optical Disk
PACS archive
picture archival and communications system
not part of CT
contains images from many modalities
allows viewing on connected computers
CT - Improvements
All CT generations measure same multi-line
transmission intensities in many directions
Improvements
Protocol for obtaining many line transmissions
# of line transmissions obtained simultaneously
Detector location
Overall acquisition speed
2nd Generation CT
arc beam allowed 10 degree
rotational increments
scan times reduced
20 sec - 2 min
2 slices obtained
simultaneously
double row of detectors
10o
3rd Generation CT
Wide angle fan beam
Rotational motion only
/ no translation
detectors rotate with tube
30o beam
Many more detectors
Scan times < 10 seconds
3rd Generation CT
Z-axis orientation
perpendicular to page
Patient
3rd Generation (Non-spiral) CT
Tube rotates once around patient
Table stationary
data for one slice collected
Table increments one slice thickness
Repeat
Tube rotates opposite direction
3rd Generation Image Quality
Improvements
Faster scan times
reduces motion artifacts
Improved spatial resolution
Improved contrast resolution
Increased tube heat capacity
less delay between scans / patients
Increased throughput
Spiral CT (late 1980’s)
Continuous rotation of gantry
Slip ring technology
Patient moves slowly but continuously
through gantry
No dead time as gantry
reverses
Much faster
Spiral CT
Z-axis orientation
perpendicular to page
Patient
Multi-slice CT (2000’s)
Multiple rows of fan beam detectors
Wider fan beam in axial direction
Table moves much faster
Substantially greater throughput
Computer Improvements
Virtually instantaneous reconstruction
time
Auto
Window protocols
Transmission to PACS
Backup
Image manipulation
Slice reformatting
3D reconstruction
And the ability to
do it all
simultaneously
Fundamental CT Tradeoff
Typically phantom dose: 1-2 rad (10-20 mSv)
To improve one requires
compromise on another
Noise
Resolution
Dose
CT Usage
16% of imaging procedures
23% of total per capita exposure
49% of medical exposure
CT Usage
Annual growth
U.S. Population: <1%
CT Procedures: >10%
~ 67,000,000 procedures in
2006
about 10% pediatric CT
Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure
David J. Brenner, Ph.D., D.Sc., and Eric J. Hall, D.Phil., D.Sc.
New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
How many children’s lives are
saved by CT?
6/19/2001
“Each year, about 1.6 million children in
the USA get CT scans to the head and
abdomen — and about 1,500 of those
will die later in life of radiationinduced cancer …
•Medical imaging procedures should be
appropriate & conducted at the lowest
radiation dose consistent with acquisition of
desired information
•Discussion of dose risks should be
accompanied by acknowledgement of
procedure benefits
•Risks of medical imaging at effective doses <
50 mSv (5 rad) for single procedures or 100
mSv(10 rad) for multiple procedures over
short time periods are too low to be detectable
& may be nonexistent.
• Predictions of hypothetical cancer incidence
and deaths in patients exposed to such low
doses are
• highly speculative
• should be discouraged
•These predictions are harmful because
they lead to sensationalistic articles …
that cause some patients & parents to
refuse imaging procedures, placing them
at substantial risk by not receiving the
clinical benefits of the prescribed
procedures