Transcript Document

Setting
PMT#5 (Ch3)
DTACQ
4.46 V
3.22 V
#4
1 k
#1
Intensity ratio versus frequency
1051222b series
 19 shots (1051222906 ~ 1051222924)
 Frequency goes from 10 to 100 kHz
 5 kHz increment
1051222c series
 19 shots (1051222925 ~ 1051222943)
 Frequency goes from 100 to 10 kHz
 5 kHz increment
 Intensity ratio = (fft amplitude at dtacq #4) / (fft amplitude at dtacq #1)
 Function generator DC offset not stable in time?
So, I checked the stability of function generator
1051222d series
 10 shots (1051222944 ~ 1051222954)
 Fixed frequency at 50.00 kHz
 Shot taken every 3 minutes
 So x axis is time (not frequency).
 Function generator DC offset slowly decreases in time.
 The rate is approximately (0.862 – 0.870) / 0.5 hour = - 0.016 /hour
Several hours later, another series was taken
1051222b series
1051222c series
1051223a series
19 shots (1051223902 ~ 1051223920)
This time, the order of frequency
change is random
5 kHz increment
Several hours later, the intensity ratios decreased maybe because only LED intensity itself
decreased. (Raw signal plots imply this)
But the slope (that is, the frequency response) seems to be the same.
Absolute intensity change in frequency or time 1/2
1051222b series (10  100 kHz in order)
1 k resistor – dtacq #1
LED – PMT#5 – dtacq #4
1051222c series (100  10 kHz in order)
Absolute intensity change in frequency or time 2/2
1051222d series (constant 50 kHz)
1 k resistor – dtacq #1
LED – PMT#5 – dtacq #4
1051223a series (random order in frequency)
Plot files
Location : /home/jinseok/mse/invessel/20051117PMT/pmt
pmt_analysis_1051222b.ps (41 plots)
pmt_analysis_1051222c.ps (41 plots)
pmt_analysis_1051222d.ps (26 plots)
pmt_analysis_1051223a.ps (41 plots)
pmt_total_000.ps (2 plots)
pmt_total_001.ps (2 plots)
contain the raw data and fft plots for all frequencies including the plots on the previous pages.
On the plots,
Red : the signal from DTACQ #1 (Resistor)
Blue : the signal from DTACQ #4 (LED – PMT)
Tentative summary
The typical measurement time (with the frequency increment of 5 kHz) from 10 to 100 kHz is
about 30 minutes.
The frequency response plots indicate the change of frequency results in about 0.08 decrease
in the intensity ratio. Then, the transient DC offset contribution to this change can be
0.016/0.08 x 100 = 20%
But, again, the frequency response test after several hours later indicates that this contribution
is the same.
If we do this test for, say, 5 different input intensities (using the neutral filters), the total test time
will be 5 x 30 min = 150 min = 2.5 hours
Then we expect the decrease of 0.016/hour x 2.5 hours = 0.04 in the intensity ratio, assuming
the rate of change in the DC offset is constant during the test.