Section 9.6 Families of Right Triangles
Download
Report
Transcript Section 9.6 Families of Right Triangles
Section 9.6
Families of Right Triangles
By: Maggie Fruehan
Any three whole numbers that satisfy the equation
a²+b²=c² form a Pythagorean Triple.
15
6
5
3
8
15
12
10
4
20
25
9
These four triangles are all members of the (3,4,5) family.
Some History…
The study of these Pythagorean triples began long before the
time of Pythagoras.
There are Babylonian tablets that contain lists of such triples.
Pythagorean triples were also used in ancient Egypt. For
example, to produce a right angle they took a piece of string,
marked it into 12 equal segments, tied it into a loop, and held
it taut in the form of a (3,4,5) triangle.
The number
of spaces
match the
(3,4,5) triple!
String with 12 knots
Sting pulled taut
Pythagorean Triples must appear as whole numbers.
3 3
2½
1½
2
4 3
0.5
5 3
0.4
0.3
Even though these are not families, they all are
members of the (3,4,5) family.
There are infinitely many families, but the most
frequently seen are the:
(3,4,5)
45
?
27
72
(5,12,13)
45/9= 5
27/9= 3
? /9= 4
72/6= 12
30/6= 5
30
?
? =36
? =78
? /6= 13
2.5(10)= 25
(7,24,25)
2.5
0.7
?
0.7(10)= 7
? (10)= 24
? = 2.4
More Families…
1½
1½ =
(8,15,17)
?
2
2=
?=
3
2
4
2
5
2
18/2= 9
(9,40,41)
?
18
80
Numerators
resemble the
(3,4,5)
triangle!
80/2= 40
?/ 2= 41
?=
1
2
2
? = 82
The Principal of the Reduced Triangle
Reduce the difficulty of the problem by multiplying or
dividing the three lengths by the same number to obtain
a similar, but simpler, triangle in the same family.
Solve for the missing side of the easier triangle.
Convert back to the original problem.
x
4
2x
2(4)=8
7½
2(7½)=15
The family
is (8,15,17).
Thus,
2x=17 and
x=8½ (in
the original
problem).
More Reduced Triangles!
200
4 + y² = 9
600
400
2² + y² = 3²
*Make sure to
change the
variable!
3
2
y
x =200 5
You can also enlarge the triangle!
1¼
y² = 5² + 8²
y
y² = 89
y = 89
5
2
4
y= 5
200
4
x
y² = 5
8
15
Find x.
17
25
6
26
x=7
x
x =12
15
13
Find x
13
x
25
Find x
41
x
40
41
Square
x = 18 2
HA!!! IT’S NOT 10!!!
because it’s a…
6² + x² = 8²
36 + x² = 64
x² = 28
8
6
x = 28
x=2 7
x
http://www.itsatrap.net/
Works Cited
Richard
Rhoad, George Milauskas,
Robert Whipple, Geometry for
Enjoyment and Challenge. Evantson,
Illinois: McDougal, Littell & Company,
1991.
http://www.math.brown.edu/~jhs/frintc
h2ch3.pdf
http://itsatrap.net/