AF in acute coronary syndrome
Download
Report
Transcript AF in acute coronary syndrome
AF in acute coronary syndrome
Professor A. Al-Khadra
MBBS, FRCPC, FAHA
Introduction
Incidence
Clinical variables associated with the
development of atrial fibrillation
In-hospital mortality
Mortality during follow-up
Types of death
Impact of atrial fibrillation upon stroke
Anticoagulation
Treatment of atrial fibrillation in acute
myocardial infarction
Introduction
Introduction
Most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia
Increasing in prevalence with age
Associated with increased long term risk of:
Stroke and thromboembolism
Congestive heart failure (CHF)
All cause mortality
Introduction
Atrial fibrillation can complicate acute
coronary syndromes particularly acute STsegment elevation myocardial infarction
Associated rapid and irregular ventricular
rates during the arrhythmia may cause
further impairment of the coronary circulation
impairment of left ventricular function
adverse consequences of neurohormonal
activation
Introduction
Atrial fibrillation may also give rise to the
occurrence of severe ventricular
tachyarrhythmias perhaps due to:
ischaemia,
varying R–R intervals,
or as a result of activation of the sympathetic
nervous system
Incidence
Incidence
Treatment of AMI changed considerably over
the last 30 years
Wide spread use of thrombolytic therapy
Primary PCI becomes gold standard
treatment for AMI
Early administration of beta blocker, ACE
inhibitors, ARBs and aldosterone antagonists
Incidence
In the thrombolytic era, the incidence of AF in
patients admitted to hospital with AMI varied
between 6.8 and 21%
GUSTO I trial which included 40 981 patients
with AMI, reported AF incidence of 10.4%
Eldar et al. reported a 9.8% incidence of
paroxysmal AF in a consecutive series of
2866 patients
GUSTO III study found an AF incidence of
6.8%
Incidence
Between 1990 and 1997, the incidence of AF
complicating AMI decreased from 18% in
1990 to 11% in 1997, probably as a result of
improved therapy including more widespread use of thrombolysis
OACIS study which included 2475 patients
treated with primary PCI, AF occurred in 12%
of patients
Incidence
The Cooperative Cardiovascular Project
specifically looked at the incidence of AF in
elderly patients suffering from AMI
106 780 patients over the age of 64 years
who were treated for AMI
22.1% of these patients had AF with almost
half of the patients developing AF during
their hospital stay and the other half
presenting already with AF at admission
Incidence
The use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs has
previously been found to be associated with
a reduction in AF in patients with different
cardiovascular diseases
TRACE study 5.3% incidence of AF
OPTIMAAL trial the incidence of AF was 2%
with a subsequent increase to 7.2% during
the follow-up period of 3 years
Incidence
It is likely that the majority of these studies
underestimated the true AF incidence since
the diagnosis of AF was usually based on a
routine ECG
CAPRICORN trial, the incidence of AF
complicating AMI could be reduced from 5.4
to 2.3% by administering the b-blocker
carvedilol
The RICO study
No difference concerning the incidence of AF
between st elevation and non st elevation MI
patients (7.6 vs. 7.7%, P ¼ 0.334)
In summary
AF complicating AMI incidence is between 2.3 and
21%.
The wide-spread use of primary PCI, has been
associated with a notable decline in the AF incidence
Trials evaluating the effects of ACE, ARBs, or bblockers on mortality and morbidity in patients with
AMI reported the lowest incidence rates of AF but the
major impact of this pharmacological therapy was
upon the late development of AF
As our population ages, one can expect that AF will
remain a frequent and troublesome complication of
AMI
Clinical variables associated with
the development of atrial
fibrillation
Cooperative Cardiovascular Project
Advanced heart failure on admission (Killip
class IV) was the most significant predictor
Elevated admission heart rate
Advanced age
Similar findings were reported from the
GUSTO I
VALIANT study, received b-blockers and
thrombolytics less
Prospective Osaka Acute Coronary
Insufficiency Study
Highest risk for AF development was an
admission heart rate ≥ 100/min
Killip class IV
Male gender
Patient age
In summary
Predictors of AF in the setting of AMI include:
increased age
presence of heart failure symptoms
higher heart rates at admission
left ventricular dysfunction
These risk factors have been described
independently of the type of reperfusion
therapy (i.e. none, thrombolysis, PCI)
In-hospital mortality
GUSTO I trial
Patients developing AF had:
a significantly higher in-hospital mortality
a higher incidence of re-infarction
a higher incidence of cardiogenic shock
a higher incidence of heart failure
a higher incidence of asystole
30 days mortality was higher for patients
developed AF after admission vs those
admitted with AF
Eldar et al. study
Compared their data with patients treated in the
pre-thrombolytic era
Patients with paroxysmal AF had a higher 30
day mortality
Had relatively lower 30 day mortality rate when
they were treated in the thrombolytic era
Large database of elderly patients
Development of AF during hospitalization
was associated with a higher mortality rate in
hospital and in the first 30 days
In contrast, patients who were in AF at
admission had a similar mortality rate to that
of patients in sinus rhythm
Patients treated with PCI (Kinjo)
More in-hospital events:
cardiogenic shock,
congestive heart failure,
ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation
In hospital mortality rate was not significantly
increased
Patient presented with AF or developed AF
during hospitalization appeared to have a
similar adverse impact upon outcomes
OPTIMAAL trial
Patients with AF on admission had in-
hospital mortality similar to those with sinus
rhythm
Patients who developed AF during
hospitalization had significantly higher
mortality
All patients included in this study had left
ventricular dysfunction
TRACE study
AF was primarily associated with increased
in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients
In summary
Studies on in-hospital mortality strongly
suggest that the development of AF along
with an AMI is an independent predictor of all
cause mortality
Mortality during follow-up
GUSTO I
1 year mortality in patients with AF was
higher than in those without the arrhythmia
Eldar/Sprint
In contrast to the data on in-hospital mortality
there was no difference between patients
that presented with AF and those who
developed AF during hospitalization
The comparison of 1 year mortality from
thrombolytic with pre-thrombolytic era
demonstrated a significant lower mortality in
the thrombolytic era
Rathore et al
When patients were stratified according to
whether AF was present on admission or
developed during hospitalization, the 1 year
mortality in those presenting with AF was
lower in contrast to those who developed AF
after admission
Kinjo et al
The 1 year mortality was significantly
increased in AMI patients treated by PCI who
developed AF after hospital admission
OPTIMAAL trial
Had a long follow-up duration over 3 years
Patients with AF at baseline had an
increased mortality risk compared with
individuals without the arrhythmia
New-onset AF was associated with
increased subsequent 30 day mortality and
over the entire trial period
TRACE study
Long term mortality was increased in all
subgroups except those with an LVEF < 0.25
This is probably caused by the high mortality
rate of subsequent heart failure in any event
VALIANT study
Three year mortality estimates were 20% in
patients without AF in the setting of AMI,
37% in those with AF complicating AMI, and
38% in patients with a history AF prior to the
AMI
In summary
The bulk of evidence demonstrates that AF
in patients hospitalized for AMI has serious
adverse prognostic implications on long-term
mortality. This seems to apply for all patient
populations studied without significant
differences related to the treatment of AMI
Types of death
TRACE study
Median follow-up period was 32 months
during which 34% patients died. In the AF
group, 50% died compared with 30% of
patients with sinus rhythm
The authors concluded that the excess
mortality in AMI patients with AF is due to a
significant increase in sudden and nonsudden cardiac death
Impact of atrial fibrillation upon
stroke
Stroke in general population
Patients with AF are at increased risk for
thrombo-embolic complications, particularly
for stroke
Risk estimated by the CHADS2 score
Stroke after MI & AF
Data on AF-associated stroke incidence in
the population of AMI patients is available
from only few investigations
Significantly higher rate for in hospital stroke
was documented for patients with AF after
AMI by GUSTO I trial
Majority of strokes were ischemic strokes
3.1% of AMI patients with AF suffered from a
stroke compared with only 1.3% of patients
in sinus rhythm
Siu et al study
At 1 year follow-up, the incidence of ischemic
stroke (10.2 vs. 1.8%) was substantially
higher in patients with transient AF compared
with those in sinus rhythm
Of note, only anti-platelet agents were
prescribed in all patients and no oral
anticoagulation therapy was used.
In summary
There are good data indicating that AF
complicating AMI not only increases the risk
for ischaemic stroke during hospitalization
but also during follow-up
This seems to apply also for transient AF
which has reversed back to sinus rhythm at
the time of discharge
These findings have implications for future
therapeutic recommendations
Anticoagulation
Majority of trials discussed were conducted
before guide-lines on therapy of AF were
available
Information on antithrombotic treatment of
patients with AF during AMI is very limited
and not based on controlled studies
Knowledge about Swedish Heart
Intensive care Admission
Between 1995 and 2002
Total of 6275 patients discharged alive after
AMI and who had AF
29% were treated with OAC
60% were treated with ASA and/or
thienopyridines
11% did not receive any antithrombotic
therapy
In the OAC group, 26% received additional
antiplatelet therapy
Knowledge about Swedish Heart
Intensive care Admission
All-cause mortality was significantly lower in
patients treated with OAC alone and was
also lower in those treated with OAC in
combination with antiplatelet therapy
compared with patients receiving only
ASA/thienopyridine.
Rubboliet al
Treated 104 patients with AF and AMI with a
triple therapy of ASA, clopidogrel, and
warfarin after reperfusion therapy with PCI
and stenting
No cardiac or peripheral thrombo-embolic
events were observed in 1 month follow-up
but (4.8%) periprocedural hemorrhages
occurred
The overall bleeding rate in this small group
was 20% with triple therapy compared with
4.5% with dual antiplatelet therapy
Ruiz-Nodar et study
Retrospective analysis on anticoagulation
treatment in patients with AF after coronary
artery stenting
426 patients, 64%were treated for acute
coronary syndromes (including 20.1% AMI)
213 received triple therapy with warfarin,
aspirin, and clopidogrel
Ruiz-Nodar et study
Non-anticoagulation with warfarin was
associated with a significant increase in
major cardiovascular events (38.7 vs. 26.5%)
and all cause mortality (27.8 vs. 17.8%) at a
median follow-up of 594 days
Treatment of atrial fibrillation in
acute myocardial infarction
Atrial Fibrillation in
acute coronary syndromes
aClass
of recommendation. bLevel of evidence.
AF = atrial fibrillation, ACS = acute coronary syndrome; DCC = direct current cardioversion.
www.escardio.org/guidelines
European Heart Journal (2010) 31, 2369-2429
Summary
AF occurs in 2–21% of patients with ACS
Widespread use of PCI, during the acute
phase, has deceased the incidence of AF
Similarly, the use of ACEIs, ARBs, or betablockers early after acute myocardial
infarction has reduced the incidence of AF
AF is more commonly associated with ACS
in older patients and those with heart failure,
higher heart rates on admission, and LV
dysfunction
AF complicating ACS is associated with
increased in-hospital and long-term mortality,
and increases the risk of ischemic stroke
during hospitalization and follow-up
Recommendations for the management of
patients with AF in the setting of ACS are
based primarily on consensus, since
adequate trial data do not exist