Classification of functional styles
Download
Report
Transcript Classification of functional styles
CLASSIFICATION OF
FUNCTIONAL STYLES
Lecture 2 - continued
The publicistic style
The publicistic style
Includes:
the
style of newspaper and magazine articles,
essays,
oratorical speech
the style of radio and TV commentaries.
Oral + written form
Aim: to convince + to cause to accept
The publicistic style
Peculiarities:
logical
argumentation + emotional appeal =
(scientific prose and belle-lettres style).
the emotional appeal – the use of words with emotive
meaning + the use of stylistic devices (not fresh or
genuine!)
the form of a monologue,
the coherent and logical syntactical structure
careful paragraphing, extended system of connectives
a great number of literary and bookish words.
Newspaper and Magazine Articles
The aim:
interpret
the news
comment on the events of the day
convince [the reader that …]
Vocabulary:
terms
(political, economic, etc.);
newspaper clichés;
emotionally coloured vocabulary;
stylistic devices.
Essays
short literary articles on philosophical, aesthetic or
literary subject;
never go deep;
individual (often in 1st person);
very popular in the 18th cent.:
the
principal literary form,
written on important topics of the day,
often criticizing the short-comings of the political and
social system in England.
Essays
Features:
brevity
of expression;
the use of 1st person singular, personal approach;
the use of emotionally coloured words;
the use of epigram, paradoxes, aphorisms.
Oratorical Speech
Includes :
parliamentary
discourse,
speeches at Congress,
sermons,
orations,
speeches on solemn public occasions.
Aim – to convince the audience and evoke an
immediate desired reaction.
Oratorical speech
Features of the oral speech:
the
use of direct address (My Lords! Mr. Chairman!
Ladies and Gentlemen!);
the use of contractions (I’ll, don’t);
the use of pronouns I and we;
the use of colloquial words and phrases,
the use of alliteration.
Oratorical speech
The speaker wants:
to
keep up the interest of the audience and hold it in
suspense, consequently:
emotionally
coloured words;
lexical and syntactical TRITE stylistic devices;
repetition;
allusions (to contemporary or historical events, to well-known
people, to literary characters, mythology and the Bible;
used to draw the historical parallels and to confirm the
statement).
Oratorical speech
Syntactical features –
the
sentences are long, can contain many dependent
clauses and parenthetical clauses;
the use of gradations: Such a claim was all a part, a
trick, a trap to provide the Republican party with a
scapegoat at that time;
antithesis, rhetorical questions, exclamatory sentences,
suspense:
We fought Lexington to free ourselves.
We fought Gettysburg to free others.
(antithesis, parallelism, repetition)
Oratorical speech
Rhetorical questions
draw
the attention of the audience
and break the monotony of a series of declarative
sentences,
have a strong emotive colouring (the speaker strives to
call for a sympathetic reaction on the part of the
listeners);
fulfill the function of a statement, not a ?
Non-rhetorical Q. are also effective.
The publicistic style
Summary
use of direct address and 1st person pronouns.
A rather wide use of connectives.
The abundant use of expressive and emotive words.
The use of tropes, especially sustained metaphors and
similes.
The use of traditional set expressions and clichés.
The use of colloquial vocabulary.
The
The problem of colloquial style
The colloquial style
informal speech of everyday conversation.
The 1st problem – classification: can it be regarded
as a functional style?
- I.R. Halperin (functional styles belong only to the
written variety of the literary language)
+ I.V. Arnold, Y.M. Skrebnev, V.A. Maltsev
The colloquial style
literary colloquial (литературно-разговорный);
unceremonious (фамильярно-разговорный);
popular speech/ common parlance (просторечье).
- our everyday means of communication.
Peculiarities
1. Typified constructions -> speech almost
automatic:
social phrases: greetings, words of parting; introductions
and wishes; congratulations, requests, thanks, apologies,
assent and dissent, hesitation el.;
the formulae of direct address:
a) socially oriented: Sir, Madam, first name, Professor …
b) bearing personal emotiveness: endearments, abusive.
The use of interjections – signs of emotions,
sometimes with a very vague meaning.
Peculiarities
2. Vocabulary. The word-stock falls into 3 layers:
the literary;
the neutral;
the colloquial.
Colloquial words are always more emotionally coloured.
(kid – infant, daddy – parent)
cock-and-bull – long, complicated story, cliff-hanger – prolonged
tense situation, from A to Z – thoroughly.
Thematically colloquial lexical units are more
anthropocentric
(monkey – mischievous child; splinter – splitting headache).
Peculiarities
3. Simple verbs: phrasal verbs are mostly used
instead of their literary synonyms:
to
get out – retire;
to stand up to – support.
The one-syllabled verbs, such as:
do,
put, take, come, go, get, turn, run, fall, etc., -
produce an enormous multiplicity of meanings.
4. Simple sentences prevail.
Peculiarities
5. Combination of compression and redundancy
Compression – realized in:
Shortened forms of modal and auxiliary verbs;
Omission of words (elliptical sentences: Been travelling?);
Clipped words;
Words of broad semantics (thing, stuff, matter);
Simplicity of syntactical constructions;
The use of monosyllabic words.
Peculiarities
Redundancy - is shown in:
So-called
time-fillers or senseless expressions like
“You know…”, “Well”;
In pleonastic use of personal pronouns (Don’t you
forget it);
In the senseless repetition of words and phrases;
The use of double negative (Don’t bring no money; Ain’t
nobody’s business).
Professor Skrebnev:
Colloquial style = oral speech? But: lectures or a
student’s answer > to bookish forms.
Colloquial speech = “dialogue”? But: the dialogue of
an Amb. with a foreign secretary.
Lingual intercourse in coll. style is immediate.
Emotive character of everyday speech? But: poetry even more emotiveness.
“Consituation” (the situation is common to each of its
participants)
A limited set of ready-made stereotyped formulas.
Prof. Skrebnev: 2 tendencies
Explication + implication - on different levels of the
language
Phonetics:
The
main feature is general carelessness and
indistinctness of articulation. The expectancy factor
makes indistinct speech comprehensible.
Explication: a loud voice, emphatic articulation (shown
graphically in italics, dividing into syllables, etc.)
Prof. Skrebnev: 2 tendencies
Morphology.
Implication:
dropping of morphemes (eg. real good,
pretty far, he don’t know).
Explication - in analytical morphology:
The
use of emphatic forms (e.g. continuous – I’m thinking, I’m
being uneasy; Do come!)
The use of multiple negation;
The use of double subject;
The use of double demonstrative pronouns (eg. Is this here
that watch?)
The use of inclusive doubling (I will kill you dead)
Prof. Skrebnev: 2 tendencies
Syntax:
Common
word combinations perform the function of
imperative sentences
Tea.
For two. Out here.
Non-interrogative
sentences perform the function of
interrogative.
You’re
The
going? Sugar, Dr.Trent?
use of pseudo-interrogative sentences:
Why
don’t you sit down? Can you pass the salt?
Prof. Maltsev: word creation
Changes in the meaning:
metaphor: paralytic – helplessly drunk; peach – adult (slang);
metonymy: wig – judge;
antonomasia: Othello;
hyperbole: smash hit show.
Changes in form:
Compounding and blending (hasbeen, block-head, brunch);
Affixation (keener – inquis. person; oldster, kiddo, fatso)
Shortening / acronyms, back clipping, back formation, front
clipping, middle clipping (e.g. maths, exams, lab, sci-fi)
Informal grammar
the noun – the use of double genitive; the use of plural
forms:
the article can be omitted, but it can be used with proper
names:
A good friend of my husband’s; I’m friends with him. He has
brains;
the Johnsons; He’s married to a Miss Brown; He bought a
Picasso; I don’t claim to be a Caruso; Here again was Tom,
the Tom…;
the pronoun: objective forms
Jack was four year older than me. You’re the only person. – Me?
We are mad, you and me; Told who? You know who I mean.
Informal grammar
The adjective: typical is the use of absolute superlatives
The adverb – the use of adjectives instead of adverbs
She has the longest straightest legs; a more older man; the most
carelessest man; the bestest man;
Don’t talk so loud!;
The verb: the continuous forms instead of the indefinite - more
emotional and personal
How are you feeling? Oh, how the stars were shining!;
the verb will is a simple mark as futurity, while shall denotes
obligation;
the use of forms with low colloquial or vulgar, illiterate
connotations
ain’t, gotcha, wanna.
Informal syntax
The use of elliptical constructions
(Pass.:
the airport. – Dr.: ok. );
Functional words are clipped (‘d, ‘s)
Leaving out the S or the functional verb or both:
Can’t
afford to buy it. // Don’t worry. Only makes
your hair gray. // Nice talking to you. // Oh, being
sarcastic.
The use of conjunctionless complex sentences:
The
book I’m reading; he says he has no appetite; it’s
a good thing he did; the thing is it gets so awfully
hot in here.